Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (19)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (13)
- Law and Politics (12)
- State and Local Government Law (8)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (7)
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (7)
- Law and Race (7)
- American Politics (6)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (6)
- International and Area Studies (6)
- Political Science (6)
- Judges (5)
- Law and Society (5)
- Supreme Court of the United States (5)
- First Amendment (4)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (4)
- African Studies (3)
- Asian Studies (3)
- Courts (3)
- Criminal Law (3)
- National Security Law (3)
- Computer Law (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (2)
- Public Policy (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Civic and Community Engagement (1)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Pace University (3)
- Singapore Management University (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
-
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Maine School of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of New Hampshire (2)
- Bemidji State University (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Central Florida (1)
- Keyword
-
- Voting (9)
- Elections (7)
- Gerrymandering (7)
- Election (6)
- Voting Rights Act (6)
-
- Election law (5)
- Voting rights (5)
- Fourteenth Amendment (4)
- Redistricting (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Constitutional convention (3)
- Democracy (3)
- Judges (3)
- New York (3)
- Reform (3)
- VRA (3)
- Voter (3)
- Voting Rights (3)
- 2016 Election (2)
- Campaign contributions (2)
- Campaign finance (2)
- Constitutional Court of Zambia (2)
- Critical infrastructure (2)
- Cybersecurity (2)
- Edgar Lungu (2)
- Electoral college (2)
- Equal Protection Clause (2)
- Federal (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Publication
-
- Maine Law Review (3)
- Pace Law Review (3)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (3)
- SAIPAR Case Review (3)
- Articles (2)
-
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (2)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Northwestern University Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present) (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Florida Law Review (1)
- Georgia Law Review (1)
- Honors Undergraduate Theses (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Journal of Legislation (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 69 of 69
Full-Text Articles in Election Law
Protecting America's Elections From Foreign Tampering: Realizing The Benefits Of Classifying Election Infrastructure As Critical Infrastructure Under The United States Code, Allaire M. Monticollo
Protecting America's Elections From Foreign Tampering: Realizing The Benefits Of Classifying Election Infrastructure As Critical Infrastructure Under The United States Code, Allaire M. Monticollo
Law Student Publications
In just the past five years, the United States has suffered numerous hacks into important entities and institutions across the country by ill-intentioned actors. Private companies and government agencies alike have felt the negative impacts of security breaches by hackers infiltrating proprietary and protected systems. Even the United States political landscape has proven vulnerable to bad actors in the realm of cyber security. Furthermore, analysts have attributed some of the most recent highly publicized hacks to state-sponsored groups. As cyber security threats and opportunities for foreign hackers to infiltrate critical systems become more prevalent, it is natural to wonder where …
Judging Congressional Elections, Lisa M. Manheim
Judging Congressional Elections, Lisa M. Manheim
Georgia Law Review
A pivotal clause of our Constitution suffers from
uncertainty and neglect. The result has scrambled the law
of contested congressional elections. These high-stakes
disputes turn on questions of procedure, and in particular
on questions of forum. Yet across the country, an
unpredictable and ad hoc set of regimes governs these
fundamental questions. The culprit behind the confusion
is Article I, Section 5 of the United States Constitution,
which states that "Each House shall be the Judge of the
Elections ... of its own Members." This command may
seem straightforward, if a bit unsettling-it allows
Congress to decide who has won …
Changing The System Without Changing The System: How The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact Would Leave Non-Compacting States Without A Leg To Stand On, Jillian Robbins
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
This Note will discuss the constitutional and legal implications of the NPVIC, and will explore the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments both for and against its implementation. It will argue that the NPVIC is constitutional, despite many opponents’ views that it is not, because it does not encroach on federal supremacy or threaten the political relevance or rights of non-compacting states. This Note proposes that if a lawsuit between the states resulted from the enactment of the NPVIC, even if the merits of the claim are constitutional, the United States Supreme Court should dismiss these cases because the states …
The Institutional Case For Partisan Gerrymandering Claims, G. Michael Parsons
The Institutional Case For Partisan Gerrymandering Claims, G. Michael Parsons
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
For voters hoping the Supreme Court’s 2017 Term brings relief from partisan gerrymandering, the end of the 2016 Term was inauspicious. In Cooper v. Harris, the majority assumed the legitimacy of “partisan advantage” arguments while the dissent—including Justice Kennedy—warned about the “serious institutional and federalism implications” of judicial intervention in the redistricting process. If past is prologue, this concern for institutional and structural interests does not bode well.
Navigating The Post-Shelby Landscape: Using Universalism To Augment The Remaining Power Of The Voting Rights Act, Jesús N. Joslin
Navigating The Post-Shelby Landscape: Using Universalism To Augment The Remaining Power Of The Voting Rights Act, Jesús N. Joslin
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Abstract forthcoming.
Judging Congressional Elections, Lisa Marshall Manheim
Judging Congressional Elections, Lisa Marshall Manheim
Articles
This Article reveals what passes as federal constitutional law in this area: a chaotic set of ad hoc, state-based interpretations that vary drastically by jurisdiction. Some states, for example, have interpreted Article I, Section 5 to permit courts to adjudicate congressional election contests. Others have concluded the opposite. Through such conflicting interpretations, state courts have contributed to a deep, intractable split on the provision's meaning and reach.
State legislatures have compounded the discord by enacting statutes that codify their interpretations, a move that renders their constitutional determinations practically unreviewable. Meanwhile, both Houses of Congress continue to adjudicate these congressional election …
Voting Realism, Gilda R. Daniels
Voting Realism, Gilda R. Daniels
All Faculty Scholarship
Since Shelby County v. Holder, the country has grown accustomed to life without the full strength of the Voting Rights Act. Efforts to restore Section 4 have been met with calls to ignore race conscious remedies and employ race neutral remedies for modern day voting rights violations. In this new normal, the country should adopt “voting realism” as the new approach to ensuring that law and reality work to address these new millennium methods of voter discrimination.
Electoral Evidence, Peter Nicolas
Electoral Evidence, Peter Nicolas
Articles
Each year, millions of Americans cast votes for specific candidates or on specific ballot measures. Each such vote generates potential "electoral evidence," the admissibility of which may be the subject of dispute in subsequent litigation. The evidence may take various forms, including the marked ballot itself, a voter's testimony regarding her vote, or her written or oral statements regarding her vote.
Electoral evidence is most commonly offered in litigation over the election outcome itself, with the parties seeking to determine how certain individuals voted to resolve a close election. However, its potential relevance is not limited to such proceedings. It …
Voice And Exit As Accountability Mechanisms: Can Foot-Voting Be Made Safe For The Chinese Communist Party?, Roderick M. Hills Jr., Shitong Qiao
Voice And Exit As Accountability Mechanisms: Can Foot-Voting Be Made Safe For The Chinese Communist Party?, Roderick M. Hills Jr., Shitong Qiao
Faculty Scholarship
According to Albert 0. Hirschman's famous dichotomy, citizens can express their preferences with their "voice" (by voting with ballots to elect better representatives) or by "exit" (by voting with their feet to choose better places to live). Suppose, however, that ballot-voting is ineffective: Can exit not merely aid but also replace voice? Using the People's Republic of China, a party state without elective democracy as a case study, we argue that exit is not a substitute for, but rather a complement to, voice. China's bureaucratic promotion system plays the same role that local elections do in the United States, promoting …