Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (7291)
- Constitutional Law (3359)
- Courts (2373)
- Human Rights Law (1693)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1364)
-
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1364)
- Evidence (1359)
- Administrative Law (1189)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1168)
- Civil Law (1159)
- Rule of Law (1101)
- Internet Law (1096)
- Conflict of Laws (1082)
- Business Organizations Law (1071)
- International Trade Law (1068)
- Legal Education (1030)
- Supreme Court of the United States (948)
- State and Local Government Law (946)
- Energy and Utilities Law (943)
- Natural Resources Law (939)
- Law and Society (937)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (933)
- Agriculture Law (930)
- Election Law (920)
- Fourth Amendment (919)
- Air and Space Law (910)
- Jurisprudence (805)
- International Law (768)
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (881)
- University of Michigan Law School (808)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (795)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (645)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (398)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (373)
- William & Mary Law School (343)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (331)
- Seattle University School of Law (275)
- University of Richmond (275)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (230)
- University of Washington School of Law (229)
- BLR (220)
- Columbia Law School (202)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (201)
- University of Kentucky (192)
- UIC School of Law (187)
- Mercer University School of Law (182)
- West Virginia University (182)
- American University Washington College of Law (179)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (155)
- Cornell University Law School (144)
- University of Colorado Law School (141)
- Brooklyn Law School (139)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (130)
- Pepperdine University (127)
- University of Maine School of Law (127)
- University of Georgia School of Law (123)
- University of Miami Law School (114)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (107)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal procedure (688)
- Criminal law (546)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (469)
- Criminal Procedure (391)
- Evidence (351)
-
- Capital punishment (286)
- Police (285)
- Death penalty (275)
- Sentencing (274)
- Fourth Amendment (270)
- Sixth Amendment (270)
- Criminal justice (269)
- Criminal Law (236)
- United States Supreme Court (236)
- Due process (231)
- Constitutional Law (224)
- Supreme Court (207)
- Fifth Amendment (206)
- Right to counsel (167)
- Constitution (154)
- New York (149)
- Jury (136)
- Prosecutors (135)
- Punishment (133)
- Juries (132)
- Testimony (129)
- Privacy (128)
- Constitutional law (125)
- Federal (125)
- Fourth amendment (124)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (760)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (723)
- Michigan Law Review (462)
- Articles (383)
- Touro Law Review (350)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (328)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (302)
- Faculty Publications (262)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (259)
- Seattle University Law Review (224)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (218)
- ExpressO (195)
- Buffalo Law Review (189)
- West Virginia Law Review (179)
- University of Richmond Law Review (178)
- Mercer Law Review (173)
- Capital Defense Journal (168)
- Kentucky Law Journal (165)
- Washington Law Review (160)
- UIC Law Review (153)
- Publications (132)
- Scholarly Articles (131)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (128)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (126)
- Maine Law Review (125)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (121)
- Scholarly Works (113)
- Pepperdine Law Review (111)
- All Faculty Scholarship (108)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 841 - 870 of 12064
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Aspek Hukum Pasar Modal (Bagian 2), Soemantoro Fhui
Aspek Hukum Pasar Modal (Bagian 2), Soemantoro Fhui
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Abstract
The Perlmutter Center For Legal Justice And The Death Penalty And Criminal Defense Clinic Present A Screening Of The Oscar-Nominated Film: The Alabama Solution, Perlmutter Center For Legal Justice At Cardozo Law, Death Penalty And Criminal Defense Clinic
The Perlmutter Center For Legal Justice And The Death Penalty And Criminal Defense Clinic Present A Screening Of The Oscar-Nominated Film: The Alabama Solution, Perlmutter Center For Legal Justice At Cardozo Law, Death Penalty And Criminal Defense Clinic
2026 Event Invitations
The Alabama Solution is a groundbreaking, critically-acclaimed HBO documentary released in 2025, documenting prison conditions in Alabama from footage recorded by people experiencing incarceration. The screening will be followed by a panel led by Perlmutter Center Deputy Director Derrick Hamilton.
Panelists
• Jose Saldana: Director, Release Aging People in Prison Campaign
• Dr. Donna Hylton: Founder and CEO, A Little Piece of Light
• Alex Duran: Co-Producer of Academy Award Nominated Film, The Alabama Solution
• David Garlock: Reentry professional and criminal justice reform advocate
• Sumeet Sharma: Director, Policy and Communications at the Correctional Association of New York
Special Screening And Panel: The Alabama Solution, Perlmutter Center For Legal Justice, Death Penalty And Criminal Defense Clinic
Special Screening And Panel: The Alabama Solution, Perlmutter Center For Legal Justice, Death Penalty And Criminal Defense Clinic
2025–2026 Flyers
No abstract provided.
