Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (124)
- Constitutional Law (122)
- Courts (55)
- Fourteenth Amendment (51)
- Supreme Court of the United States (41)
-
- Evidence (38)
- State and Local Government Law (34)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (25)
- Judges (24)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (22)
- Fourth Amendment (19)
- Legal History (18)
- Jurisprudence (15)
- Law and Society (15)
- International Law (13)
- Human Rights Law (11)
- Law and Race (11)
- Legislation (11)
- Civil Procedure (9)
- Jurisdiction (9)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (8)
- Litigation (8)
- National Security Law (8)
- Juvenile Law (7)
- Rule of Law (7)
- Common Law (6)
- Conflict of Laws (6)
- Law and Politics (6)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (53)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (43)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (10)
- Cleveland State University (8)
- Columbia Law School (7)
-
- Roger Williams University (6)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- BLR (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- Pepperdine University (5)
- The University of Akron (5)
- University of Kentucky (5)
- University of Maine School of Law (5)
- University of Richmond (5)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (3)
- University of Missouri School of Law (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (40)
- Michigan Law Review (34)
- Articles (16)
- Faculty Scholarship (11)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (8)
-
- Publications (6)
- Akron Law Review (5)
- ExpressO (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Kentucky Law Journal (5)
- Maine Law Review (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (4)
- Cleveland State Law Review (4)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Pepperdine Law Review (4)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Brooklyn Law Review (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Journal Publications (2)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 231 of 231
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Use Of Habeas Corpus To Allow Federal Court To Review State Court Jury Determination Of Voluntariness Of Confession, Herbert R. Brown S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Use Of Habeas Corpus To Allow Federal Court To Review State Court Jury Determination Of Voluntariness Of Confession, Herbert R. Brown S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The prisoner had been convicted of murder in the state court. He brought a habeas corpus proceeding in federal district court to secure his release from custody on the ground that the conviction was based on a confession which was obtained by physical violence. The confession had been submitted to the jury, which was instructed to consider it only if it found that it was not obtained by duress or fear produced by threats. The district court granted the writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, held, affirmed. The district court could determine the facts of the case for itself. …
Constitutional Law - Public Trial In Criminal Cases, Carl S. Krueger S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Public Trial In Criminal Cases, Carl S. Krueger S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The criminal trial has been traditionally open to the public in Anglo-Saxon procedure, as it was in Roman and other civilized societies of an earlier time. The public trial of today, however, has been subjected to considerable criticism on the ground that there is a tendency for criminal trials to degenerate into public spectacles, frequently interrupting the orderly procedure of justice, and not infrequently actually prejudicing the accused. If no useful purpose is served by the presence of the idle public during the deadly serious determination of guilt or innocence, should not the judge, subject to the right of admittance …
Evidence-Confessions-Mcnabb Rule Not Applicable Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Harry T. Baumann S.Ed.
Evidence-Confessions-Mcnabb Rule Not Applicable Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Harry T. Baumann S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, detained on a vagrancy charge in Texas, voluntarily confessed to a homicide committed in Nebraska. Upon his return to the latter state, the defendant repeated his confession and was subsequently arraigned, having been in custody for twenty-five days. The confessions were introduced at the trial and a conviction of manslaughter followed. Defendant, failing to gain a reversal in the state court, sought review by the United States Supreme Court, charging that a failure to arraign the defendant promptly in breach of local statutes was a want of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. On certiorari, held, affirmed, Justices …
The Writ Of Error Coram Nobis--Kentucky's Answer To The Expanding Federal Concept Of Procedural Due Process In Criminal Cases, John W. Sublett
The Writ Of Error Coram Nobis--Kentucky's Answer To The Expanding Federal Concept Of Procedural Due Process In Criminal Cases, John W. Sublett
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judgments - Double Jeopardy - Res Judicata - Effect Of Prior Conviction Or Acquittal On Subsequent Suit For Statutory Penalty Or Forfeiture, Edward W. Rothe S.Ed.
Judgments - Double Jeopardy - Res Judicata - Effect Of Prior Conviction Or Acquittal On Subsequent Suit For Statutory Penalty Or Forfeiture, Edward W. Rothe S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The case of United States v. One De Soto Sedan has again focused attention on some of the perplexing problems raised by the statutory imposition of both criminal and civil sanctions for the same wrongful act. The court held that an acquittal in a criminal prosecution for possessing liquor on which no federal tax had been paid was a bar to a civil in rem proceeding to forfeit claimant's car as having been used in the removal, deposit and concealment of the same liquor with intent to defraud the United States of taxes. Since the two proceedings involved the same …
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Use Of Extraneous Evidence In Determining Criminal Sentence, Colvin A. Peterson, Jr. S. Ed.
