Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

The End Of Forced Arbitration Of Sexual Violence And The Uncertain Future, Heidi M. S. Sandomir

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note argues that forced arbitration clauses in employment contracts systematically deny justice to survivors of workplace sexual violence by shielding employers from accountability and limiting legal recourse. While the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFAA) represents a step forward by invalidating predispute arbitration agreements for sexual assault and harassment claims, it falls short of fully addressing the issue due to gaps in retroactive application, inconsistent court interpretations, and lack of alignment with Title VII. The note calls for broader legislative reforms to eliminate forced arbitration in all discrimination cases and ensure survivors' access to …

Non-Satisfaction Of Pre-Arbitration Requirements: Moving Away From Conditions Precedent Towards The Admissibility Of A Claim – Nwa V Nvf, Darius Chan, Joel Soon

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

In earlier cases, the non-satisfaction of pre-arbitration requirements has been analysed by the Singapore and English courts by reference to the issue of conditions precedent. It was assumed without argument that, if a requirement was construed as a condition precedent, the failure to satisfy that requirement would deprive the tribunal of jurisdiction. More recently, English and Hong Kong case law has focused on a different issue, asking whether the failure to meet the pre-arbitration requirement affects the tribunal’s jurisdiction or the admissibility of the claim. This case note analyses whether the Singapore courts should follow suit.

Automating Discrimination: Ai Hiring Practices And Gender Inequality, Lori Andrews, Hannah Bucher

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Amazing Carrie Menkel-Meadow And What Wins When Passions Collide, Lela Love

Articles

Carrie Menkel-Meadow (sometimes referred to as “Carrie” herein) is famous in the dispute resolution world as one of the field’s founders. Her prolific writing on dispute resolution—negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and the variants of these major processes—evidences an unrivaled passion for the subject. A renaissance thinker, her intellectual explorations also extend to other areas such as women’s rights and restorative justice for victims of egregious wrongs.

Her multiple passions sometimes create dynamic tensions. For example, what happens if mediation norms threaten a woman’s rights? Or if mediators divert the focus of a dispute resolution process to the future, neglecting a horrific …

Carrie Menkel-Meadow: Dispute Resolution In A Feminist Voice, Andrea K. Schneider

Articles

The presence of women in the law has changed the law’s substance, practice, and process. Carrie Menkel-Meadow, whose scholarship centers on this theme, is one such revolutionary woman.

Professor Menkel-Meadow, who I am proud to call my colleague, co-author, and friend (hereinafter referred to as Carrie), began her career in 1977 with a series of simple questions that sparked a breathtaking body of work. Carrie probed the depth of male domination in the realm of law and wondered what changes female representation might engender. In particular, she focused her inquiry on the value orientation each respective gender might bring to …

Peer Mediation: A New Opportunity In St. Louis City Schools, Beatrice Connaghan

SLU Law Journal Online

Mediation is often used in legal disputes, but what happens when the same process is applied to children in order to deter conflicts and avoid the need for school administration intervention? In this article, Beatrice Connaghan discusses the process of training students to become peer mediators to deter conflicts in St. Louis Schools.

Collaborative Processes And Family Engagement, Kelly Browe Olson

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Non-Applications Of Good Faith, Trust, And Confidentiality In Arbitration: A Study Of The Annulment Cases In Indonesia, Anangga W. Roosdiono, Muhamad Dzadit Taqwa, Mayta Ciara Salsabila

Indonesia Law Review

Arbitration is a dispute resolution method that is chosen by the parties for, mainly, avoiding weaknesses of resolving disputes through the general court. It has three principles, that strongly connect to one another, to hold: good faith, trust, and confidentiality. These principles determine whether a dispute resolution through arbitration will be successful. However, in many - if not all - cases, many disputing parties still do not maintain these principles. This reality can be observed in annulment cases. Although the annulment mechanism renders a protection to the parties from the errors made by intention, this mechanism opens an opportunity for …

Most Favoured Nation Clause: Unleashing Its Legal Potential In Favour Of Foreign Investors In Renewable Energy Sector, Mohammad Akefi Ghaziani, Vahid Akefi Ghaziani, Moosa Akefi Ghaziani Dr.

