Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Procedure (501)
- Constitutional Law (204)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (111)
- Law and Society (109)
- Evidence (98)
-
- Courts (88)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (79)
- International Law (77)
- State and Local Government Law (72)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (69)
- Jurisprudence (63)
- Law and Race (61)
- Legal History (54)
- Legal Studies (49)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (48)
- Human Rights Law (43)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (38)
- Legislation (37)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (35)
- Jurisdiction (34)
- Legal Profession (34)
- Law and Gender (33)
- Fourth Amendment (32)
- Judges (31)
- Juvenile Law (31)
- Law and Psychology (31)
- Legal Education (31)
- Civil Law (30)
- Institution
-
- Vanderbilt University Law School (169)
- American University Washington College of Law (94)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (79)
- University of Georgia School of Law (65)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (62)
-
- Boston University School of Law (59)
- Columbia Law School (59)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (48)
- University of Colorado Law School (46)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (38)
- University of Denver (38)
- West Virginia University (38)
- Fordham Law School (35)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (35)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (33)
- The University of Akron (33)
- University of Maine School of Law (26)
- University of Baltimore Law (25)
- Pepperdine University (24)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (24)
- University of Missouri School of Law (23)
- Georgetown University Law Center (22)
- Cleveland State University (21)
- University of Kentucky (20)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (19)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (18)
- Pace University (17)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (16)
- Duke Law (15)
- New York Law School (15)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (195)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (94)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (67)
- Faculty Publications (50)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (50)
-
- St. Thomas Law Review (46)
- Publications (43)
- Scholarly Works (43)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (40)
- West Virginia Law Review (36)
- Akron Law Review (32)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (31)
- All Faculty Scholarship (30)
- University of Denver Criminal Law Review (30)
- Journal Articles (26)
- Touro Law Review (26)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (24)
- Maine Law Review (24)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (24)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (22)
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (22)
- Pepperdine Law Review (22)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (21)
- American University Law Review (19)
- Cleveland State Law Review (17)
- Georgia Criminal Law Review (17)
- Popular Media (16)
- Scholarly Articles (14)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (13)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (13)
- Publication Type
Articles 1471 - 1500 of 1604
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Immunity Through Confession?, John A. Spanogle Jr.
Immunity Through Confession?, John A. Spanogle Jr.
Vanderbilt Law Review
Does this advice from Judge Leonard P. Moore sound fanciful? Could it ever profit a criminal to confess his guilt? The advisability of such action may not be as improbable as it sounds. In order to determine whether it is fanciful or not it is necessary to review several cases decided by the United States Supreme Court, which this article will undertake to do.
Legislation, Law Review Staff
Legislation, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
Budget Planners--Regulation To Protect Debtors
=====================================
Criminal Law--Taxation of Court Costs
=====================================
Statute of Limitations--Professional Negligence--Foreign Objects Left in Patient's Body
Criminal Law And Procedure -- 1963 Tennessee Survey, Robert E. Kendrick
Criminal Law And Procedure -- 1963 Tennessee Survey, Robert E. Kendrick
Vanderbilt Law Review
1. Homicide. A number of years ago the Tennessee Supreme Court adopted the common law principle that one is justified in taking life in defense of his habitation when actually or apparently necessary to repel an attempt by another to enter forcibly or violently under circumstances creating a reasonable apprehension that the assailant's design is imminently to commit a felony therein or to assault or offer personal violence or inflict personal injury on an inmate so that there are reasonable grounds for concluding that life is endangered or great bodily harm is threatened thereby.'
