Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (841)
- Seattle University School of Law (211)
- University of Michigan Law School (190)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (175)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (106)
-
- UIC School of Law (57)
- University of Richmond (53)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (51)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (44)
- University of Maine School of Law (29)
- Pepperdine University (24)
- West Virginia University (23)
- BLR (22)
- St. Mary's University (22)
- University of Colorado Law School (20)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (18)
- Brooklyn Law School (17)
- University of Miami Law School (17)
- Cornell University Law School (15)
- Georgia State University College of Law (15)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (15)
- University of Georgia School of Law (15)
- Boston University School of Law (14)
- Notre Dame Law School (14)
- Brigham Young University Law School (13)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (13)
- Pace University (12)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (12)
- William & Mary Law School (12)
- Georgetown University Law Center (11)
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (96)
- Federal (94)
- Courts (91)
- Supreme Court (85)
- Sixth Amendment (81)
-
- United States Supreme Court (75)
- Defendant (72)
- New York (67)
- Evidence (64)
- Criminal procedure (61)
- State (61)
- Due process (55)
- Police (55)
- Jury (50)
- Criminal law (49)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (48)
- Juries (45)
- Trial (45)
- Testimony (44)
- § 6 (44)
- Court of Appeals (43)
- Sentencing (43)
- Criminal justice (42)
- Witnesses (40)
- Fifth Amendment (39)
- Appellate Division (37)
- Court (36)
- Judges (36)
- Fourth Amendment (34)
- 1990) (31)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (719)
- Seattle University Law Review (206)
- Touro Law Review (159)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Articles (93)
-
- Michigan Law Review (86)
- Faculty Scholarship (57)
- UIC Law Review (52)
- Cardozo Law Review (41)
- University of Richmond Law Review (41)
- Maine Law Review (29)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (24)
- Scholarly Articles (23)
- West Virginia Law Review (22)
- ExpressO (21)
- Pepperdine Law Review (20)
- Publications (18)
- Faculty Publications (16)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (15)
- Indiana Law Journal (15)
- Georgia State University Law Review (14)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (12)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (12)
- BYU Law Review (11)
- Faculty Works (11)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (11)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (11)
- All Faculty Scholarship (10)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (10)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (10)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2161 - 2190 of 2373
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
The Judiciary's Use Of Supervisory Power To Control Federal Law Enforcement Activity, Department Of Justice Office Of Legal Policy
The Judiciary's Use Of Supervisory Power To Control Federal Law Enforcement Activity, Department Of Justice Office Of Legal Policy
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In McNabb v. United States, the Supreme Court claimed- for the first time in its history-the prerogative of "establishing and maintaining civilized standards of procedure and evidence" in the exercise of "supervisory authority over the administration of criminal justice in the federal courts." Since then, the Court has used this self-declared oversight power on numerous occasions and for a wide variety of purposes, but it has never adequately explained either the provenance or the scope of this type of judicial authority. Lower federal courts have followed suit, on the largely unexamined assumption that they too are endowed with supervisory …
Adverse Inferences From Silence, Department Of Justice Office Of Legal Policy
Adverse Inferences From Silence, Department Of Justice Office Of Legal Policy
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Report, the eighth in the Truth in Criminal Justice series, assesses the rules relating to the evidentiary consideration of the defendant's silence. Its general conclusion is that the existing restrictive rules in this area are unjustified impediments to the search for truth. The notion that the fifth amendment's prohibition of compelling a person in a criminal case to be a witness against himself bars drawing adverse inferences from the defendant's silence is not well-founded. In practical effect, these rules impede the conviction of the guilty by barring consideration of an aspect of the defendant's conduct-his failure to respond to …
Future Disabilities Under New York’S Human Rights Law, Andrea Lisa Leeb
Future Disabilities Under New York’S Human Rights Law, Andrea Lisa Leeb
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Killing Daddy: Developing A Self-Defense Strategy For The Abused Child, Joelle A. Moreno
Killing Daddy: Developing A Self-Defense Strategy For The Abused Child, Joelle A. Moreno
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Diminishing Expectations Of Privacy In The Rehnquist Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 825 (1989), Laurence A. Benner
Diminishing Expectations Of Privacy In The Rehnquist Court, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 825 (1989), Laurence A. Benner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sandra Day O’Connor, Abortion, And Compromise For The Court, Susan M. Halatyn
Sandra Day O’Connor, Abortion, And Compromise For The Court, Susan M. Halatyn