Indonesia Law Review

International Investment Law and other international legal systems, such as trade law and environmental law have interactions and dynamic interrelationships in meeting global challenges including energy security, climate change, and the need for the renewable energy transition. They help in delivering the principles of justice in the context of changing global values and legal practices. Accordingly, they have a potential share in the global climate change mitigation agenda through innovative policies and regulations, inter alia, to facilitate and promote foreign investment and trade in the renewable energy sector. Similarly, these systems have common principles in their respective agreements. The Most-Favoured …

Brian Flores's Employment Discrimination Lawsuit Against The Nfl: A Game Changer Or Business As Usual?, Michael Conklin, Jennifer Barger-Johnson, Marty Ludlum

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

The Novelty In Terms Of Jurisdiction And Procedural System For The Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitration Awards In The United Arab Emirates, Prof. Sayed Mahmoud Ahmed, Dr. Mudhafar Jaber Al-Rawi

UAEU Law Journal

يجسد التنفيذ الاختياري والجبري غاية طلب التحكيم لكل من يحصل على حكم يحقق المراد من الدعوى التحكيمية. وفي نطاق أحكام التحكيم الأجنبية، فإن الترخيص بدون شروط أو قيود وطنية لتنفيذ أحكام التحكيم الأجنبية يؤدي إلى المساس بسيادة الدولة على إقليمها، لذا أصبح الأمر بالتنفيذ هو الأداة الرقابية القضائية التي يفرضها المشرع الوطني على إرادة الأطراف، فهي رقابة لاحقة على صدور حكم التحكيم – الوطني أو الدولي أو الأجنبي -حين يراد تنفيذه. ونظراً لتباين التشريعات الدولية والوطنية في شروط وإجراءات تنفيذ الاحكام التحكيمية الأجنبية فإن مشكلة الدراسة تكمن في معرفة أي النصوص الواجبة التطبيق لتقدير مدى توافر اختصاص وإجراءات استصدار الأمر …

International Arbitration, Sujey Herrera, Marcus Quintanilla, Martine Forneret, Emily Scherker, Jeffrey Rosenthal, James A. Egerton-Vernon, Richard Deutsch, Ranjan Agarwal, Félix Poggio, Rafael Pereyra Zorraquin, Joyce Fong, Dan Perera, Rong Gu, Helen Tang, Weina Ye, Timur Ibrahim Sen, Andrew White, Jayesh H, Dawn Yamane Hewett, Julianne Jaquith, Chelsea Pollard, Ibrahim Sattout, Adnan Gaafar, Myriam Khedair, James Boykin, Stijn Winters, Amanda Lee, Peter Ashford, Sabrina Janzik, Christina Nitsche, Gerard Meijer, Valerie Verberne, Markian Malskyy, Oksana Karel, Daryna Hrebeniuk, Keara A. Bergin, Christopher P. Denicola

The Year in Review

No abstract provided.

Litigating Terror In The Sinai After The Egyptian Spring Revolution: Should States Be Liable To Foreign Investors For Failure To Prevent Terrorist Attacks?, Robert Howse, Amin R. Yacoub

Michigan Journal of International Law

The ambiguity of the due diligence standard of the Full Protection and Security obligation in investment treaties persists to this day. A recent ICSID tribunal found a developing state liable for breaching the Full Protection and Security obligation due to its inability to protect a foreign investment against terrorist attacks in a remote deserted area. In this article, we analytically criticize the Ampal v. Egypt arbitral award against the comprehensive factual matrix behind the case. Based on our criticism of Ampal, we argue that developing states should not be liable for failing to prevent or stop terrorist attacks under the …

Review Of The Little Book Of Police Youth Dialogue: A Restorative Path Toward Justice, Robert Brenneman

The Journal of Social Encounters

No abstract provided.

Shestowsky’S Study Supports Value Of Lawyers’ Early Education Of Clients About Their Procedural Options, John M. Lande, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post summarizes parts of Donna Shestowsky’s study on parties’ expectations about the process used to resolve their cases. She writes, “Our findings suggest the value of educating litigants about legal procedures, helping them develop realistic expectations for what each procedure can entail for their situation, and helping them make informed decisions about whether to attend their procedures. . . . Our results suggest how important it is for lawyers to educate their clients about each of their procedural options. Effective education and managing client expectations might lead to the formation of attitudes that reflect realistic expectations, and, in turn, …

Readings And Resources For Teaching, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post provides links to resources that instructors can use when teaching dispute resolution.

Theorizing Responsibility In The Investor State Dispute Resolution System, Kristen Boon

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

The Investor-State Dispute System (“ISDS”) permits investors to sue states when their investments are injured. The system was designed to protect investors and impose responsibilities on states; it is uncontroversial to say that the ISDS system is one-sided. But a chorus of voices is now asking: should investors have responsibilities too? The narrative is one of injustice, driven by the perception that states have signed on to a system that has left them with large financial exposure to investors. This viewpoint has been reinforced, in the eyes of some, by the influence of big business, and by state losses …

Keterlambatan Pemberitahuan Akuisisi Pada Perusahaan Yang Terafiliasi Ditinjau Dari Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia (Studi Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Kppu) No. 27/Kppu-M/2019), Rahmad Hidayat

"Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI

Abstract

Whether we realize it or not, business competition between business actors in the relevant market will more or less be affected by the acquisition. Acquisition in business competition has a close relationship with abuse of dominant position in the market which can lead to monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. If the Acquisition is carried out to hinder business competition and the economy, then it is contrary to Article 29 of Law no. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. Therefore, the Acquisition should be investigated further to ascertain the extent to which …

Study Of Odr In Family Cases With Positive Results, John Lande

Faculty Blogs

This post summarizes the results of a study finding that parties who used ODR for child custody, parenting time, or child support matters were more likely to reach agreement and to rate their experience more highly than those who declined to use ODR.

