Criminal Procedure Commons^™

Recent Books, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This department undertakes to note or review briefly current books on law and matters closely related thereto.

Constitutional Law-Due Process Clause-Right Of An Accused To Have Counsel Appointed By The Court, Frank H. Roberts

Michigan Law Review

On May 16, 1932, petitioner, then seventeen years of age, was arraigned, tried, convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to life imprisonment. Petitioner was without legal assistance throughout these proceedings, was never advised of his rights to counsel, was never informed of the consequences of a guilty plea and, as disclosed by the record, was considerably confused as to the effect of such plea. In 1945, he moved for leave to file a delayed motion for new trial in the court in which he was convicted, on the ground that there had been serious impairment of his …

Constitutional Law-Search And Seizure, Howard A. Jacobs S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The most important step in the development of this constitutional provision came in 1886 in the famous case of Boyd v. United States. There the Court gave life to the Fourth Amendment by recognizing its intimate relation to the Fifth Amendment; thus laying the foundation for the federal rule that the Fifth Amendment protects every person from incrimination by the use of evidence obtained through search or seizure made in violation of his rights under the Fourth Amendment. With the exception of a temporary setback in 1903, this rule, as restated in the Weeks case, has effectively weathered a …

Declaratory Judgment Where Criminal Action Is Pending, Robert E. Walsh S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Subsequent to the filing of an information against him before a Justice of the Peace by the Secretary of Agriculture of the State of Iowa for violation of the Iowa Cream Grading Act, plaintiff applied to the District Court for an injunction against the proceeding before the Justice, and requested a declaration that he was not subject to the act. The District Court denied the injunction, but issued a decree declaring that plaintiff was not subject to the Cream Grading Act. On appeal, held, affirmed. Where complicated legal issues cannot be determined with equal facility by a Justice of …

Right To A Fair Trial

Indiana Law Journal

Notes and Comments: Criminal Procedure

Conviction Of Perjury As A Disqualification Of A Witness In The State Of Washington, John Lee

Washington Law Review

Has Washington completely abrogated the common law rule which makes any person convicted of an infamous crime an incompetent witness?

Criminal Law And Procedure, Jerome Hall

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law And Procedure-Recent Developments-(A Service For Returning Veterans), John B. Waite

Michigan Law Review

In discussing developments of the criminal law during the war years it is convenient to group them into the three conventional divisions-substantive, procedural, and penal.

Criminal Procedure: Killing Of A Misdemeanant Who Is Forcibly Resisting Arrest, Doyle B. Inman

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law And Procedure-Whether Reversible Error For Judge To Give Instructions Relating To Credibility Of Defendant Witness, Edwin Boos

Michigan Law Review

Appellant who was convicted of committing a criminal abortion, moved for a new trial alleging as error an instruction given by the judge to the jury. The instruction singled out the defendant from the other witnesses, pointing to his high degree of interest in a verdict of not guilty, as reason for scrutinizing his testimony. The judge also warned the jury that it need not accept blindly the testimony of the accused. Held, reversed, new trial ordered. Swanson v. State, (Ind. 1944) 52 N.E. (2d) 616.

Criminal Procedure--Effect Of A Defective Warrant On A Homicide Committed In The Course Of Its Execution, Fred B. Redwine

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure--The Various Drafts, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

In February 1944 the REVIEW carried an article by Dean Harno of the University of Illinois entitled, "Proposed Rules of Criminal Procedure: Final Draft." In a footnote the draft was referred to as "Final Report ( 1943) ." While that issue of the REVIEW was on the press the Advisory Committee distributed a draft of the rules entitled "Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Second Preliminary Draft." In July 1944 a third printing of the proposed rules was circulated. This printing, labeled "Report," is, according to Mr. Holtzhoff, secretary of the committee, "the Final Draft of the Rules." It thus appears …

The Place Of Trial Of Criminal Cases: Constitutional Vicinage And Venue, William Wirt Blume

Michigan Law Review

In 1909 one Henry G. Connor, presumably Mr. Justice Connor of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, published in the Pennsylvania Law Review an article entitled "The Constitutional Right to a Trial by a Jury of the Vicinage." The question discussed was: May a state constitutionally provide by statute that a crime be tried in a county other than that in which it was committed? Or, putting the question in terms of vicinage as distinguished from venue, may a state constitutionally provide by statute that a crime be tried by jurors summoned from a county other than the county …

Criminal Justice In Germany: Ii, Hans Julius Wolff

Michigan Law Review

The trial (Hauptverhandlung) is the main and central part of the whole criminal proceeding. All that is brought forward in the trial and only what is brought forward there can furnish the basis for the verdict. Whatever has preceded the trial proper becomes irrelevant as soon as the trial is opened.

The principles governing the trial are publicity, orality, immediateness, and concentration.

