Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (189)
- University of Michigan Law School (77)
- William & Mary Law School (20)
- Fordham Law School (16)
- University of Colorado Law School (10)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (9)
- University of Richmond (8)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (7)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (7)
- Brooklyn Law School (6)
- Cleveland State University (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- Notre Dame Law School (6)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- University of Miami Law School (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Association of American Law Schools (1)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (72)
- Voting Rights Act (47)
- Voting (44)
- Elections (40)
- Gerrymandering (28)
-
- Race and law (28)
- Voting rights (27)
- Discrimination (26)
- Supreme Court (26)
- Constitution (23)
- Redistricting (21)
- Equal Protection Clause (20)
- Election law (18)
- Congressional districts (17)
- Campaign finance (16)
- Preclearance (16)
- Racial discrimination (16)
- Congress (14)
- Law (14)
- Constitutional violations (13)
- Democracy (13)
- Remedial regimes (13)
- Voting practices (13)
- First Amendment (12)
- Judicial review (12)
- Shelby County v. Holder (12)
- Election Law (11)
- Electoral processes (11)
- Law reform (11)
- Minorities (11)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (188)
- Michigan Law Review (31)
- Articles (24)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (15)
- Supreme Court Preview (14)
-
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (13)
- Publications (10)
- University of Richmond Law Review (8)
- Touro Law Review (7)
- Cleveland State Law Review (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Court Briefs (4)
- Journal of Law and Policy (4)
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (3)
- Scholarly Articles (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Washington Law Review (3)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (3)
- William & Mary Law Review (3)
- American University Law Review (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Book Chapters (2)
- Brooklyn Law Review (2)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (2)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 421 - 427 of 427
Full-Text Articles in Election Law
Residency Requirements For Voting And The Tensions Of A Mobile Society, John R. Schmidhauser
Residency Requirements For Voting And The Tensions Of A Mobile Society, John R. Schmidhauser
Michigan Law Review
It is the purpose of this article to determine the extent to which persons otherwise qualified to vote are disenfranchised by the complex of state residency requirements and to assess the practical and constitutional aspects of any statutory prospects for change.
Nonpopulation Factors Relevant To An Acceptable Standard For Apportionment, Jerold H. Israel
Nonpopulation Factors Relevant To An Acceptable Standard For Apportionment, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
Of the many problems left unanswered in Baker v. Carr,' the one that has received the most attention both from lower courts and commentators is that of prescribing a specific standard for determining what constitutes a denial of "equal protection" in legislative apportionment.2 The starting point universally accepted - indeed, probably required by Baker - for attacking this problem is the definition of apportionment equality in terms of mathematical measurement of the individual's "voting power."3 Perfect equality in apportionment is viewed as requiring that each election district contain an equal population, so that every individual's vote in his district will …
Constitutional Law - Freedom Of Speech And Press - Prohibitions On The Publication Or Distribution Of Anonymous Campaign Literature, Frank G. Reeder S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Freedom Of Speech And Press - Prohibitions On The Publication Or Distribution Of Anonymous Campaign Literature, Frank G. Reeder S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant was charged under a federal statute' with the publication and distribution of a pamphlet which concerned a candidate for United States Senator in a special senatorial election and which did not contain the name of the person or group responsible for its publication and distribution as required by the statute. The defendant alleged that his occupation as a farmer made him particularly subject to regulation by the federal government, and that he feared coercion or reprisals from the federal representatives with whom he dealt if he complied with the statute's disclosure requirement. On motion to dismiss the information on …
On Charting A Course Through The Mathematical Quagmire: The Future Of Baker V. Carr, Jerold H. Israel
On Charting A Course Through The Mathematical Quagmire: The Future Of Baker V. Carr, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
The Tennessee reapportionment decision, Baker v. Carr,' has been popularly characterized as one of the "very few judicial decisions which have fundamentally reshaped our constitutional system."'2 Newspaper and magazine commentators generally have predicted that the decision of last March is likely to "change the course of our history" by producing a drastic alteration in the balance of power on the state political scene.3 While this end may be desirable,4 any such estimate of the future impact of the Baker decision, at least insofar as its legal consequence is concerned,5 seems not only premature but somewhat exaggerated. The future significance of …
Civil Rights - Elections - Federal Injunction Against Racial Discrimination, Robert Jillson
Civil Rights - Elections - Federal Injunction Against Racial Discrimination, Robert Jillson
Michigan Law Review
In September 1958, in its first complaint under the Civil Rights Act of 1957, the United States sought to enjoin certain election registrars and deputy registrars in Terrell County, Georgia from continuing racially-discriminatory practices in their registration of voters. The defendants, claiming the 1957 statute to be unconstitutional, moved for dismissal. The district court granted defendants' motion, rejecting government arguments that the subsection authorizing suit by the United States was limited to cases, like the case before the Court, of discrimination by the state. On direct appeal to the Supreme Court, held, reversed. Because the alleged racial discrimination by …
The Newberry Case, Ralph W. Aigler
The Newberry Case, Ralph W. Aigler
Articles
Senator Newberry of Michigan and sixteen others were convicted in the United States District Court on the charge that they "unlawfully and feloniously did conspire, combine, confederate, and agree together to commit the offense [in the Newberry indictment] on his part of wilfully violating the act of Congress approved June 25, 1910, as amended, by giving, contributing, expending, and using and by causing to be given, contributed, expended and used in procuring his nomination and election at said primary and general elections, a greater sum than the laws of Michigan permitted and above ten thousand dollars," etc. The Act of …
Note And Comment, James H. Brewster, Frank L. Sage, Harry B. Hutchins, Frank L. Sage, Henry M. Bates, Henry M. Bates
Note And Comment, James H. Brewster, Frank L. Sage, Harry B. Hutchins, Frank L. Sage, Henry M. Bates, Henry M. Bates
Michigan Law Review
A Spurious Law Course; Railroad Taxation in Michigan and Wisconsin; Surgical Operation on Minor Without Consent of Parent; The Power of Municipal Corporations to Grant Exclusive Privileges; Inheritance Taxes and the Right to Transfer and Inherit Property; The Sovereign Power of a State to Prevent Election Frauds; Original Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in Election Cases;