Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (890)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (788)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (299)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (294)
- Seattle University School of Law (270)
-
- BLR (220)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (218)
- University of Richmond (182)
- Columbia Law School (174)
- American University Washington College of Law (155)
- UIC School of Law (153)
- University of Michigan Law School (149)
- University of Maine School of Law (117)
- Brooklyn Law School (116)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (114)
- University of Georgia School of Law (96)
- UC Law SF (91)
- Mercer University School of Law (87)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (86)
- Cornell University Law School (81)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (79)
- University of Miami Law School (76)
- Roger Williams University (75)
- St. John's University School of Law (72)
- Pace University (71)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (70)
- Boston University School of Law (69)
- St. Mary's University (68)
- Fordham Law School (67)
- Southern Methodist University (63)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (501)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (461)
- Criminal procedure (376)
- Criminal Law (225)
- Evidence (217)
-
- Death penalty (191)
- Constitutional Law (190)
- Sentencing (189)
- Criminal justice (188)
- Criminal Procedure (185)
- Capital punishment (142)
- Fourth Amendment (133)
- Due process (124)
- Supreme Court (115)
- Police (105)
- Sixth Amendment (105)
- Courts (100)
- Jurisprudence (95)
- Punishment (95)
- New York (94)
- Constitution (91)
- Law and Society (85)
- Law (82)
- Criminal (81)
- Crime (80)
- Prosecutors (80)
- Federal (77)
- Fifth Amendment (77)
- Constitutional law (73)
- Jury (73)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (735)
- Faculty Scholarship (554)
- Cardozo Law Review (325)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (259)
- Seattle University Law Review (222)
-
- ExpressO (195)
- Touro Law Review (185)
- Articles (176)
- University of Richmond Law Review (146)
- UIC Law Review (128)
- Faculty Publications (127)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Maine Law Review (115)
- All Faculty Scholarship (100)
- Scholarly Articles (95)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (94)
- Michigan Law Review (89)
- Mercer Law Review (80)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (79)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (77)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (77)
- Scholarly Works (76)
- Supreme Court Case Files (76)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (68)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (61)
- Publications (59)
- West Virginia Law Review (58)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (54)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (50)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (49)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 6031 - 6060 of 7310
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
Outsider Trading On Confidential Information - A Breach In Search Of A Duty, Roberta S. Karmel
Outsider Trading On Confidential Information - A Breach In Search Of A Duty, Roberta S. Karmel
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Andrea Wilson
Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Andrea Wilson
Mercer Law Review
Appeals attempting to resolve issues concerning the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("U.S.S.G.") continue to require much of the resources of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The sentencing guidelines are the driving force behind thousands of prosecutions and appeals each year. However, the number of amendments to the guidelines has diminished in recent years, and the court seems to be free to do more fine-tuning than in the past.
Can Shaming Punishments Educate?, Stephen P. Garvey
Can Shaming Punishments Educate?, Stephen P. Garvey
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
So-called "shaming" penalties have received a fair amount of attention in the popular press and, thanks primarily to the work of Dan Kahan and Toni Massaro, in the legal literature as well. Unfortunately, the current debate focuses on "shame" as the main way to understand what these penalties are all about. I argue that at least some of these so-called shaming penalties are better understood as "educative" penalties. I develop this "educating model" and contrast it with the "shaming model." I also suggest that penalties fitting the educating model have more normative appeal than those fitting the shaming model.
