Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (152)
- Evidence (32)
- Constitutional Law (31)
- Courts (27)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (15)
-
- Jurisprudence (15)
- International Law (14)
- Law and Society (14)
- Legal History (12)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (10)
- Legislation (10)
- Supreme Court of the United States (10)
- Fourth Amendment (9)
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Law and Politics (8)
- Law and Race (8)
- Legal Profession (8)
- Litigation (7)
- Judges (6)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (6)
- Civil Law (5)
- Civil Procedure (5)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (5)
- Human Rights Law (5)
- Science and Technology Law (5)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Legal Remedies (4)
- Other Law (4)
- Institution
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (52)
- William & Mary Law School (14)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (13)
- University of Richmond (13)
- University of San Diego (13)
-
- BLR (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (7)
- Columbia Law School (6)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
- Mercer University School of Law (5)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (18)
- Criminal procedure (10)
- Criminal Procedure (9)
- Criminal law (7)
- Evidence (7)
-
- Jurisprudence (7)
- Trial (7)
- United States Supreme Court (7)
- Criminal justice (6)
- Famous Trials (6)
- Sixth Amendment (6)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Privacy (5)
- Testimony (5)
- Admissibility (4)
- Confrontation Clause (4)
- Crawford v. Washington (4)
- Cross-examination (4)
- Death penalty (4)
- General Law (4)
- Hearsay (4)
- Innocence (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Plea bargaining (4)
- Race (4)
- Search and seizure (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Capital Punishment (3)
- Capital punishment (3)
- Courts (3)
- Publication
-
- Cardozo Law Review (31)
- Faculty Scholarship (19)
- Articles (16)
- San Diego Law Review (12)
- University of Richmond Law Review (12)
-
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (11)
- ExpressO (9)
- Faculty Works (7)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (6)
- William & Mary Law Review (6)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Mercer Law Review (5)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (4)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (4)
- Washington Law Review (4)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers (3)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Working Paper Series (2)
- All Faculty Publications (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 210 of 218
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Neuroimaging And The "Complexity" Of Capital Punishment, O. Carter Snead
Neuroimaging And The "Complexity" Of Capital Punishment, O. Carter Snead
Journal Articles
The growing use of brain imaging technology to explore the causes of morally, socially, and legally relevant behavior is the subject of much discussion and controversy in both scholarly and popular circles. From the efforts of cognitive neuroscientists in the courtroom and the public square, the contours of a project to transform capital sentencing both in principle and in practice have emerged. In the short term, these scientists seek to play a role in the process of capital sentencing by serving as mitigation experts for defendants, invoking neuroimaging research on the roots of criminal violence to support their arguments. Over …
Institutional Competence And Organizational Prosecutions, Daniel C. Richman
Institutional Competence And Organizational Prosecutions, Daniel C. Richman
Faculty Scholarship
The business pages regularly provide graphic stories about corporate deferred prosecution agreements (“DPAs”). And commentators regularly fulminate about this alleged abuse of government power, quite confident (or w illfully blind to the fact) that the removal of this non-nuclear option from the prosecutorial arsenal would substantially lessen the ability of prosecutors to obtain cooperation from firms and their employees. Yet this emerging practice has received all too little scholarly attention, and Professor Brandon Garrett has made an important contribution by carefully examining the available facts and creatively drawing on the structure reform literature to highlight questions it raises about legitimacy …
The Technology Of Surveillance: Will The Supreme Court's Expectations Ever Resemble Society's?, Stephen Henderson
The Technology Of Surveillance: Will The Supreme Court's Expectations Ever Resemble Society's?, Stephen Henderson
Other Faculty Publications
For law students studying criminal procedure—or at least for those cramming for the exam—it becomes a mantra: government conduct only implicates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches if it invades a “reasonable expectation of privacy.” This is not the contemporary definition of the word “search,” nor was it the definition at the time of the founding. But, via a well-intentioned concurrence by Justice Harlan in the famous 1967 case of Katz v. United States, it became the Court’s definition.This lack of fealty to the English language left some questions. For example, is determining whether someone has a “reasonable expectation …
What's On Your Mind? Imputing Motive In A Title Vii Case, An Analysis Of Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Co. V. Eeoc, Barbara J. Fick
What's On Your Mind? Imputing Motive In A Title Vii Case, An Analysis Of Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Co. V. Eeoc, Barbara J. Fick
Journal Articles
This article examines the case E.E.O.C. v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles, which was scheduled for argument before the Supreme Court, but was dismissed before that argument occurred.
