Criminal Procedure Commons^™

The District Attorney As A Mobilizer In A Community Approach To Child Sexual Abuse, Robert E. Cramer Jr.

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions: The Current State Of The Art, Michael H. Graham

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Competency Requirement For The Child Victim Of Sexual Abuse: Must We Abandon It?, Robin W. Morey

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Press-Enterprise Co. V. Superior Court Of California For The County Of Riverside, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Bowers V. Hardwick, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Kuhlmann V. Wilson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Meritor Savings Bank, Fsb V. Vinson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Thornburgh V. American College Of Obstetricians And Gynecologists, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Batson V. Kentucky, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Wainwright V. Witt: A New Standard For Death-Qualifying A Capital Jury, Phillip M. Stowers

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Monitoring Of Beeper Signal Emanating From Private Residence Violates Fourth Amendment Rights Of Those Who Have An Expectation Of Privacy In The Home., Steven J. Berry

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Black Innocence And The White Jury, Sheri Johnson

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Racial prejudice has come under increasingly close scrutiny during the past thirty years, yet its influence on the decisionmaking of criminal juries remains largely hidden from judicial and critical examination. In this Article, Professor Johnson takes a close look at this neglected area. She first sets forth a large body of social science research that reveals a widespread tendency among whites to convict black defendants in instances in which white defendants would be acquitted. Next, she argues that none of the existing techniques for eliminating the influence of racial bias on criminal trials adequately protects minority-race defendants. She contends that …

Florida's New Speedy Trial Rule: The "Window Of Recapture", John F. Yetter

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Reluctant Witness For The Prosecution: Grand Jury Subpoenas To Defense Counsel, Stacy Caplow

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The "Good Faith Exception" Cases: Reasonable Exercises In Futility, Craig M. Bradley

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Iii. Criminal Law And Procedure

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Prisoners' Access To The Courts: Legal Requirements And Practical Realities, Wayne T. Westling, Patricia Rasmussen

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Burger Court And Prosecutorial Misconduct, Bennett L. Gershman

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

Professor Gershman critically examines a series of recent Supreme Court decisions dealing with prosecutorial misconduct. In each case, the Court reversed the lower court and reinstated the conviction.

There are a broad range of issues involved; from suppression of evidence to trial misconduct. As a former prosecutor in New York City, the author is forced to conclude that, "Prosecutorial misconduct occurs because it works and because sanctions for misbehavior are virtually nonexistent."

Maryland's Prompt Criminal Trial Provisions: Hicks And Beyond, Harold Douglas Norton

University of Baltimore Law Review

In 1971, the Maryland General Assembly and court of appeals adopted the prompt trial provisions. It was not until the court's 1979 decision in State v. Hicks, however, that the "teeth" were put into the provisions, by supplying dismissal as the sanction for violation of the defendant's rights under the prompt trial provisions. Since that time, there has been an abundance of litigation in an attempt to clarify the applicability of the provisions and the sanction. In this article, the author presents a practical guide to the Maryland prompt trial provisions, analyzing the provisions and the wealth of recent case …

Seizing Opportunity, Searching For Theory: Article I, Section 7, George R. Nock

Seattle University Law Review

Washington case law dealing with searches and seizures has now reached a developmental stage from which it can proceed either haphazardly or along any of several well-defined lines. The purpose of this Article is not to provide a compendium of Washington search-and-seizure cases. Rather, the Article analyzes the more recent (and some of the earlier) cases in which the Washington Supreme Court has interpreted article I, section 7, and suggests several alternative theoretical bases for the further development of Washington constitutional search-and-seizure jurisprudence.

Executive Targeting Of Congressmen As A Violation Of The Arrest Clause, Anita Bernstein

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Gates, Leon And The Compromise Of Adjudicatory Fairness: (Part I)-A Dialogue On Prejudicial Concurrences, Joel J. Finer

Law Faculty Articles and Essays

On July 5, 1984, the Supreme Court in Leon v. United States held that where law enforcement officials execute a search warrant issued in violation of the dictates of the fourth amendment but act in the "good faith," "objectively-reasonable" belief that the warrant was constitutionally valid, the fruits of the search should not (with a few exceptions) be excluded from evidence under the exclusionary rule. On June 8, 1983, in Illinois v. Gates, the Supreme Court, after calling for and receiving briefs and arguments on the same issue of whether the exclusionary rule should be modified, concluded, for reasons of …

Introduction To Debate (Between N. Morris And R. Bonnie): Should The Insanity Defense Be Abolished?, Joel J. Finer

Law Faculty Articles and Essays

The author introduces a debate between Professor Norval Morris and Professor Richard Bonnie on the insanity defense.

An Exception To Administering Miranda Warnings Exists Where Police Questioning Is Promptd By Concern For Public Safety., Stephen S. Goodman Iv

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

The Wrong's Of Victim's Rights, Lynne Henderson

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In A Rescue Situation, William T. Pizzi

Publications

No abstract provided.

The Wrongs Of Victim's Rights, Lynne N. Henderson

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Book Review Of Passion: An Essay On Personality , Richard F. Devlin Frsc

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Passion is a cogently structured, compel Jingly argued and seductively enthralling masterpiece which, in years to come, will undoubtedly stand out as an inspirational source for many who seek social transformation. Unger's style, in this essay at least, is lucid and inviting. Substantively, Passion demonstrates not only the depth of his penetrating intellect but also his command of an array of' disciplines. Unger's polymathy is all the more impressive when we remember that ours is an era in which idiosyncratic specialization is the norm.

Depraved Mind Murder And Intoxication: Some Sobering Thoughts On People V. Register

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Kidnapping: A Modern Definition, John L. Diamond

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.