Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Tribal Rights, Human Rights, Kristen A. Carpenter, Angela R. Riley

Publications

No abstract provided.

What Sally Soprano Teaches Lawyers About Hitting The Right Ethical Note In Adr Advocacy, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

Paradoxically, when lawyers opt to mediate or arbitrate, lawyers may still wind up selecting, shaping and advocating in these dispute resolution processes to resemble the very litigation process they have sought to avoid. After all, litigation likely comports with the lawyer’s own conflict style, comfort level and concepts of justice. As a consequence of this litigation bias, we see that the metaphorical doors of a multi-door courthouse that once offered a menu of dispute resolution choices are increasingly leading us back to one choice: a variation of the litigation door. Even though the Model Rules of Professional Conduct confirm …

Confidentiality: The Illusion And The Reality— Affirmative Steps For Lawyers And Mediators To Help Safeguard Their Mediation Communications, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

Confidentiality is one promise of mediation that is increasingly broken, even though judges, lawyers and mediators frequently extol the sacredness of mediation confidentiality as a primary benefit for considering mediation as a settlement forum. We observe that legal challenges to any aspect of the mediation have caused judges to scrutinize mediation communications in a way that renders mediation confidentiality vulnerable at a minimum and violated at the worst. We are finding it a chronic challenge to decipher the precise and appropriate boundaries of mediation confidentiality. Moreover, we are increasingly discomforted to see that even unsuccessful legal challenges to mediation …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 14, Iss. 2

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

The Impact Of Gender On Negotiation Performance, Charles B. Craver

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In 2009, Professors Russell Korobkin and Joseph Doherty published an article suggesting that male law students are more proficient negotiators than female law students. Their study was based upon student negotiation performance on a single employment discrimination hypothetical in which the only issue was money-a classic zero sum exercise, where there was no way the participants could engage in integrative bargaining based upon the different degrees to which the parties valued diverse issues. The exercise was given to 136 first-year law students at University of California-Los Angeles (U.C.L.A.) and University of Southern California (U.S.C.). The participants were not taking a …

Increasing Referrals To Small Claims Mediation Programs: Models To Improve Access To Justice, Heather Scheiwe Kulp

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The justice system is in crisis. In 2011, 85% of Connecticut's family court cases had at least one self-represented litigant. In Massachusetts, 92% of parties appearing in housing cases are selfrepresented. New York saw self-representation in 97% of child support cases. Although judges and attorneys are learning to adapt to this new reality, the strain is felt strongly by bench and bar alike.

This article explores a service that many courts already offer-small claims mediation-and studies how courts may more effectively refer parties to such services. Specifically, this article identifies six primary models courts use to refer parties to small …

State Courts Or Adr In Nazi-Era Art Disputes: A Choice "More Apparent Than Real"?, Christa Roodt

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This article explores the first and arguably most important procedural choice a party can make when instituting a claim in respect to Nazi-era art, namely between alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") and state court litigation. A sound analysis of the meeting points and potential conflicts of processes involving administrative bodies, ADR fora and the judiciary can contribute to more effective law reform.

The "State Of Necessity" Defense: A Burden, Not A Blessing To The International Investment Arbitration System, Kelley Chubb

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note discusses how the necessity defense, in the context of the Argentinian financial crisis arbitrations, has undermined the legitimacy of the international investment arbitration system. A discussion of the Argentinean cases listed above reveals that its application is inconsistent. A successful claim for necessity requires the following factors: (1) an essential interest must be at stake, (2) that interest must be threatened by grave and imminent peril, (3) the wrongful conduct must be the only method to protect the threatened interest, and (4) the offending government must have considered a balance of interests and must not have contributed to …

Hawaiian Land Disputes: How The Uncertainty Of The Native Hawaiian Indigenous Tribal Status Exacerbates The Need For Mediation, Donna S. Salcedo

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Many people see the Hawaiian Islands as a paradise in the Pacific Ocean. However, most are unaware that history has left an unpleasant and permanent scar on the original inhabitants of the islands, the Native Hawaiians. It is often forgotten that the islands were once ruled by its monarchy. In fact, the Hawaiian Kingdom was not overthrown until 1893, and the islands did not reach statehood until 1959. Despite this however, Native Hawaiians have never officially been considered an indigenous tribe. This lack of recognition from the federal government has caused a strong sense of injustice that is prevalent throughout …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 14, Iss. 3

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

The Rise In Judicial Hostility To Arbitration: Revisiting Hall Street Associates, Thomas E. Carbonneau

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

When the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Hall Street Associates, LLC v. Mattel, Inc., commentators expected the Court to resolve the split among the federal circuits regarding the validity and enforceability of 'opt-in' agreements. Since the late 1990s, these agreements had become a means through which contracting parties could obtain enhanced judicial supervision of arbitral awards by providing for judicial review of the merits of arbitrator rulings. While commentators got a resolution to the split, they received a great deal more than they had been promised. In effect, the Court concluded that the statutory framework for enforcement …

