Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (197)
- Universitas Indonesia (122)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (78)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (70)
- UIC School of Law (52)
-
- BLR (34)
- University of Michigan Law School (27)
- University of Colorado Law School (20)
- Boston University School of Law (10)
- New York Law School (9)
- Georgia State University College of Law (8)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (8)
- Barry University School of Law (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- Pepperdine University (6)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- University of Miami Law School (6)
- Brooklyn Law School (5)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (5)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (5)
- University of Maine School of Law (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Duquesne University (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- St. Mary's University (4)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (99)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (69)
- Constitution (44)
- Criminal procedure (35)
- Defendant (34)
-
- Federal (34)
- Supreme Court (34)
- Criminal law (33)
- State (33)
- Evidence (31)
- New York (28)
- Constitutional Law (27)
- Judges (27)
- Police (27)
- 1990) (22)
- Court of Appeals (21)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (21)
- § 6 (21)
- Jury (20)
- Law and Society (20)
- Courts (19)
- Fifth Amendment (19)
- Law (19)
- United States Supreme Court (19)
- Criminal Law (18)
- Fourth Amendment (17)
- Criminal justice (16)
- International Law (16)
- Law enforcement (16)
- Due process (15)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (196)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Touro Law Review (59)
- UIC Law Review (50)
- Cardozo Law Review (37)
-
- ExpressO (33)
- Articles (28)
- Faculty Scholarship (24)
- Publications (20)
- Michigan Law Review (17)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (10)
- Articles & Chapters (9)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (8)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (6)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (5)
- Georgia State University Law Review (5)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
- Maine Law Review (5)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (4)
- Arkansas Law Review (3)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (3)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (3)
- Duquesne Law Review (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 751 - 780 of 805
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
The Great Writ In Action: Empirical Light On The Federal Habeas Corpus Debate, Larry Yackle
The Great Writ In Action: Empirical Light On The Federal Habeas Corpus Debate, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
The national debate regarding federal habeas corpus for state prisoners is fueled in the main by ideology. To some, the authority of the federal courts to entertain constitutional challenges to state criminal convictions is the embodiment of all that was right about the Warren Court and the vision that Court offered of a meaningful system of American liberty, underwritten by independent federal tribunals willing and able to check the coercive power of government. By this account, the Bill of Rights is the protean source of safeguards for individual freedom - commanding generous, imaginative, and insightful elaboration by federal courts at …
Beyond The Warren Court And Its Conservative Critics: Toward A Unified Theory Of Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Donald A. Dripps
Beyond The Warren Court And Its Conservative Critics: Toward A Unified Theory Of Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Donald A. Dripps
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Part I develops more fully the differences that divide liberal and conservative commentators on criminal procedure, taking special note of the series of Reports prepared by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Policy and published recently in the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. Part II explains my disquiet with the suggestion that original-meaning jurisprudence ought to guide criminal procedure doctrine. Part II also defends the thesis that the fourteenth amendment protects the individual interest in freedom from unjust punishment, rather than any abstract interest in truth for its own sake. Part III considers two familiar controversies in criminal …
The Truth About Massiah, James J. Tomkovicz
The Truth About Massiah, James J. Tomkovicz
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
First, the Article will summarize the Justice Department's discussion of the Massiah right to counsel and the exclusion of evidence under Massiah. Next, it will evaluate the nature of the Report and the character of legal scholarship. Finally, it will explore the substantive debate over Massiah. In that section, the Article will point out the matters on which the DOJ and I agree, will attempt to frame the fundamental questions raised by the Massiah doctrine, and will investigate potential sources of answers to those constitutional questions. Ultimately, it will provide the answers that I prefer, explaining the premises …
Stanford V. Kentucky: The Minimum Age For The Maximum Penalty - Death, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (1990), Alison R. Faltersack
Stanford V. Kentucky: The Minimum Age For The Maximum Penalty - Death, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (1990), Alison R. Faltersack
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered V. United States: Supreme Court Approves Attorney Fee Foreiture, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 471 (1990), Stephen M. Kightlinger
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered V. United States: Supreme Court Approves Attorney Fee Foreiture, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 471 (1990), Stephen M. Kightlinger
