Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (878)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (788)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (299)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (294)
- Seattle University School of Law (270)
-
- BLR (220)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (218)
- Columbia Law School (174)
- University of Richmond (174)
- American University Washington College of Law (155)
- UIC School of Law (153)
- University of Michigan Law School (149)
- University of Maine School of Law (117)
- Brooklyn Law School (116)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (114)
- University of Georgia School of Law (96)
- UC Law SF (91)
- Mercer University School of Law (87)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (86)
- Cornell University Law School (81)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (79)
- University of Miami Law School (76)
- Roger Williams University (75)
- St. John's University School of Law (72)
- Pace University (71)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (70)
- Boston University School of Law (69)
- St. Mary's University (68)
- Fordham Law School (67)
- Southern Methodist University (63)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (501)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (464)
- Criminal procedure (376)
- Criminal Law (225)
- Evidence (217)
-
- Death penalty (191)
- Constitutional Law (190)
- Sentencing (189)
- Criminal justice (188)
- Criminal Procedure (185)
- Capital punishment (142)
- Fourth Amendment (133)
- Due process (124)
- Supreme Court (115)
- Police (105)
- Sixth Amendment (105)
- Courts (101)
- Jurisprudence (95)
- Punishment (95)
- New York (94)
- Constitution (91)
- Law and Society (86)
- Law (82)
- Criminal (81)
- Crime (80)
- Prosecutors (80)
- Federal (77)
- Fifth Amendment (77)
- Constitutional law (73)
- Jury (73)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (723)
- Faculty Scholarship (554)
- Cardozo Law Review (325)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (259)
- Seattle University Law Review (222)
-
- ExpressO (195)
- Touro Law Review (185)
- Articles (176)
- University of Richmond Law Review (138)
- UIC Law Review (128)
- Faculty Publications (127)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Maine Law Review (115)
- All Faculty Scholarship (100)
- Scholarly Articles (95)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (94)
- Michigan Law Review (89)
- Mercer Law Review (80)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (79)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (77)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (77)
- Scholarly Works (76)
- Supreme Court Case Files (76)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (68)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (61)
- Publications (59)
- West Virginia Law Review (58)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (54)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (50)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (49)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 7021 - 7050 of 7291
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
The Secret Foreign Bank Account And Legitimate Alternatives, Charles W. Adams
The Secret Foreign Bank Account And Legitimate Alternatives, Charles W. Adams
Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works
The author, a member of the California State Bar and consultant, Euro-Dutch Trust Company, George Town, Grand Cayman, B. W. I., labels the use of the secret foreign bank account "foolish and lazy." He suggests that the taxpayer can reduce his tax bite through tax deferral planning, an area in which legislation has been continued and expanded.
The Theory Of Criminal Negligence: A Comparative Analysis, George P. Fletcher
The Theory Of Criminal Negligence: A Comparative Analysis, George P. Fletcher
Faculty Scholarship
Negligence is a problematic ground for criminal liability. Every major Western legal system punishes negligent as well as intentional violations of protected interests; but theorists both here and abroad feel uneasy about the practice Negligent motoring and negligent manufacturing significantly threaten the public interest; yet Western judges seem more comfortable punishing counterfeiters and prostitutes than imposing sanctions against those who inadvertently take unreasonable risks. Negligence appears indeed to be an inferior, almost aberrant ground for criminal liability. Every interest protected by the criminal law is protected against intentional violations; but only a few-life, bodily integrity, and sometimes property-are secured against …
Criminal Law--Right To Counsel At Revocation Of Probation, Steven C. Hanley
Criminal Law--Right To Counsel At Revocation Of Probation, Steven C. Hanley
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Informing A Jury Of The Legal Effect Of Its Answers., James G. Denton
Informing A Jury Of The Legal Effect Of Its Answers., James G. Denton
St. Mary's Law Journal
Limiting jury consideration to facts, as opposed to the outcome, best serves special issue systems. The purpose of the special issues system is to ensure juries answer the presented questions without bias or prejudice. Though several writers have persuasively advocated for advising juries of the consequences of their findings, doing so seems to undermine the purpose of special issue systems because it allows for juries to answer questions with reference to their desired outcome. To ensure juries answer issues on the facts alone, trial judges should not give a jury, directly or indirectly, any information that may apprise them of …
Assistance In Addition To Counsel For Indigent Defendants: The Need For, The Lack Of, The Right To, Dennis W. Alexander
Assistance In Addition To Counsel For Indigent Defendants: The Need For, The Lack Of, The Right To, Dennis W. Alexander
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Toward Effective Criminal Discovery: A Proposed Revision Of Federal Rule 16, Alan M. Lieberman
Toward Effective Criminal Discovery: A Proposed Revision Of Federal Rule 16, Alan M. Lieberman
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Some Observations On Waiver In Indiana Criminal Appeals: The Substantial Re-Adoption Of Rule 1-14b In Trial Rule 59, Francis X. Mccloskey
Some Observations On Waiver In Indiana Criminal Appeals: The Substantial Re-Adoption Of Rule 1-14b In Trial Rule 59, Francis X. Mccloskey
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Decision Trees, Peter L. Strauss, Michael R. Topping
Decision Trees, Peter L. Strauss, Michael R. Topping
Faculty Scholarship
The object of this paper is to inform those concerned with the administration of justice in Ethiopia – particularly, criminal justice – about a new and simple procedure which may assist in procuring uniform interpretation and application of laws and regulations. The problem of uniform interpretation and application is particularly severe where, as in Ethiopia, new laws must be interpreted and applied by persons who have not yet had the opportunity of formal legal education. For these persons the discovery of the relevant code articles and the understanding of their interrelationships and application must be very difficult indeed. One possible …
Recent Legislation
University of Richmond Law Review
This is a list of the recent legislation from 1970.