The Relevance Of The Cisg In Settling International Arbitration Claims Arising Due To Covid-19 In Absence Of Force Majeure And Hardship Clauses, Gilberto Guerrero-Rocca

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Faculty List

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Mass Arbitration 2.0, Andrew B. Nissensohn

Washington and Lee Law Review

Over the past four decades, corporate interests, in concert with the Supreme Court, have surgically dismantled the American civil litigation system. Enacted nearly a century ago, the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) was once a procedural law mandating that federal courts enforce arbitration agreements between sophisticated parties with equal bargaining power. Through death by a thousand cuts, corporate interests shielded themselves from nearly all methods of en masse dispute resolution. These interests weaponized the FAA into a “one size fits all” means to compel potential litigants with unequal bargaining power into arbitration. The so-called “Arbitration Revolution” is the subject of much …

Home Run Or Strike Out: Can Baseball Arbitration Solve America’S Medical Debt Crisis?, Sarah Jolley

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In 2012, a New York woman named Claudia Knafo found herself in need of a complicated spinal surgery. She immediately began the long and arduous process of selecting a physician in her insurance network, even going so far as to interview prospective surgeons to confirm their in-network status. Claudia finally selected a well-regarded local surgeon, whose website verified his in-network status with her health insurance plan, after calling his office to confirm. Weeks after her successful spinal surgery, Claudia received notice that the doctor’s receptionist and website were incorrect—the surgeon was not actually in-network. Claudia’s health insurance plan provided $66,0000 …

Is Arbitration For Olympic Athletes Arbitrary?, Shelby Ehrmann

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In December of 2021, Professional Russian Figure Skater Kamila Valieva completed a doping control test during a Russian National Figure Skating Championship. On February 7, 2022, a World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) accredited laboratory detected the presence of a banned substance from Kamila’s December 2021 test. The Russian Anti-Doping Agency, (RUSADA) which is in charge of the application of WADA, first implemented a provisional suspension on Kamila, prohibiting her from competing in the 2022 Olympic Winter Games. The RUSADA’s Disciplinary Anti-Doping Committee (DADC) then moved to lift this provisional suspension. The International Olympic committee, the WADA and the International Skating Union …

Gig Workers: Walking A Tightrope Without A Safety Net, Joshua M. Javits, Matthew L. Luby

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Annually every spring—until the COVID-19 pandemic which began in March 2020, professional sports teams turn to their own budding prospects. Rookie drafts garner media attention and propel the possibility of staggering salaries into the headlines. Undrafted free agents, for their part, begin searching for jobs. With a lesser celebrity profile, many American workers have themselves become free agents in an economy transformed by technology The static newspaper classified ads of the past have been joined by vast online platforms, such as TaskRabbit and Freelancer.com, that allow jobseekers to connect with individuals seeking a diverse range of services—from graphic design and …

Third Party Arbitration Funding And Islamic Shari’A: Friends Not Foes, Mohamed Sweify

Journal of Dispute Resolution

International arbitration exacts considerable monetary costs. In response, new mechanisms have emerged to eliminate the risks of these costs. One of these mechanisms is Third-Party Funding (TPF). Claimants may consider TPF where they cannot afford the costs of arbitration or to spread their risks and take the claim costs off their corporate balance sheets. It enables the poorly funded party to pursue its claim on an equal footing with the well-funded one. Recently, TPF has acquired great attention that made it a revolutionary development in the practice of international arbitration. The practice of TPF has moved from common law jurisdictions …

The Future Of Arbitration Law?, Kristen M. Blankley

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Article provides an in-depth statistical analysis of statutory interpretation of the Supreme Court’s arbitration docket. This paper follows my work in Standing on Its Own Shoulders: The Supreme Court’s Statutory Interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act. By looking at how the Court interprets the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), this paper makes predictions about how arbitration cases might be resolved in the future. This paper considers the reliance on and use of fourteen tools of statutory interpretation over the Court’s 52 cases and 114 separate opinions interpreting the FAA through the end of 2021. By considering four crucial sub-categories of …

Description

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Masthead

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.