Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

How To Resolve Capital Cases Through Pretrial Mediation, Clare Haugh

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Adam Lawson sat in shackles, cradling his head in his hands, rocking back and forth. He was waiting in the State Attorney's Office in Jacksonville, Florida, preparing to meet the Liles family, whose matriarch had been the victim of a home invasion and homicide he committed over a year earlier. Mr. Lawson was charged with capital murder, and his case was the third in a series of attempted mediations in death-eligible criminal cases by the State Attorney for Florida's Fourth Judicial Circuit.

Speaking Arabic In Israel: "He Whose Hand Is In The Water Is Not Like Whose Hand Is In The Fire", Yael Efron, Mohammed S. Wattad

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Collective Policy Design: An Inclusive Approach To Legislative Negotiation, Joseph Crupi

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Members of legislatures often do not have equal opportunities to participate in legislative negotiations. The lack of inclusiveness in legislative negotiations may result in suboptimal policy outcomes and undermine representative democracy. Legislatures face two categories of barriers to conducting inclusive negotiations: (1) the scope and complexity of legislative negotiations and (2) members' lack of incentives and capacity to engage in inclusive negotiations. Legislatures may be able to overcome these barriers by synthesizing and applying insights from agile project management, design thinking, collective intelligence, social choice theory, and interest-based negotiation. Specifically, legislatures may be able to conduct negotiations that are both …

Environmental Dispute Resolution In Brazil: New Paths And Lessons From The U.S. Legal Experience, Daniel Castelo Branco Ramos

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Article analyzes the Brazilian legal framework of Environmental Dispute Resolution ("EDR"), taking into account its ability to ensure the effectiveness of environmental protection and comparing it with the United States' legal mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR"), largely adopted by the U.S. in the 1980s.

The aim of this Article, in detailing these points of comparison, is to facilitate discussion about improvements to the Brazilian environmental legal system through ADR. First, this Article makes an incursion into the most relevant collaborative innovations introduced in the American legal system as of the 1980s, with the aim of expanding ADR. Second, …

Why Reinvent The Wheel? Tapping Consultative Selling Research To Expand Mediator Effectiveness, Ava J. Abramowitz

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

So much of what we do as mediators is based on the Getting to Yes process developed for negotiators. Basing our conduct on negotiation makes sense, if you think of mediation as facilitated negotiation, but mediation is that and more. It touches on areas as diverse as risk management and return on investment and emotional aspirations and the angry desire for paybacks. The list is as complicated as the people caught up in a dispute.

This paper suggests we can make more progress in understanding how disputes settle if we look to other fields, such as sales, that have faced …

The Parthenon Marbles Case: Background And The Arguments Of Greece And The Uk, Irini Stamatoudi

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the longstanding dispute over the Parthenon Marbles, focusing on the legal, ethical, and policy arguments between Greece and the UK. It critiques the UK's reliance on the "Universal Museum" theory and legal constraints, arguing that the Marbles' return to Greece is justified on ethical and cultural grounds. The article emphasizes the importance of reuniting the Marbles in their original context and challenges the UK's position as outdated and contrary to modern principles of cultural heritage law.

The Unintended Consequence Of Settlement Fever And The Rule Of Law, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

Welcome to the final column of a three-part series about how settlement fever has influenced our justice system as it evolves into settlement-centric culture. This column will focus on how the rule of law, once touted as the primary benchmark of justice, has now taken a secondary role to private ordering when shaping some negotiated and mediated settlements.

