Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (7308)
- Constitutional Law (3372)
- Courts (2391)
- Human Rights Law (1705)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1376)
-
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1366)
- Evidence (1361)
- Administrative Law (1203)
- Civil Law (1171)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1169)
- Rule of Law (1113)
- Internet Law (1109)
- Conflict of Laws (1094)
- Business Organizations Law (1083)
- International Trade Law (1080)
- Legal Education (1042)
- Energy and Utilities Law (955)
- Natural Resources Law (951)
- Supreme Court of the United States (948)
- State and Local Government Law (947)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (945)
- Agriculture Law (942)
- Law and Society (938)
- Election Law (932)
- Air and Space Law (922)
- Fourth Amendment (919)
- Jurisprudence (805)
- International Law (768)
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (893)
- University of Michigan Law School (808)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (795)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (645)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (399)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (373)
- William & Mary Law School (344)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (331)
- University of Richmond (288)
- Seattle University School of Law (275)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (231)
- University of Washington School of Law (229)
- BLR (220)
- Columbia Law School (203)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (201)
- University of Kentucky (192)
- UIC School of Law (187)
- Mercer University School of Law (182)
- West Virginia University (182)
- American University Washington College of Law (179)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (155)
- Cornell University Law School (144)
- University of Colorado Law School (142)
- Brooklyn Law School (139)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (130)
- Pepperdine University (127)
- University of Maine School of Law (127)
- University of Georgia School of Law (123)
- University of Miami Law School (115)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (107)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal procedure (688)
- Criminal law (547)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (441)
- Criminal Procedure (389)
- Evidence (348)
-
- Capital punishment (286)
- Police (285)
- Death penalty (275)
- Sentencing (274)
- Criminal justice (271)
- Fourth Amendment (269)
- Sixth Amendment (267)
- Criminal Law (236)
- United States Supreme Court (236)
- Due process (231)
- Constitutional Law (219)
- Supreme Court (207)
- Fifth Amendment (204)
- Right to counsel (167)
- Constitution (154)
- New York (149)
- Prosecutors (135)
- Jury (134)
- Juries (132)
- Testimony (129)
- Privacy (128)
- Punishment (126)
- Constitutional law (125)
- Federal (125)
- Fourth amendment (124)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (761)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (735)
- Michigan Law Review (462)
- Articles (383)
- Touro Law Review (350)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (328)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (302)
- Faculty Publications (263)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (259)
- Seattle University Law Review (224)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (218)
- ExpressO (195)
- University of Richmond Law Review (190)
- Buffalo Law Review (189)
- West Virginia Law Review (179)
- Mercer Law Review (173)
- Capital Defense Journal (168)
- Kentucky Law Journal (165)
- Washington Law Review (160)
- UIC Law Review (153)
- Publications (133)
- Scholarly Articles (131)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (128)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (127)
- Maine Law Review (125)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (121)
- Scholarly Works (114)
- Pepperdine Law Review (111)
- All Faculty Scholarship (108)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 7801 - 7830 of 12092
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Co-Teaching International Criminal Law: New Strategies To Meet The Challenges Of A New Course, Stacy Caplow, Maryellen Fullerton
Co-Teaching International Criminal Law: New Strategies To Meet The Challenges Of A New Course, Stacy Caplow, Maryellen Fullerton
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Hélène Cixous's The Perjured City: Nonprosecution Alternatives To Collective Violence, Susan Ayres
Hélène Cixous's The Perjured City: Nonprosecution Alternatives To Collective Violence, Susan Ayres
Faculty Scholarship
In instances of collective violence — apartheid in South Africa, mass killings in Rwanda, and other crimes against humanity such as slavery — what response provides justice? How can justice be achieved under such a system? Legal justice through prosecution would be unjust. This opens the possibility of nonprosecution alternatives involving forgiveness. Hélène Cixous’s play about forgiveness as an alternative to criminal prosecution, The Perjured City: Or, the Awakening of the Furies, was written in response to an actual case of failed justice in France, known as the Bad Blood Scandal. The play provides a model of forgiveness and a …
The Accelerating Degradation Of American Criminal Codes, Michael T. Cahill, Paul H. Robinson
The Accelerating Degradation Of American Criminal Codes, Michael T. Cahill, Paul H. Robinson
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Conflicting Stories And Reasonable Doubt: Variations On W. (D.)'S Theme, Steve Coughlan
Conflicting Stories And Reasonable Doubt: Variations On W. (D.)'S Theme, Steve Coughlan
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Whether the guilt of an accused has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt is always a difficult issue, particularly so when the accused has testified. There is little difficulty when an accused's exculpatory testimony is accepted by the trial judge, since that of course leads unambiguously to an acquittal. More complex is the situation where a trial judge does not simply accept the accused's version of events — that is, most of the time. In those circumstances, trial judge must embark down the twisty road of deciding whether disbelieved testimony can nonetheless result in an acquittal, or alternatively whether an …
