Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

The Supreme Court Stops State Laws From Covertly Disfavoring Arbitration, Allows State Courts To Narrowly Interpret Powers-Of-Attorney: A Comment On Kindred Nursing Centers Ltd. Partnership V. Clark, Micah Mayotte

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Why Victims Deserve The Right To Choose How To Resolve Their Sexual Harassment Claims, Kathryn Meyer

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Fifth Circuit Sides With The Nfl In The Hotly-Contested Ezekiel Elliott Suspension: A Comment On National Football League Players Association V. National Football League, Nicole A. Wheeler

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Opening A Window For Chinese Ad Hoc Arbitration, Meng Chen

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

In The Wake Of Arbitration: Papers From The Sixth Annual Csis South China Sea Conference, Kyle Ganow

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Player 3 Has Entered The Game: Arbitration Comes To The Esports Industry, Ryan Boonstra

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Realizing Restorative Justice: Legal Rules And Standards For School Discipline Reform, Lydia Nussbaum

Scholarly Works

Zero-tolerance school disciplinary policies stunt the future of school children across the United States. These policies, enshrined in state law, prescribe automatic and mandatory suspension, expulsion, and arrest for infractions ranging from minor to serious. Researchers find that zero-tolerance policies disproportionately affect low-income, minority children and correlate with poor academic achievement, high drop-out rates, disaffection and alienation, and greater contact with the criminal justice system, a phenomenon christened the "School-to-Prison Pipeline."

A promising replacement for this punitive disciplinary regime derives from restorative justice theory and, using a variety of different legal interventions, reform advocates and lawmakers have tried to institute …

Twenty-Five Ways To Say No, Jonathan Van Patten

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Re-Inventing Arbitration: How Expanding The Scope Of Arbitration Is Re-Shaping Its Form And Blurring The Line Between Private And Public Adjudication, Deborah R. Hensler, Damira Khatam

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Response: Public Litigation, Private Arbitration?, David L. Noll

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Forty Years On, Practitioners, Parties, And Scholars Look Ahead, Thomas D. Barton, James P. Groton

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Adminization: Gatekeeping Consumer Contracts, Yonathan A. Arbel

Articles

Large companies and debt collectors frequently file unmeritorious claims against consumers. Recent high-profile actions brought by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau against J.P. Morgan, Citibank, and other large debt collectors illustrate the breadth and importance of this phenomenon. Due to the limited financial power of individuals, consumers often do not defend against such baseless claims, which results in the entry of millions of default judgments every year. To combat this problem, policymakers and scholars have explored a variety of court-based solutions that would make it easier for consumers to defend in court, but these prove ineffectual.

To solve the problem …

Vindicating The Effective Vindication Exception: Protecting Federal Statutory Rights In The Employment Context, Colby J. Byrd

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

Bekele V. Lyft, Inc., Anne Maly

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Ethical Practice Of Human-Centered Civil Justice Design, Victor D. Quintanilla, Haley Hinkle

Articles by Maurer Faculty

Over the past two decades, legal professionals have increasingly engaged in a new form of professional activity: civil justice design. In the past, legal professionals handled cases and transactions for clients or served as neutrals, including mediators and arbitrators, who helped to resolve disputes between parties. Today, legal professionals increasingly play a principal design role in creating systems that resolve streams of conflicts, disputes, and grievances between parties. Lawyers regularly now create internal grievance procedures, procedures for companies to resolve disputes with customers, and court-annexed alternative dispute resolution systems. The emergence of this new role raises difficult questions about the …

"Arbitration Schmarbitration": Examining The Benefits And Frustrations Of Defining The Process, Jean R. Sternlight

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Arbitration's Dark Shadow, Benjamin P. Edwards

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Arbitration, What Is It Good For?, Thomas O. Main

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Blurring Of The Public/Private Distrinction Or The Collapse Of A Category? The Story Of Investment Arbitration, Guillermo J. Garcia Sanchez

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Reconciling Fault Lines In Arbitration And Redefining Arbitration Through The Broader Lens Of Procedure, Imre S. Szalai

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Metaphysics Of Arbitration: A Reply To Hensler And Khatam, Hiro N. Aragaki

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Peace Vs. Justice Puzzle And The Syrian Crisis, Paul R. Williams, Lisa K. Dicker, C. Danae Paterson

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

Those involved in peace negotiations often face the dilemma of balancing demands for justice with the imperative of stopping the conflict as quickly as possible. There are abiding ethical and moral debates surrounding this tension between peace and justice. In Syria—where the death toll has exceeded 470,000, 11 million have been displaced, and there are over 14,000 documented cases of death by torture—the peace versus justice puzzle is a living dilemma with which those involved in the peace process grapple with on a daily basis.

