Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Procedure (9)
- Criminal Law (6)
- Criminal procedure (6)
- Criminal law (5)
- CRIMINAL LAW (4)
-
- CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (4)
- Jury instructions (4)
- Appeal (3)
- Confrontation Clause (3)
- Habeas corpus (3)
- Jury Instructions (3)
- Batson objection (2)
- Criminal (2)
- Criminal Appeal (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Grand Jury (2)
- Kidnapping (2)
- PSI (2)
- Self-representation (2)
- Sentencing (2)
- Venire (2)
- Witness (2)
- AND SELF INCRIMINATION IN MEDICAL MARIJUANA REGISTRIES (1)
- APPEAL (1)
- Abuse of Discretion (1)
- Access to courts (1)
- Alford plea (1)
- Appeals (1)
- BATSON (1)
- Bail (1)
Articles 151 - 180 of 302
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Summary Of Ford V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 55, Alan R. Smith
Summary Of Ford V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 55, Alan R. Smith
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a district court judgment of conviction, by way of a jury verdict, for pandering of prostitution.
Summary Of Adam V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 54, Matthew Vantusko
Summary Of Adam V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 54, Matthew Vantusko
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
An appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, for trafficking in a controlled substance.
Summary Of Cortes V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 44, Sean W. Mcdonald
Summary Of Cortes V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 44, Sean W. Mcdonald
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell.
Summary Of Rose V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 43, Michael Li
Summary Of Rose V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 43, Michael Li
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
An appeal of a second-degree murder conviction by jury verdict.
Summary Of Winkle V. Warden, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 42, Tim Mott
Summary Of Winkle V. Warden, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 42, Tim Mott
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing Respondents to release her to the 305 program based on the language of NRS 209.427 and 209.429.
Summary Of Saletta V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 34, Erin Elliot
Summary Of Saletta V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 34, Erin Elliot
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a judgment of conviction by a criminal defendant convicted of indecent or obscene exposure.
Summary Of Rogers V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 25, Sean W. Mcdonald
Summary Of Rogers V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 25, Sean W. Mcdonald
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from judgment of conviction, pursuant to jury verdict, of driving under the influence of a controlled substance on grounds certain evidence was inadmissible.
Summary Of Nevada Ex. Rel Bd. Of Parole Comm’Rs V. Morrow, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 61, Danielle Woodrum
Summary Of Nevada Ex. Rel Bd. Of Parole Comm’Rs V. Morrow, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 61, Danielle Woodrum
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
An appeal from a district court order clarifying a judgment granting a writ of mandamus, and a proper person appeal from a district court order granting a motion to dismiss
Summary Of Hobbs V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 18, Christopher Scott Connell
Summary Of Hobbs V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 18, Christopher Scott Connell
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
An appeal from a judgment of conviction, by way of jury verdict, for battery and injury to other property.
Summary Of Stockmeier V. State, Bd. Of Parole Comm’Rs, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 19, Chelsey Bosworth
Summary Of Stockmeier V. State, Bd. Of Parole Comm’Rs, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 19, Chelsey Bosworth
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
A proper person appeal and counsel cross-appeal to have factual statements in a presentence investigation report (PSI) corrected after a prisoner’s sentencing.
Summary Of State V. Lucero, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 7, Brian Blaylock
Summary Of State V. Lucero, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 7, Brian Blaylock
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
An appeal of the Second Judicial District Court’s denial of the State’s motion to correct a reduced sentence imposed upon revocation of probation.
Summary Of Lamb V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 3, Erin Elliot
Summary Of Lamb V. State, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 3, Erin Elliot
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a judgment of conviction by a criminal defendant convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison.
Summary Of Dieudonne V. State, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 1, Charles Gianelloni
Summary Of Dieudonne V. State, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 1, Charles Gianelloni
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a criminal defendant claiming an absolute right to be sentenced by the same judge who accepted his plea deal. Defendant also objects to victim impact statements that were given at his sentencing trial, but were not properly sworn.
Summary Of State V. Castaneda_Swm, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 45, Sean W. Mcdonald
Summary Of State V. Castaneda_Swm, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 45, Sean W. Mcdonald
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from order of dismissal of indecent exposure charges, after the district court judge concluded the state indecent exposure statute was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.
Summary Of Hoagland V. State, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. 37, Meredith Still
Summary Of Hoagland V. State, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. 37, Meredith Still
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The district court rejected appellant Richard William Hoagland’s argument that necessity is a defense to driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). The judge did not permit Hoagland to submit jury instructions on the defense or to present evidence to the jury to support the defense. In this case, the Nevada Supreme Court considered whether a defendant may assert a necessity defense to DUI.
Summary Of Bahena V. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 57, Michael Gianelloni
Summary Of Bahena V. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 57, Michael Gianelloni
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
No abstract provided.
Summary Of Ramirez V. State, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 22, Anthony R. Sassi
Summary Of Ramirez V. State, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 22, Anthony R. Sassi
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction in the Second Judicial District Court, pursuant to a jury verdict of second-degree felony murder by means of child abuse, neglect, or endangerment.