Blinding Justice And Video Conferencing?, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

How might dispute resolution processes for civil matters conducted on video conferencing be designed to reduce racial justice inequities and increase Black participants’ sense of procedural justice? In March 2020, responding to Covid-19 pandemic health concerns, all in-person, court-connected, and private dispute resolution processes shifted to video conferencing. Proponents of video conferencing have long touted how video conferencing would increase access to justice by providing an efficient, cost-effective, and time-saving alternative to in-person appearances. An unexplored question in March 2020 was how video conferencing would affect racial justice inequities. Black individuals and other marginalized groups were already disproportionately suffering …

Zooming In On Neutrals’ Implicit ‘Isms, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

Video conferencing, extolled for its economic and efficiency benefits, has now become an accepted option in the “new normal” of dispute resolution practice. Consequently, our professional discussions about video conferencing have advanced from sharing the mechanics of “how to” conduct an arbitration or mediation on Zoom to more nuanced explorations about the appropriate use of video conferencing. This column contributes to this exploration by questioning how dispute resolution processes conducted via video conferencing might trigger the implicit biases of arbitrators and mediators and compromise a neutral’s ethical obligation to be impartial. When a neutral conducts their dispute resolution processes …

Hook, Line, And Sinker: The Use Of Subsidies, The Globalized System Of Preferences, And Arbitration To Save Our Ocean's Fish, Lindsy Maglich

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In the wee hours of the morning, local fishermen from the impoverished West African country of Senegal head out to sea on their hand-hewn canoes, hoping to catch fish to bring home to sell for income. Thirty years ago these fishermen would bring in nets full of fish, yet these days the smaller local fisherman cannot compete with the Chinese megatrawlers sweeping their mile-long nets through the waters off of West Africa. Because Chinese fishing fleets have depleted the seas of fish near their home, China has sent 2,600 fishing vessels across the world to exploit the waters of other …

The Effects Of The Global Financial Crisis On Employment Arbitration: Evidence From The Securities Industry Discrimination Complaints, Aibak Hafeez

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This paper examines how the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) 2008-09 influenced the usage and outcomes of discrimination arbitration cases for employee plaintiffs in the securities industry. It casts light on whether arbitration is able to serve as an appropriate and preferable workplace dispute resolution system during a macroeconomic crisis when aggrieved employees are most vulnerable and financially powerless. Macroeconomic recessionary periods are characterized with an increase in employment discrimination claims. As the labor market becomes slack during an economic recession, it becomes easier for firms to indulge in discriminatory behavior. In such a scenario, employee-plaintiffs desire an inexpensive, faster, and …

“Are We Just Going To Sit Back And Wait For ‘Regulatory Roller Coasters’ To Derail? Balancing Public Policy Vs. Fet Violations In Investment-Arbitration”, Gilberto Guerrero-Rocca

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Pathways To Preferences For Collaborative Conflict Resolution: Disputants’ Process Goals Drive Preferences, Ashley Votruba, Jared Noetzel, Abigail L. Herzfeld

Department of Psychology: Faculty Publications

Understanding individuals’ preferences for how to resolve conflict—specifically legal disputes—has long interested researchers, particularly those considering procedural justice. This study considers the impact of relational factors that influence individuals’ preferences for dispute resolution processes for civil legal issues. Specifically, it examines the impact of self-construal and the relationship between the parties in conflict on preferences for specific features of dispute resolution processes and considers the role of underlying resolution goals as potential mediators in a parallel mediation model. Using a novel paradigm in which the outcome variables of interest focused on specific dispute resolution process features allowed the researchers to …

The Lost Cause Of Free Speech, Mary Anne Franks

Articles

No abstract provided.

Trade's Mini-Deals, Kathleen Claussen

Articles

The modern consensus is that U.S. trade law is made through statute and through large congressional-executive agreements, both of which maintain Congress' constitutional primacy over the regulation of foreign commerce. Contrary to this understanding, however, short, targeted agreements negotiated by the U.S. executive with foreign trading partners - recently referred to as "mini-deals" - have become a fixture of the trade law landscape over the last three decades in staggering number. More than 1,200 such agreements govern the movement of goods and services in and out of the United States from and to 130 countries. Such deals are not only …

