Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Fourth Amendment (74)
- Constitutional Law (72)
- Criminal Law (55)
- Privacy Law (50)
- Science and Technology Law (30)
-
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (25)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (22)
- Evidence (22)
- Supreme Court of the United States (20)
- Courts (19)
- Internet Law (19)
- Law and Society (19)
- State and Local Government Law (18)
- Computer Law (15)
- Legislation (11)
- Civil Procedure (10)
- First Amendment (10)
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (10)
- Fourteenth Amendment (9)
- Judges (9)
- Civil Law (8)
- Communications Law (8)
- Human Rights Law (8)
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Law and Race (8)
- Legal Remedies (8)
- Litigation (8)
- Institution
-
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (17)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (14)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (9)
- BLR (8)
- Seattle University School of Law (7)
-
- Pepperdine University (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- St. John's University School of Law (5)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- California Western School of Law (3)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (3)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- National Law School of India University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Universitas Indonesia (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (14)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Faculty Articles (11)
- ExpressO (8)
- Seattle University Law Review (7)
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- Other Faculty Publications (5)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (4)
- Publications (4)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (3)
- Catholic University Law Review (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (2)
- School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events (2)
- St. John's Law Review (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence (1)
- FIU Law Review (1)
- Faculty Books and Book Chapters (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 128 of 128
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Robbins, Belton And Ross: Reconsideration Of Bright Line Rules For Warrantless Container Searches, Christopher J. St. John
Robbins, Belton And Ross: Reconsideration Of Bright Line Rules For Warrantless Container Searches, Christopher J. St. John
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note analyzes the development of these warrantless container search and seizure exceptions to furnish a comprehensive review of their justifications. The major focus is on the underlying rationale of Belton and Ross and the possible ramifications of such far-reaching warrant exceptions. The Note recommends that state courts interpret their state constitutions to allow the less drastic alternative of warrantless seizures of certain containers rather than warrantless searches as permitted by Belton and Ross under the federal Constitution. In addition, an analytic methodology for isolating interrelated yet distinct search and seizure questions is proposed. Initially, a general background of fourth …
Criminal Law–Arrest Without A Warrant–A Man's Home Is His Castle, Nancy Marian Epperson
Criminal Law–Arrest Without A Warrant–A Man's Home Is His Castle, Nancy Marian Epperson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Privacy And The Presentence Report, William P. Mclauchlan
Privacy And The Presentence Report, William P. Mclauchlan
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Constitution And Contempt Of Court, Ronald Goldfarb
The Constitution And Contempt Of Court, Ronald Goldfarb
Michigan Law Review
Few legal devices find conflict within the lines of our Constitution with the ubiquity of the contempt power. These conflicts involve issues concerning the governmental power structure such as the separation of powers and the delicate balancing of federal-state relations. In addition, there are civil rights issues attributable to the conflict between the use of the contempt power and such vital procedural protections as the right to trial by jury, freedom from self-incrimination, double jeopardy, and indictment-to name only the most recurrent and controversial examples. Aside from these problems, there are other civil liberties issues, such as those involving freedom …
Legislation - Federal Criminal Procedure - Modification Of Jencks Decision, Raymond J. Dittrich, Jr. S.Ed.
Legislation - Federal Criminal Procedure - Modification Of Jencks Decision, Raymond J. Dittrich, Jr. S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant was convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. §1001. During the trial, the court denied defendant's motion to order the government to produce for defendant's inspection reports submitted by government witnesses to government agents. The reports dealt with the same subject about which these witnesses later testified. The court of appeals affirmed the decision. On certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, held, reversed, one justice dissenting. The government has a privilege to refuse to surrender statements made by its prospective witnesses, but it may claim the privilege only at the expense of a dismissal of its case …