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Are Twelve Heads Better Than One?, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Are Twelve Heads Better Than One?, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Articles
Few advocates of the jury system would argue that the average juror is as competent a tribunal as the averagejudge. Whatever competence the jury has is a function of two of its attributes: its number and its interaction. The fact that a jury must be composed of at least six people,' with different backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives, provides some protection against decisions based on an idiosyncratic view of the facts. Not only must the jury include at least six people, but they must be chosen in a manner that conforms to the ideal of the jury as representative of community …
Grand Jury Reform: A Proposal For Change In Virginia, Charles E. Wall
Grand Jury Reform: A Proposal For Change In Virginia, Charles E. Wall
University of Richmond Law Review
Once a cornerstone of American jurisprudence, the requirement of prosecution based upon grand jury indictment no longer stands unchallenged. Instead, alternate means of commencing prosecution, most notably by information and the preliminary hearing, have prompted lawmakers to look at the grand jury with a heightened scrutiny. Subsequently, such alternatives have become the primary prosecutorial tools in many states. Virginia, however, retains the grand jury system which was implemented in colonial times.
Duckworth V. Eagan: A Little-Noticed Miranda Case That May Cause Much Mischief, Yale Kamisar
Duckworth V. Eagan: A Little-Noticed Miranda Case That May Cause Much Mischief, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Professor Yale Kamisar, the country's foremost scholar of Miranda and police interrogation, presents an analysis and critique of the Supreme Court's latest interpretation of Miranda. In Duckworth, a 5-4 Court upheld the "if and when" language systematically used by the Hammond, Indiana, Police Department: "We have no way of giving you a lawyer, but one will be appointed for you, if you wish, if and when you go to court." The real issue was whether the police effectively conveyed the substance of a vital part of Miranda: the right to have a lawyer appointed prior to any questioning. Professor Kamisar …
When Racists And Radicals Meet, Ronald J. Bacigal, Margaret Ivey Bacigal
When Racists And Radicals Meet, Ronald J. Bacigal, Margaret Ivey Bacigal
Law Faculty Publications
In order to stimulate scholarly discussion, this Essay presents an empirical account of the Greensboro incident from the perspective of those who participated in the episode and in the resulting civil rights trial. The Essay traces the circumstances leading to the violence and reviews the resultant litigation with special attention given to the role of the trial judge in politically volatile cases. The candid reflections offered by the trial judge and other participants allow the reader to examine both the event and the litigation, not merely in the abstract, but as implemented by flesh-andblood lawyers, litigants, and judges. .
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court's New Vision Of Federal Habeas Corpus For State Prisoners, Joseph L. Hoffmann
The Supreme Court's New Vision Of Federal Habeas Corpus For State Prisoners, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Postsentence Sentencing: Determining Probation Revocation Sanctions, Bradford Mank
Postsentence Sentencing: Determining Probation Revocation Sanctions, Bradford Mank
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
Although procedural due process requirements govern the proof of a violation in a probation revocation hearing, judges exercise almost total discretion in deciding what sanctions to impose once a violation is established. These postsentence judgments can be as important as the initial sentencing. Sanctions for even minor probation violations can range from obligating a probationer to meet with his probation officer more frequently to executing a suspended prison sentence. The Supreme Court recognized in Morrissey v. Brewer that the choice of sanctions is often more complex than the proof of a violation. Principles must be developed to regulate postsentence sentencing. …
Arizona V. Hicks: Probable Cause Requirement Under The Plain View Doctrine, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
Arizona V. Hicks: Probable Cause Requirement Under The Plain View Doctrine, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 903 (1988), Robert J. Kuker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of Attorney Fee Forfeiture Under Rico And Cce, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 155 (1988), John R. Russell
The Constitutionality Of Attorney Fee Forfeiture Under Rico And Cce, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 155 (1988), John R. Russell
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Illinois Courts Struggle To Evaluate Race-Neutral Explanations For Peremptory Challenges Under Batson V. Kentucky, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 235 (1988), Kevin E. Bry
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rock V. Arkansas: Hypnosis And The Prejudice Rule - Your Memories May Not Be Your Own, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 409 (1988), Gail Downer Zwemke
Rock V. Arkansas: Hypnosis And The Prejudice Rule - Your Memories May Not Be Your Own, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 409 (1988), Gail Downer Zwemke
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Consequences Of Federalizing Criminal Law, Roger J. Miner '56
Consequences Of Federalizing Criminal Law, Roger J. Miner '56
Criminal Law
No abstract provided.