Summary Of State Of Nevada, Dmv V. Taylor-Caldwell, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 14 , David Krawczyk
Summary Of State Of Nevada, Dmv V. Taylor-Caldwell, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 14 , David Krawczyk
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Consideration of whether Nev. Rev. Stat. §484.384 mandates driver’s license revocation when two consecutive breath samples are obtained from a DUI suspect and only one breath sample tests over the legal limit for alcohol.
Summary Of Higgs V. State, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 1, Kathleen Wilde
Summary Of Higgs V. State, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 1, Kathleen Wilde
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
A multi-faceted appeal from a Second Judicial District Court conviction of first-degree murder.
Summary Of Thompson V. State, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. 59, Stephanie S. Buntin
Summary Of Thompson V. State, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. 59, Stephanie S. Buntin
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a judgment of conviction by jury of conspiracy to commit a crime, burglary, robbery, first-degree kidnapping, and attempted grand larceny auto.
Summary Of Ouanbengboune V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 56, Ammon Francom
Summary Of Ouanbengboune V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 56, Ammon Francom
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
An appeal from an Eighth Judicial District Court judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of first-degree murder with the use of a deadly weapon and robbery with the use of a deadly weapon.
Summary Of Glover V. Dist. Court, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 53, Amy Kominsky
Summary Of Glover V. Dist. Court, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 53, Amy Kominsky
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
This case involved a writ of prohibition to determine if Defendant’s double jeopardy rights were violated when the district court ordered a mistrial and subsequent retrial as a “manifest necessity” based on potential jury bias because defense counsel impermissibly argued facts not in evidence.
Summary Of Mendoza-Lobos V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 49, Ryan Mcinerney
Summary Of Mendoza-Lobos V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 49, Ryan Mcinerney
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appellant Douglas Mendoza-Lobos was convicted of one count each of burglary, robbery with the use of a deadly weapon, sexual assault with the use of a deadly weapon, attempted sexual assault with the use of a deadly weapon, assault with a deadly weapon, and battery with a deadly weapon. On appeal, Mendoza-Lobos argued that the district court failed to comply with NRS 193.165(1) in imposing the sentences for the deadly weapon enhancements because it failed to articulate sufficient findings on the record. As a preliminary matter, the Court addressed whether NRS 193.165(1) (1) violated the separation-of-powers doctrine and (2) required …
Summary Of Wyman V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. 46, Karlee Phelps
Summary Of Wyman V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. 46, Karlee Phelps
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a judgment of conviction for second-degree murder, challenging the district court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to dismiss for pre-indictment delay and Appellant’s motion for certificate of materiality to obtain out-of-state mental health records.
Summary Of Zana V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 41, Anthony R. Sassi
Summary Of Zana V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 41, Anthony R. Sassi
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
An appeal from a judgment of conviction in the Eighth Judicial District Court, pursuant to a jury verdict, of one count of open or gross lewdness, three counts of lewdness with a child under the age of fourteen, and six counts of visual representation depicting sexual conduct of a person under the age of sixteen.
Summary Of Funderburk V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 25, James Conway
Summary Of Funderburk V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 25, James Conway
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a judgment of conviction, upon a jury verdict, of two counts of burglary while in possession of a deadly weapon, two counts of conspiracy to commit robbery, and four counts of robbery with use of a deadly weapon.
Summary Of Mcconnell V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 24, Ian Houston
Summary Of Mcconnell V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 24, Ian Houston
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from an order of the district court dismissing appellant’s post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case.
Summary Of Ramet V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 19, Tara C. Zimmerman
Summary Of Ramet V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 19, Tara C. Zimmerman
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appellant Daniel Anthony Ramet was convicted of first-degree murder. On appeal, Ramet contended that the testimony concerning his refusal to consent to a search of his home, taken together with the prosecutor’s comment on it, was violative of his Fourth Amendment rights. The Court concluded that the district court erred in allowing testimony and argument regarding Ramet’s invocation of his Fourth Amendment right. However, they further concluded that the error in admitting the statements was harmless. The Court therefore affirmed Ramet’s conviction.Óÿ
Summary Of Hannon V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 15, Shannon Rowe
Summary Of Hannon V. State, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 15, Shannon Rowe
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court took this opportunity to align Nevada’s standard for emergency home entries with the recent Supreme Court opinion in Brigham City v. Stuart.2 The Supreme Court held in that case that for a warrantless entry to be lawful there must be an objectively reasonable basis to believe that a party inside is in danger.3 Accepting this standard eliminates Nevada’s previous test, which allowed courts to look at the law enforcement agent’s lack of intent to arrest or search.
Summary Of Scarbo V. Dist. Ct., 125 Nev. Ad. Op. No. 12, Michelle D. Alarie
Summary Of Scarbo V. Dist. Ct., 125 Nev. Ad. Op. No. 12, Michelle D. Alarie
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Consolidated writs for mandamus challenging the district court’s denial of petitioners’ request for full and complete copies of competency examination reports prior to competency hearing.