Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (160)
- Supreme Court of the United States (109)
- Fourth Amendment (106)
- Criminal Law (105)
- Constitutional Law (97)
-
- Evidence (64)
- Courts (55)
- State and Local Government Law (39)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (29)
- Jurisprudence (27)
- Law and Society (27)
- Law and Race (24)
- Judges (22)
- Legal History (16)
- Fourteenth Amendment (15)
- Legal Profession (12)
- Privacy Law (11)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (10)
- Civil Procedure (9)
- Legislation (9)
- Litigation (9)
- Science and Technology Law (9)
- Civil Law (8)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (8)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (8)
- Human Rights Law (7)
- Law and Gender (7)
- Law and Psychology (7)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (126)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (31)
- American University Washington College of Law (10)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (10)
- University of Colorado Law School (8)
-
- New York Law School (7)
- Boston University School of Law (5)
- Pepperdine University (5)
- St. John's University School of Law (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- Barry University School of Law (3)
- Georgia State University College of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- St. Mary's University (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- University of South Carolina (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- BLR (2)
- Bemidji State University (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Emory University School of Law (2)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Articles (50)
- Michigan Law Review (43)
- Touro Law Review (28)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (13)
- Book Chapters (10)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (9)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (9)
- Publications (8)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- NYLS Law Review (6)
- Cardozo Law Review (5)
- Pepperdine Law Review (5)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (4)
- Seattle University Law Review (4)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Georgia State University Law Review (3)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (3)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (3)
- Michigan Law Review Online (3)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (3)
- Reviews (3)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Barry Law Review (2)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (2)
- Emory Law Journal (2)
- ExpressO (2)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 210 of 285
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Privacy's Problem And The Law Of Criminal Procedure, William J. Stuntz
Privacy's Problem And The Law Of Criminal Procedure, William J. Stuntz
Michigan Law Review
Part I of this article addresses the connection between privacy-based limits on police authority and substantive limits on government power as a general matter. Part II briefly addresses the effects of that connection on Fourth and Fifth Amendment law, both past and present. Part ID suggests that privacy protection has a deeper problem: it tends to obscure more serious harms that attend police misconduct, harms that flow not from information disclosure but from the police use of force. The upshot is that criminal procedure would be better off with less attention to privacy, at least as privacy is defined in …
Fifth Amendment First Principles: The Self-Incrimination Clause, Akhil Reed Amar, Renée B. Lettow
Fifth Amendment First Principles: The Self-Incrimination Clause, Akhil Reed Amar, Renée B. Lettow
Michigan Law Review
In Part I of this article, we examine the global puzzle of the Self-Incrimination Clause and the local confusion or perversion lurking behind virtually every key word and phrase in the clause as now construed. In Part II we elaborate our reading of the clause and show how it clears up the local problems and solves the overall puzzle.
Response: The Problems With Privacy's Problem, Louis Michael Seidman
Response: The Problems With Privacy's Problem, Louis Michael Seidman
Michigan Law Review
A Response to William J. Stuntz's "Privacy's Problem and the Law of Criminal Procedure"
Reply, William J. Stuntz
Reply, William J. Stuntz
Michigan Law Review
A Reply to Louis Michael Seidman's Response
On The 'Fruits' Of Miranda Violations, Coerced Confessions, And Compelled Testimony, Yale Kamisar
On The 'Fruits' Of Miranda Violations, Coerced Confessions, And Compelled Testimony, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Ms. Renee B. Lettow have written a lively, provocative article that will keep many of us who teach constitutional-criminal procedure busy for years to come. They present a reconception of the "first principles" of the Fifth Amendment, and they suggest a dramatic reconstruction of criminal procedure. As a part of that reconstruction, they propose, inter alia, that at a pretrial hearing presided over by a judicial officer, the government should be empowered to compel a suspect, under penalty of contempt, to provide links in the chain of evidence needed to convict him.