The Curious Case Of Transformative Dispute Resolution: An Unfortunate Marriage Of Intransigence, Exclusivity, And Hype, Robert J. Condlin

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Why do proponents of Transformative Dispute Resolution ("TDR") defend the Theory in such intransigent, exclusivist, and grandiose terms? TDR is a mature theory, and a relatively sophisticated one, and qualities of this sort usually go hand in hand with a balanced, refined, and well-modulated sense of self, but TDR proponents will have none of that. They make ambitious (some would say outlandish) assertions about the Theory's capacity to develop moral and political character, reform deliberative government, and resolve ethno-political conflict, while simultaneously rejecting overtures from sympathetic outsiders to rein in the overstated aspects of these claims, and craft a more …

A Tale Of Two Lawyers: How Arbitrators And Advocates Can Avoid The Dangerous Convergence Of Arbitration And Litigation, Neal M. Eiseman, John E. Bulman, R. Thomas Dunn

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

When modern arbitration became popular in the United States in the 18th and 19th centuries, courts viewed it as a threat to their exclusive powers. Over time, that mindset has changed dramatically. The passage of the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") in 1926 embraced a federal policy strongly favoring arbitration as a method of relieving court congestion and providing parties with a speedier, less costly means of resolving disputes. Thereafter, agreements to arbitrate found their way into many standard form agreements and business contracts as arbitration became accepted as a bona fide alternative to litigating in court. Today, as litigators can …

What If You Build It And No One Comes?: The Introduction Of Mediation To Russia, Kathryn Hendley

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Russia joined the community of countries where disputes can legally be diverted to mediation in early 2011. Russian court officials and judges were optimistic that mediation would alleviate the nagging problem of overloaded dockets; however, initial experience has shown that Russian litigants are skeptical of mediation. The reasons for this skepticism are a complex mix of institutional disincentives and a lack of familiarity with alternative dispute resolution. The relatively low costs associated with going to court in Russia, measured in terms of money, time, and relational damage, have done little to encourage litigants to opt for mediation. The absence of …

Ensuring Remedies To Cure Cramming, Amy J. Schmitz

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

On July 23, 2012, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") called wireless telephone bill cramming "a significant consumer problem," and both the FTC and Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") have been delving into the morass of concerns regarding cramming with respect to landline (or wired) telephone billing. "Cramming" occurs when a third party unaffiliated with a customer's telephone company adds charges to the telephone bills that the company sends to the customer. These charges can be for anything from horoscopes to long-distance telephone services.

Is Adjudication A Public Good? "Overcrowded Courts" And The Private Sector Alternative Of Arbitration, Stephen J. Ware

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Courts are underfunded, dockets are crowded, and litigation is slow. These observations lead many lawyers and judges to call for increased court funding. While I would like to see a significantly higher percentage of government spending go to courts, I do not believe that is likely to happen. So I suggest we think about "underfunded" courts differently.

2013 International Advocate For Peace Award Acceptance Speech, Jimmy Carter

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

On April 10, 2013, the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution presented its annual International Advocate for Peace Award to Jimmy Carter, 39th President of the United States. What follows is a transcription of his public address at the Law School, entitled "America as Global Mediator."

Exchanging Shares To Settle A Lawsuit: Should A Confidentiality Agreement Bar Evidence Of Securities Fraud?, Christopher Tao

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Suppose that two parties enter into a mediated written settlement, but in a subsequent court proceeding, one party claims to have discovered evidence clearly establishing fraud by the opposing party during the mediation process. When a court has to determine whether or not to enforce a negotiated settlement, do mediation confidentiality rules permit the court to admit one party's evidence of the other party's fraud or misrepresentations during the mediation?

Is Adr The Solution? How Adr Gets Around The Get Controversy In Jewish Divorce, Aviva Vogelstein

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The New York State government in particular has attempted to find creative solutions to the modern problems associated with Jewish divorce issues. This Note first gives a brief historical background of the beth din and the reasons for its authority, elucidating why alternative dispute resolution (ADR) benefits the American legal system and explaining how and why the beth din serves as a preferred method of ADR in contemporary America. Using New York as a case study, this Note then proposes that, although New York civil legislative solutions and tort claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress may sometimes achieve satisfactory …

Masthead, Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 15 (2013-14)

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Law And Negotiation: Necessary Partners Or Strange Bedfellows?, Nancy L. Schultz

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Almost thirty years ago, Robert Condlin wrote an article discussing the frustrations of students in his Negotiations class. He noted that his law students saw legal argument in negotiation primarily as a source of vexation rather than resolution. In the twenty-plus years I have taught negotiations, I have heard the same thing many times. Students will prepare and research and then be disconcerted when their negotiating partners are not swayed by their brilliant legal arguments. One comment by a student in a paper discussing his team's preparation for negotiation shows the initial thought process in a domestic relations negotiation: "It …

Conflicts Between Arbitration Agreements And Arbitration Rules, Steven C. Bennett