Penegakan Peraturan Lalu Lintas Dan Kepatuhan Terhadapnya (Dengan Minat Khusus Kota Jakarta), Soerjono Soekanto
Penegakan Peraturan Lalu Lintas Dan Kepatuhan Terhadapnya (Dengan Minat Khusus Kota Jakarta), Soerjono Soekanto
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Abstract
Isaiha Duckket V. The State Of Nevada, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 9 (Feb. 05, 2026), Adrienne Jack-Sands
Isaiha Duckket V. The State Of Nevada, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 9 (Feb. 05, 2026), Adrienne Jack-Sands
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
In Duckket v. State, the Supreme Court of Nevada found no error in allowing a criminal defendant to represent himself despite multiple competency evaluations before and during trial, nor was his right to a speedy trial infringed when none of the delays were caused by the State.
Fbi National Stolen Art File: Lost Artifacts And Missing Data, Allison N. Arnold
Fbi National Stolen Art File: Lost Artifacts And Missing Data, Allison N. Arnold
Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects
This data exploration project studies the FBI’s National Stolen Art File (NSAF). The NSAF is a repository for information on stolen artistic and cultural objects. By design, the objects in the NSAF should have distinguishing features and some monetary value, with a present minimum of $5,000 USD. As a public awareness tool, the objects in the NSAF should have a reasonable chance of being identified and potentially restituted in the future.
Using object data taken from the NSAF on August 25, 2024, my data exploration work includes a narrative of the data preparation process and a series of data visualizations. …
A "Simple" Second Look: The Argument For Mandatory Judicial Recusal In Pennsylvania Post Conviction Hearings, Taylor Banks
A "Simple" Second Look: The Argument For Mandatory Judicial Recusal In Pennsylvania Post Conviction Hearings, Taylor Banks
Criminal Law Society Blog
The Due Process Clause guarantees criminal defendants an impartial adjudicator, yet post-conviction proceedings often escape meaningful judicial recusal. In Pennsylvania, the same judge who presided over a criminal trial commonly adjudicates that defendant’s post-conviction review, even when prior rulings are challenged. This Article argues that such self-review creates an objectively intolerable risk of bias, undermining due process and public confidence in the judiciary. Drawing on Supreme Court precedent and psychological research on confirmation bias, the Article demonstrates that existing recusal standards fail to address structural risks in post-conviction adjudication. It proposes legislative reform mandating judicial recusal when a judge previously …
Milbank Expands Partnership With The Perlmutter Center For Legal Justice At Cardozo Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law
Milbank Expands Partnership With The Perlmutter Center For Legal Justice At Cardozo Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law
Cardozo Law News Archive
Milbank LLP announced a significant expansion of its partnership with the Perlmutter Center for Legal Justice at Cardozo School of Law, increasing its charitable commitment to $2.5 million through 2029. The expanded funding will strengthen the Milbank Exoneration Review Unit, support additional staffing, and advance post-conviction advocacy for wrongfully convicted and excessively sentenced individuals.
The Laura And Isaac Perlmutter Foundation Expands Support For The Perlmutter Center For Legal Justice At Cardozo Law Of Yeshiva University, Bringing Their Total Contribution To $16 Million, With Up To An Additional $2 Million Committed, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law
The Laura And Isaac Perlmutter Foundation Expands Support For The Perlmutter Center For Legal Justice At Cardozo Law Of Yeshiva University, Bringing Their Total Contribution To $16 Million, With Up To An Additional $2 Million Committed, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law
Cardozo Law News Archive
The Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Foundation announced an additional $500,000 gift to the Perlmutter Center for Legal Justice at Cardozo School of Law, along with a four-year matching commitment of up to $2 million. The expanded support will strengthen the Center's work on wrongful convictions, clemency, resentencing, and experiential legal education while advancing criminal justice reform initiatives.
Williams V. The Second Judicial District Court Of The State Of Nevada, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 5 (Jan. 29, 2026), Kaleigh Evanchak
Williams V. The Second Judicial District Court Of The State Of Nevada, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 5 (Jan. 29, 2026), Kaleigh Evanchak
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Nevada Supreme Court may reassign a district judge in a criminal case to preserve fairness and the presumption of innocence, even if the judge will not be disqualified for judicial bias.
