Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (196)
- University of Michigan Law School (116)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (85)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (46)
- UIC School of Law (36)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (27)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (24)
- William & Mary Law School (24)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (21)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (17)
- University of Richmond (15)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (12)
- Cornell University Law School (11)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (11)
- University of Colorado Law School (11)
- Emory University School of Law (10)
- Fordham Law School (10)
- St. John's University School of Law (10)
- University of Georgia School of Law (10)
- University of Maine School of Law (10)
- Mercer University School of Law (9)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (9)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (8)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (8)
- American University Washington College of Law (7)
- Georgia State University College of Law (7)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
- Southern Methodist University (7)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (7)
- Brooklyn Law School (6)
- Keyword
-
- Fourth Amendment (199)
- Police (106)
- Fourth amendment (92)
- Privacy (74)
- United States Supreme Court (68)
-
- Exclusionary rule (67)
- Searches (67)
- Probable cause (65)
- Search and seizure (65)
- Search (59)
- Criminal procedure (56)
- Supreme Court (50)
- Warrant (43)
- Seizures (40)
- Search and Seizure (39)
- Criminal Procedure (37)
- Evidence (35)
- Seizure (33)
- Reasonable suspicion (29)
- Fifth Amendment (28)
- Constitution (27)
- Constitutional Law (26)
- Miranda v. Arizona (26)
- Surveillance (26)
- Law (25)
- New York (25)
- Federal (24)
- Mapp v. Ohio (24)
- Technology (24)
- Law enforcement (22)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (195)
- Touro Law Review (82)
- Michigan Law Review (59)
- Faculty Scholarship (43)
- Articles (37)
-
- Faculty Articles (34)
- UIC Law Review (33)
- Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice (22)
- Faculty Publications (14)
- Cardozo Law Review (13)
- Oklahoma Law Review (13)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (13)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (12)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (11)
- Publications (11)
- Scholarly Articles (11)
- Maine Law Review (10)
- Mercer Law Review (9)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (8)
- Scholarly Works (8)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (8)
- Book Chapters (7)
- Georgia State University Law Review (7)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (7)
- University of Richmond Law Review (7)
- NYLS Law Review (6)
- Other Faculty Publications (6)
- St. Thomas Law Review (6)
- William & Mary Law Review (6)
- Akron Law Review (5)
- Publication Type
Articles 871 - 900 of 919
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
The Unsettled Law Of Third Party Consent, 11 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 115 (1977), Lee Carson
The Unsettled Law Of Third Party Consent, 11 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 115 (1977), Lee Carson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mondale On Mapp, Yale Kamisar
Mondale On Mapp, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Any judicial reversal of the Mapp rule threatens to have just the opposite effect. Law enforcement officials are likely to treat a decision that illegally obtained evidence may be admitted into state criminal trials as though that were a practical suspension of the constitutional rules as to lawful arrest, search, and seizure. They are likely to feel that once again "the judiciary is okaying it." With the smell of revelations of FBI "black-bag jobs" and intelligence agency abuses still in the air, is this how we want the Court to contribute to the atmosphere of police practices as we enter …
Search And Seizure In Alaska: A Comprehensive Review, Jeff M. Feldman
Search And Seizure In Alaska: A Comprehensive Review, Jeff M. Feldman
Articles
In the eighteen years since Alaska achieved statehood, fifty-two cases involving issues of search and seizure have reached the Alaska Supreme Court. This article will analyze these cases with an eyetowards outlining the law of search and seizure in Alaska, isolating those areas in which the Alaska Supreme Court has departed from prevailing search and seizure doctrine, and using past decisions to predict the probable outcomes to search and seizure issues still unresolved in Alaska.