Compromise And Continuity: Miranda Waivers, Confession Admissibility, And The Retention Of Interrogation Protections, Mark Berger
Compromise And Continuity: Miranda Waivers, Confession Admissibility, And The Retention Of Interrogation Protections, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Unconscious Racism And The Criminal Law, Sheri Johnson
Unconscious Racism And The Criminal Law, Sheri Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Gateway For Successive Habeas Petitions: An Argument For Schlup V. Delo'S Probability Standard For Actual Innocence Claims, Mark M. Oh
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comparative Law Symposium: Is There A European Advantage In Criminal Procedure: Preface, Carl M. Selinger
Comparative Law Symposium: Is There A European Advantage In Criminal Procedure: Preface, Carl M. Selinger
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction: Adding A Comparative Perspective To American Criminal Procedure Classes, Albert W. Alschuler
Introduction: Adding A Comparative Perspective To American Criminal Procedure Classes, Albert W. Alschuler
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Main-Streaming Comparative Criminal Justice: How To Incorporate Comparative And International Concepts And Materials Into Basic Criminal Law And Procedure Courses, Richard S. Frase
Main-Streaming Comparative Criminal Justice: How To Incorporate Comparative And International Concepts And Materials Into Basic Criminal Law And Procedure Courses, Richard S. Frase
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
European Perspectives On The Accused As A Source Of Testimonial Evidence, Gordon Van Kessel
European Perspectives On The Accused As A Source Of Testimonial Evidence, Gordon Van Kessel
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The American Adversary System, William T. Pizzi
The American Adversary System, William T. Pizzi
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mezzanatto And The Economics Of Self-Incrimination, Eric Rasmusen
Mezzanatto And The Economics Of Self-Incrimination, Eric Rasmusen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
After Legal Indeterminacy: Carl Schmitt And The National Socialist Legal Order, 1933-1936, William E. Scheuerman
After Legal Indeterminacy: Carl Schmitt And The National Socialist Legal Order, 1933-1936, William E. Scheuerman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Coping With "Loss": A Re-Examination Of Sentencing Federal Economic Crimes Under The Guidelines, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Coping With "Loss": A Re-Examination Of Sentencing Federal Economic Crimes Under The Guidelines, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Faculty Publications
This Article has three objectives. First, it attempts to rethink the sentencing of federal economic criminals in light of the basic purposes of sentencing and of the Guidelines' particular structure and objectives. Second, it examines the deficiencies in the current sentencing guidelines regarding theft, fraud, and other economic crimes, and the problem areas in the case law construing those guidelines. Third, it proposes and analyzes a consolidated guideline, together with accompanying application notes, for sentencing virtually all theft and fraud cases (a draft of which follows the text of this Article as Appendix A).
Criminal Discovery: What Truth Do We Seek?, Milton C. Lee Jr.
Criminal Discovery: What Truth Do We Seek?, Milton C. Lee Jr.
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Maintaining An Accusatorial System Of Justice: The States' Refusal To Follow The Supreme Court's Sanctioning Of Official Police Deception In Moran V. Burbine, John F. Terzano
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Ours is the accusatorial as opposed to the inquisitorial system. Such has been the characteristic of Anglo-American criminal justice since it freed itself from practices borrowed by the Star Chamber from the Continent whereby an accused was interrogated in secret for hours on end. Under our system society carries the burden of proving its charge against the accused not out of his own mouth. It must establish its case, not by interrogation of the accused even under judicial safeguards, but by evidence independently secured through skillful investigation.... Protracted, systematic and uncontrolled subjection of an accused to interrogation by the police …
Interpreting The Constitution From Inside The Jury Box: Affecting Interstate Commerce As An Element Of The Crime, Richard W. Smith
Interpreting The Constitution From Inside The Jury Box: Affecting Interstate Commerce As An Element Of The Crime, Richard W. Smith
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Individual Liability For Conduct By Criminal Organizations In The United States, Peter J. Henning
Individual Liability For Conduct By Criminal Organizations In The United States, Peter J. Henning
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Rule Of Law Amid Lawlessness: Counseling The Accused In Rwanda's Domestic Genocide Trials, Mark A. Drumbl
Rule Of Law Amid Lawlessness: Counseling The Accused In Rwanda's Domestic Genocide Trials, Mark A. Drumbl
Scholarly Articles
This article, by way of personal narrative, sets out my experiences with Legal Aid Rwanda in February and March of 1998. In doing so, it describes, from a defense counsel perspective, an attempt to create due process within a procedural void. Legal Aid Rwanda's mandate focused not on the handful of detainees actually selected to proceed to trial, but rather on the vast numbers languishing in prison. In the end, my experiences lead me to question the merit of a courtroom in addressing mass crimes, of adjudication as a device to promote national reconciliation in a post-genocidal society, and of …
Is Miranda Dead, Was It Overruled, Or Is It Irrelevant, Alfredo Garcia
Is Miranda Dead, Was It Overruled, Or Is It Irrelevant, Alfredo Garcia
St. Thomas Law Review