Criminal Justice In Germany, Hans Julius Wolff

Michigan Law Review

Criminal law and procedure, perhaps even more than civil, reflect the underlying conceptions of the political system with which they are connected. The ideological structure of criminal procedure in Germany, as well as in other continental European states, rests on the historical development through which constitutional institutions in those countries have passed since the French Revolution. It mirrors the transformation of the all-powerful state of the period of absolutism into the liberal state with its guaranteed freedoms and rights of the individual and strict legal limits to the power of the authorities (Rechtsstaat); and in recent years it has adapted …

Constitutional Law-Due Process-Punishment For Acts Done Without Consciousness Of Wrongdoing, Benjamin M. Quigg, Jr. S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

In the recent case of United States v. Dotterweich the United States Supreme Court (four justices dissenting) held the president of a drug jobbing company personally liable for violation of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act on informations charging misbranding and adulteration of products. There was no evidence of any personal guilt on the defendant's part, nor was there any proof or claim that he ever knew of the introduction into commerce of the adulterated drugs in question. The disagreement among the members of the court was essentially one of statutory interpretation, but in view of the fact that …

Conclusiveness Of Sheriff's Return

Indiana Law Journal

Procedure Note

Proposed Rules Of Federal Criminal Procedure: Final Draft, Albert J. Harno

Michigan Law Review

In February 1941, the Supreme Court appointed an advisory committee to prepare a draft of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. That committee has made its report to the Court and has presented a final draft of the rules. The adoption of these rules would be a landmark in criminal law administration. The importance of the draft does not lie in the fact that it projects matters that are novel or new, but rather in that it presents in successive provisions, stated in simple language, the best practices in criminal law procedure that have been evolved through experience. Of equal, or …

Perjured Testimony As A Ground For Coram Nobis In Kentucky, Leo E. Oxley

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Rule Of Dying Declarations, Leo E. Oxley

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Proposed Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure, Wendell Berge

Michigan Law Review

The recently published Preliminary Draft of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is now before the bench and bar for discussion. The rules proposed are, of course, tentative. Following a procedure similar to that adopted in the case of the civil rules a few years ago, they have been printed and distributed by the Advisory Committee at this stage for the purpose of obtaining criticisms and suggestions. Some of the rules merely restate existing law as provided by statute or adopted by general agreement in judicial decisions. Others work substantial procedural changes. How is the product to be judged?

Searches And Seizures-The Criterion Of Reasonableness

Michigan Law Review

Epithetical jurisprudence is an easy way out of difficulty. Find some term to the use of which established law has commonly attached a consequence; apply that term to the fact situation at hand; the legal consequence is automatically determined. If it happens that the new fact situation is not quite like those to which the term has previously been applied, the term has unobtrusively acquired a new significance; but the forms of logical decision have been followed. One perennial illustration of that epithetical process is the judicial determination that a particular search or seizure is "reasonable" or "unreasonable" epithets whose …

Witnesses-Privilege Against Self-Incrimination-Effect Of Incorrect Decision By Trial Judge In Compelling Answer When Privilege Asserted

Michigan Law Review

ln a judicial proceeding, a question is asked of a witness, which question he declines to answer, claiming that the answer will tend to incriminate him. The judge orders him to answer. He does so and the answer does incriminate him. What happens?

Habeas Corpus As A Method Of Review-Prohibition-Mandamus

Michigan Law Review

It is a well-settled rule, sustained by innumerable cases, that errors and irregularities committed by a court within the sphere of its jurisdiction cannot be inquired into in habeas corpus proceedings. The reason commonly given for this rule is that such a proceeding is a collateral attack on the judgment, and a collateral attack is necessarily limited to the inquiry whether the court has acted without jurisdiction or has exceeded its jurisdiction.

Constitutional Law - Criminal Law And Procedure - Presence Of Accused During Arguments Of Law, Arthur B. Lathrop

Michigan Law Review

The defendant was indicted for a felony on charges of wilfully attempting to "evade or defeat'' federal income taxes based on his failure to report money allegedly received by him from "backers" of numbers games in exchange for political protection. On cross-examination he was questioned about certain payments made in the year following the ones on which the indictment was based. His attorney objected on the ground that the question was going to be the subject of another indictment against the defendant, and asked that the jury be dismissed while an argument was had upon the point of law raised. …

Character Of Deceased And Uncommunicated Threats By Deceased In Homicide Cases, Henry Howe Bramblet

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Effect Of Comment On Failure Of Defendant To Testify In Kentucky, Robert M. Spragens

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

A Critique Of The Test Of Insanity In Criminal Cases In Kentucky, Carleton M. Davis

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Evidence: Effect Of Conviction In Subsequent Civil Suit, Henry Howe Bramblet

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Further On Appeals By The State In Criminal Cases State V. Rosen

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.