Criminal Restitution: A Survey Of Its Past History And An Analysis Of Its Present Usefulness, Richard E. Laster
Criminal Restitution: A Survey Of Its Past History And An Analysis Of Its Present Usefulness, Richard E. Laster
University of Richmond Law Review
In the complex structure often inappropriately designated the system of criminal justice,a there are few visible signs of consideration for the party who suffers most from criminal activity-the victim. Yet, historically, this was not always the situation, nor is it necessarily true today in countries other than the United States. Even in the United States compensation plans for victims of crime have been passed by a few state legislatures, and most state statutes on probation allow restitution by the criminal to his victim as a condition thereof. In addition, at the less visible levels of the criminal legal process, restitution …
Supreme Court Of Texas Is Without Jurisdiction To Grant A Writ Of Mandamus To Direct A District Judge To Dismiss An Indictment In A Criminal Case On The Ground That Relator Was Denied A Speedy Trial., John A. Pizzitola
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
The Limits Of The Criminal Sanction, By Herbert L. Packer, Roger B. Dworkin
The Limits Of The Criminal Sanction, By Herbert L. Packer, Roger B. Dworkin
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Habeas Corpus Proceedings In The Supreme Court Of Texas., Joe Greenhill, Martin D. Beirne Jr.
Habeas Corpus Proceedings In The Supreme Court Of Texas., Joe Greenhill, Martin D. Beirne Jr.
St. Mary's Law Journal
Writs of habeas corpus, anchored both in the common law and Constitution of Texas, are vitally important to secure the freedom of those wrongfully imprisoned. However, minimal literature on the subject exists to assist attorneys who must prepare and present an application for writ of habeas corpus to the Supreme Court of Texas. To address the gap in literature, this article lays out the process attorneys should follow when filing a writ of habeas corpus. The most important items which should be brought before the Court are: (1) a motion for leave to file the application; (2) the application for …
Due Process And The Juvenile Offender., Carlos Cadena
Due Process And The Juvenile Offender., Carlos Cadena
St. Mary's Law Journal
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proceedings. The goal of the juvenile court movement was to establish systems of education and protection of errant children, rather than deterrence and retribution. To accomplish these results, the juvenile court was shorn of all resemblance to criminal courts. Public hearings were to be avoided and the intervention of counsel was not required, since the juvenile judge represented both the child and the state. However, it became clear that children were receiving the protection of the state because they engaged in criminal conduct and with little …
Volume 01 (Part 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 01 (Part 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 08 (Part 1 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 08 (Part 1 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 10 (Part 1 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 10 (Part 1 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 03 (Part 1 Of 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 03 (Part 1 Of 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 02 (Part 6 Of 6), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 02 (Part 6 Of 6), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 08 (Part 3 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 08 (Part 3 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
James V. Headley: Right To Counsel For Petty Offenses
James V. Headley: Right To Counsel For Petty Offenses
Georgia Law Review
The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the case of James v. Headley' was confronted with the question of whether an accused is entitled to court-appointed counsel when charged only with a "petty offense," that is, an offense carrying a maximum penalty of six months in jail and/or a $500 fine. Basing its decision on the sixth amendment,the court concluded that the two appellants were entitled to have court appointed counsel. The court, in an opinion by Judge Wisdom, held that as a general proposition, there is a sixth amendment right to counsel for any defendant in a …
Volume 04 (Part 1 Of 2), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 04 (Part 1 Of 2), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 10 (Part 4 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 10 (Part 4 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 10 (Part 2 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 10 (Part 2 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 10 (Part 3 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 10 (Part 3 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 09 (Part 3 Of 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 09 (Part 3 Of 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 08 (Part 4 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 08 (Part 4 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 08 (Part 2 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 08 (Part 2 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 07 (Part 4 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 07 (Part 4 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.
Volume 07 (Part 3 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Volume 07 (Part 3 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas
Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969
No abstract provided.