Criminal Procedure Commons^™

Evidence - Rules Of Evidence In Disbarment, Habeas Corpus, And Grand Jury Proceedings, Paul S. Gerding S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

It is the purpose of this comment to examine three common-law proceedings in which rules of evidence are generally not governed by statute, to determine whether the liberalism expressed in administrative hearings has extended to non-statutory areas. Specifically, to what extent have the exclusionary rules of evidence, which rest on the theory of preventing the jury from being misled (the "jury theory"), been abandoned in disbarment, habeas corpus, and grand jury proceedings?

Evidence - Rules Of Evidence In Disbarment, Habeas Corpus, And Grand Jury Proceedings, Paul S. Gerding S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

It is the purpose of this comment to examine three common-law proceedings in which rules of evidence are generally not governed by statute, to determine whether the liberalism expressed in administrative hearings has extended to non-statutory areas. Specifically, to what extent have the exclusionary rules of evidence, which rest on the theory of preventing the jury from being misled (the "jury theory"), been abandoned in disbarment, habeas corpus, and grand jury proceedings?

The Judge's Responsibility On A Plea Of Guilty, William J. Thompson

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law--Plea Of Guilty--"Jurisdictional Facts", J. Mc K.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law - Due Process And Right Of Confrontation- Jencks Act, Robert J. Margolin S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The Jencks Act like the rule it purportedly reaffirmed, was designed to insure "justice." Although the stated purpose of the act was to preserve the rights of any defendant under due process of law, the question remains unresolved whether, in articulating the rule in terms of "justice," the Court in Jencks v. United States incorporated it into the requirements of due process. To be sure, the underlying intent of both the Court and Congress is unclear, but of far more concern than the intent is whether the Jencks Act, in fact, violates the constitutional mandates of the Fifth and Sixth …

Admissibility In Criminal Cases Of Evidence Of Other Sex Offenses

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Duty Of Military Defense Counsel To An Accused, Alfred Avins

Michigan Law Review

This article is designed to study the manner in which those Canons of Professional Ethics have been assimilated into the administration of military justice and made the standards for the duty of a military defense counsel.

Waiver Of Trial Jury In Felony Cases In Kentucky, Billy R. Paxton

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Criminal Procedure--Search And Seizure--Admissibility Of Evidence Obtained In Search Incidental To Arrest Without A Warrant, Carl R. Clontz

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Suppression Of Evidence In Criminal Tax Proceedings, Jacob W. Mayer

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Supreme Court - October 1958 Term, Bernard Schwartz

Michigan Law Review

The Supreme Court, reads a famous passage by Bryce, "feels the touch of public opinion. Opinion is stronger in America than anywhere else in the world, and judges are only men. To yield a little may be prudent, for the tree that cannot bend to the blast may be broken."

The history of the highest Court bears constant witness to the truth of Bryce's statement. Supreme Court action which has moved too far in one direction has always ultimately provoked an equivalent reaction in the opposite direction. Even an institution as august as the high tribunal cannot escape the law …

Confessions And Criminal Procedure—A Proposal, George Neff Stevens

Washington Law Review

The time has come to review in the light of United States Supreme Court decisions the procedures presently employed by state courts in testing the voluntariness of confessions in criminal cases. If these procedures be wanting, new procedures should be and must be devised which will give promise of assuring compliance with the standards established by these United States Supreme Court decisions.

Criminal Law And Procedure--1959 Tennessee Survey, Robert E. Kendrick

Vanderbilt Law Review

Conspiracy--Cline v. State was an appeal from a conviction of a conspiracy to dynamite and destroy a public school building in Clinton, Tennessee, in violation of a statute making it a felony for two or more persons to agree "to commit an illegal act capable of producing conditions destructive to life or property.. ." by possessing, transporting or using explosives. Three men, D1, D2 and D3, had been indicated; but, before defendants were put to trial, the state entered a "nolle prosequi" against D1, who became a state's witness. Afterwards, D2 was acquitted in the same trial in which D3, …

Compulsory Attendance Of Nonresident Witnesses, J. D. Mcd.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Prosecutor Indiscretion: A Result Of Political Influence

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Evidence - Character Testimony - Impeachment Through Reference To Prior Specific Acts Of Defendant, Lawrence E. Blades S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Defendant, on trial for arson, presented a character witness who testified that defendant's reputation in the community was good. During cross-examination the prosecutor asked if the witness had heard that defendant had been arrested for or convicted of various specific crimes in other states. No objection was made by the defense, and the trial judge took no action. The witness answered no to each question, and subsequently a jury verdict of guilty was returned. On appeal, held, reversed and remanded, three judges dissenting. Failure of the trial judge, before allowing such cross-examination, to ascertain on his own motion and …

Attendance Of Out-Of-State Witnesses In Criminal Trials

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Multiple Prosecutions, Collateral Estoppel And The Constitution

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, L. S. D.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Should The Admissibility Of Dying Declarations In Evidence Be Limited To Homicide Cases, J. C. W. Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Maryland Version Of The Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act, With Special Reference To The Writ Of Habeas Corpus, John D. Alexander Jr.

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Presence Of Accused At Trial Necessary - Kidnapping And False Imprisonment Differentiated - Midgett V. State, Beverly R. Williford

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law - Criminal Procedure - Successive State Prosecutions For Same Activity, Robert L. Bombaugh

Michigan Law Review

Petitioner suspected of having robbed five persons on a single occasion. was indicted and tried for the robbery of three of them. His sole defense was alibi and he was acquitted when only one of the five victims identified him as the robber. Petitioner was then tried under an indictment for the robbery of a fourth victim. Petitioner interposed the same defense but was convicted at this second trial. The New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed. On certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, held, affirmed, three justices dissenting. Neither the successive trials nor the failure of the court to …

Recent Decision Note, Thomas L. Shaffer

Journal Articles

Petitioner was arrested without a warrant by a federal narcotics agent. Sole justification for the arrest, pursuant to the Narcotics Control Act of 1956, was information from a paid informer of the Narcotics Bureau who had proved reliable during six months of association with arresting officers. The informer's description of the petitioner, including dress, baggage, and manner of walking, and his prediction of the petitioner's time of arrival at the point of arrest, were detailed and accurate. The arresting officers searched petitioner immediately after the arrest and seized narcotics and implements used in narcotics addiction. At trial petitioner moved to …

Book Review, Lee E. Skeel

Cleveland State Law Review

Reviewing Equal Justice for the Accused, Doubleday and Company, 1959

The Discovery And Production Of Grand Jury Proceedings - United States V. The Proctor And Gamble Company Et Al., Joseph A. Matera

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Is The Grand Jury Necessary?, James P. Whyte Jr.

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Capital Punishment Reconsidered, William O. Reichert

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Change Of Venue And Venire In Kentucky, Jerry Fuller

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Criminal Procedure--Right To Counsel Prior To Trial, G. D. G.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.