The New Universal Jurisdiction: In Absentia Signaling Over Clearly Defined Crimes, Anthony J. Colangelo
The New Universal Jurisdiction: In Absentia Signaling Over Clearly Defined Crimes, Anthony J. Colangelo
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
Through The Looking-Glass At The Brady Doctrine: Some New Reflections On White Queens, Hobgoblins, And Due Process, Eugene Cerruti
Through The Looking-Glass At The Brady Doctrine: Some New Reflections On White Queens, Hobgoblins, And Due Process, Eugene Cerruti
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Summary Of Wright V. Dep’T Of Motor Vehicles, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 14, Scott Mcdonald
Summary Of Wright V. Dep’T Of Motor Vehicles, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 14, Scott Mcdonald
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The defendant appealed the Department of Motor Vehicles’ (DMV) revocation of his driver’s license because he believed the arresting officer was without reasonable grounds for ordering an evidentiary blood alcohol test.2 Defendant also challenged the reliability of the field sobriety test (“FST”) as administered and questioned whether the DMV revoked his privileges with proper authority.3
A Jurisprudence Of Doubt: Missouri V. Seibert, United States V. Patane, And The Supreme Court's Continued Confusion About The Constitutional Status Of Miranda, Johnathan L. Rogers
A Jurisprudence Of Doubt: Missouri V. Seibert, United States V. Patane, And The Supreme Court's Continued Confusion About The Constitutional Status Of Miranda, Johnathan L. Rogers
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Decline Of The Juvenile Death Penalty: Scientific Evidence Of Evolving Norms, Jeffery Fagan
The Decline Of The Juvenile Death Penalty: Scientific Evidence Of Evolving Norms, Jeffery Fagan
Faculty Scholarship
Shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Atkins v. Virginia holding that the execution of mentally retarded persons violated the Eighth Amendment, legal scholars, advocates, and journalists began to speculate that the Court would next turn its attention to the question of the execution of persons who were juveniles – below eighteen years of age – at the time they committed homicide. Following the Atkins decision, four Justices expressed the view that the rationale of Atkins also supported the conclusion that execution of juvenile offenders was unconstitutional. A constitutional test of capital punishment for juveniles was inevitable. …
An Evidentiary Paradox: Defending The Character Evidence Prohibition By Upholding A Non-Character Theory Of Logical Relevance, The Doctrine Of Chances, Edward J. Imwinkelried
An Evidentiary Paradox: Defending The Character Evidence Prohibition By Upholding A Non-Character Theory Of Logical Relevance, The Doctrine Of Chances, Edward J. Imwinkelried
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Selection And Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, And Life Tenure, Judith Resnik
Judicial Selection And Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, And Life Tenure, Judith Resnik
Cardozo Law Review
How ought a democracy select its judges? Critics in Canada, England, and Wales invoke the democratic values of accountability and transparency to call for a diminution in prime ministerial control over judicial appointments. In the United States, Article III of the Constitution's text directs that the President nominate - with the advice and consent of the Senate - life-tenured federal judges. Bitter conflicts about particular nominees have produced many proposals for changes of that system. And in those states that rely on various forms of judicial election, concerns focus on funding and campaigning. In short, both globally and locally, democracies …
The Crime Victim's Right To Attend The Trial: The Reascendant National Consensus, Douglas Evan Beloof, Paul Cassell
The Crime Victim's Right To Attend The Trial: The Reascendant National Consensus, Douglas Evan Beloof, Paul Cassell
Utah Law Faculty Scholarship
This article contends that crime victims should have an unequivocal right to attend a criminal trial, even in cases where they will be called as witnesses. A victim's right to attend trial has strong historical support, as at common law victims attended trial as private prosecutors. More recently, crime victims' rights legislation passed in the majority of states recognizes the victim's right to attend. Nothing in the Constitution prevents victims from attending trial, and strong public policy reasons support such an approach. Observing the trial can have import therapeutic and other benefits for victims. Any risk of prejudice to a …
Are The 1949 Geneva Conventions Self-Executing Treaties For Purposes Of Challenges To Military Commissions Procedures?, Rachel E. Cohen
Are The 1949 Geneva Conventions Self-Executing Treaties For Purposes Of Challenges To Military Commissions Procedures?, Rachel E. Cohen
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Crawford V. Washington: The End Of Victimless Prosecution?, Andrew King-Ries
Crawford V. Washington: The End Of Victimless Prosecution?, Andrew King-Ries
Faculty Law Review Articles
Domestic violence offenses are difficult to prosecute because the batterer's actions often make the victim unavailable to testify. Since the mid- 1990s, prosecutors have pursued "victimless" prosecutions' to combat the problem.2 Victimless prosecutions seek to introduce reliable evidence without the victim's in-court testimony, often to maintain the victim's safety or to avoid re-victimizing the victim.3 The victimless prosecution is based largely on the admission of hearsay statements that a victim makes to 911 operators, police officers, doctors, nurses, paramedics, and social workers.4 Victimless prosecution has been a highly successful tool in society's efforts to eradicate domestic violence and it is …