Criminal Procedure—Filing By Information: Determination Of Probable Cause Required Before Extended Restraint On Liberty—Gerstein V. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975), Cynthia B. Whitaker
Criminal Procedure—Filing By Information: Determination Of Probable Cause Required Before Extended Restraint On Liberty—Gerstein V. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975), Cynthia B. Whitaker
Washington Law Review
Robert Pugh was arrested in Florida without a warrant and charged by prosecutor's information. Pugh and other incarcerated arrestees charged by information without a preliminary hearing brought a class action suit in federal district court challenging the constitutionality of the charging procedure. Plaintiffs maintained that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment required that accused persons be accorded a determination of probable cause for detention soon after their arrest. They also argued that the prosecuting attorney was not sufficiently neutral or detached to make the necessary determination. The district court accepted the plaintiffs' arguments, and the Court of Appeals …
Conspiracy And Federal Jurisdiction: From Crimmins To Feola, Mark Berger
Conspiracy And Federal Jurisdiction: From Crimmins To Feola, Mark Berger
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Subsequent Use Of Electronic Surveillance Interceptions And The Plain View Doctrine: Fourth Amendment Limitations On The Omnibus Crime Control Act, Raymond R. Kepner
Subsequent Use Of Electronic Surveillance Interceptions And The Plain View Doctrine: Fourth Amendment Limitations On The Omnibus Crime Control Act, Raymond R. Kepner
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Despite the critical examination to which many sections of Title III have been subjected, section 2517(5) has received little serious scrutiny from either the courts or the commentators. This note will analyze the constitutionality of the section in terms of the standards which the Supreme Court has articulated, both with respect to the law of search and seizure generally and with respect to electronic surveillance. This examination will reveal that section 2517(5) cannot be sustained under the existing contours of fourth amendment interpretation.
The Street Perspective: A Conversation With The Police, Patrick L. Baude
The Street Perspective: A Conversation With The Police, Patrick L. Baude
IUSTITIA
Professor Baude's purpose in this discussion is to elicit police officers' comments on what members of the legal profession ought to know about the influence of the "street perspective" in shaping those officers' attitudes towards the criminal justice system and the role they play in it. It is police insistence on the broad validity of insights which only "the street" can provide that accounts for the considerable gulf between "front-line" enforcement officers and other functionaries in (and students of) that system. Law students (and no doubt lawyers) seem uncomfortable with the notion that our system cannot adequately be understood without …
Gerstein V. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975); In Re Florida Rules Of Criminal Procedure, 309 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1975), R. Wayne Miller
Gerstein V. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975); In Re Florida Rules Of Criminal Procedure, 309 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1975), R. Wayne Miller
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Procedure- PRELIMINARY HEARINGS- NONADVERSARY JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF PROBABLE CAUSE TO DETAIN IS PREREQUISITE TO EXTENDED RESTRAINT OF LIBERTY FOLLOWING ARREST.
In Re Forfeiture Of The Following Described Vehicle, 1972 Porsche 2 Dr., '74 Florida License Tag Id 91788 Vin #9111200334, 307 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 1975), Michael P. Mabile
In Re Forfeiture Of The Following Described Vehicle, 1972 Porsche 2 Dr., '74 Florida License Tag Id 91788 Vin #9111200334, 307 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 1975), Michael P. Mabile
Florida State University Law Review
Criminal Law- FORFEITURES- SIGNIFICANT INVOLVEMENT IN ILLICIT DRUG OPERATION REQUIRED TO JUSTIFY AUTOMOBILE FORFEITURE; EVIDENCE OBTAINED BY ILLEGAL SEARCH INADMISSIBLE IN FORFEITURE PROCEEDING; IMPOUNDMENT OF AUTOMOBILE WITHOUT WARRANT IN ABSENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE AND EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES INVALIDATES RELATED INVENTORY SEARCH.
A Reconsideration Of The Fourth Amendment's Doctrine Of Search Incident To Arrest.Pdf, David Aaronson
A Reconsideration Of The Fourth Amendment's Doctrine Of Search Incident To Arrest.Pdf, David Aaronson
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
INTRODUCTION: The doctrine of search incident to arrest provides that, as an incident to every lawful full custody arrest, law enforcement officers have an automatic right to conduct a thorough search of the arrestee and the area within his immediate control.' Although the Supreme Court has stated that the search incident to arrest exception to the fourth amendment's general requirement of a search warrant has been "settled from its first enunciation," the doctrine should be reexamined in terms of constitutional jurisprudence.
