Criminal Procedure Commons^™

The Last Stand For Union Power, Laura Christensen Garcia, Danya Moodabagil

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

An Examination Into The Physical And Sexual Abuse Of Children In Juvenile Detention Centers, Claudia Cornejo

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Chicago's War On Crime, Madison Flores

Public Interest Law Reporter

About one in five U.S. adults say they or someone close to them has had a personal experience with gun violence.¹ Seventy-one percent of Americans also believe gun laws should be stricter.² Most people favor a federal law preventing people with mental illnesses from purchasing guns and a smaller percentage favor a nationwide ban on semi-automatic weapons.³ The debate is not so simply divided between those who want to ban all guns and those who want no restrictions on guns. Rather, many Americans value both preventing gun violence and protecting gun rights.⁴

To understand the atmosphere …

Sanctioned Abuse: Corporal Punishment, Restraint And Seclusion Of Children In Public Schools, Jasper Gingrich

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Affirmative Action In Jeopardy, Natalie Jakubowski

Public Interest Law Reporter

Forty-five years ago, the United States Supreme Court decided the landmark case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke ("Bakke"), which confirmed the constitutionality of race as a factor for consideration in college admissions, otherwise known as affirmative action.¹ Since then, colleges have considered race as an additional "plus factor" in their admissions processes and have immensely increased the percentage of minority enrollment in colleges. However, the Supreme Court will hear two cases in 2023: Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina. …

A Brief Introduction To The Legal Response To Childhood Fatalities And Injuries On Family Farms, Madeline Krolczyk

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Punishing Poverty: The Inequalities Of Cash Bail And The Move Towards Reform, Emily L. Salamone

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Felony Disenfranchisement: A Barrier To True Democracy, Anna Baish

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Beneath The Welfare Façade, Anna Bowser

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Name, Image, And Likeness In Ncaa College Athletics, Marlee Burridge

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Barricading The Ballot Box: How Legislative Changes To Ballot Referendums Threaten America's Tradition Of Direct Democracy, Tripp Frank

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Safeguarding Sanctuary: The Growing Pains Of A Sanctuary City, Iris Gomez

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Where The Fourth Amendment Fails: The Loophole Of No-Knock Warrants And The Devastating Community Safety Consquences, Grace Hague

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Out Of Sight, Out Of Mind: Banning The Unhoused From Chicago's Public Spaces, Alex Kirchner

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Scotus On "Wotus", Will Matushek

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

"If You Die, That's On You": The Persistence Of Inhumane Conditions At Cook County Jail, Leanna Nichols

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

United States V. Rahimi: A Closer Look At The Implications For Domestic Abuse Victims, Dani Scudder

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Stop Cop City: The Expanding Reach Of The Racketeer Influenced And Corrupt Organizations Act's Threat To First Amendment Protected Activism, Elizabeth Stamper

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

"No Evictions" Policies: Evaluating The Disparate Impact Of Auto-Rejection On Black Women, Mehreen Tariq

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Looking Inward: Building A Restorative Legal Aid Agency, Andy Froelich

Public Interest Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

“If You Build It, They Will Come”: Reverse Location Searches, Data Collection, And The Fourth Amendment, Matthew L. Brock

Law Student Publications

On January 6, 2021, the world looked on, stunned, as thousands of rioters stormed the U.S. Capitol on live television in support of then-President Donald Trump. In the days and weeks that followed, federal law enforcement scrambled to identify those involved in the attack, in what has become the largest criminal investigation in American history. Whereas even 20 years prior it would have been difficult to identify those involved, as of February 2023, more than 950 people have been identified and charged in relation to the January 6th Capitol attack. Many of these individuals were identified using a wide array …

Is A Green Tie Enough? – Truth And Lies In The Courtroom, Jack B. Harrison

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Expected Risks And Exacerbations Of Poverty, Mental Health Disorders, And Maternal Mortality From Abortion Bans: A Comparative Literature Analysis, Daniel J. Francisco

All Master's Theses

Background. Early termination of a pregnancy (hereinafter referred to as an “abortion”) has been debated in the United States (U.S.) for decades, without much regard to the negative outcomes that forced pregnancies have for those assigned female at birth regarding poverty, mental health and maternal mortality. In 1973, access to safe abortions was protected so long that the procedure was done within the legal gestational period and/or was necessary for the health and safety of the patient (Blackmun, 1972). Unfortunately, in 2022, the Supreme Court took that protection away and made it legal for states to determine the reproductive rights …

Judges For Sale: The Effect Of Campaign Contributions On State Criminal Courts, Arturo Romero Yáñez, Neel U. Sukhatme

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Do campaign contributions impact democratic processes? Using donation data from Texas, we show that criminal defense attorneys who contribute to a district judge’s electoral campaign are preferentially assigned by that judge to indigent defense cases, i.e., public contracts in which the state pays private attorneys to represent poor defendants.

We estimate that attorney donors receive twice as many cases as non-donors during the month of their campaign contribution. Nearly two-thirds of this increase is explained by the contribution itself, with the remainder attributable to shared preferences within attorney-judge pairs, such as those based on professional, ideological, political, or personal ties. …

Search And Seizure Budgets, Kiel Brennan-Marquez, Stephen E. Henderson

Faculty Articles

This article proposes a new means of restraining police power: quantitative limits on the number of law enforcement intrusions—searches and seizures—that may occur over a given period of time. Like monetary constraints, search and seizure budgets would aim to curb abusive policing and improve democratic oversight. But unlike their monetary counterparts, budgets would be indexed directly to the specific police activities that most enable escalation and abuse. What is more, budgets are a tool that finds support, conceptually, in the American framing experience. The Fourth Amendment has long been understood to require procedural limits, such as probable cause, on specific …

To Protect And Serve California's Children: Mitigating Police Coercion Of Minors Through California's New Attorney Consultation Mandate, Lila Garlinghouse

University of San Francisco Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Great Effacement: New Zealand's Silencing On The 2019 Mosque Shooter, J.C. Oleson

University of San Francisco Law Review

No abstract provided.

Safeguarding The Alford Plea: Minimizing State-Sanctioned Wrongful Convictions, Zana Molina

Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice

No abstract provided.

Deconstructing Dog Sniffs At Traffic Stops, Andrea J. Garland

Marquette Law Review

Trial courts often uphold searches of cars at traffic stops when the grounds for the search are that a drug dog established probable cause to think that the vehicle was involved in a drug crime. Traditionally, courts have not considered the sniffs to be searches. The United States Supreme Court has relied on two presumptions to uphold searches based on dog sniffs. These are (1) the dog is trained to only signal the presence of the scent of contraband; and (2) the dog does not physically occupy the vehicle but simply walks around the vehicle.

The Perverse Carrot: How Extreme Economic Precarity Is Exploited Through Witness Perks, Roxann Matthews

University of San Francisco Law Review

No abstract provided.