The (Futile) Search For A Common Law Right Of Confrontation: Beyond Brasier's Irrelevance To (Perhaps) Relevant American Cases, Randolph N. Jonakait
The (Futile) Search For A Common Law Right Of Confrontation: Beyond Brasier's Irrelevance To (Perhaps) Relevant American Cases, Randolph N. Jonakait
Articles & Chapters
After Crawford v. Washington asserted that the Confrontation Clause constitutionalized the common law right of confrontation, cases have been suggested that illustrate that right. This short essay considers whether the 1779 English case Rex v. Brasier is such a decision, as some contend. The essay concludes that Brasier says nothing about the right of confrontation and points to a comparable framing-era, American case that indicates that general rules about hearsay and confrontation were not at issue. The essay maintains that if the historical understandings of the right of confrontation and hearsay are to control the Confrontation Clause, then framing-era, American …
Does Warrantless Wiretapping Violate Moral Rights?, Evan Tsen Lee
Does Warrantless Wiretapping Violate Moral Rights?, Evan Tsen Lee
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Reader's Companion To Against Prediction: A Reply To Ariela Gross, Yoram Margalioth, And Yoav Sapir On Economic Modeling, Selective Incapacitation, Governmentality, And Race, Bernard E. Harcourt
A Reader's Companion To Against Prediction: A Reply To Ariela Gross, Yoram Margalioth, And Yoav Sapir On Economic Modeling, Selective Incapacitation, Governmentality, And Race, Bernard E. Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
From parole prediction instruments and violent sexual predator scores to racial profiling on the highways, instruments to predict future dangerousness, drug-courier profiles, and IRS computer algorithms to detect tax evaders, the rise of actuarial methods in the field of crime and punishment presents a number of challenging issues at the intersection of economic theory, sociology, history, race studies, criminology, social theory, and law. The three review essays of "Against Prediction" by Ariela Gross, Yoram Margalioth, and Yoav Sapir, raise these challenges in their very best light. Ranging from the heights of poststructuralist and critical race theory to the intricate details …
Building Criminal Capital Behind Bars: Peer Effects In Juvenile Corrections, Patrick J. Bayer, Randi Hjalmarsson, David Pozen
Building Criminal Capital Behind Bars: Peer Effects In Juvenile Corrections, Patrick J. Bayer, Randi Hjalmarsson, David Pozen
Faculty Scholarship
This paper analyzes the influence that juvenile offenders serving time in the same correctional facility have on each other's subsequent criminal behavior. The analysis is based on data on over 8,000 individuals serving time in 169 juvenile correctional facilities during a two-year period in Florida. These data provide a complete record of past crimes, facility assignments, and arrests and adjudications in the year following release for each individual. To control for the non-random assignment to facilities, we include facility and facility-by-prior offense fixed effects, thereby estimating peer effects using only within-facility variation over time. We find strong evidence of peer …
Why U.S. Federal Criminal Penalties For Dealing In Illicit Cultural Property Are Ineffective, And A Pragmatic Alternative, Derek Fincham
Why U.S. Federal Criminal Penalties For Dealing In Illicit Cultural Property Are Ineffective, And A Pragmatic Alternative, Derek Fincham
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
At The Intersection Of Race And History: The Unique Relationship Between The Davis Intent Requirement And The Crack Laws, Christopher J. Tyson
At The Intersection Of Race And History: The Unique Relationship Between The Davis Intent Requirement And The Crack Laws, Christopher J. Tyson
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
Criminal Justice And The 1967 Detroit 'Riot', Yale Kamisar
Criminal Justice And The 1967 Detroit 'Riot', Yale Kamisar
Articles
