Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (196)
- University of Michigan Law School (116)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (85)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (46)
- UIC School of Law (36)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (27)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (24)
- William & Mary Law School (24)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (21)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (17)
- University of Richmond (15)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (12)
- Cornell University Law School (11)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (11)
- University of Colorado Law School (11)
- Emory University School of Law (10)
- Fordham Law School (10)
- St. John's University School of Law (10)
- University of Georgia School of Law (10)
- University of Maine School of Law (10)
- Mercer University School of Law (9)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (9)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (8)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (8)
- American University Washington College of Law (7)
- Georgia State University College of Law (7)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
- Southern Methodist University (7)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (7)
- Brooklyn Law School (6)
- Keyword
-
- Fourth Amendment (199)
- Police (106)
- Fourth amendment (92)
- Privacy (74)
- United States Supreme Court (68)
-
- Exclusionary rule (67)
- Searches (67)
- Probable cause (65)
- Search and seizure (65)
- Search (59)
- Criminal procedure (56)
- Supreme Court (50)
- Warrant (43)
- Seizures (40)
- Search and Seizure (39)
- Criminal Procedure (37)
- Evidence (35)
- Seizure (33)
- Reasonable suspicion (29)
- Fifth Amendment (28)
- Constitution (27)
- Constitutional Law (26)
- Miranda v. Arizona (26)
- Surveillance (26)
- Law (25)
- New York (25)
- Federal (24)
- Mapp v. Ohio (24)
- Technology (24)
- Law enforcement (22)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (195)
- Touro Law Review (82)
- Michigan Law Review (59)
- Faculty Scholarship (43)
- Articles (37)
-
- Faculty Articles (34)
- UIC Law Review (33)
- Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice (22)
- Faculty Publications (14)
- Cardozo Law Review (13)
- Oklahoma Law Review (13)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (13)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (12)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (11)
- Publications (11)
- Scholarly Articles (11)
- Maine Law Review (10)
- Mercer Law Review (9)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (8)
- Scholarly Works (8)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (8)
- Book Chapters (7)
- Georgia State University Law Review (7)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (7)
- University of Richmond Law Review (7)
- NYLS Law Review (6)
- Other Faculty Publications (6)
- St. Thomas Law Review (6)
- William & Mary Law Review (6)
- Akron Law Review (5)
- Publication Type
Articles 751 - 780 of 919
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
The Warren Court And Criminal Justice: A Quarter-Century Retrospective, Yale Kamisar
The Warren Court And Criminal Justice: A Quarter-Century Retrospective, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Many commentators have observed that when we speak of "the Warren Court," we mean the Warren Court that lasted from 1962 (when Arthur Goldberg replaced Felix Frankfurter) to 1969 (when Earl Warren retired). But when we speak of the Warren Court's "revolution" in American criminal procedure we mean the Warren Court that lasted from 1961 (when the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio was decided) to 1966 or 1967. In its final years, the Warren Court was not the same Court that had handed down Mapp or Miranda v. Arizona.
