Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (74)
- Constitutional Law (52)
- Courts (44)
- State and Local Government Law (39)
- Supreme Court of the United States (37)
-
- Jurisprudence (31)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (29)
- Judges (27)
- Fourteenth Amendment (21)
- Evidence (20)
- Litigation (19)
- Fourth Amendment (14)
- Civil Procedure (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Family Law (5)
- Food and Drug Law (5)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (5)
- Legal Profession (5)
- Social Welfare Law (5)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Law and Politics (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Legal Studies (3)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (2)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Legal Writing and Research (2)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (36)
- Mercer University School of Law (20)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (18)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (13)
- University of Michigan Law School (7)
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (5)
- UIC School of Law (4)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- West Virginia University (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Campbell University School of Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (2)
- University of Montana (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- 1990) (32)
- New York (32)
- Federal (31)
- State (31)
- Constitution (28)
-
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (26)
- Defendant (21)
- Court of Appeals (19)
- § 6 (16)
- Capital punishment (15)
- Supreme Court (13)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (12)
- § 1 (12)
- Evidence (11)
- U.S. Cont. Amend. V (10)
- U.S. Cont. Amend. XIV (10)
- Due process (9)
- Police (9)
- Criminal (8)
- United States (8)
- Appellate Division (7)
- Jury (7)
- U.S. Cont. Amend. VI (7)
- Violated (7)
- Constitutional (6)
- Court (6)
- Judge (6)
- Statute (6)
- Trial judge (6)
- § 11 (6)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (35)
- Mercer Law Review (20)
- Capital Defense Journal (14)
- Cardozo Law Review (12)
- Articles (8)
-
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (5)
- UIC Law Review (4)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (4)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Publications (3)
- West Virginia Law Review (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Campbell Law Review (2)
- Court Decisions (2)
- Faculty Works (2)
- Florida State University Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles & Book Chapters (1)
- Bar Associations (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 148
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
The Lockett Paradox: Reconciling Guided Discretion And Unguided Mitigation In Capital Sentencing, Scott E. Sundby
The Lockett Paradox: Reconciling Guided Discretion And Unguided Mitigation In Capital Sentencing, Scott E. Sundby
Articles
No abstract provided.
Selecting Impartial Juries: Must Ignorance Be A Virtue In Our Search For Justice -- Welcome And Statement Of The Issue, Fred H. Cate, Newton N. Minow
Selecting Impartial Juries: Must Ignorance Be A Virtue In Our Search For Justice -- Welcome And Statement Of The Issue, Fred H. Cate, Newton N. Minow
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The United States Sentencing Guidelines: Justice For All Or Justice For A Few, Jim Mchugh
The United States Sentencing Guidelines: Justice For All Or Justice For A Few, Jim Mchugh
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Steven D. Benjamin
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Steven D. Benjamin
University of Richmond Law Review
During the past year, the Virginia Court of Appeals continued in its role as the most significant contributor to criminal case law. The court ruled on a myriad of issues; the recurring topics involved arrest and investigatory detention, self-defense, the execution of search warrants, double jeopardy, the admissibility of eye-witness identification, and the circumstances and admissibility of a police interrogation. Also, the court ruled on numerous trial and procedural questions regularly encountered by the circuit courts and criminal practitioners.
Driving Under The Influences In Illinois, Robert G. Johnston, Thomas P. Higgins
Driving Under The Influences In Illinois, Robert G. Johnston, Thomas P. Higgins
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jurisdiction Of The County Court
Habeas Corpus, Qualified Immunity, And Crystal Balls: Predicting The Course Of Constitutional Law, Kit Kinports
Habeas Corpus, Qualified Immunity, And Crystal Balls: Predicting The Course Of Constitutional Law, Kit Kinports
Faculty Scholarship
After describing the basic legal and policy issues surrounding the qualified immunity defense and the use of novelty to explain procedural defaults in habeas cases, Part I of this article advocates a standard for both types of cases that asks whether a person exercising reasonable diligence in the same circumstances would have been aware of the relevant constitutional principles. With this standard in mind, Part II examines the qualified immunity defense in detail, concluding that in many cases public officials are given immunity even though they unreasonably failed to recognize the constitutional implications of their conduct. Part III compares the …
To Tell What We Know Or Wait For Godot?, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
To Tell What We Know Or Wait For Godot?, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Articles
Professor Elliott raises two questions about the American Psychological Association's practice of submitting amicus briefs to the courts. First, are our data sufficiently valid, consistent, and generalizable to be applicable to the real world issues? Second, are amicus briefs adequate to communicate scientific findings? The first of these is not a general question, but must be addressed anew each time the Association considers a new issue. An evaluation of the quality and sufficiency of scientific knowledge about racial discrimination, for example, tells us nothing at all about the quality and sufficiency of scientific knowledge about sexual abuse. "Are the data …
Self-Defense As A Justification For Punishment, George P. Fletcher
Self-Defense As A Justification For Punishment, George P. Fletcher
Faculty Scholarship
There are few legal ideas as basic as the principle of legitimate self-defense. Every individual, it is said, has the right to defend his or her person, property or living space against wrongful aggression and, if necessary, to kill the aggressor. This principle is so deeply ingrained in our legal thinking that it is difficult to imagine a legal system that did not acknowledge it. The concept of having rights would be virtually toothless unless we could use force to vindicate our rights against aggression.
The notion of having rights is less well-accepted in Jewish law than are the ideas …
Understanding Teague V. Lane, John H. Blume, William Pratt
Understanding Teague V. Lane, John H. Blume, William Pratt
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Merciful Juries: The Resilience Of Jury Nullification, Alan W. Schefin, Jon M. Van Dyke
Merciful Juries: The Resilience Of Jury Nullification, Alan W. Schefin, Jon M. Van Dyke
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Great Repression: Criminal Punishment In The Nineteen-Eighties, Michael Mandel
The Great Repression: Criminal Punishment In The Nineteen-Eighties, Michael Mandel
Articles & Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
Applying Washington's Sentencing Reform Act To Mandatory Life Prisoners: An Ex Post Facto Violation, Steven J. Samario
Applying Washington's Sentencing Reform Act To Mandatory Life Prisoners: An Ex Post Facto Violation, Steven J. Samario
Washington Law Review
Following the 1989 session of the Washington Legislature, the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (Board) began redetermining the minimum terms of prisoners serving a mandatory life sentence for crimes committed before July 1984. To calculate these new minimum terms, the legislature directed the Board to apply the same sentencing ranges enacted in the Washington Sentencing Reform Act, which took effect July 1, 1984. This Comment analyzes whether the state violated the United States Constitution when it ordered that these minimum terms be redetermined. It concludes that Washington courts should void the state's action because it violates the constitutional prohibition against ex …
Criminal Law 1991 Legislative Update, Philip A. Cherner, H. Patrick Furman
Criminal Law 1991 Legislative Update, Philip A. Cherner, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Exigent Circumstances Exception To The Warrant Requirement, H. Patrick Furman
The Exigent Circumstances Exception To The Warrant Requirement, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure: United States V. Noriega: Criminal Forfeiture Of Attorney Fees And Due Process Requirements, Nathan Whatley
Criminal Procedure: United States V. Noriega: Criminal Forfeiture Of Attorney Fees And Due Process Requirements, Nathan Whatley
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Exclusionary Rule And Confession Evidence: Some Perspectives On Evolving Practices And Policies In The United States And England And Wales, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.