Forty years ago the kindling of segregation, racism, and poverty burst into the flame of urban rioting in Detroit, Los Angeles, Newark, and other U.S. cities. The following essay is excerpted from a report by Professor Emeritus Yale Kamisar filed with the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (the Kerner Commission) regarding the disorders that took place in Detroit July 23-28, 1967. The report provided significant material and was the subject of one article in the series of pieces on the anniversary of the disturbances that appeared last summer in The Michigan Citizen of Detroit. Immediately after the disturbances ended, …
Crawford, Davis, And Way Beyond, Richard D. Friedman
Crawford, Davis, And Way Beyond, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Until 1965, the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution hardly mattered. It was not applicable against the states, and therefore had no role whatsoever in the vast majority of prosecutions. Moreover, if a federal court was inclined to exclude evidence of an out-of-court statement, it made little practical difference whether the court termed the statement hearsay or held that the evidence did not comply with the Confrontation Clause.
Structural Reform In Criminal Defense: Relocating Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Claims, Eve Brensike Primus
Structural Reform In Criminal Defense: Relocating Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Claims, Eve Brensike Primus
Articles
This Article suggests a structural reform that could solve two different problems in criminal defense representation. The first problem is that the right to effective trial counsel lacks a meaningful remedy. Defendants are generally not permitted to raise ineffective assistance of counsel claims until collateral review. Given that collateral review typically occurs years after trial, most convicted defendants have completed their sentences by that time and therefore have little incentive to pursue ineffectiveness claims. Moreover, there is no right to counsel on collateral review, and it is unrealistic to expect defendants to navigate the complicated terrain of an ineffectiveness claim …
On The Fortieth Anniversary Of The Miranda Case: Why We Needed It, How We Got It--And What Happened To It, Yale Kamisar
On The Fortieth Anniversary Of The Miranda Case: Why We Needed It, How We Got It--And What Happened To It, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Last year (the year I gave the talk on which this article is based) marked the fortieth anniversary of Miranda v. Arizona,' one of the most praised, most maligned-and probably one of the most misunderstood-Supreme Court cases in American history. It is difficult, if not impossible, to evaluate Miranda without looking back at the test for the admissibility of confessions that preceded it.
International Consensus As Persuasive Authority In The Eighth Amendment, Youngjae Lee
International Consensus As Persuasive Authority In The Eighth Amendment, Youngjae Lee
Faculty Scholarship
This Article is about the epistemic significance of international consensus on constitutional interpretation in the Eighth Amendment context. First, the Article examines whether meaningful conclusions about one's desert judgments can be reached through a process of interjurisdictional comparison that focuses on the existence of a consensus on the question of what punishment is appropriate for what crimes and criminals. Second, this Article examines the relevance of international consensus on penal practices by analogizing the consensus to three different types of consensus: scientific, aesthetic, and moral. This Article concludes from this discussion that so long as the Supreme Court stays with …
Forced Medication And The Need To Protect The Rights Of The Mentally Ill Criminal Defendant, Emily C. Lieberman
Forced Medication And The Need To Protect The Rights Of The Mentally Ill Criminal Defendant, Emily C. Lieberman
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The note argues that the current legal framework for forcibly medicating mentally ill criminal defendants, particularly pre-trial detainees, often violates their constitutional rights. It contends that the reliance on "dangerousness" as a criterion for forced medication is too vague and easily abused, leading to inconsistent and unconstitutional applications. The analysis advocates for stricter standards, clearer definitions of dangerousness, and heightened judicial scrutiny to protect the rights of mentally ill defendants.