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Pattern Of Racketeering Element Of Rico Liability, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
The Pattern Of Racketeering Element Of Rico Liability, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Plea For Help: Pleading Problems In Section 1983 Municipal Liability Claims, Evan S. Schwartz
A Plea For Help: Pleading Problems In Section 1983 Municipal Liability Claims, Evan S. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Where To Draw The Guideline: Factoring The Fruits Of Illegal Searches Into Sentencing Guidelines Calculations, Cheryl G. Bader, David S. Douglas
Where To Draw The Guideline: Factoring The Fruits Of Illegal Searches Into Sentencing Guidelines Calculations, Cheryl G. Bader, David S. Douglas
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Form And Function In The Administration Of Justice: The Bill Of Rights And Federal Habeas Corpus, Larry Yackle
Form And Function In The Administration Of Justice: The Bill Of Rights And Federal Habeas Corpus, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
Part I critiques the Report's insistence that accurate fact finding exhausts, or nearly exhausts, the objectives of criminal justice, identifies the fundamental role of the Bill of Rights in the American political order, and situates federal habeas corpus within that framework. Part II traces the Report's historical review of the federal habeas jurisdiction and critiques the Report's too-convenient reliance on selected materials that, on examination, fail to undermine conventional understandings of the writ's development as a postconviction remedy. Part III responds to the Report's complaints regarding current habeas corpus practice and refutes contentions that the habeas jurisdiction overburdens federal dockets …
Contradiction And Critical Legal Studies, David G. Carlson
Contradiction And Critical Legal Studies, David G. Carlson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Roberson: The Supreme Court Expands Suspects' Rights In The Custodial Interrogation Setting, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 685 (1989), Thomas N. Radek
Arizona V. Roberson: The Supreme Court Expands Suspects' Rights In The Custodial Interrogation Setting, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 685 (1989), Thomas N. Radek
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Police Trespass And The Fourth Amendment: A Wall In Need Of Mending, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 795 (1989), Clifford S. Fishman
Police Trespass And The Fourth Amendment: A Wall In Need Of Mending, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 795 (1989), Clifford S. Fishman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Hicks: Probable Cause Requirement Under The Plain View Doctrine, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
Arizona V. Hicks: Probable Cause Requirement Under The Plain View Doctrine, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of Attorney Fee Forfeiture Under Rico And Cce, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 155 (1988), John R. Russell
The Constitutionality Of Attorney Fee Forfeiture Under Rico And Cce, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 155 (1988), John R. Russell
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rock V. Arkansas: Hypnosis And The Prejudice Rule - Your Memories May Not Be Your Own, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 409 (1988), Gail Downer Zwemke
Rock V. Arkansas: Hypnosis And The Prejudice Rule - Your Memories May Not Be Your Own, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 409 (1988), Gail Downer Zwemke
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judge Robert H. Bork's Decisions In Which He Wrote No Opinion: An Analysis Of The Regulatory And Benefit Cases, Robert A. Anthony
Judge Robert H. Bork's Decisions In Which He Wrote No Opinion: An Analysis Of The Regulatory And Benefit Cases, Robert A. Anthony
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Judicial Performance Of Robert H. Bork In Administrative And Regulatory Law, Richard B. Stewart
The Judicial Performance Of Robert H. Bork In Administrative And Regulatory Law, Richard B. Stewart
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Do The United States Sentencing Guidelines Deprive Defendants Of Due Process?, Bradford Mank
Do The United States Sentencing Guidelines Deprive Defendants Of Due Process?, Bradford Mank
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
It is difficult to determine whether due process requires individualized sentencing because sentencing goals and practices have varied greatly during the course of this nation's history. A court applying Judge Bork's original intent doctrine of constitutional interpretation would probably reach a result different from that reached by a court employing a more liberal view of due process protections.1o It is likely that liberals and conservatives on the current Supreme Court would disagree on whether the Guidelines violate due process.
This article argues that the Guidelines can be saved and can satisfy due process requirements if the Supreme Court interprets the …
Colorado V. Connelly: The Gratuitous Union Of Voluntariness And State Coercion, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1987), James P. Byrne Jr.
Colorado V. Connelly: The Gratuitous Union Of Voluntariness And State Coercion, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (1987), James P. Byrne Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Silence As A Trial Strategy After Strickland And Cronic: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?Nic : The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jo Ellen Silberstein
Silence As A Trial Strategy After Strickland And Cronic: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?Nic : The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jo Ellen Silberstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.