Sentencing: Learning From, And Worrying About, The States, Gerard E. Lynch
Sentencing: Learning From, And Worrying About, The States, Gerard E. Lynch
Faculty Scholarship
The Columbia Law Review's Symposium on sentencing, which took place less than two weeks after the Supreme Court's dramatic semi-invalidation of the federal sentencing guidelines, was certainly timely. Nevertheless, it is critical to understanding the Symposium's purposes to realize that it was not planned in response to United States v. Booker, or even to Blakely v. Washington. The Symposium was conceived before either case was decided, as a very conscious attempt to steer the discussion of sentencing away from Congress and the federal guidelines and toward states' experiences. The vast majority of criminals are sentenced in state …
Justice And Fairness In The Protection Of Crime Victims, George P. Fletcher
Justice And Fairness In The Protection Of Crime Victims, George P. Fletcher
Faculty Scholarship
In this Article, Professor Fletcher discusses the crucial distinction between justice and fairness-as well as its effect on the shifting "boundaries of victimhood "-from a comparative viewpoint by examining the approaches that various human rights instruments take to the problem of victims' rights. While the European Convention on Human Rights represents an evolving "middle ground" in the treatment of victims' rights (such recent cases as X. & Y. v. The Netherlands, A. v. United Kingdom, and M.C. v. Bulgaria are examined), only the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court gives real priority to victims of crime with …
Summary Of Carter V. State, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 75, Collin Webster
Summary Of Carter V. State, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 75, Collin Webster
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a judgment of conviction, entered after jury verdict, for one count of attempted sexual assault.
Summary Of Flores V. State Of Nevada, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 72, Patti Ross
Summary Of Flores V. State Of Nevada, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 72, Patti Ross
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Defendant Martha Flores was found guilty of first-degree murder by child abuse of her five-year-old stepdaughter, Zoraida Flores. Postmortem examinations concluded that the child had been physically abused and her death was caused by a blunt-force trauma to the head. Flores resided with her husband, Jose Flores, his five-year-old daughter Zoraida, Flores’ daughters and mother and an infant. Flores was the primary caregiver of the family while Jose worked to support them. On January 28, 2001, emergency medical personnel responded to the Flores’ apartment and provided assistance to Zoraida. They were unable to resuscitate the child. The postmortem examination of …
Summary Of Foster V. State, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 20, Debra L. Pieruschka
Summary Of Foster V. State, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 20, Debra L. Pieruschka
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Troy Anthony Foster, appellant, was charged with four counts of sexual assault and one count of kidnapping. A jury found Foster guilty of three counts of sexual assault and acquitted him on one count of sexual assault and of kidnapping. Foster appealed his conviction asserting five assignments of error. The Nevada Supreme Court rejected Foster’s contentions concluding in part the evidence presented at trial was more than sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. Foster then filed a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus in district court, claiming ineffective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel. The district court …
Summary Of Garcia V. State , Justin L. Carley
Summary Of Garcia V. State , Justin L. Carley
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Ramon Garcia appealed his convictions for: (1) burglary while in possession of a firearm, (2) robbery with the use of a deadly weapon, (3) first-degree kidnapping, 4. conspiracy to commit burglary, (5) another burglary while in the possession of a firearm, 6. conspiracy to commit robbery, (7) attempted robbery with the use of a deadly weapon, and 8. false imprisonment. Garcia argued that: (1) the jury instruction on false imprisonment was improper, (2). the state presented insufficient evidence to support a verdict on kidnapping and false imprisonment, (3) the district court erroneously failed to hold a hearing on his motion …
Summary Of Hymon V. State, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 23, Bryson D. Perkins
Summary Of Hymon V. State, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 23, Bryson D. Perkins
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
In April 2001, Hymon stole a purse from a woman in the lobby of an auto repair shop. He ran, and two of the shop’s mechanics pursued him. They caught up to him when he fell on the curb, but he stood and swung a four- to six-inch long pocketknife. They backed away, allowing him to escape, but the police apprehended him shortly thereafter. After Hymon requested to represent himself, the district court conducted a Faretta canvass,2 and concluded that Hymon was competent to waive his right to counsel. Hymon was uncooperative and unwilling to communicate with the prosecutor, so …
Summary Of State V. District Court (Jackson), 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 4, Kenneth E. Hogan
Summary Of State V. District Court (Jackson), 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 4, Kenneth E. Hogan
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Petitioner, seeking a writ of mandamus, contended that the district court abused its discretion by awarding defendant credit against her prison sentence for time served on house arrest as a condition of bail.