Criminal Law Notes: The Preliminary Hearing As A Constitutional Requirement, F. Thomas Schornhorst
Criminal Law Notes: The Preliminary Hearing As A Constitutional Requirement, F. Thomas Schornhorst
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Fourth Amendment - Conduct Of An Effective Foreign Policy Demands That Presidential Power To Conduct Electronic Surveillance For Foreign Affaris Purposes Not Be Subjected To Warrant Requirement, And That Subsequent Judicial Review Be Limited, Mark R. Cuker
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Fourth Amendment As A Way Of Talking About People: A Study Of Robinson And Matlock, James Boyd White
The Fourth Amendment As A Way Of Talking About People: A Study Of Robinson And Matlock, James Boyd White
Articles
One way to regard what the Supreme Court has done in the cases it has decided under the Fourth Amendment is to say that it has created a specialized discourse of adjudication, a language in which it can talk about and dispose of the repeated conflicts that arise between an officer engaged in the process of crime control and a citizen upon whose freedom or security he intrudes. The events which bring these two figures together are bewildering in their variety and complexity, and the claims on each side are deeply felt and strenuously made. It has not been easy …
Search And Seizure- Permissible Scope Of A Search Incident To A Valid Custodial Arrest
Search And Seizure- Permissible Scope Of A Search Incident To A Valid Custodial Arrest
University of Richmond Law Review
While the fourth amendment does not make a warrant mandatory for all searches, it does require that all searches meet the test of reasonableness. The search incident to a lawful arrest is one of the well-established exceptions to the warrant requirement. The incidental search doctrine and the exclusionary rule were first discussed by the United States Supreme Court in Weeks v. United States. The Supreme Court's failure to enunciate definitive standards in defining the permissible scope of a search incident to an arrest has created numerous problems for the courts and police. The limitations on the permissible scope of a …
Search And Seizure- Knowledge Of Fourth Amendment Rights Not A Prerequisite To A Valid Consent Search
University of Richmond Law Review
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution, applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment, guarantees to every citizen the indefeasible right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures. As a response to a long history of English colonial abuses, the fourth amendment was intended by the drafters of the Bill of Rights to be a safeguard against governmental misuse of the writs of assistance' and the general warrant. The Supreme Court has broadly interpreted the constitutional mandate of the fourth amendment as proscribing all searches and seizures which do not comply with its stringent provisions. However, certain …
Constitutional Law - Fourth Amendment - A Witness May Not Invoke The Exclusionary Rule To Suppress Evidence Before The Grand Jury Or As A Basis For Refusing To Answer Questions Based On Evidence Seized In Violation Of His Fourth Amendment Rights, Leland G. Ripley
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Automobile Inventory Search And Cady V. Dombrowski, Robert M. Hall
The Automobile Inventory Search And Cady V. Dombrowski, Robert M. Hall
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law Notes: Fourth Amendment Developments And Their Impact Upon The Criminal Process In Indiana, F. Thomas Schornhorst
Criminal Law Notes: Fourth Amendment Developments And Their Impact Upon The Criminal Process In Indiana, F. Thomas Schornhorst
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Almeida-Sanchez V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Almeida-Sanchez V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Schneckloth V. Bustamonte, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Schneckloth V. Bustamonte, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Searches Without Warrants, Jerold H. Israel
Searches Without Warrants, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
My primary area of concentration today is the search made without a warrant. Studies indicate that 95 percent or more of all searches are without warrants. It is quite understandable, then, that most of the search-and-seizure litigation concerns the validity of searches without warrants.
Warrantless Searches And Seizures, Mack Allen Player
Warrantless Searches And Seizures, Mack Allen Player
Scholarly Works
The fourth amendment to the Constitution has two basic clauses. The first, the reasonableness clause, protects the people against unreasonable searches and seizures. The second, the warrant clause, sets forth conditions under which a warrant may issue. Searches and seizures made pursuant to a warrant are, quite obviously, governed by the commands of the warrant clause. However, the effect of the warrant clause upon searches and seizures made without warrants is not clear from the amendment itself, and the Supreme Court has failed to develop a consistent interpretation of the proper role of that clause.