Flippen v. State, a homicide case, …
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
Antitrust--FTC Proceeding Will Not Toll the Statute of Limitations in an Action Under Section 4(b) of the Clayton Act
============================
Conflict of Laws--Where None of the Beneficiaries Reside in Forum State, Limitation on Amount of Recovery Imposed by State Where Tort Occurred Governs
============================
Criminal Law--Double Jeopardy--Conviction of Greater Degree of Offense on Retrial
============================
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure--No Requirement that Agent Appointed To Receive Service of Process be Expressly Bound To Give Notice to Principal
============================
Labor Law--NLRA--Union's Duty To Represent Fairly
============================
Labor Law-Walsh--Healey Act--Secretary of Labor Not Authorized To Set More Than One Prevailing Wage
============================= …
Hart And Honore, Causation In The Law, John H. Mansfield
Hart And Honore, Causation In The Law, John H. Mansfield
Vanderbilt Law Review
It is scarcely necessary at this date to give notice of the publication of Causation in the Law. Since its appearance four years ago the book has become widely known and has been much discussed by legal scholars, particularly in the fields of torts and criminal law. Doubtless it has received similar attention from philosophers, for it is a work that seeks to achieve something which is seldom attempted, and then with little success, namely, to combine legal and philosophical thinking in a way that secures the understanding and approval of both philosophers and lawyers by satisfying the analytical rigor …
Recent Case Comments, Law Review Staff
Recent Case Comments, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
Attorneys--Violation of Canon 27 by Encouraging or Permitting Favorable Publicity
============================
Constitutional Law--Dismissal of Criminal Charges Because of Deprivation of Right to Effective Counsel by Eavesdropping
============================
Criminal Law--Credit Card Invoice as a "Security" under National Stolen Property Act
============================
Criminal Law--Rights of Alleged Parole Violator at Revocation Hearing
============================
Labor Law--Federal Procedure--Right to Jury Trial under Section 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act
============================
Labor Law--Representation. Elections--Provision on Ballot Allowing Vote for "No Representation"
============================
Labor Law--Unfair Labor Practice--Availability of Injunction Prior to Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies
============================
Taxation--Federal Estate Tax--Survivor's Annuity as Insurance Under Section 2039 a …
Science, Common Sense, And Criminal Law Reform, Jerome Hall
Science, Common Sense, And Criminal Law Reform, Jerome Hall
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Professor Hall advocates a reappraisal of the current trend in criminal law of substituting expert psychiatric testimony for common-sense determinations of insanity based on the long experience of the criminal-law tradition. Holding that the average layman is as competent to recognize extreme mental illness as the psychiatric expert, the author discusses the doctrine of the "irresistible impulse" and submits that the current departures from the M'Naghten rule tend to "substitute the ideology of a particular group of psychiatrists for the principle of moral responsibility." Professor Hall suggests that realistic reform cannot be achieved without considering the "moral life and its …
Operating A Motor Vehicle While Under The Influence
Operating A Motor Vehicle While Under The Influence
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law And Procedure -- 1962 Tennessee Survey, Robert E. Kendrick
Criminal Law And Procedure -- 1962 Tennessee Survey, Robert E. Kendrick
Vanderbilt Law Review
The American states have generally codified in one form or other the common law "felony murder rule" to the effect that homicide committed while perpetrating or attempting a felony, and as a consequence thereof, is murder. Tennessee's statute in this regard, which largely follows the most widely adopted version of the rule in limiting it to specified felonies and in classifying homicides committed in connection therewith as first degree murder, was applied in two cases decided by the state supreme court during the survey period.
Criminal Law--Entrapment, Robert William Burk Jr.
Criminal Law--Entrapment, Robert William Burk Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Invitee And Retreat Rule In Criminal Law
Invitee And Retreat Rule In Criminal Law
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Culpability For Defense Of Third Persons
Criminal Culpability For Defense Of Third Persons
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments On Recent Cases, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Comments On Recent Cases, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
A New Criminal Code For Maryland?, John M. Brumbaugh
A New Criminal Code For Maryland?, John M. Brumbaugh
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The M'Naghten Rules And Proposed Alternatives, Jerome Hall
The M'Naghten Rules And Proposed Alternatives, Jerome Hall
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Responding to overt and implied criticism of the M'Naghten Rules for determining legal insanity to excuse criminal responsibility, Mr. Hall proposes a national seminar or study by judges of the diverse and perplexing problems they must face in deciding issues in this field. He thinks that M'Naghten needs repair rather than replacement and that a rough consensus might be attainable.