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Use Of Extraneous Evidence In Determining Criminal Sentence, Colvin A. Peterson, Jr. S. Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner was convicted of murder in the first degree with a recommendation for life imprisonment. In reliance on police and probation reports showing petitioner's background which included over thirty burglaries for which he had never been arraigned and a "morbid sexuality," the trial judge disregarded the jury's recommendation and imposed the death sentence. Although petitioner did not have an opportunity to examine the reports prior to the sentence hearing, he was represented by counsel at the hearing and did not challenge them at that time. Petitioner contended that he had been denied due process of law because his sentence had …
Habeas Corpus-Inadequacy Of State Remedy, Joseph Gricar
Habeas Corpus-Inadequacy Of State Remedy, Joseph Gricar
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner had pleaded guilty to a criminal indictment and was sentenced to prison by an Illinois circuit court. His petition for a writ of habeas corpus, based upon an alleged denial of due process at trial, was denied without hearing. The Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Loftus, decided in 1949, seems squarely to have held that habeas corpus is a proper post-trial proceeding for hearing charges of denial of due process. Since the Illinois Supreme Court does not review habeas corpus proceedings in the circuit court, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. Held, remanded to the …
Constitutional Law-Due Process Of Law-Freedom From Unreasonable Search And Seizure-The Admissibility Of Illegally Seized Evidence, Bernard Goldstone S.Ed.
Constitutional Law-Due Process Of Law-Freedom From Unreasonable Search And Seizure-The Admissibility Of Illegally Seized Evidence, Bernard Goldstone S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Local police officers entered the private office of petitioner, a practising physician, without a warrant and seized his private books and records. As a result of the information thus obtained, petitioner was convicted of conspiracy to perform an abortion. Petitioner claimed that his constitutional rights were invaded contending that due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment includes freedom from unreasonable search and seizure and prevents the admission of illegally seized evidence, but this was denied by the Supreme Court of Colorado and the conviction was affirmed. On certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States, held, affirmed, …
Appeal And Error-Eisler's Flight And The Case And Controversy Question, Albert B. Perlin, Jr. S.Ed.
Appeal And Error-Eisler's Flight And The Case And Controversy Question, Albert B. Perlin, Jr. S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review a federal court conviction on a charge of contempt of Congress. Pending determination of the appeal, appellant was released on bail and, after argument on the merits but before a decision had been rendered, he wrongfully fled the country. Subsequently the Attorney General notified the Court that appellant had been apprehended in England at the request of the Secretary of State and that a court of competent jurisdiction there found that appellant was not guilty of an extraditable offense under English law. The Court of its own motion then considered the …
Evidence-Federal Criminal Procedure-Admissibility Of Confession Obtained During Illegal Detention, William F. Snyder S. Ed.
Evidence-Federal Criminal Procedure-Admissibility Of Confession Obtained During Illegal Detention, William F. Snyder S. Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner was arrested without a warrant on suspicion of larceny. He was held without commitment for a period of thirty hours during which he was intermittently questioned but was not subjected to any form of physical coercion. At the end of this period, he signed a confession which was the basis for his conviction in the district court. On certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, following affirmation in the court of appeals, held, reversed. The detention was unlawful as a violation of rule 5 (a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the confession thus obtained was …
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Federal Right To Counsel In Non-Capital Cases In State Courts, J. D. Mcleod
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Federal Right To Counsel In Non-Capital Cases In State Courts, J. D. Mcleod
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner was convicted in Illinois on pleas of guilty to two indictments charging him with a non-capital offense. On writ of error to the Supreme Court of Illinois, petitioner alleged that the trial court had not inquired into his desire or ability to have counsel and that he had been convicted without having had assistance of counsel. His contention that the circumstances alleged constituted a violation of the State and Federal Constitutions was overruled, and the judgments of the lower court affirmed. On certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, held affirmed. The due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment …
Habeas Corpus-Federal Courts-Exhaustion Of State Remedies, E. W. Rothe, Jr.
Habeas Corpus-Federal Courts-Exhaustion Of State Remedies, E. W. Rothe, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner's writ of habeas corpus, alleging denial of due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, was quashed on the merits by an inferior Florida court whose action was affirmed without opinion by the Florida Supreme Court. It was impossible to ascertain whether the affirmance was on the merits or on the ground that, under Florida law, habeas corpus was not the proper procedure to raise the due process issue. A later decision by the Florida Supreme Court clearly established that the prior case had been decided on the merits of the constitutional question, and that habeas corpus …
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Right Of Prisoner Condemned To Death To Hearing On His Sanity, E. Blythe Stason Jr.