Playing The Game Of International Law, Uri Weiss, Joseph Agassi

Touro Law Review

In the realist game of international negotiations, each state attempts to promote their interest regardless of international law. Thus, it is negotiations in the shadow of the sword, i.e., a negotiation in which each side knows that if the parties will not achieve an agreement, the alternative may be a war, and thus the bargaining position of each party is a function of their capacities in a case of war. Negotiation in the shadow of international law is an alternative to it: in this alternative the parties negotiate according to their international legal rights. It reduces injustice and incentive to …

Re-Formulating The Test For Ascertaining The Proper Law Of An Arbitration Agreement: A Comparative Common Law Analysis, Darius Chan, Jim Yang Teo

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

Following two recent decisions from the apex courts in England and Singapore on the appropriate methodology to ascertain the proper law of an arbitration agreement, the positions in these two leading arbitration destinations have now converged in some respects. But other issues of conceptual and practical significance have not been fully addressed, including the extent to which the true nature of the inquiry into whether the parties had made a choice of law is in substance an exercise in contractual interpretation, the applicability of a validation principle, and the extent to which the choice of a neutral seat may affect …

Mass Arbitration, J. Maria Glover

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

For decades, the class action has been in the crosshairs of defense-side procedural warfare. Repeated attacks on the class action by the defense bar, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and other defense-side interest groups have been overwhelmingly successful. None proved more successful than the “arbitration revolution”—a forty- year campaign to eliminate class actions through forced arbitration provisions in private contracts. The effects for civil justice have been profound. Scores of claims vanished from the civil justice landscape—claims concerning civil rights, wage theft, sexual harassment, and consumer fraud. The effects for social justice, racial justice, gender justice, and economic justice were …

Negotiating Social Change: Backstory Behind The Repeal Of Don’T Ask, Don’T Tell, Linell A. Letendre, Hal Abramson

Scholarly Works

This Article is about negotiating social change in the largest U.S.institution, the Military and its five Services. Inducing social change in any institution and society is notoriously difficult when change requires overcoming clashing personal values among stakeholders. And, in this negotiation over the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT), clashing values over open service by gays and lesbians were central to the conflict.

In response to President Obama’s call to repeal DADT, the Secretary of Defense selected a Working Group to undertake studies, surveys and focus groups to inform the debate. During the nine-month process of gathering a massive …

Systemic Risk Of Contract, Tal Kastner

Scholarly Works

Complexity and uncertainty define our world, now more than ever. Scholars and practitioners have celebrated modular contract design as an especially effective tool to manage these challenges. Modularity divides complex structures into relatively discrete, independent components with simple connections. The benefits of this fundamental drafting approach are intuitive. Lawyers divide contracts into sections and provisions to make them easier to understand and reduce uncertainty. Dealmakers constructing complex transactions use portable agreements as building blocks to reduce drafting costs and enable innovation. Little attention, however, has been paid to the risks introduced by modularity in contracts. This Article demonstrates how this …

Arbitration Case Law Updates 2021–2022 (June 2022), Sandra D. Grannum, Elissa Germaine

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

This article summarizes leading arbitration cases and related issues that are of particular relevance to the securities arbitration practitioner. There appears to be a move away from compelling arbitration and federal jurisdiction of motions to confirm or vacate. The courts have decided several cases specifically involving FINRA arbitrations, discussing who can bring them and what courts have jurisdiction over them.

In addition, the Federal Arbitration Act was amended by the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021, the title of which speaks for itself.

Empirical Analysis Of National Court Enforcement Of International Commercial Arbitration Awards, Roger P. Alford, Crina Baltag, Matthew E.K. Hall, Monique Sasson

Journal Articles

The empirical research in this article relies on a data set including all national court decisions on recognition, enforcement and setting aside (vacatur) of international commercial arbitration awards available in the Kluwer database that were rendered from 1 January 2010 to 1 June 2020. Within the time parameters of this study, there were 504 vacatur actions and 553 offensive recognition and enforcement actions. Those decisions were rendered by national courts in 74 different jurisdictions.

The research coded every argument raised by defendants challenging the recognition and enforcement of awards based on grounds set forth in Article V of the United …