Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (841)
- Seattle University School of Law (211)
- University of Michigan Law School (190)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (175)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (106)
-
- UIC School of Law (57)
- University of Richmond (53)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (51)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (44)
- University of Maine School of Law (29)
- Pepperdine University (24)
- West Virginia University (23)
- BLR (22)
- St. Mary's University (22)
- University of Colorado Law School (20)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (18)
- Brooklyn Law School (17)
- University of Miami Law School (17)
- Cornell University Law School (15)
- Georgia State University College of Law (15)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (15)
- University of Georgia School of Law (15)
- Boston University School of Law (14)
- Notre Dame Law School (14)
- Brigham Young University Law School (13)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (13)
- Pace University (12)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (12)
- William & Mary Law School (12)
- Georgetown University Law Center (11)
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (96)
- Federal (94)
- Courts (91)
- Supreme Court (85)
- Sixth Amendment (81)
-
- United States Supreme Court (75)
- Defendant (72)
- New York (67)
- Evidence (64)
- Criminal procedure (61)
- State (61)
- Due process (55)
- Police (55)
- Jury (50)
- Criminal law (49)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (48)
- Juries (45)
- Trial (45)
- Testimony (44)
- § 6 (44)
- Court of Appeals (43)
- Sentencing (43)
- Criminal justice (42)
- Witnesses (40)
- Fifth Amendment (39)
- Appellate Division (37)
- Court (36)
- Judges (36)
- Fourth Amendment (34)
- 1990) (31)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (719)
- Seattle University Law Review (206)
- Touro Law Review (159)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Articles (93)
-
- Michigan Law Review (86)
- Faculty Scholarship (57)
- UIC Law Review (52)
- Cardozo Law Review (41)
- University of Richmond Law Review (41)
- Maine Law Review (29)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (24)
- Scholarly Articles (23)
- West Virginia Law Review (22)
- ExpressO (21)
- Pepperdine Law Review (20)
- Publications (18)
- Faculty Publications (16)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (15)
- Indiana Law Journal (15)
- Georgia State University Law Review (14)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (12)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (12)
- BYU Law Review (11)
- Faculty Works (11)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (11)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (11)
- All Faculty Scholarship (10)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (10)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (10)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2101 - 2130 of 2373
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Procedure
The Fourth, Fifth And Sixth Amendments: The Supreme Court's Major Search And Seizure, Interrogation, And Criminal Jury Selection Decisions During The 1990 Term, William E. Hellerstein
The Fourth, Fifth And Sixth Amendments: The Supreme Court's Major Search And Seizure, Interrogation, And Criminal Jury Selection Decisions During The 1990 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Telling Tales In Court: Trial Procedure And The Story Model, Richard O. Lempert
Telling Tales In Court: Trial Procedure And The Story Model, Richard O. Lempert
Articles
There are three ways in which stories may figure prominently at trials. First, litigants may tell stories to jurors. Not only is there some social science evidence that this happens, but trial lawyers have an instinctive sense that this is what they do. Ask a litigator to describe a current case and she is likely to reply, "Our story is ... " Second, jurors may try to make sense of the evidence they receive by fitting it to some story pattern. If so, the process is likely to feed back on itself. That is, jurors are likely to build a …
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Alabama V. White: Anonymous Tip Held Sufficient Basis For Investigatory Stop Under Fourth Amendment, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 909 (1991), Martin K. Berks
Alabama V. White: Anonymous Tip Held Sufficient Basis For Investigatory Stop Under Fourth Amendment, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 909 (1991), Martin K. Berks
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
James V. Illinois: Wither The Exclusionary Rule - Not Quite Yet, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 493 (1991), David H. Norris
James V. Illinois: Wither The Exclusionary Rule - Not Quite Yet, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 493 (1991), David H. Norris
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Videotaped Reenactments In Civil Trials: Protecting Probative Evidence From The Trial Judge's Unbridled Discretion, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 433 (1991), Elizabeth A. Savage
Videotaped Reenactments In Civil Trials: Protecting Probative Evidence From The Trial Judge's Unbridled Discretion, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 433 (1991), Elizabeth A. Savage
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Crime And Punishment In The Federal Courts, Roger J. Miner '56
Crime And Punishment In The Federal Courts, Roger J. Miner '56
Criminal Law
No abstract provided.
New York Law School — Final Examinations, Roger J. Miner '56
New York Law School — Final Examinations, Roger J. Miner '56
New York Law School Events and Publications
No abstract provided.
Selecting Impartial Juries: Must Ignorance Be A Virtue In Our Search For Justice -- Welcome And Statement Of The Issue, Fred H. Cate, Newton N. Minow
Selecting Impartial Juries: Must Ignorance Be A Virtue In Our Search For Justice -- Welcome And Statement Of The Issue, Fred H. Cate, Newton N. Minow
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jurisdiction Of The County Court
To Tell What We Know Or Wait For Godot?, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
To Tell What We Know Or Wait For Godot?, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Articles
Professor Elliott raises two questions about the American Psychological Association's practice of submitting amicus briefs to the courts. First, are our data sufficiently valid, consistent, and generalizable to be applicable to the real world issues? Second, are amicus briefs adequate to communicate scientific findings? The first of these is not a general question, but must be addressed anew each time the Association considers a new issue. An evaluation of the quality and sufficiency of scientific knowledge about racial discrimination, for example, tells us nothing at all about the quality and sufficiency of scientific knowledge about sexual abuse. "Are the data …
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.