(Re)Individualizing Criminal Law, Itay Ravid
(Re)Individualizing Criminal Law, Itay Ravid
Faculty Publications
Criminal law purports to care about the individual culpability of those committing crimes. Individual mental states or defenses based on one’s beliefs are considered foundational to moral responsibility and criminal conviction. The expansion of algorithmic risk assessment tools in the criminal legal system, however, threatens these principles, changing the criminal law subject from an autonomous individual to merely a predicted object. This Article argues that risk assessment tools—now functioning as gatekeepers at both the entry and exit stages of the criminal process, from predictive policing to compassionate release eligibility—have shifted the criminal system away from its foundation in individual culpability. …
Perlmutter Center's Derrick Hamilton, Reform Advocates Secure Passage Of New York State's Prison Justice Omnibus Package, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law
Perlmutter Center's Derrick Hamilton, Reform Advocates Secure Passage Of New York State's Prison Justice Omnibus Package, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law
Cardozo Law News Archive
Cardozo School of Law recognized Derrick Hamilton, Deputy Director of the Perlmutter Center for Legal Justice, and fellow criminal justice reform advocates for their role in advancing New York State's Prison Justice Omnibus Package. The legislation expands transparency, oversight, and accountability in state correctional facilities and reflects the advocacy of the End Prison Violence campaign.
“I Like My Eighteenth Century Fresh”: Geofence Warrants, General Warrants, And The Evolving Fourth Amendment, Alexa M. Mascaró
“I Like My Eighteenth Century Fresh”: Geofence Warrants, General Warrants, And The Evolving Fourth Amendment, Alexa M. Mascaró
University of Miami Law Review
Almost 250 years ago, our Founding Fathers fought to create a nation free from the confines of British imperial rule. Outrage over governmental intrusions enabled by suspicionless general warrants and writs of assistance galvanized an American polity determined to prevent the abuses that had come to define colonial life. The Fourth Amendment was enacted as a response to executive overreach, and it was deeply informed by the fraught history that led to its adoption—a history that is still used by courts today to define constitutional protections.
In the digital age, the rapid speed of technological innovation has created a precarious …
Diet: Another Piece Of The Crime Puzzle?, Jerrod Brown, Jeremiah Schimp, Leanne Skehan, Amanda Fenrich, Janina Cich
Diet: Another Piece Of The Crime Puzzle?, Jerrod Brown, Jeremiah Schimp, Leanne Skehan, Amanda Fenrich, Janina Cich
Nutritional Neurocriminology Today
An expanding body of research suggests that diet and nutrition may play an influential yet underrecognized role in problematic and criminal behaviors. This article synthesizes research linking excessive consumption of sugar and ultra-processed foods to adverse neurobehavioral outcomes, impaired impulse control, aggression, mood dysregulation, and sleep problems. Integrating research suggests that metabolic disruption, neuroinflammation, and gut–brain axis dysfunction may influence cognitive and emotional regulation. While criminal behavior is complex and multifactorial, this article emphasizes nutrition as a modifiable factor to inform forensic mental health practice, correctional policy, and rehabilitative strategies.
Ajay (Ajay) V. State, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 4 (Jan. 15, 2026), David Elder
Ajay (Ajay) V. State, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 4 (Jan. 15, 2026), David Elder
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
A waiver of Miranda rights is invalid if the rights are only explained in English and the criminally accused individual has limited English proficiency.
Rogers V. State Of Nevada, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 3 (Jan. 15, 2026), Luis Dorantes
Rogers V. State Of Nevada, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 3 (Jan. 15, 2026), Luis Dorantes
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
NEITHER NRS 176.055 NOR NRS 178.463 PERMITS CREDITING TIME PREVIOUSLY SERVED IN PRISON ON VACATED CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS AGAINST THE LENGTH OF A CIVIL COMMITMENT.
Organized Transnational Smuggling Of Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances: Means, Effects, And International Control Mechanisms, Youness Nafid
Organized Transnational Smuggling Of Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances: Means, Effects, And International Control Mechanisms, Youness Nafid
Journal of Police and Legal Sciences
This study highlights, discusses, and analyzes the conditions and elements through which the crimes of drug and psychotropic substance trafficking of an organized and transnational nature are realized. These crimes are committed through multiple, complex, and organized means. We based our analysis on the provisions of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, as it is one of the most significant international agreements that serves as a reference for member states in defining and regulating the concept of organized criminal groups, as well as in defining the concept and cases of transnational organized crime.
