Criminal Procedure Commons^™

Critiquing The Legal Order In The Name Of “Critical Morality”, Julius Cohen

Cardozo Law Review

The moral criticism of the legal order has been a longtime sport (serious), if not an industry, for law teachers, theorists, judges, and other legal functionaries. In the process, they often reach for criteria beyond those utilized in conventional morality. Sometimes the reach "beyond" is ad hoc; sometimes it is accompanied by an awareness that it is toward a pattern of a higher-level, critical morality. The reach beyond is often triggered by a need to resolve conflicts within conventional morality. Or it is a function of the distrust of some of the sources of conventional morality, such as prejudice, unrefined …

The Other Dimension Of Law, Pierre Legendre

Cardozo Law Review

What kind of a questioning would make it possible for psychoanalysis to become theoretically useful for jurists? How could such a questioning have an effect on the practice of law? In the same measure, is it theoretically plausible for psychoanalysts, attached as they are to their own casuistry, to interrogate the law? What must be recognized from the start, if this questioning is to be more than superficial, is that the intellectual and social dogmas of today are obstacles to the liberty of thought [esprit].

The Invisible Cupola: From Casual To Collective Attribution In Ecological Liability, Gunther Teubner

Cardozo Law Review

When I speak about the cupola, it is not Brunelleschi's architectural masterpiece crowning the Florentine duomo that appears before my eyes. Rather, I see the ugly architecture of organized crime, the brutal supersecret "cupola" on top of the Mafia's hierarchy which overshadows social life in Italy. Does this cupola exist or not? Over the recent years, the Mafia's cupola has been the object of a bitter struggle between Italian judges. While the lower courts have been sending numerous mafiosi to prison because they were part of the invisible cupola controlling "tutti i grandi delitti," the court of the next instance …

The Partial Republican, John O. Mcginnis

Articles

No abstract provided.

Daubert: Interpreting The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli

Cardozo Law Review

In 1992 Judge Becker and Professor Orenstein referred to the Frye issue - the admissibility of novel scientific evidence-as the "most controversial and important unresolved question" in the Federal Rules of Evidence. Indeed, during the prior decade the federal courts had battled over the issue, as had their state counterparts. Similarly, text writers and law review commentators vigorously disagreed about the proper standard for admitting scientific evidence. While one ABA report on the Federal Rules explored the Frye issue and concluded that it "is not clear that any standard would produce agreement at the moment," another report cited it as …

The Meaning Of Daubert And What That Means For Forensic Science, Randolph N. Jonakait

Cardozo Law Review

Daubert's effect on forensic science is unclear because the opinion is unclear. The Daubert Court did start blazing a useful path by stating that before scientific testimony is admitted, the trial court must be convinced that "the reasoning or methodology underlying the testimony is scientifically valid and ... that [the] reasoning or methodology properly can be applied to the facts in issue." But the Court's trailblazing was incomplete and often misleading.

The Next Step After Daubert: Developing A Similarly Epistemological Approach To Ensuring The Reliability Of Nonscientific Expert Testimony, Edward J. Imwinkelried

Cardozo Law Review

On June 28, 1993, after much fanfare, the United States Supreme Court rendered its decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The decision was not only preceded by intense media attention; the decision was also immediately followed by a massive-and growing-volume of commentary. As is usually true with landmark decisions, it is imperative to identify what the Court decided and what the Court left unresolved.

Impeachment By Conviction Evidence: Judicial Discretion And The Politics Of Rule 609, Victor Gold

Cardozo Law Review

No provision of the Federal Rules of Evidence has sparked more controversy than Rule 609, which deals with the admissibility of convictions to impeach a witness. When first proposed, the provision was the subject of fierce debate, sparking repeated revision during its drafting and while it was under consideration by Congress. Ultimately, no one side in this legislative battle prevailed entirely; the Rule strikes a compromise between sharply conflicting policies. The text of Rule 609, incorporating no less than three balancing tests, two references to fairness, one to justice, and several other undefined terms, leaves the task of resolving the …

Never Again? The "Concentration Camps" In Bosnia-Herzegovina: A Legal Analysis Of Human Rights Abuses, Alan C. Laifer

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note draws parallels between the atrocities committed during the Holocaust and the ongoing violence in Bosnia, emphasizing the need for international accountability. It advocates for the establishment of a War Crimes Tribunal, modeled after the Nuremberg Tribunal, to prosecute individuals responsible for genocide and other war crimes. The analysis critiques the international community’s inaction and underscores the importance of upholding international law to prevent future atrocities.

Justice Byron White And The Argument That The Greater Includes The Lesser, Michael E. Herz

Articles

No abstract provided.

Living Under Siege: Do Stalking Laws Protect Domestic Violence Victims?, Susan E. Bernstein

Cardozo Law Review

Nearly thirty percent of all women murdered in America are killed by their husbands or boyfriends, and as many as ninety percent of them have been stalked.

Prostitution: A Violation Of Women's Human Rights, Dorchen Leidholdt

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article argues that prostitution is a violation of women's human rights, asserting that it is not a form of work or a legitimate choice but rather an exploitative institution rooted in gender inequality. The author criticizes the pro-prostitution lobby for framing prostitution as empowering, arguing that this perspective ignores the inherent abuse and exploitation faced by women in the industry.

A Date With Justice: Prostitution And The Decriminalization Debate, Margaret A. Baldwin

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article critiques the decriminalization of prostitution, arguing that it fails to address the systemic exploitation and violence faced by women in prostitution. The author contends that decriminalization would empower pimps, johns, and legal systems to further exploit women, as it legitimizes their power dynamics. The analysis emphasizes the need to prioritize the survival and empowerment of prostituted women over legal reforms that benefit their exploiters.

Voice And Text In Constitutionalism, Ferenc Feher

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Identity, George P. Fletcher

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

John D. Appel, Arthur J. Jacobson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Forensic Expertise In Dutch Criminal Procedure, Johannes F. Nijboer

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Road To Repose: Limitations On Avoidance Actions In Chapter 11 Via 11 U.S.C. § 546(A)(2), Paul David Brusiloff

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sanctioning Voice: Quotation Marks, The Abolition Of Torture, And The Fifth Amendment, Margreta De Grazia

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Case For Televised Executions, Gil Santamarina

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Protecting Native American Culture, Leonard D. Duboff

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Suicide And Justice, Arthur J. Jacobson

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Comment On Edwards: Ward Edwards And The New Bayesian Software, David T. Wasserman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Influence Diagrams, Bayesian Imperialism, And The Collins Case: An Appeal To Reason, Ward Edwards

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Expert-Novice Differences And Implications For Choice Of Bench Versus Jury Trial, Anne W. Martin

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Missing Evidence, Dale A. Nance

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Distribution Of Damages In Car Accidents Through The Use Of Neural Networks, Lothar Philipps

Cardozo Law Review

After a traffic accident the damage has to be fairly divided among the parties involved, and a ratio has to be determined. There are many precedents for this, and judges have developed catalogues suggesting ratios for common types of accidents.

The problem that "every case is different," however, remains. Many cases have familiar aspects, but also unfamiliar ones. Even if a case is composed of several familiar aspects with established ratios, the question remains as to how these are to be figured into one ratio. The first thought would be to invent a mathematical formula, but such formulae are rigid …

The Admissibility Of Dna Testing, D. H. Kaye

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Some Caveats Concerning Dna As Criminal Identification Evidence: With Thanks To The Reverend Bayes, Richard Lempert

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

What Dna “Fingerprinting” Can Teach The Law About The Rest Of Forensic Science, Michael J. Saks, Jonathan J. Koehler

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.