Is it morally permissible to allow conflict (and the attendant human suffering) to continue, …

Ethics Meets The “O” In Dr, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

Lawyers, the menu of justice options available to resolve your clients’ legal disputes has now expanded to include online dispute resolution processes. Online dispute resolution (ODR) is an umbrella term that may be used to describe the use of technology to help expedite legal case management, replicate existing dispute resolution processes online, such as by utilizing video conferencing for arbitration and mediation (“replication ODR”); or to help streamline or even resolve legal claims through the use of algorithms (“algorithm ODR” or “algorithm- based ODR”). Even though ODR is fast becoming a regular part of legal practice, generally, and dispute …

Arbitration Law Update: 2017-2018, Teresa J. Verges, Elissa Germaine

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

This article summarizes the leading federal and state arbitration cases during the last year that are of particular relevance to the securities arbitration practitioner. In its sole arbitration decision during the 2017-18 term, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis that employers could require their employees to waive their right to class actions and collective arbitration. Courts also addressed a host of novel issues, including whether investors can force a non-FINRA member and municipal bond indentured trustee to arbitrate before FINRA, the arbitrability of claims against a cryptocurrency exchange, and the applicability of a state's …

Acts Like A Lawyer, Talks Like A Lawyer…Non-Lawyer Advocates Representing Parties In Dispute Resolution, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

What are the ethical implications for lawyer mediators, arbitrators and dispute resolution providers when the lines between the roles of lawyers and the non-lawyers who are representing clients in dispute resolution become blurry? Traditionally, non-lawyer advocates (hereinafter NARs) have represented clients in the negotiations, mediation and arbitration of legal matters without cause for concern. Yes, labor union representatives, sports agents, and special education advocates are three familiar examples of non-lawyers who represent clients in negotiations, mediations and arbitrations, informing clients of their legal rights. Routinely, the lawyers and neutrals presiding over the dispute resolution procedure have warmly welcomed these …

... Because "Yes" Actually Means "No": A Personalized Prescriptive To Reactualize Informed Consent In Dispute Resolution, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

This paper proposes a radical departure from the status quo approach to securing a client’s informed consent about settlement options and refocuses informed consent practice back to what informed consent is about, the client. As it exists today, the status quo approach to securing a client’s informed consent about whether or not to use an alternative dispute resolution procedure to resolve the client’s case is inadequate. It thwarts a client’s right to exercise party self- determination and stymies a client’s ability to make informed justice choices. Lawyers, courts, ADR providers and neutrals routinely provide litigants with generic information about the …

Nudging Civil Justice: Examining Voluntary And Mandatory Court Mediation User Experience In Twelve Regions, Shahla F. Ali

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Nudge theory suggests that positive reinforcement to encourage compliance is at least as effective, if not more effective, than traditional directions issued through legislation. This Article tests nudge theory in the context of court mediation reform by examining whether, and if so how, light nudges encouraging voluntary mediation have a differential effect on civil justice outcomes as compared with more robust nudges through mandated mediation processes. A statistical analysis of 2016-2017 civil justice indicators in twelve regions suggests light nudges, (voluntary court mediation programs, or (self-directed resolution), on average associated with higher overall jurisdictional scores for efficiency and non-discrimination. In …

The Muslim/Arab Sulha And The Restorative Justice Model Same Purpose, Different Approach, Doron Pely, Golan Luzon

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Article establishes sulha, the traditional Arab and Islamic dispute resolution practice, as a restorative justice ("RJ") mechanism. The Article compares sulah with western RJ: both practices strive for the same goal, repairing damaged relations, highlights the conceptual and functional similarities, including support for victims, and the importance of perpetrator responsibility. The Article introduces the concept of reintegrative honoring theory ("RHT")-a novel concept that describes the reliance of sulha relies on restoration of victims' sense of honor. Finally, the Article compares RHT with western reintegrative shaming theory ("RST").

Faith-Based Mediation In The Pakistan-India Conflict, Sarah Khan

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Section II of this Note explores the background history of Muslims and Hindus in India, the partition, and some of the most prominent issues that stand in the way of resolution. Section III discusses how religious mediation methods have been, and continue to be, used successfully in the contexts of other countries and conflicts. Section IV proposes that these methods be applied in the Pakistan-India situation to target specific issues facing the two countries, while incorporating the already proposed solutions that are on the table by politicians today.

How Pre-Dispute Arbitration Clauses Chill Whistleblowing And End-Run Dodd-Frank Whistleblowing Protections, Noah Weingarten

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note proceeds in six parts. First, it examines the mechanics of the SEC whistleblower program, its success, and the importance of whistleblowers. Second, it analyzes whistleblower retaliation protections and contrasts the protections under DoddFrank with those under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX"). Third, it analyzes how the SEC protects whistleblowers under its regulatory powers. Fourth, it analyzes the importance of retaliation claims from the whistleblower's perspective. Fifth, it analyzes how and why companies employ pre-dispute arbitration clauses to get a more favorable forum to entertain retaliation claims and how federal courts have been enforcing these arbitration clauses. Finally, …