Constitutional Law-Due Process-Right Of Prisoner Condemned To Death To Hearing On His Sanity, E. Blythe Stason Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner, sentenced to death in California for murder, obtained a judicial stay of execution on the ground that he had become insane since sentence had been passed. Eighteen days later he was certified as sane by the medical superintendent of the state hospital, who made this determination by an ex parte examination without giving petitioner notice or opportunity of hearing. A new date for execution was then set. The applicable statute provided a procedure, enforceable by mandamus, whereby a sentenced prisoner could obtain a hearing on his sanity. The petitioner, without seeking mandamus to compel the warden to act, applied …
Criminal Law-Withdrawal Of A Plea Of Guilty, Andrew W. Lockton, Iii S.Ed.
Criminal Law-Withdrawal Of A Plea Of Guilty, Andrew W. Lockton, Iii S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of statutory rape. After questioning him the court accepted his plea, and sentence was deferred pending an investigation by the probation and psychopathic departments. Before being sentenced, defendant requested that his plea be changed but did not deny that he was guilty. The court refused his request and sentenced him. Held, defendant should have been allowed to withdraw his plea of guilty. People v. Anderson, 321 Mich. 533, 33 N.W. (2d) 72 (1948).
Criminal Law-New Trial-Absence Of Accused From Trial Because Of Attorney's Negligence, Alan Goldstein
Criminal Law-New Trial-Absence Of Accused From Trial Because Of Attorney's Negligence, Alan Goldstein
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, represented by an attorney, was ordered, under an appearance bond, to appear at the November term of the court of general sessions to answer to an indictment for assault and battery with intent to kill. The indictment was not prepared during the November term, and at the end of the term the court ordered all those whose cases were not called to appear at the next term of court. At the February term defendant's case came up, but his attorney had apparently failed to read the court calendar, as neither the defendant nor the attorney knew that the trial …
Joughin And Morgan: The Legacy Of Sacco And Vanzetti, Michigan Law Review
Joughin And Morgan: The Legacy Of Sacco And Vanzetti, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of THE LEGACY OF SACCO AND VANZETTI. By G. Louis Joughin and Edmund M. Morgan.
Constitutional Law - Criminal Law And Procedure - Presence Of Accused During Arguments Of Law, Arthur B. Lathrop
Constitutional Law - Criminal Law And Procedure - Presence Of Accused During Arguments Of Law, Arthur B. Lathrop
Michigan Law Review
The defendant was indicted for a felony on charges of wilfully attempting to "evade or defeat'' federal income taxes based on his failure to report money allegedly received by him from "backers" of numbers games in exchange for political protection. On cross-examination he was questioned about certain payments made in the year following the ones on which the indictment was based. His attorney objected on the ground that the question was going to be the subject of another indictment against the defendant, and asked that the jury be dismissed while an argument was had upon the point of law raised. …
Recent Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Recent Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The abstracts consist merely of summaries of the facts and holdings of recent cases and are distinguished from the notes by the absence of discussion.
Criminal Law And Procedure - Remedies Available To Convicted Defendant When New Facts Are Found, Smith Warder
Criminal Law And Procedure - Remedies Available To Convicted Defendant When New Facts Are Found, Smith Warder
Michigan Law Review
Due to its haphazard growth and evolution, the Anglo-American system of jurisprudence occasionally left gaping defects in its general contours. Many of these defects have been and are being filled, both by statute and by the continuing development of the common law. However, there is one case which re-occurs with distressing frequency where no satisfactory remedy has been developed and where this lack of remedy can have unjust or even barbaric results.
Constitutional Law - Federal Criminal Procedure - Short Form Indictment, James H. Roberton
Constitutional Law - Federal Criminal Procedure - Short Form Indictment, James H. Roberton
Michigan Law Review
It is the purpose of this comment to discuss the validity under the Federal Constitution of an indictment, drawn in accordance with the proposed code, which would merely accuse the defendant of having committed some kind of "offense," and would leave the particulars of the offense to a bill of particulars.
Due Process And Punishment, Clarence E. Laylin, Alonzo H. Tuttle
Due Process And Punishment, Clarence E. Laylin, Alonzo H. Tuttle
Michigan Law Review
To threaten such a man with punishment," wrote Sir James .LFitzjames Stephen,' "is like threatening to punish a man for not lifting a weight which he cannot move."