This Article will proceed in three stages. Part I will provide the historical, social, and political backdrop to the Miranda opinion. It will discuss the pragmatic basis for the path that the Court chose to follow in Miranda. Part II will underscore the attempts to overrule Miranda and the Court's almost instant departure from its doctrinal foundation. In doing so, the argument is that the Court's retreat can be viewed in large measure as a reaction to the negative response the opinion engendered, both politically and socially. It also can be viewed as the logical outcome of the Court's need …
Extended Jurisdiction Juvenile Prosecution: A New Approach To The Problem Of Juvenile Delinquency In Illinois, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1351 (1998), Mary E. Spring
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Standards And Procedures For Determining Whether A Defendant Is Competent To Make The Ultimate Choice - Death; Ohio's New Precedent For Death Row Volunteers, Matthew T. Norman
Standards And Procedures For Determining Whether A Defendant Is Competent To Make The Ultimate Choice - Death; Ohio's New Precedent For Death Row Volunteers, Matthew T. Norman
Journal of Law and Health
Despite the fact that many states will allow a death row defendant to waive his legal appeals in order to hasten his execution date, there are inadequate standards and procedures for determining whether the "volunteer" is first competent to make this ultimate decision of life versus death. To provide background for this issue, this Note will discuss the events initially leading up to the nation's first death row "volunteer", then it will introduce subsequent volunteers of the present day. This Note then will look at what the United States Supreme Court has said about the standards and procedures that are …
Archibald Cox: Teacher, David J. Seipp
Archibald Cox: Teacher, David J. Seipp
Faculty Scholarship
Archie Cox is a teacher. He taught generations of law students at Harvard Law School and, more recently, at Boston University School of Law. He left the classroom on three occasions, reluctantly, when first President Truman, then President Kennedy, then President Nixon's Attorney General called Professor Cox to Washington to play a part on the national stage. In his first weeks as Watergate Special Prosecutor, Cox carried with him a stack of blue books, Labor Law examinations he still had to grade (p. 263). In the public eye, his straight-backed demeanor, his familiar crew cut, half-glasses, bow tie, and tweeds …
Beyond Privacy, Beyond Probable Cause, Beyond The Fourth Amendment: New Strategies For Fighting Pretext Arrests, 69 U. Colo. L. Rev. 693 (1998), Timothy P. O'Neill
Beyond Privacy, Beyond Probable Cause, Beyond The Fourth Amendment: New Strategies For Fighting Pretext Arrests, 69 U. Colo. L. Rev. 693 (1998), Timothy P. O'Neill
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Mccleskey Puzzle: Remedying Prosecutorial Discrimination Against Black Victims In Capital Sentencing, Evan Tsen Lee, Ashutosh Bhagwat
The Mccleskey Puzzle: Remedying Prosecutorial Discrimination Against Black Victims In Capital Sentencing, Evan Tsen Lee, Ashutosh Bhagwat
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Section 2254(D) Of The New Habeas Statute: An (Opinionated) User's Manual, Evan Tsen Lee
Section 2254(D) Of The New Habeas Statute: An (Opinionated) User's Manual, Evan Tsen Lee
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Rape By Fraud And Rape By Coercion, Patricia J. Falk
Rape By Fraud And Rape By Coercion, Patricia J. Falk
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
For more than a century, courts, legislatures, and legal commentators have struggled with the controversial and highly charged question of whether accomplishing sexual intercourse by means of fraud or coercion is blameworthy and appropriately condemnable as rape. In 1986 Professor Susan Estrich suggested that rape law should "prohibit fraud to secure sex to the same extent we prohibit fraud to secure money, and prohibit extortion to secure sex to the same extent we prohibit extortion to secure money." (Susan Estrich, Rape, 95 Yale L. J. 1087, 1120 (1986)). Such suggestion spawned the latest cycle of discussion about this age-old conundrum …
Mental Culpability And Prosecutorial Misconduct, Bennett L. Gershman
Mental Culpability And Prosecutorial Misconduct, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This Article argues that a prosecutor's intent is always relevant to the courts' analysis of misconduct, and that the courts should always consider a prosecutor's intent in determining whether a rule was violated and whether the verdict was prejudiced. Part II of this Article examines the use of the objective test to analyze a prosecutor's trial conduct. Part II offers several reasons courts give for avoiding inquiry into a prosecutor's mental culpability, analyzes those reasons, and concludes that although the application of an objective test is sufficient to correct misconduct in some instances, it does not foreclose application of a …
Feminism And Defending Men On Death Row, Phyllis L. Crocker
Feminism And Defending Men On Death Row, Phyllis L. Crocker
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
In this Essay I explore the relationship between being a feminist and representing men on death row. It is appropriate to engage in this inquiry in considering how the law has developed in the twenty-five years since Furman v. Georgia. During that time both Furman and the advent of feminist legal theory have required a restructuring in the way we think about two fundamental legal questions: for death penalty jurisprudence, how and why we sentence an individual to death; and for feminist jurisprudence, how the law views crimes of violence against women. The relationship between these two developments becomes apparent …
Criminal Procedure—Crazy As I Need To Be: The United States Supreme Court's Latest Addition To The Incompetency Doctrine. Cooper V. Oklahoma, 116 S. Ct. 1373 (1996)., S. Christopher Thomason
Criminal Procedure—Crazy As I Need To Be: The United States Supreme Court's Latest Addition To The Incompetency Doctrine. Cooper V. Oklahoma, 116 S. Ct. 1373 (1996)., S. Christopher Thomason
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.