Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (210)
- Constitutional Law (93)
- Courts (52)
- Evidence (34)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (32)
-
- Fourth Amendment (32)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (29)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (28)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (27)
- Human Rights Law (23)
- State and Local Government Law (23)
- Legal Studies (17)
- International Law (16)
- Judges (16)
- Law and Society (16)
- Jurisprudence (14)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (13)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (13)
- Legal History (13)
- Supreme Court of the United States (13)
- Litigation (11)
- Law and Race (10)
- Fourteenth Amendment (9)
- Jurisdiction (9)
- Legislation (9)
- Rule of Law (9)
- Sociology (9)
- Civil Procedure (8)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (76)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (20)
- University of Georgia School of Law (19)
- University of Michigan Law School (17)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (15)
-
- William & Mary Law School (13)
- University of Washington School of Law (10)
- American University Washington College of Law (8)
- University of the Pacific (8)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (7)
- Southern Methodist University (7)
- Columbia Law School (6)
- Mercer University School of Law (6)
- Georgia State University College of Law (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- Pace University (5)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (5)
- Barry University School of Law (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (4)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (4)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Duke Law (3)
- Hamline University (3)
- Keyword
-
- New York (25)
- Criminal procedure (23)
- Sixth Amendment (23)
- Touro (23)
- Fourth Amendment (22)
-
- Due process (18)
- Evidence (16)
- Constitution (14)
- Criminal law (14)
- Death penalty (13)
- Capital punishment (12)
- Search and seizure (12)
- Supreme Court (12)
- Confrontation Clause (11)
- Jury (11)
- Law (11)
- Law review (11)
- Sentencing (11)
- Criminal Procedure (10)
- Murder (10)
- Police (10)
- United States (10)
- Hearsay (9)
- Right to counsel (9)
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Crawford v. Washington (8)
- Criminal (8)
- Criminal justice system (8)
- Effective assistance of counsel (8)
- Fourth amendment (8)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (74)
- Faculty Scholarship (21)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (15)
- Articles (12)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (12)
-
- Faculty Publications (11)
- Cardozo Law Review (9)
- All Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (6)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (6)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (6)
- Mercer Law Review (5)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (5)
- Publications (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- Washington Law Review (5)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- McGeorge Law Review (4)
- McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles (4)
- Michigan Law Review (4)
- Notre Dame Law Review (4)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (3)
- Catholic University Law Review (3)
- Florida Law Review (3)
- Georgia State University Law Review (3)
- Hamline Law Review (3)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (3)
- NULR Online (3)
- Nevada Law Journal (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 363
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Death Penalty, Josh D. Moore
Death Penalty, Josh D. Moore
Mercer Law Review
The Georgia Supreme Court addressed two death sentences on direct appeal in this survey period, affirming both of them, and addressed four more death penalty cases at various stages of collateral review, leaving death sentences intact in all but one case. Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel frequently dominated the court's discussion of these cases, playing a central role in all but two of them. The court, however, also addressed some important issues touching on mental-health evaluations and evidence, lethal injection, death qualification, and victim-impact testimony
Jury Voting Paradoxes, Jason Iuliano
Jury Voting Paradoxes, Jason Iuliano
Michigan Law Review
The special verdict is plagued by two philosophical paradoxes: the discursive dilemma and the lottery paradox. Although widely discussed in the philosophical literature, these paradoxes have never been applied to jury decision making. In this Essay, I use the paradoxes to show that the special verdict’s vote-reporting procedures can lead judges to render verdicts that the jurors themselves would reject. This outcome constitutes a systemic breakdown that should not be tolerated in a legal system that prides itself on the fairness of its jury decision-making process. Ultimately, I argue that, because the general verdict with answers to written questions does …
The Sentencing Of "Couriers" Under Section 33b Of The Misuse Of Drugs Act: Pp V Chum Tat Suan [2014] Sgca 59, Benjamin Joshua Ong
The Sentencing Of "Couriers" Under Section 33b Of The Misuse Of Drugs Act: Pp V Chum Tat Suan [2014] Sgca 59, Benjamin Joshua Ong
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
Sections 33B(1)–(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act (“the Act”)1 allow for a person who commits an offence under ss 5(1) or 7 of the Act to be sentenced to life imprisonment and caning instead of death if two conditions are met.