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Arbitration is a "creature of contract." As a result, under the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") and equivalent state laws, both the obligation to arbitrate and the specific terms under which arbitration will occur are typically determined by the agreement of the parties. In many instances, parties choose to adopt the rules of an arbitration-sponsoring organization such as the American Arbitration Association ("AAA"). But parties are also free to adopt their own ad hoc procedures (sometimes based on elements of the rules of an arbitration-sponsoring organization) or to use the rules of an arbitration-sponsoring organization as a base and modify those …

Response To Condlin's Critique Of Transformative Mediation, Robert A. Baruch Bush, Joseph P. Folger

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

We welcome thoughtful critical analysis of the transformative framework because we believe such comments further substantive discussion and debate. Some prior critiques of the framework have been beneficial in helping to clearly map the ideological divide in the ADR field-a divide that separates very different approaches to conflict intervention. Cogent and honestly substantiated critiques of the transformative approach have strengthened the discourse about conflict intervention practice by building stronger arguments on all sides of the debate over the various goals and expectations for mediation.

No Longer Left To Their Own Devices: Utilizing And Facilitating Mediation To Give Students Access To Assistive Technology, Eric Slepak

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note seeks to fill that void by examining the unique role AT plays in a student's development and how mediation succeeds (and fails) in helping the student secure desired equipment and services. Part II of this Note examines the background law and facts governing the dissemination of AT devices and services and the mechanisms for resolving disputes surrounding that dissemination. Part III provides an illustrative example to demonstrate the complex legal issues that arise in the determination of technology appropriate for students with disabilities.

Part IV then examines why mediation offers a superior mode of resolution to both parents …

The Age Of (Guilt Or) Innocence: Using Adr To Reform New York's Juvenile Justice System In The Wake Of Miller V. Alabama, Morgan Molinoff

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

"Youth matters." The concept is deceptively simple. Of course youth matters. One must be a certain age to drive, to vote, to drink, to be elected president. However, the issue becomes much more complex in the context of criminal responsibility and punishment. Should children be held less accountable for their crimes because of their age? Do juveniles have a greater capacity for rehabilitation than adults? By explaining that youth matters in Graham v. Florida and holding that juveniles cannot be sentenced to life in prison without parole for non-homicide crimes, Justice Kennedy of the United States Supreme Court answered these …

Screening For Intimate Partner Violence In Mediation, Kelly Browe Olson

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Embodied Conflict Resolution: Resurrecting Roleplay-Based Curricula Through Dance, Nadja Alexander, Michelle Lebaron

All Faculty Publications

Moving on from the authors’ seminal 2009 critique of the overuse of role-plays in negotiation teaching, "Death of the Role-Play" (chapter 13 in Rethinking Negotiation Teaching), Alexander and LeBaron have taken the rapidly increasing enthusiasm for experiential learning in a new direction: multiple intelligences. Their particular interest is in a use of experiential learning that focuses on kinesthetic intelligence, employing actual physical movement, particularly dance, to unlock creativity in other mental domains, as well as to encourage authentic participation by people whose skills are not primarily verbal or mathematical. Those who may be inclined to be skeptical should note that …

Developments In Adr, Tania Sourdin, Nadja Alexander

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) processes are now widely used throughout Australia to resolve and manage disputes without the need to use traditional rights-based processes such as litigation. ADR usually refers to dispute resolution processes that are 'alternative' to traditional court proceedings. ADR is also now used as an acronym for 'assisted', 'additional', 'affirmative', or 'appropriate' dispute resolution processes within the Australian environment. ADR processes can be used across diverse areas, including commercial, legal, social, environmental and political fields. This paper identifies some key features and trends in the Australian ADR context.

When Bad Guys Are Wearing White Hats, Catherine A. Rogers

Faculty Scholarship

Allegations of ethical misconduct by lawyers have all but completely overshadowed the substantive claims in the Chevron case. While both sides have been accused of flagrant wrongdoing, the charges against plaintiffs’ counsel appear to have captured more headlines and garnered more attention. The primary reason why the focus seems lopsided is that plaintiffs’ counsel were presumed to be the ones wearing white hats in this epic drama. This essay postulates that this seeming irony is not simply an example of personal ethical lapse, but in part tied to larger reasons why ethical violations are an occupational hazard for plaintiffs’ counsel …

The Rise In Judicial Hostility To Arbitration: Revisiting Hall Street Associates, Thomas E. Carbonneau

Faculty Scholarship

When the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Hall Street Associates,LLC v. Mattel, Inc., commentators expected the Court to resolve the split among the federal circuits regarding the validity and enforceability of 'opt-in' agreements.Since the late 1990s, these agreements had become a means through which contracting parties could obtain enhanced judicial supervision of arbitral awards by providing for judicial review of the merits of arbitrator rulings. While commentators got a resolution to the split, they received a great deal more than they had been promised.

Stylistic opacity made the opinion in Hall Street somewhat inaccessible. In fact, as …