The Legitimation Of Electronic Eavesdropping: The Politics Of "Law And Order", Herman Schwartz
The Legitimation Of Electronic Eavesdropping: The Politics Of "Law And Order", Herman Schwartz
Michigan Law Review
This Article will examine some constitutional considerations raised by wiretapping and eavesdropping in light of recent Supreme Court decisions, the probable extent of such activity, the limitations imposed upon it by title III and the ABA Standards, and the arguments for the "necessity" of electronic surveillance. Finally, a few jaundiced comments will be offered about legislative and judicial lawmaking in the field of criminal justice, particularly in a time of crisis.
The Warren Court And Criminal Procedure, A. Kenneth Pye
The Warren Court And Criminal Procedure, A. Kenneth Pye
Michigan Law Review
On October 5, 1953, Earl Warren became Chief Justice of the United States. During the fifteen years of his tenure as Chief Justice, fundamental changes in criminal procedure have resulted· from decisions of what is popularly called "the Warren Court." There may be a legitimate difference of opinion whether these changes constitute a "criminal law revolution" or merely an orderly evolution toward the application of civilized standards to the trial of persons accused of crime. Whatever the characterization, however, there can be little doubt that the developments of the past fifteen years have unalterably changed the course of .the administration …
"Street Encounters" And The Constitution: Terry, Sibron, Peters, And Beyond, Wayne R. Lafave
"Street Encounters" And The Constitution: Terry, Sibron, Peters, And Beyond, Wayne R. Lafave
Michigan Law Review
In light of the surfeit of law review commentary on the subject of stop and frisk, a word about what follows is in order. This Article is not intended to be a restatement or summary of the recent debate on stop and frisk. Terry and its companions have put some of the issues to rest and pushed others to the forefront, and with the resulting change in the battle lines the time is ripe for a reassessment. The concern here is with the approach taken by the Supreme Court in Terry, Sibron, and Peters, and the emphasis is …
Custodial Police Interrogation In Our Nation's Capital: The Attempt To Implement Miranda, Richard J. Medalie, Leonard Zeitz, Paul Alexander
Custodial Police Interrogation In Our Nation's Capital: The Attempt To Implement Miranda, Richard J. Medalie, Leonard Zeitz, Paul Alexander
Michigan Law Review
In his attempt to define the meaning of democracy, Carl Becker, looking back to Plato's view of society, observed that "[a]ll human institutions, we are told, have their ideal forms laid away in heaven, and we do not need to be told that the actual institutions conform but indifferently to these ideal counterparts." Becker's observation may well set the perspective from which to view what occurred when the attempt was made in the District of Columbia to implement the Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v. Arizona.
Search By Consent, Jerold H. Israel
Search By Consent, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
My topics this morning are eavesdropping, search by consent and entrance gained by fraud and deceit. You should be forewarned that these are areas in which the law has been "on the move" for the past few years. Changes have occurred and still more will take place in the future. I will attempt to anticipate some of those developments, but, obviously, the only safe course is keeping up-to-date through continuing education. In covering my assigned topics, I hope to paint with a rather broad brush. It has always been my feeling that the pohce officer cannot be expected to learn …
Recent Developments In The Law Of Search And Seizure, Jerold H. Israel
Recent Developments In The Law Of Search And Seizure, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
This article is designed to provide a survey of recent decisions dealing with several important issues in the area of search and seizure. It is intended primarily as a basic collection of sources. I have, therefore, sought to keep my own commentary at a minimum and the citations to relevant cases at a maximum. Wherever space permits, I have let the courts speak for themselves. In most instances, however, it has been necessary to provide fairly general descriptions of the cases.
Family Law—Application Of The Rules Against Search And Seizure To Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Alan Eber
Family Law—Application Of The Rules Against Search And Seizure To Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Alan Eber
Buffalo Law Review
Matter of Williams, 49 Misc. 2d 154, 267 N.Y.S.2d 91 (Ulster County Family Ct. 1966).
Constitutional Law - Search And Seizure - Wife's Consent To Search And Seizure Of Husband's Property Held Not Sufficient To Waive Constitutional Rights Protecting Husband. State V. Hall, 142 S.E.2d 177 (1965)., R. H. Kraftson
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.