The Warren Court And Criminal Justice: A Quarter-Century Retrospective, Yale Kamisar
The Warren Court And Criminal Justice: A Quarter-Century Retrospective, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Many commentators have observed that when we speak of "the Warren Court," we mean the Warren Court that lasted from 1962 (when Arthur Goldberg replaced Felix Frankfurter) to 1969 (when Earl Warren retired). But when we speak of the Warren Court's "revolution" in American criminal procedure we mean the Warren Court that lasted from 1961 (when the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio was decided) to 1966 or 1967. In its final years, the Warren Court was not the same Court that had handed down Mapp or Miranda v. Arizona.
Taking The Fifth: Reconsidering The Origins Of The Constitutional Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, Eben Moglen
Taking The Fifth: Reconsidering The Origins Of The Constitutional Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, Eben Moglen
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this essay is to cast doubt on two basic elements of the received historical wisdom concerning the privilege as it applies to British North America and the early United States. First, early American criminal procedure reflected less tenderness toward the silence of the criminal accused than the received wisdom has claimed. The system could more reasonably be said to have depended on self-incrimination than to have eschewed it, and this dependence increased rather than decreased during the provincial period for reasons intimately connected with the economic and social context of the criminal trial in colonial America.
Second, …
When Terry Met Miranda: Two Constitutional Doctrines Collide, Mark A. Godsey
When Terry Met Miranda: Two Constitutional Doctrines Collide, Mark A. Godsey
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
No abstract provided.
How Reasonable Is The Reasonable Man?: Police And Excessive Force, Geoffrey P. Alpert, William C. Smith
How Reasonable Is The Reasonable Man?: Police And Excessive Force, Geoffrey P. Alpert, William C. Smith
Faculty Publications
The authority of the police to use force represents one of the most misunderstood powers granted to representatives of government. Police officers are authorized to use both psychological and physical force to apprehend criminals and solve crimes. This Article focuses on issues of physical force. After a brief introduction and a review of current legal issues in the use of force, the Article discusses "reasonableness" and the unrealistic expectation which is placed on police to understand, interpret, and follow vague "reasonableness" guidelines. Until the expectations and limitations on the use of force are clarified, in behavioral terms, police officers will …
The Emerging International Consensus As To Criminal Procedure Rules, Craig M. Bradley
The Emerging International Consensus As To Criminal Procedure Rules, Craig M. Bradley
Michigan Journal of International Law
This article will demonstrate that these general claims, as well as certain observations about specific countries, were, with one significant exception, substantially wrong when they were written. More importantly, due to significant developments in several countries in the years since those reports came out, they are even more wrong now. That is, not only have the U.S. concepts of pre-interrogation warnings to suspects, a search warrant requirement, and the use of an exclusionary remedy to deter police misconduct been widely adopted, but in many cases other countries have gone beyond the U.S. requirements.
The Special Relationship Rule: Is It Consistent With The Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity? - A Study Of Kircher V. City Of Jamestown, Brian T. Cohen
The Special Relationship Rule: Is It Consistent With The Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity? - A Study Of Kircher V. City Of Jamestown, Brian T. Cohen
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evaluating The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule: The Problem Of Police Compliance With The Law, William C. Heffernan, Richard W. Lovely
Evaluating The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule: The Problem Of Police Compliance With The Law, William C. Heffernan, Richard W. Lovely
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Part I of this article reviews background matters bearing on our research - in particular, we discuss the Court's framework for analyzing exclusion as a deterrent safeguard, the research questions that need to be raised within that framework, and the research strategy we adopted in light of the Court's approach to exclusion. Part II analyzes our findings on police knowledge of the rules of search and seizure. Part III analyzes our findings on officers' willingness to obey the law. Part IV evaluates our findings in light of policy questions concerning the exclusionary rule. We consider whether the Court should retain …
Jurisdiction Of The County Court
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interaction Between State And Federal Right To Counsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeounsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeo, Joseph D. Sullivan
Interaction Between State And Federal Right To Counsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeounsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeo, Joseph D. Sullivan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.