Criminal Procedure Commons^™

Volume 09 (Part 1 Of 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 07 (Part 1 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 06 (Part 1), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 05 (Part 1 Of 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 02 (Part 1 Of 6), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 01 (Part 1 Of 5), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 07 (Part 2 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 06 (Part 3 Of 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Criminal Procedure, 1969 - Is It A Means Or An End?, Erwin N. Griswold

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Effect Of Mathis On Right To Counsel In Tax Investigations, Norvie L. Lay

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Bail As A Preferred Freedom And The Failures Of New York's Revision, Neil Fabricant

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law—Denial Of Counsel And Failure To Provide Adequate Warnings Regarding Constitutional Rights Have Important Bearing On Confessions Which Are Tested Under The Totality Of Circumstances., Edwin H. Wolf

Buffalo Law Review

Greenwald v. Wisconsin, 390 U.S. 519 (1968).

Journalistic Media And Fair Trial, William M. Ware, Gerard D. Dimarco

Cleveland State Law Review

The rights of an accused to a fair trial, and freedom of the press, both are fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution. Yet these constitutional guarantees, in collision, present one of the most critical current conflicts in the administration of criminal justice. The problem involves what is presently called "prejudicial news reporting" -news which is prejudicial to the right of the defendant to a fair trial. This paper will try to analyze this conflict, hoping to reach some conclusions which will ultimately aid in the administration of justice without abridging the rights of any parties involved.

Criminal Justice In Extremis: Administration Of Justice During The April 1968 Chicago Disorder, Mark N. Aaronson

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Juvenile Justice - Unlawful Extrajudicial Confession Excluded Under Miranda - Testimonial In-Court Confession "Impelled" By The Admission Of The Invalid Confession Into Evidence. In Re Teters. (Cal. 1958), Edward J. Pulaski Jr.

San Diego Law Review

This recent case discusses In re Teters. (Cal. 1958).

Police Warning In Drunk Driver Tests, Richard Galex

Cleveland State Law Review

Recently, the Supreme Court specifically declined to consider the applicability of Miranda to motor vehicle cases in general. The various state courts are now being called upon to decide the extent of its application and, in particular, whether the Miranda mandate controls in misdemeanor proceedings. This article examines the present status of Miranda in relation to drinking driver traffic offenses as interpreted by the various courts, and the necessity of extending the rule to these offenses.

The Legitimation Of Electronic Eavesdropping: The Politics Of "Law And Order", Herman Schwartz

Michigan Law Review

This Article will examine some constitutional considerations raised by wiretapping and eavesdropping in light of recent Supreme Court decisions, the probable extent of such activity, the limitations imposed upon it by title III and the ABA Standards, and the arguments for the "necessity" of electronic surveillance. Finally, a few jaundiced comments will be offered about legislative and judicial lawmaking in the field of criminal justice, particularly in a time of crisis.

Sentencing: The Good, The Bad And The Enlightened, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr., Bill Cunningham

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Capital Punishment: A Model For Reform, Charles E. Glasscock

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Criminal Insanity Procedures In Kentucky, James Whitlow

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Confessions--Right To Counsel Before Trial: The Indigent Defendant, Roy Mitchell Moreland

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Criminal Procedure--Constitutional Limitations On Imposition Of More Severe Sentence After Conviction Upon Retrial, W. Stokes Harris Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Interstate Rendition: Rights And Remedies Of The Accused Seeking Asylum In Massachusetts, Gene R. Shreve

Articles by Maurer Faculty

The subject of Interstate Rendition is one of conspicuous unfamiliarity to the average Massachusetts lawyer. Yet, as this article indicates, the rendition hearing presents a valuable opportunity to alert defense counsel to assist the accused at a critical stage of the criminal proceeding. The author, a graduate of Harvard Law School is presently law clerk to United States District Judge Sara/h T. Hughes of the Northern District of Texas. He formerly served as Massachusetts Assistant Attorney General where he presided at numerous rendition hearings conducted by the Department of the Attorney General for the Governor.

"Uncontrollable" Actions And The Eighth Amendment: Implications Of Powell V. Texas, Kent Greenawalt

Faculty Scholarship

No questions of criminal justice are more fundamental than the bases for imposing criminal punishment, yet the Federal Constitution says nothing explicit about them. It is, therefore, understandable that the increasing limitations imposed by constitutional interpretation upon procedures for ascertaining criminal guilt have not been accompanied by similar limits upon principles of criminal responsibility. That the difference in treatment is understandable does not, of course, necessarily mean it has been justified.

When the Court struck down a law punishing addiction in Robinson v. California in 1962, it was still unclear whether it was willing to become significantly implicated in developing …

James V. Headley: Right To Counsel For Petty Offenses

Georgia Law Review

The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the case of James v. Headley' was confronted with the question of whether an accused is entitled to court-appointed counsel when charged only with a "petty offense," that is, an offense carrying a maximum penalty of six months in jail and/or a $500 fine. Basing its decision on the sixth amendment,the court concluded that the two appellants were entitled to have court appointed counsel. The court, in an opinion by Judge Wisdom, held that as a general proposition, there is a sixth amendment right to counsel for any defendant in a …

Jury Consideration Of Parole, Fernand N. Dutile

Journal Articles

Under our system of criminal justice, a jury faces two basic decisions: the determination of guilt and, in many cases, the selection of an appropriate penalty for the convicted. In both instances the jurors' impressions of the parole system could be crucial. For example, the jury's notion—correct or incorrect—that the defendant will be eligible for parole very quickly if sentenced to prison may cause it to compromise on the issue of guilt. In cases where the jury has discretion in setting the penalty, this notion may seduce it into selecting the death penalty over life imprisonment.

There are additional problems …

A Goal-Oriented Model Code Of Pre-Arraignment Procedure For Wisconsin, Cyril D. Robinson

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

In this article we analyze the arrest chapter of the proposed code as it was substantially completed at the time the project was terminated, although it has been updated to accommodate relevant recent case law. We examine the need for guiding principles in drafting a code, the proper aims and organization of the code, the proposed provisions of the arrest chapter, and the law and practice which recommend both the principles and the provisions.

Criminal Law--Plea Bargaining, Larry Andrew Winter

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reflections From A Different Perspective, B. J. George Jr.

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

A signal fact of the 1960's is the widespread attention being paid to modernization of America's criminal law and procedure. After nearly a century of patchwork adjustments of state codes or fragmentary modification of the common law, the federal government and a great many states are moving toward new substantive codes and new codes or rules of criminal procedure. As one who has been working as a reporter in Michigan's endeavor to revise its criminal law and procedure, I have been asked to comment in a general way on Mr. Robinson's effort at reforming Wisconsin law.

The Warren Court And Criminal Procedure, A. Kenneth Pye

Michigan Law Review

On October 5, 1953, Earl Warren became Chief Justice of the United States. During the fifteen years of his tenure as Chief Justice, fundamental changes in criminal procedure have resulted· from decisions of what is popularly called "the Warren Court." There may be a legitimate difference of opinion whether these changes constitute a "criminal law revolution" or merely an orderly evolution toward the application of civilized standards to the trial of persons accused of crime. Whatever the characterization, however, there can be little doubt that the developments of the past fifteen years have unalterably changed the course of .the administration …