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Prosecutor's Obligation To Grant Defense Witness Immunity, Bennett L. Gershman
The Prosecutor's Obligation To Grant Defense Witness Immunity, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The author enumerates the three most common situations in which the courts have required the prosecutor to offer immunity to defense witnesses: (1) to safeguard the defendant's right to essential exculpatory testimony; (2) where the use of the prosecutor's powers to grant immunity causes such distortion in the fact-finding process as to require granting immunity to defense witnesses; and (3) where immunity is required to remedy prosecutory misconduct such as the intimidation of witnesses. The use of the "missing witness" instruction to avoid reaching the constitutional issue is also discussed.
Administrative Searches For Evidence Of Crime: The Impact Of New York V. Burger, Perry S. Reich
Administrative Searches For Evidence Of Crime: The Impact Of New York V. Burger, Perry S. Reich
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Risk Arbitrage And Insider Trading: A Functional Analysis Of The Fiduciary Concept Under Rule 10b-5, Laurence A. Steckman
Risk Arbitrage And Insider Trading: A Functional Analysis Of The Fiduciary Concept Under Rule 10b-5, Laurence A. Steckman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Rights In Transition: Sections 1981 And 1982 Cover Discrimination On The Basis Of Ancestry And Ethnicity, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Civil Rights In Transition: Sections 1981 And 1982 Cover Discrimination On The Basis Of Ancestry And Ethnicity, Eileen Kaufman, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure In The Rehnquist Court: Has The Rehnquisition Begun?, Craig M. Bradley
Criminal Procedure In The Rehnquist Court: Has The Rehnquisition Begun?, Craig M. Bradley
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Suspending Imposition And Execution Of Criminal Sentences: A Study Of Judicial And Legislative Confusion, John M.A. Dipippa
Suspending Imposition And Execution Of Criminal Sentences: A Study Of Judicial And Legislative Confusion, John M.A. Dipippa
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Videotaping Children's Testimony: An Empirical View, Paula E. Hill, Samuel M. Hill
Videotaping Children's Testimony: An Empirical View, Paula E. Hill, Samuel M. Hill
Michigan Law Review
Increases in the number of reported incidents of child abuse and sexual molestation have resulted in more and younger children becoming courtroom participants. Some courts refuse to consider the special needs of the child in this adversarial environment. Relying on questionable precedent, these courts hold that the defendant's right to directly confront the child, as well as strict compliance with evidentiary rules, overrides that child's interest in freedom from embarrassment or psychological trauma. This Note focuses on pressures felt by the testifying child and the ways in which these pressures affect her testimony; it then proposes using videotaped testimony as …
Appealability, Under The Collateral Order Doctrine, Of Orders Denying Motions For Appointment Of Counsel In Federal Civil Litigation After Richardson-Merrell, Inc. V. Koller, Kevin G. Dumbach
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bounds And Beyond: A Need To Reevaluate The Right Of Prisoner Access To The Courts, Steven D. Hinckley
Bounds And Beyond: A Need To Reevaluate The Right Of Prisoner Access To The Courts, Steven D. Hinckley
University of Richmond Law Review
There is little doubt that a prisoner's most important right is access to the courts. Without access, prisoners have neither a forum in which to question the conditions and constitutionality of their confinement, nor an arena in which to seek vindication of other alleged rights violations. Therefore, the right of access is the foundation upon which other prisoners' rights are built.
Silence As A Trial Strategy After Strickland And Cronic: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?Nic : The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jo Ellen Silberstein
Silence As A Trial Strategy After Strickland And Cronic: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?Nic : The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jo Ellen Silberstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.