A World Without Privacy: Why Property Does Not Define The Limits Of The Right Against Unreasonable Searches And Seizures, Sherry F. Colb
A World Without Privacy: Why Property Does Not Define The Limits Of The Right Against Unreasonable Searches And Seizures, Sherry F. Colb
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
From The Battlefront To The Homefront: Infrared Surveillance And The War On Drugs Place Privacy Under Siege, Lynne M. Pochurek
From The Battlefront To The Homefront: Infrared Surveillance And The War On Drugs Place Privacy Under Siege, Lynne M. Pochurek
St. Thomas Law Review
While George Orwell contemplated the realities of modem technology racing ahead with ever increasing speed and thwarting our individual privacy, it is clear that the Framers of the Constitution did not. This technological advancement, coupled with America's overriding concern with fighting the "war on drugs," has immensely compromised the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Once commanding great respect, this Amendment was "sanctified by a Supreme Court that felt compelled to protect all of us, the innocent and guilty alike, from arbitrary and unlawful government intrusions." Unfortunately, the modem courts have not been faithful in adhering to the Framers' …
The "Wrap" On Probable Cause: The Fourth Amendment Contained, Paul L. Kaminsky
The "Wrap" On Probable Cause: The Fourth Amendment Contained, Paul L. Kaminsky
St. Thomas Law Review
Part I of this Note begins by exploring the meaning of probable cause, briefly tracing its development. Part I continues with an examination of how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Fourth Amendment and the probable cause requirement relates to searches and seizures of containers, specifically, containers that may fall within the Sanders' footnote "exception." The relationship between the Sanders doctrine and that of the "plain view" doctrine will also be examined. In Part II, this Note presents the case of United States v. Prandy-Binett as an example of the above-mentioned doctrinal exceptions to the requirements of the Fourth Amendment …
Of Myths And Mapp: A Response To Professor Magee, Sheri Johnson
Of Myths And Mapp: A Response To Professor Magee, Sheri Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Consent Exception To The Warrant Requirement, H. Patrick Furman
The Consent Exception To The Warrant Requirement, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Court's "Two Model" Approach To The Fourth Amendment: Carpe Diem!, Craig M. Bradley
The Court's "Two Model" Approach To The Fourth Amendment: Carpe Diem!, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Resources And Rights: Towards A New Prototype Of Criminal Representation, Laura Gardner Webster
Resources And Rights: Towards A New Prototype Of Criminal Representation, Laura Gardner Webster
Mercer Law Review
A comprehensive concern in recent criminal procedure decisions in the United States Supreme Court has been the apprehension that certain rights afforded to the accused detract from efficient law enforcement. Efficiency in controlling crime and obtaining accurate verdicts is preferred over the recognition of rights which impede that process. This model of the purposes of the criminal justice system has its origins in the judicial reluctance to apply the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule as a means of excluding otherwise probative evidence simply because "the constable blundered."' The problems in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence are well known. As two commentators have observed, …
Search, Seizure And The Positive Law: Expectations Of Privacy Outside The Fourth Amendment, Daniel B. Yeager
Search, Seizure And The Positive Law: Expectations Of Privacy Outside The Fourth Amendment, Daniel B. Yeager
Faculty Scholarship
This Article is about the misunderstood relationship between the Fourth Amendment and the positive law. It shows how state property law and other expressions of the positive law are more resilient and useful to Fourth Amendment analysis than the Court's decisions of the past three decades recognize.
The Right Of The People To Be Secure, Ronald J. Bacigal
The Right Of The People To Be Secure, Ronald J. Bacigal
Law Faculty Publications
Part I of this Article defines searches and seizures of property and person, discussing the Supreme Court's initially broad interpretation of the Fourth Amendment and its subsequent narrowing in later decisions. Part II discusses several police "chase cases" leading up to the elimination of accidental and attempted seizures from Fourth Amendment protection in Brower v. County of Inyo and California v. Hodari D. Part Ill analyzes the Brower decision and its effect on accidental seizures, concluding that the analysis set forth therein should be abolished and advocating an alternate test. Part IV confronts the Court's elimination of attempted seizures from …
Oops - We Forgot To Put It In The Refrigerator: Dna Identification And The State's Duty To Preserve Evidence, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 809 (1992), Albert M.T. Finch Iii
Oops - We Forgot To Put It In The Refrigerator: Dna Identification And The State's Duty To Preserve Evidence, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 809 (1992), Albert M.T. Finch Iii
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Protective Sweep Incident To A Lawful Arrest: An Analysis Of Its Validity Under The Federal And New York State Constitution, Steven M. Fox
Protective Sweep Incident To A Lawful Arrest: An Analysis Of Its Validity Under The Federal And New York State Constitution, Steven M. Fox
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Guilt: Henry Friendly Meets The Maharal Of Prague, Irene Merker Rosenberg, Yale L. Rosenberg
Guilt: Henry Friendly Meets The Maharal Of Prague, Irene Merker Rosenberg, Yale L. Rosenberg
Michigan Law Review
So while the overnight deliberation rule is at least partially bound up with the question of reliability and relates to the judicial process itself, the broader and more fundamental issue raised by this law is whether we should free the guilty to preserve a value that we deem necessary to proper working of the criminal justice process, regardless of the culpability of individual defendants. To this Judge Friendly's answer is generally no, 113 and the MaHaRaL's is yes.