Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (878)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (788)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (299)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (294)
- Seattle University School of Law (270)
-
- BLR (220)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (218)
- Columbia Law School (174)
- University of Richmond (174)
- American University Washington College of Law (155)
- UIC School of Law (153)
- University of Michigan Law School (149)
- University of Maine School of Law (117)
- Brooklyn Law School (116)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (114)
- University of Georgia School of Law (96)
- UC Law SF (91)
- Mercer University School of Law (87)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (86)
- Cornell University Law School (81)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (79)
- University of Miami Law School (76)
- Roger Williams University (75)
- St. John's University School of Law (72)
- Pace University (71)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (70)
- Boston University School of Law (69)
- St. Mary's University (68)
- Fordham Law School (67)
- Southern Methodist University (63)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (501)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (464)
- Criminal procedure (376)
- Criminal Law (225)
- Evidence (217)
-
- Death penalty (191)
- Constitutional Law (190)
- Sentencing (189)
- Criminal justice (188)
- Criminal Procedure (185)
- Capital punishment (142)
- Fourth Amendment (133)
- Due process (124)
- Supreme Court (115)
- Police (105)
- Sixth Amendment (105)
- Courts (101)
- Jurisprudence (95)
- Punishment (95)
- New York (94)
- Constitution (91)
- Law and Society (86)
- Law (82)
- Criminal (81)
- Crime (80)
- Prosecutors (80)
- Federal (77)
- Fifth Amendment (77)
- Constitutional law (73)
- Jury (73)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (723)
- Faculty Scholarship (554)
- Cardozo Law Review (325)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (259)
- Seattle University Law Review (222)
-
- ExpressO (195)
- Touro Law Review (185)
- Articles (176)
- University of Richmond Law Review (138)
- UIC Law Review (128)
- Faculty Publications (127)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Maine Law Review (115)
- All Faculty Scholarship (100)
- Scholarly Articles (95)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (94)
- Michigan Law Review (89)
- Mercer Law Review (80)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (79)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (77)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (77)
- Scholarly Works (76)
- Supreme Court Case Files (76)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (68)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (61)
- Publications (59)
- West Virginia Law Review (58)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (54)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (50)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (49)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 7081 - 7110 of 7291
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Two Kinds Of Legal Rules: A Comparative Study Of Burden-Of-Persuasion Practices In Criminal Cases, George P. Fletcher
Two Kinds Of Legal Rules: A Comparative Study Of Burden-Of-Persuasion Practices In Criminal Cases, George P. Fletcher
Faculty Scholarship
Good men everywhere praise the presumption of innocence. And be they Frenchmen, Germans, or Americans, they agree on the demand of the presumption in practice. Both here and abroad, the state's invocation of criminal sanctions demands a high degree of proof that the accused has committed the offense charged. To express the requisite standard of proof, common lawyers speak of the prosecutor's duty to prove his case beyond a reasonable doubt. And Continental lawyers invoke the maxim in dubio pro reo – a precept requiring triers of fact to acquit in cases of doubt.
The French speak of the presomption …
Criminal Law And Procedure, Dudley Warner Woodbridge
Criminal Law And Procedure, Dudley Warner Woodbridge
Virginia Bar Notes
No abstract provided.
Causation In Common Sense: A Reply To Messrs. Hart And Honore, Paul F. Rothstein
Causation In Common Sense: A Reply To Messrs. Hart And Honore, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
No abstract provided.
On Interpreting The Ethiopian Penal Code, Peter L. Strauss
On Interpreting The Ethiopian Penal Code, Peter L. Strauss
Faculty Scholarship
The aim of this article is to set out and discuss some general principles of interpreting the Ethiopian Penal Code – that is to say, of using it. Even now, ten years after it came into effect, many people have difficulty in understanding and using the Penal Code in a straightforward way. It seems complex, and many of its fundamental conceptions are unfamiliar to Ethiopian lawyers. This article, discussing at length how the code is built, may help reduce its apparent complexity and thus facilitate its day-to-day application.
Transatlantic Attitudes Toward Self-Incrimination, Kevin H. Tierney
Transatlantic Attitudes Toward Self-Incrimination, Kevin H. Tierney
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Mistrials In Courts-Martial: A Study Of The Evolution Of The Judicial Character Of The Military Judge, Paul E. Wilson
Mistrials In Courts-Martial: A Study Of The Evolution Of The Judicial Character Of The Military Judge, Paul E. Wilson
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Suspect And Society, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Covert Contingencies In The Right To The Assistance Of Counsel, Abraham S. Blumberg
Covert Contingencies In The Right To The Assistance Of Counsel, Abraham S. Blumberg
Vanderbilt Law Review
On the basis of a sociological survey showing that a very large percentage of guilty pleas are induced by defense counsel, Professor Blumberg concludes that criminal justice is not structured on the adversary model which the Supreme Court's right to counsel decisions presuppose. He submits that the primary loyalty of defense counsel is to the criminal court "system," the informal organization of court officials on which they depend for their professional existence. He suggests further that the additional attorneys which will be required to implement the right to counsel decisions will simply serve to make the"system" more efficient in utilizing …
Grounds For Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: A Suggested Standard, Patrick L. Baude
Grounds For Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: A Suggested Standard, Patrick L. Baude
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
In Re Gault: Understanding The Attorney's New Role, Glenn C. Equi, James D. Hutchinson, Barney B. Welsh
In Re Gault: Understanding The Attorney's New Role, Glenn C. Equi, James D. Hutchinson, Barney B. Welsh
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Law Enforcement States Its Views, John Edgar Hoover
Law Enforcement States Its Views, John Edgar Hoover
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law-Confessions-Admission Of Illegally Obtained Confession In State Criminal Prosecution Is Harmless Error Not Requiring Reversal Of Conviction--People V. Jacobson, Michigan Law Review
Criminal Law-Confessions-Admission Of Illegally Obtained Confession In State Criminal Prosecution Is Harmless Error Not Requiring Reversal Of Conviction--People V. Jacobson, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Defendant voluntarily admitted that he had murdered his daughter to a social worker, two ambulance attendants, and three police officers sent to investigate the incident. He continued to declare his guilt to these officers after his arrest, on the way to the police station, and at the police station where he was interrogated without the benefit of counsel although he had not waived his right to counsel. All of the confessions-approximately ten-were admitted in evidence at the defendant's trial over his objection that the two confessions obtained during the interrogation should have been excluded since he had been denied his …
United States V. Tempia: The Questionable Application Of Miranda To The Military, James F. Falco
United States V. Tempia: The Questionable Application Of Miranda To The Military, James F. Falco
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Newman: Conviction: The Determination Of Guilt Or Innocence Without Trial, B. J. George Jr.