Summary Of Warren V. State, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 84, Charles R. Cordova, Jr.
Summary Of Warren V. State, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 84, Charles R. Cordova, Jr.
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
In November 2003 the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department executed a decoy operation targeting the crime of robbery. An officer was posed on a public street dressed as an intoxicated, off-duty casino dealer with a stack of twenty one-dollar bills visible in his left dress shirt pocket. The defendant approached the officer, made conversation and casually removed the dollar bills while placing his arm around the officer. When the officer acted as though he was turning his head to catch the defendant in the act, the defendant pushed the officer’s head away with his forearm twice. The defendant was arrested …
Reflections On The Essential Role Of Legal Scholarship In Advancing Causes Of Citizen Groups, Nadine Strossen
Reflections On The Essential Role Of Legal Scholarship In Advancing Causes Of Citizen Groups, Nadine Strossen
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Protecting The Innocent: The Massachusetts Governor's Council Report, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Protecting The Innocent: The Massachusetts Governor's Council Report, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Unconstitutionality Of "Hold Until Cleared": Reexamining Material Witness Detentions In The Wake Of The September 11th Dragnet, Ricardo J. Bascuas
The Unconstitutionality Of "Hold Until Cleared": Reexamining Material Witness Detentions In The Wake Of The September 11th Dragnet, Ricardo J. Bascuas
Articles
No abstract provided.
Developmental Incompetence, Due Process, And Juvenile Justice Policy, Elizabeth S. Scott, Thomas Grisso
Developmental Incompetence, Due Process, And Juvenile Justice Policy, Elizabeth S. Scott, Thomas Grisso
Faculty Scholarship
In 2003, the Florida District Court of Appeal reversed the murder conviction and life sentence imposed on Lionel Tate, who was twelve years old when he killed his six-year-old neighbor. Since Lionel was reported to be the youngest person in modern times to be sent to prison for life, the case had generated considerable debate, and the decision was appealed on several grounds. What persuaded the appellate court that the conviction could not stand, however, was the trial court's rejection of a petition by Lionel's attorney for an evaluation of his client's competence to assist counsel and to make a …
Constitutionally Excluded Confessions: Applying America's Lessons To A Democratic Iraq, Joseph T. Thai
Constitutionally Excluded Confessions: Applying America's Lessons To A Democratic Iraq, Joseph T. Thai
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Testimonial Or Nontestimonial? The Admissibility Of Forensic Evidence After Crawford V. Washington, John M. Spires
Testimonial Or Nontestimonial? The Admissibility Of Forensic Evidence After Crawford V. Washington, John M. Spires
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Data Matching, Data Mining, And Due Process, Daniel J. Steinbock
Data Matching, Data Mining, And Due Process, Daniel J. Steinbock
Georgia Law Review
The Article concerns the governmental use of computerized data matching (comparison of records) and data mining (profiling),which increasingly are aimed at locating potential terrorists. The most striking aspect of virtually all anti-terrorist data matching and data mining decisions is the total absence of even the most rudimentary procedures for notice, hearing, or other opportunities for meaningful participation before, or even after, the deprivation is imposed. The Article evaluates under Fourth Amendment and due process standards a variety of law enforcement activities data matching or data mining might instigate. After reviewing these activities' potential effects on private, governmental, and accuracy interests, …