Decentralizing The Fight Against Human Trafficking In The United States: The Need For Greater Involvement In Fighting Human Trafficking By State Agencies And Local Non-Governmental Organizations, Shashi Irani Kara
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note argues that while the federal government has made significant strides in combating human trafficking through legislation like the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA), these efforts are insufficient due to the decentralized nature of the crime. It emphasizes the necessity for greater involvement from state agencies and local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to effectively address the diverse and localized manifestations of trafficking.
Apology In The Context Of Wrongful Conviction: Why The System Should Say It's Sorry, Abigail Penzell
Apology In The Context Of Wrongful Conviction: Why The System Should Say It's Sorry, Abigail Penzell
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
The first section of this Note will discuss apology as a psychological tool to heal victims, offenders, and the community. The second section will examine the use of apology in analogous contexts to that of wrongful conviction. The third section will explore the potential or perceived disadvantages of offering an apology in the criminal context. The fourth section will detail the desire for apology among the wrongfully convicted as well as give examples of situations - like Mr. Fuller's - in which an apology has been tendered and has helped victims reintegrate into society. Finally, I will conclude that the …
In Search Of Validity: A New Model For The Content And Procedural Treatment Of Trademark Infringement Surveys, Irina D. Manta
In Search Of Validity: A New Model For The Content And Procedural Treatment Of Trademark Infringement Surveys, Irina D. Manta
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Penal Court Procedures: Doctrinal Issues, Stephen C. Thaman
Penal Court Procedures: Doctrinal Issues, Stephen C. Thaman
All Faculty Scholarship
Volume III: This is an encyclopedia entry on doctrinal issues in penal court procedures.
Criminal Justice And The Challenge Of Family Ties, Dan Markel, Jennifer M. Collins, Ethan J. Leib
Criminal Justice And The Challenge Of Family Ties, Dan Markel, Jennifer M. Collins, Ethan J. Leib
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This Article asks two basic questions: When does, and when should, the state use the criminal justice apparatus to accommodate family ties, responsibilities, and interests? We address these questions by first revealing a variety of laws that together form a string of family ties subsidies and benefits pervading the criminal justice system. Notwithstanding our recognition of the important role family plays in securing the conditions for human flourishing, we then explain the basis for erecting a Spartan presumption against these family ties subsidies and benefits within the criminal justice system. We delineate the scope and rationale for the presumption and …
Imposing A Cap On Capital Punishment, Adam M. Gershowitz
Imposing A Cap On Capital Punishment, Adam M. Gershowitz
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Forfeiture Of The Confrontation Right After Crawford And Davis, Richard D. Friedman
Forfeiture Of The Confrontation Right After Crawford And Davis, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
So my topic this morning is on forfeiture of the confrontation right, which I think plays a central role in confrontation doctrine. And to try to present that, let me state the entirety of confrontation doctrine as briefly as I can. This is, at least, what I think the doctrine is and what it can be: A testimonial statement should not be admissible against an accused to prove the truth of what it asserts unless the accused either has had or will have an opportunity to confront the witness-which should occur at trial unless the witness is then unavailable-or has …
Summary Of Hightower V. Statehightower V. State, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. 7, Shauna Welsh
Summary Of Hightower V. Statehightower V. State, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. 7, Shauna Welsh
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appellant Dennis Lydell Hightower appeals his conviction on the grounds that the district court erred when it denied his request to allow an incarcerated defense witness to appear at trial in civilian clothing. Hightower was convicted of one count each of gross misdemeanor conspiracy to commit larceny, gross misdemeanor unlawful taking of a motor vehicle, and felony conspiracy to commit robbery. When the victim stopped his car to help an apparent stranded bicyclist, Hightower’s codefendant, Derrick Farr, knocked the victim to the ground after repeatedly striking him in the face. While on the ground, Hightower took the victim’s wallet and …
"We're Here To Protect Democracy. We're Not Here To Practice It": The U.S. Military's Involvement In Trafficking In Persons And Suggestions For The Future, Jorene Soto
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article argues that the U.S. military has historically been complicit in human trafficking, particularly through its involvement in prostitution near overseas bases, and that current legal and policy measures fail to adequately address this issue. While laws like the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) provide some framework, enforcement and penalties are insufficient to deter military personnel from contributing to trafficking. The article calls for stronger legal policies, enhanced education, and stricter penalties to combat this issue effectively.