Transborder Abductions By American Bounty Hunters - The Jaffe Case And A New Understanding Between The United States And Canada, Kristofer R. Schleicher
Transborder Abductions By American Bounty Hunters - The Jaffe Case And A New Understanding Between The United States And Canada, Kristofer R. Schleicher
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
A Spectrum Of International Criminal Procedure: Shifting Patterns Of Power Distribution In International Criminal Courts And Tribunals, Jessica Peake
A Spectrum Of International Criminal Procedure: Shifting Patterns Of Power Distribution In International Criminal Courts And Tribunals, Jessica Peake
Pace International Law Review
Using the pure adversarial model expounded in part I (a) as the baseline for analysis, Parts II, III and IV of this article will explore the procedural evolution that has taken place at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (II), the International Criminal Court (III) and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (IV). Part V will then plot the structural and procedural shifts that have taken place at those courts onto the spectrum of procedure identified in part I (c), before concluding, in Part VI, with what these shifts teach us about the convergence of adversarial …
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People V. Barnville, David Schoenhaar
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People V. Barnville, David Schoenhaar
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Cespedes, Kathleen Egan
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Cespedes, Kathleen Egan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People V. Butler, Courtney Weinberger
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People V. Butler, Courtney Weinberger
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Court, New York County, People V. James, Nicole Compas
Criminal Court, New York County, People V. James, Nicole Compas
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Queens County, People V. Michaelides, Christin Harris
Supreme Court, Queens County, People V. Michaelides, Christin Harris
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Kings County, People V. Miller, Courtney Weinberger
Supreme Court, Kings County, People V. Miller, Courtney Weinberger
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Kings County, People V. Chapman, Kerri Grzymala
Supreme Court, Kings County, People V. Chapman, Kerri Grzymala
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, First Department, People V. Ramirez, Nicole Compas
Appellate Division, First Department, People V. Ramirez, Nicole Compas
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Vasquez, Jessica Goodwin
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Vasquez, Jessica Goodwin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People Ex Rel. Furde V. New York City Dep't Of Correction, Adam D'Antonio
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People Ex Rel. Furde V. New York City Dep't Of Correction, Adam D'Antonio
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, Third Department, People V. Rivette, Michele Kligman
Appellate Division, Third Department, People V. Rivette, Michele Kligman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
District Court, Nassau County, People V. Yaghoubi, David Schoenhaar
District Court, Nassau County, People V. Yaghoubi, David Schoenhaar
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Principles For Establishment Of A Rule Of Law Criminal Justice System, William M. Cohen
Principles For Establishment Of A Rule Of Law Criminal Justice System, William M. Cohen
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Not So Fast: I Have Been Deprived Of My Right To Counsel, Elias Arroyo
Not So Fast: I Have Been Deprived Of My Right To Counsel, Elias Arroyo
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Putting The Cat Back In The Bag: Involuntary Confessions And Self-Incrimination, Joseph A. Iemma
Putting The Cat Back In The Bag: Involuntary Confessions And Self-Incrimination, Joseph A. Iemma
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination: Are Underlying Questions About A Pending Conviction On Appeal A Violation Of A Defendant's Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination?, Macdonald R. Drane Iv
Self-Incrimination: Are Underlying Questions About A Pending Conviction On Appeal A Violation Of A Defendant's Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination?, Macdonald R. Drane Iv
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy: A Resentencing Game, Deirdre Cicciaro
Double Jeopardy: A Resentencing Game, Deirdre Cicciaro
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justification For Police Intrusions, Corey Rashkover
Justification For Police Intrusions, Corey Rashkover
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interpreting Search Incident To Arrest In New York: Past, Present, And Future, Jacqueline Iaquinta
Interpreting Search Incident To Arrest In New York: Past, Present, And Future, Jacqueline Iaquinta
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizures: Constitutionally Protected Or Discretionary Police Work?, Jaren Fernan
Search And Seizures: Constitutionally Protected Or Discretionary Police Work?, Jaren Fernan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Seize First, Search Later: The Hunt For Digital Evidence, Paige Bartholomew
Seize First, Search Later: The Hunt For Digital Evidence, Paige Bartholomew
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Retroactive Change In The Law To Punish A Defendant, George Schoenwaelder
Retroactive Change In The Law To Punish A Defendant, George Schoenwaelder
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Extradition - International Law - The United States Night Circuit Court Of Appeals Holds Government-Sponsored Abduction Abroad Is Not A Lawful Alternative To Extradition. United States V. Verdugo-Urquidez, 939 F.2d 1341 (9th Cir. 1991), Thomas L. Horan
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Confessions And The Right To Silence In Japan, Daniel H. Foote
Confessions And The Right To Silence In Japan, Daniel H. Foote
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Frame Of Reference And Other Problems, Richard D. Friedman, Jeffrey L. Fisher
The Frame Of Reference And Other Problems, Richard D. Friedman, Jeffrey L. Fisher
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
George argues that, centuries ago, jurists did not distinguish between testimonial and nontestimonial hearsay, and so the distinction cannot be a historically well-grounded basis for modern confrontation doctrine. The argument proceeds from an inaccurate frame of reference. When the confrontation right developed, principally in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and English defendants—Raleigh among them—demanded that adverse witnesses be brought face to face with them, they were making a procedural assertion as to how witnesses must give their testimony. (Giving testimony is what witnesses in litigation do.) Rarely did they phrase this claim in terms of hearsay, for the simple reason …