Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (443)
- Seattle University School of Law (183)
- UIC School of Law (6)
- Columbia Law School (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Dar es Salaam (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law (14)
- Campaign finance (9)
- Corporations (8)
- Citizens United (7)
- SFFA (7)
-
- Supreme Court (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Corporate law (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Public health (5)
- Regulation (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Constitution (4)
- Legislation (4)
- SEC (4)
- Shareholder (4)
- Technology (4)
- Citizens United v. FEC (3)
- Corporate (3)
- Corporate Governance (3)
- Data (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Education (3)
- Election law (3)
- Elections (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (443)
- Seattle University Law Review (183)
- UIC Law Review (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Publications (3)
-
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Books (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (1)
- Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (1)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 661 - 663 of 663
Full-Text Articles in Election Law
A Corporation May Not Contribute Funds To Affect The Outcome Of A Referendum., Larry D. Brockman
A Corporation May Not Contribute Funds To Affect The Outcome Of A Referendum., Larry D. Brockman
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Corporate Contributions To Ballot-Measure Campaigns, Gail L. Achterman
Corporate Contributions To Ballot-Measure Campaigns, Gail L. Achterman
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
It is not clear that the perceived dangers of corporate participation in politics are real dangers, or that outright prohibition of such participation is the best means of preserving the democratic character of the electoral process. Any controls on corporate spending in initiative campaigns should be firmly based upon articulated conceptions of the corporation's legitimate role in society. This article examines some of these conceptions and their relationship to the process of direct legislation and thereafter makes recommendations for workable controls in light of that analysis.
Corporations - Political Activities - Interpretation Of Statute Prohibiting Political Contributions By Corporation, George Kircos
Corporations - Political Activities - Interpretation Of Statute Prohibiting Political Contributions By Corporation, George Kircos
Michigan Law Review
Defendant corporation, organized to promote the recall of Senator Joseph R. McCarthy, was charged with violating section 346.12 of the Wisconsin statutes, which prohibits corporations doing business in Wisconsin from paying or contributing any money, etc., to promote or defeat the candidacy of any person for nomination, appointment, or election to any political office. The trial court entered a forfeiture judgment against the defendant. On appeal, held, reversed. The statutory phrase "doing business" was intended to limit the scope of the prohibition to corporations organized for profit. Corporations, such as the defendant, organized solely for political purposes are not …