We called for the enhancement …
The Evidence Machine: Rethinking Admissibility And Privacy In India's Ai Surveillance State, Samyukta Ramaswamy
The Evidence Machine: Rethinking Admissibility And Privacy In India's Ai Surveillance State, Samyukta Ramaswamy
Indian Journal of Law and Technology
The proliferation of artificial intelligence (‘AI’) surveillance technologies that utilise machine learning (‘ML’) capabilities to gather and process information to derive insights about individuals has transformed the surveillance landscape by enabling governments and private entities to engage in increasingly pervasive monitoring and data-driven profiling. In India, this transformation is compounded by the presence of executive-controlled surveillance mechanisms under the legal framework of the Telecommunications Act 2023, the Telecommunications (Procedures and Safeguards for Lawful Interception of Messages) Rules 2024, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, amongst others, which authorises wide-ranging data interception and dragnet surveillance while exempting government agencies …
Chatgpt Goes To (National)Law School, Rahul Hemrajani, Vedant Gupta, R Srivatsan, Radhika Singhal, Krishne Tanneerbavi, Shristy Chhaparia, Siddharth Johar, Srujan Sangai, Suvanssh Mahajan, Priyansh Dixit, V Sreedharan, Dhruv Holla, Gunjan Modi, Kajal Jamdare, Pratyay Amrit, Sannah Mudbidri, Ishaan Goel, Akshit Singla, Arjun Mehta, Madhav Mitruka, Mannat Mahaey, Nathaniel Warjri, Swapnil Das, Ojas Chandaniha, Yash Ahirwar, Animesh Tiwari, Aman Meena
Chatgpt Goes To (National)Law School, Rahul Hemrajani, Vedant Gupta, R Srivatsan, Radhika Singhal, Krishne Tanneerbavi, Shristy Chhaparia, Siddharth Johar, Srujan Sangai, Suvanssh Mahajan, Priyansh Dixit, V Sreedharan, Dhruv Holla, Gunjan Modi, Kajal Jamdare, Pratyay Amrit, Sannah Mudbidri, Ishaan Goel, Akshit Singla, Arjun Mehta, Madhav Mitruka, Mannat Mahaey, Nathaniel Warjri, Swapnil Das, Ojas Chandaniha, Yash Ahirwar, Animesh Tiwari, Aman Meena
Indian Journal of Law and Technology
This paper presents the first comprehensive empirical evaluation of Large Language Models’ (‘LLMs’) performance in Indian legal education. We compare six Artificial Intelligence (‘AI’) chatbots with law students at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru, across four subjects: Contract Law, Corporate Law, Criminal Procedure, and Jurisprudence. Our findings show that LLMs achieve performance comparable to human students (B+ grade), with newer commercial models consistently outperforming older and open-source alternatives. We also find that while LLMs excel in theoretical subjects and structured legal analysis, they show limitations in handling jurisdiction-specific knowledge and complex scenario-based reasoning. These findings have important …
The Brady Materiality Standard, Brandon L. Garrett, Adam M. Gershowitz
The Brady Materiality Standard, Brandon L. Garrett, Adam M. Gershowitz
Faculty Scholarship
The Brady doctrine requires prosecutors to disclose all favorable and material evidence to the defense. To effectuate that rule, the U.S. Supreme Court has defined materiality as a “reasonable probability” that the evidence would have affected the outcome at trial. But apart from that definition, the Court has resisted offering any further guidance to lower courts. While far too little is known about how Brady materiality claims are actually adjudicated, there is strong evidence that courts often reject Brady claims involving withheld evidence on the grounds that the evidence was not significant enough to be material.