Criminal Law--Presence Of Accused At Trial, Thomas Edward Mchugh
Criminal Law--Presence Of Accused At Trial, Thomas Edward Mchugh
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Case Comments, Law Review Staff
Recent Case Comments, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
Conflict of Laws--Full Faith and Credit--Prior Conflicting Divorce Decrees
=================
Conflict of Laws--Tax Claims of One State Held Not Enforceable in Another State
=================
Constitutional Law--Discrimination--Statute Prohibiting Racial Discrimination in Renting of Private Apartment Houses Does Not Violate Due Process
=================
Constitutional Law--Establishment of Religion--Recitation of State Composed Prayer in Public Schools Held Unconstitutional
=================
Criminal Law--Narcotics-Criminal Prosecution for Addiction Is a Cruel and Unusual Punishment Violating Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments
=================
Damages--Collateral Source Rule--Value of Medical Services Plaintiff Received as a Gratuity Not Allowed as Special Damages
=================
Due Process--Taxation of Insurance Premiums Paid to Foreign Insurers on Property …
Burden Of Proof As To Perpetrators Of Crimes
Burden Of Proof As To Perpetrators Of Crimes
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remarks About Appeal As Prejudicial In Criminal Cases
Remarks About Appeal As Prejudicial In Criminal Cases
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law--Shoplifting--Lack Of Requirement Of Intent Does Not Invalidate Statute, David Mayer Katz
Criminal Law--Shoplifting--Lack Of Requirement Of Intent Does Not Invalidate Statute, David Mayer Katz
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law And Procedure -- 1961 Tennessee Survey (Ii), Robert E. Kendrick
Criminal Law And Procedure -- 1961 Tennessee Survey (Ii), Robert E. Kendrick
Vanderbilt Law Review
In reviewing Cowan v.State, the Tennessee Supreme Court noted the following facts: Defendant, seeing an automobile stop at an isolated spot on a so-called "lovers' lane," approached it by way of a woods, being unseen by the two teen-age couples in the automobile until he was quite nearby. The occupants' attempt to drive away was thwarted by the defendant's exhibiting and threatening to use a pistol, warning against further escape attempts, and demanding and receiving the ignition key. He then insisted that the girls have sexual intercourse with him; and when they refused, he stated that he would not "take …
Book Reviews, Law Review Staff
Book Reviews, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
Decision at Law
By David W. Peck.
New York: Dodd, Mead & Co.,1961. Pp. vii, 303.
==============================
Corporation Lawyer: Saint or Sinner? By Beryl Harold Levy.
Philadelphia and New York: Chilton Co., 1961. Pp. x, 175.
reviewer: Elliott E. Cheatham
================================
Criminal Psychology Edited by Richard W. Nice. New York: Philosophical Library, Inc., 1962. Pp. 284.
reviewer: J. Paschall Davis
=================================
Symposium on the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 Edited by Ralph Slovenko. Baton Rouge: Claitor's Bookstore, 1961. Pp. xliv, 1237. $20.00.
reviewer: Robert N. Covington
==================================
Handling Accident Cases, Vol. 3
By Albert Averbach.
Rochester: The Lawyers …
The Companion Of The New Hampshire Doctrine Of Criminal Insanity, John Reid
The Companion Of The New Hampshire Doctrine Of Criminal Insanity, John Reid
Vanderbilt Law Review
The problem of criminal responsibility is one of the most difficult in criminal law. Of the various solutions that have been devised, the author suggests that the New Hampshire-Scottish approach--with its emphasis on insanity as a question of fact for the jury--is the most desirable.
Subnormal Mentality As A Defense In The Criminal Law, John E.V. Pieski
Subnormal Mentality As A Defense In The Criminal Law, John E.V. Pieski
Vanderbilt Law Review
Although little is left of the theory which ascribed to mental deficiency causative force in criminal conduct, the entire episode taught at least two valuable lessons to modem criminologists. First, it served as a warning against superficial research and hasty conclusions, thus inducing subsequent scholars to take a more scientific approach to similar problems. Second, it aided in alerting others that, although not all or even most criminals are mentally deficient, there are an appreciable number of criminals who possess a subnormal mentality, and who must be reckoned within the criminal law. Notwithstanding that the legal profession has utilized the …
Criminal Law--Defense Of Others, Charles Henry Rudolph Jr.
Criminal Law--Defense Of Others, Charles Henry Rudolph Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Donnelly, Goldstein & Schwartz: Criminal Law, B. J. George Jr.
Donnelly, Goldstein & Schwartz: Criminal Law, B. J. George Jr.
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Criminal Law. By Richard C. Donnelly, Joseph Goldstein and Richard D. Schwartz.
The Scientific And Humane Study Of Criminal Law, Jerome Hall
The Scientific And Humane Study Of Criminal Law, Jerome Hall
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Three Modern Problems In Criminal Law, E. Barrett Prettyman
Three Modern Problems In Criminal Law, E. Barrett Prettyman
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminally Enforceable Duty To Act
Criminally Enforceable Duty To Act
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Theory Of Criminal Discovery And The Practice Of Criminal Law, David W. Louisell
The Theory Of Criminal Discovery And The Practice Of Criminal Law, David W. Louisell
Vanderbilt Law Review
To crystallize in a few words the motif of a career as varied and comprehensive as that of Eddie Morgan would in any event be difficult, but it is doubly so for a life devoted, as his has been, to stuff as vital and dynamic as procedure and evidence. For me, his work most fundamentally is to be characterized as a quest for greater rationality in the adjudicative process. Whether one thinks of his analysis of the hearsay rule,' or his rationale of the admissions exception to it, or his treatment of the dead man's statute, or his study of …