Beyond Protective Orders: Interdisciplinary Domestic Violence Clinics Facilitate Social Change, Sara R. Benson
Beyond Protective Orders: Interdisciplinary Domestic Violence Clinics Facilitate Social Change, Sara R. Benson
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article argues that interdisciplinary domestic violence clinics in law schools offer a transformative approach to addressing domestic violence by integrating legal and extra-legal services. These clinics not only provide holistic support to survivors but also empower them to advocate for systemic change. By fostering collaboration among law students, social workers, psychologists, and community organizations, such clinics address the multifaceted needs of survivors while training future lawyers to approach legal issues with a broader societal perspective. The article highlights the potential of these clinics to drive social progress by amplifying the voices of survivors and influencing legal and community responses …
Plea-Bargaining, Negotiating Confessions And Consensual Resolution Of Criminal Cases, Stephen C. Thaman
Plea-Bargaining, Negotiating Confessions And Consensual Resolution Of Criminal Cases, Stephen C. Thaman
All Faculty Scholarship
This report explores the various types of consensual procedures that make up the procedural arsenals of modern criminal justice systems and if and how they have contributed to procedural economy in the respective country. It discusses whether or not important procedural principles have been compromised, undermining the legitimacy of the criminal justice system.
An Agument For Original Intent: Restoring Rule 801 (D) (1) (A) To Protect Domestic Violence Victims In A Post-Crawford World., Andrew King-Ries
An Agument For Original Intent: Restoring Rule 801 (D) (1) (A) To Protect Domestic Violence Victims In A Post-Crawford World., Andrew King-Ries
Faculty Law Review Articles
Prosecution of domestic violence is extremely difficult, largely due to the fact that defendants are successfully pressuring victims to refuse to testify or to recant their testimony at trial. With its decision in Crawford, the Supreme Court eliminated the ability of prosecutors to use hearsay exceptions to place the domestic violence victim's statements before the jury for their substantive consideration. The Supreme Court also closed this avenue to combat defendants' efforts to avoid liability through coercive pressure on victims. Therefore, the Court's change in the Confrontation Clause law limits the prosecution's arsenal for combating witness intimidation and, at the same …
Egypt: Criminal Procedure, Sadiq Reza
Egypt: Criminal Procedure, Sadiq Reza
Faculty Scholarship
This chapter presents the criminal-procedure law of Egypt according to the sources of that law: the 1971 Constitution, the 1950 Code of Criminal Procedure, the 1958 Emergency Law, and other legislation; decisions by the Supreme Constitutional Court (SCC), the Court of Cassation, and other organs of the Egyptian judiciary; and administrative and executive regulations. Included are references to controversial aspects of this law and its practice, such as the use of military courts, state security courts, and emergency courts and powers. The chapter thus serves as an introduction to modern Egyptian criminal procedure and a reference source for scholars and …
Innocence, Race, And The Death Penalty, Barry Scheck
Innocence, Race, And The Death Penalty, Barry Scheck
Articles
The article argues that the death penalty in the United States is deeply flawed due to systemic issues such as wrongful convictions, racial disparities, and procedural failures. It emphasizes the critical role of DNA exonerations in revealing these injustices and advocates for reforms to address the root causes of wrongful convictions, including inadequate legal representation and flawed forensic science. The article also highlights the moral and financial costs of capital punishment, urging its abolition.