To examine how Brady …
Civil And Criminal Justice Remedies For Intimate Partner Violence, Demetrice M. Lopez, Anika Ramos
Civil And Criminal Justice Remedies For Intimate Partner Violence, Demetrice M. Lopez, Anika Ramos
Hunter Center Publications
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a persistent public health problem that impacts the physical and mental health of millions of people each year. The United States has historically relied on the legal system as the primary means of addressing IPV as a criminal or civil infraction. This chapter begins with a review of the history of IPV in the context of the legal system. It then considers the dynamics of IPV and its influence on the legal response. The chapter then looks at the broader impact of IPV and remedies for survivors in the justice system. Finally, it considers the …
The Indelible Flaws Of Conviction Integrity Units, Sarah Gottlieb
The Indelible Flaws Of Conviction Integrity Units, Sarah Gottlieb
Scholarly Articles
Conviction Integrity Units within prosecutors’ offices have doubled in number over the last 10 years. Leaders of the innocence movement initially praised these units, believing they were necessary for the future of innocence work given their unique access to discovery, and scholars hoped Conviction Integrity Units would lead prosecutors away from fighting against claims of innocence to sincere and open review of wrongful convictions. But, as Conviction Integrity Units proliferated, the question of whether prosecutors can fulfill the mandate of these offices and conduct thorough review of their colleagues’ work has received insufficient inquiry, particularly given that official misconduct continues …
“No One Can Hear You Scream”: Intimate Partner Violence And Family Justice Centers In Rural America, Jordan Stevenson
“No One Can Hear You Scream”: Intimate Partner Violence And Family Justice Centers In Rural America, Jordan Stevenson
Legal Writing Competition Winners
In rural Kentucky, where cars are a necessity to traverse the rugged Appalachian Mountains and sparsely populated farmlands, “Barbara’s” abusive husband couldn’t let her get away—so he set her car aflame. Although census-defined rural areas contain only 20% of the United States population, some studies have found that intimate partner violence is more common and severe in rural areas than urban or suburban regions.
People, especially women, in rural areas experience intimate partner violence in unique ways tied to their geographic and cultural context. Consequently, organizations, courts, and law enforcement struggle to meet the needs of affected populations in rural …
Collaborative Nullification: Bending Or Ignoring The Law To Free The Over-Punished, David A. Singleton
Collaborative Nullification: Bending Or Ignoring The Law To Free The Over-Punished, David A. Singleton
Journal Articles
The United States accounts for about 25% of the world’s prisoners but only about 5% of its population. It has the fifth highest imprisonment rate—higher than China and Russia—with people of color disproportionately impacted. This racialized mass incarceration, and the lack of political will to meaningfully address it, demands bold remedies. ...
So, what should attorneys do for clients like Pat when no viable release mechanisms remain: concede defeat and move on, or collaborate with those who are willing to ignore the law and grant release anyway?
This article proposes that the second option, which I call “collaborative nullification,” can …
Computational Clinical Judgment: Predicting Risk With Large Language Models, Hannah Laqueur, Ryan W. Copus
Computational Clinical Judgment: Predicting Risk With Large Language Models, Hannah Laqueur, Ryan W. Copus
Faculty Works
For seventy years, research has shown actuarial methods outperform clinical judgment. Yet actuarial approaches have limitations: they generally rely on structured data; cannot exploit rare case-specific details; have limited accuracy where outcome data are scarce or incomplete; and cannot offer case-level justifications. Large language models (LLMs) offer a different approach. Like actuarial methods, they aggregate information algorithmically, but like clinicians, they bring general knowledge and can provide case-level justifications. We prompted seven LLMs to assess rearrest risk from 113 parole hearing transcripts and compared their predictions to a machine learning model trained on 4,000 cases with 91 administrative variables. GPT-5 …
Legislatively Erased: The Failure Of Privacy Legislation To Protect People Connected To The Criminal Legal System, Chaz Arnett, Kate Weisburd
Legislatively Erased: The Failure Of Privacy Legislation To Protect People Connected To The Criminal Legal System, Chaz Arnett, Kate Weisburd
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Can We Close The Rhode Island Women’S Prison?, Nick Horton
Can We Close The Rhode Island Women’S Prison?, Nick Horton
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Imprisoned Without A Verdict: The Constitutional Crisis Of Pre-Trial Solitary Confinement, Symone R. Gibbs
Imprisoned Without A Verdict: The Constitutional Crisis Of Pre-Trial Solitary Confinement, Symone R. Gibbs
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
Kalief Browder’s name endures as a chilling reminder of the human cost of pre-trial solitary confinement. His story reveals the constitutional paradox and moral failure at the heart of this practice: Individuals who remain legally innocent are subjected to one of the harshest punishments the state can impose. This practice strips people of their liberty twice over, first through incarceration itself, and again through prolonged isolation that inflicts devastating psychological harm. Despite its severity, the use of solitary confinement against pre-trial detainees remains largely overlooked in legal scholarship and reform, even as it undermines the presumption of innocence, exacerbates systemic …