Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Psychology (15)
- Jurisprudence (6)
- Health Law and Policy (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Criminal Law (4)
-
- Law and Society (3)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Legal Remedies (2)
- Medical Jurisprudence (2)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (2)
- Mental and Social Health (2)
- Sexuality and the Law (2)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Courts (1)
- Estates and Trusts (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Psychiatric and Mental Health (1)
- Institution
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Disability Law
Sterilization Of Mentally Retarded Persons: Reproductive Rights And Family Privacy, Elizabeth S. Scott
Sterilization Of Mentally Retarded Persons: Reproductive Rights And Family Privacy, Elizabeth S. Scott
Faculty Scholarship
Sterilization is one of the most frequently chosen forms of contraception in the world; many persons who do not want to have children select this simple, safe, and effective means of avoiding unwanted pregnancy. For individuals who are mentally disabled, however, sterilization has more ominous associations. Until recently, involuntary sterilization was used as a weapon of the state in the war against mental deficiency. Under eugenic sterilization laws in effect in many states, retarded persons were routinely sterilized without their consent or knowledge.
Sterilization law has undergone a radical transformation in recent years. Influenced by a distaste for eugenic sterilization …
The Right To An Adequate Income And Employment: A Reply To Professor Bernstein, David L. Chambers
The Right To An Adequate Income And Employment: A Reply To Professor Bernstein, David L. Chambers
Book Chapters
Bernsteins's Paper advances no constitutional arguments for requiring the government to ensure economic security for retarded citizens. His omission is justified not merely by the alternative focus he has chosen, but also by the absence of any sound or vendible constitutional arguments to advance. There remain, however, important roles for attorneys.