Newman: Conviction: The Determination Of Guilt Or Innocence Without Trial, B. J. George Jr.
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Conviction: The Determination of Guilt or Innocence Without Trial by Donald J. Newman
Film Censorship: The American And British Experience, Robert J. Klein
Film Censorship: The American And British Experience, Robert J. Klein
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Review Of H.L.A. Hart, The Morality Of The Criminal Law, Oxford University Press (1965), Stanley Z. Fisher
Review Of H.L.A. Hart, The Morality Of The Criminal Law, Oxford University Press (1965), Stanley Z. Fisher
Faculty Scholarship
This slim volume contains the text of two lectures given by Professor Hart at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 1964. The first lecture, "Changing Conceptions of Responsibility," expresses concern at the turn in which the "liberal" criminal law reform movement in England has taken in connection with the law of criminal responsibility. Professor Hart takes issue with the stand of a leading reformer, Lady Wootton, who advocates abolition of the mens rea prerequisite to penal liability. In her view, the mental state of a harm-doer is relevant not to determining his penal liability (conviction), but only to the decision …
Book Review Of Cases And Readings In Criminal Law And Procedure, Michael Katz
Book Review Of Cases And Readings In Criminal Law And Procedure, Michael Katz
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Notes For Law Day Speech, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Notes For Law Day Speech, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Powell Speeches
Speech delivered at Richmond Kiwanis Club, Richmond, Virginia.
A Critical View Of The Uniform Crime Reports, Sophia M. Robison
A Critical View Of The Uniform Crime Reports, Sophia M. Robison
Michigan Law Review
No one would deny that the FBI performs a vital function in investigating, identifying, and tracking down suspects who may endanger the life, liberty, and property of Americans. However, this writer feels that the Uniform Crime Reports published by the FBI should be subjected to a very critical analysis. Of primary concern are the indiscriminate acceptance of the official data by legislators and social science investigators and the doubtful inferences which a frightened public draws from news releases proclaiming that "the U.S. is sitting on a seething volcano of crime."
Book Review Of Arrest: The Decision To Take A Suspect Into Custody, Dale W. Broeder
Book Review Of Arrest: The Decision To Take A Suspect Into Custody, Dale W. Broeder
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Double Punishment For Burglarious Offenses
Double Punishment For Burglarious Offenses
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proof By Confession, O. John Rogge
Proof By Confession, O. John Rogge
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Ramifications Of The Police Lineup, Thomas Edward Byrne, Marc B. Kaplin, Walter John Taggart
Constitutional Ramifications Of The Police Lineup, Thomas Edward Byrne, Marc B. Kaplin, Walter John Taggart
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Uncertain Rules Of Timeliness In Petitions For The Writ Of Habeas Corpus, Edwin M. Goldsmith Iii
The Uncertain Rules Of Timeliness In Petitions For The Writ Of Habeas Corpus, Edwin M. Goldsmith Iii
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Arrest: The Decision To Take A Suspect Into Custody, By Wayne La Fave, Donald L.A. Kerson
Arrest: The Decision To Take A Suspect Into Custody, By Wayne La Fave, Donald L.A. Kerson
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Recent Cases
University of Richmond Law Review
This is a summary of the case law from 1966.
Right To Counsel In Criminal Cases, Edward T. Haggins
Right To Counsel In Criminal Cases, Edward T. Haggins
Cleveland State Law Review
"The right to be heard would be, in many cases, of little avail if it did not comprehend the right to be heard by counsel. Even the intelligent and educated layman has small and sometimes no skill in the science of law... He requires the guiding hand of counsel at every step of the proceedings against him." These words, written in 1932 by Mr. Justice Sutherland for the majority in the famous case of Powell v. Alabama underline the fundamental right of a defendant in American criminal proceeding to have the assistance of counsel.
Norris: A Casebook Of Complete Criminal Trials, Otis J. Smith
Norris: A Casebook Of Complete Criminal Trials, Otis J. Smith
Michigan Law Review
A Review of A Casebook of Complete Criminal Trials by Harold Norris
American Bar Association Section Of Antitrust Law: Jury Instructions In Criminal Antitrust Cases, Ralph M. Carson
American Bar Association Section Of Antitrust Law: Jury Instructions In Criminal Antitrust Cases, Ralph M. Carson
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Jury Instructions in Criminal Antitrust Cases by The American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law