Criminal Law Commons^™

International Criminal Law, Linda Strite Murnane

The International Lawyer

No abstract provided.

Regional International Criminal Courts: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?, Firew Kebede Tiba

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Regionalism in international relations is a fact of life. Regional judicial implementation of international norms is relatively common in the fields of international human rights, international investment, and trade laws. There are attempts to break ground in the realm of international criminal law by creating a regional international criminal court, such as the proposed addition of the criminal jurisdiction to the African Court of Justice and Human Rights. Although there was momentum in creating a universal permanent international criminal court, the enthusiasm for the tribunal's exercise of jurisdiction has not continued. The International Criminal Court ("ICC") will remain short of …

Adolescent Sex Offender Registration Policy: Perspectives On General Deterrence Potential From Criminology And Developmental Psychology, Cynthia J. Najdowski, H. M. Cleary, M. C. Stevenson

Psychology Faculty Scholarship

Sex offender registration policies have expanded rapidly, now extending to adolescent offenders across the nation. Policies mandating registration are based, in part, on arguments that registration is needed to prevent dangerous sex offenders from committing additional offenses and that risk of registration deters would-be offenders from offending in the first place. Research suggests that registration does not serve the former specific deterrent function for adolescents, but less is known regarding the latter goal of general deterrence. The disciplines of criminology and developmental psychology both offer important theoretical perspectives, but these frameworks have yet to be applied to this unique context. …

Federal Preemption On Michigan State's Authority Enacting Law Concerning Ballast Water Discharge In The Great Lake, Mengxue Xie

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Practice Regarding Motions For Acquittal At The Close Of Evidence For The Prosecution. Specifically An Overview Of The Law And Practice Of The International Criminal Tribunals Regarding Motions For Judgment Of Acquittal At The Close Of The Prosecution Case, The Legal Standards Applied By The Other Tribunals That Also Provide For Such Motions, As Well As In The Practice Adopted, Including Whether The Practice Involves Full Briefing By The Parties Or Just Oral Argument., Daniel Joseph Carravallah

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Disagreement Settlement Between Co-Investigating Judges When Super-Majority Vote Is Not Reached In Pre-Trial Chamber, Yitao Li

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Scope Of Judicial Discretion Over Indictment At The Pre-Trial Level. Specifically Addressing Whether A Suspect Or Charged Person May Be Indicted By The Co-Investigating Judges For Specific Criminal Events That Have Not Been Specifically Requested To Be Investigated In Either An Introductory Or Supplemental Submission Against That Suspect By The Co-Prosecutors? If So, Under What Conditions?, Victoria Sarant

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Can Thomas Kwoyelo Negate The Requisite Mens Rea By Qualifying For Any Psychological Defenses Resulting From His Adbuction During His Childhood By A Militant Organization?, Scott Bobbitt

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Can A Service Member Who Lies In Order To Obtain Leave Still Be Charged With Being Absent Without Leave Under Article 86 Of The Uniform Code Of Military Justice?, Christina Marie Dombrowski

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

The Environmental Protection Of The Great Lakes And Enbridge’S Line 5 Under The Straits Of Mackinac, Brittany Hock

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Speed Of The Eccc Trials Compared To Other International Trials And Tribunals. Specifically Discussing The Numerical Speed Of The Pre-Indictment, Pre-Trial, And Trial Phases As Compared To Other International Trials And Tribunals. Also Specifically Discussing Whether The Eccc Comparatively Fails To Achieve The Purposes Of International Criminal Trials As A Direct Result Of The Speed Of The Eccc’S Process., Erin Rosson

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Fairness Of The Trial Of Eccc Case 002/01 Compared To Other Comparable Judgments In International Tribunals, Nicole Triola

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

How Does The Judgement Of The Eccc Trial Chamber Against Nuon Chea And Khieu Samphan In Case 002/01 Compare With The Judgments Of Other International Criminal Courts Or Tribunals In Terms Of The Quality And Quantity Of The Evidence Relied On As The Basis Of Convictions?, Sabrina Turner

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Relationship Between Old Age And Prosecution Specifically Addressing Whether Old Age Should Ever Be A Factor In Deciding Whether To Prosecute Large Scale Human Rights Abusers, Assuming Reasonable Health., Valerie Villacampa

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Anarchy In The Tribal Border Regions – How Do Federal And State Governments Handle Transnational Crime Prevention And Enforcement In Tribal Border Regions?, Aji M. Drameh

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Indians, Race, And Criminal Jurisdiction In Indian Country, Alexander Tallchief Skibine

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

With the possible exception of the Indian Major Crimes Act, the classification of “Indian” for the purposes of the ICCA and the Duro Fix is not “racial” even if it includes non-enrolled people of Indian ancestry with significant connections to tribal communities. Furthermore, although the first prong of the Rogers test should be eliminated on policy grounds, the holding of the Zepeda court that the first prong could be satisfied by proof of blood quantum from any Indian tribe, recognized or not, is highly suspicious, seems to be arbitrary, and boosts the argument that the classification of “Indian” in such …

In Loco Juvenile Justice: Minors In Munis, Cash From Kids, And Adolescent Pro Se Advocacy - Ferguson And Beyond, Mae Quinn

Journal Articles

No abstract provided.

Lights Hidden Under Bushel's Case, Thomas A. Green

Book Chapters

Some forty years ago, Charlie Donahue created a course which he titled "Law, Morals and Society." Designed for undergraduates, and situated among the offerings of the University of Michigan's interdisciplinary Medieval and Renaissance Collegium, the course reflected the approach to doing history that, as this volume recognizes, Charlie has followed throughout his long and enormously influential career as scholar, teacher, lecturer, and inepressible master of well-timed interventions during conference-panel discussion periods. "LMS" was composed of four units. Charlie, who taught two of them, led off with the legal basis for the deposition of Richard II; I followed with the law …

Forward Progress: A New Pattern Criminal Jury Instruction For Impeachment With Prior Inconsistent Statements Will Ease The Court’S Burden By Emphasizing The Prosecutor’S, 84 Fordham L. Rev. 1455 (2016), Hugh Mundy

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

Due in part to the “difficult-to-follow” instruction, the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence (“the Advisory Committee” or “the Committee”) is now contemplating the expansion of Rule 801(d)(1)(A) to allow for the substantive admissibility of all prior inconsistent statements. While a revised rule would obviate the need for a limiting instruction, the change would enable federal prosecutors to offer out-of-court statements of tenuous reliability as proof against criminal defendants. A more just approach lies in a recrafted jury instruction—one which frames the admissibility of prior inconsistent statements in terms of the prosecutor’s burden of proof.

In this Article, …

Harte V. State, 132 Nev., Adv. Op. 40 (June 2, 2016), Brandonn Grossman

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

The Court reaffirmed Flanagan v State, holding that the district court has discretion to admit evidence of a codefendant’s sentence in penalty hearings and affirming the district court’s sentence in the matter.

The Human Rights Of Sea Pirates: Will The European Court Of Human Rights Decisions Get More Killed?, Barry Hart Dubner, Brian Othero

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

What Common Law And Common Sense Teach Us About Corporate Cybersecurity, Stephanie Balitzer

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This Note examines the challenges of corporate cyberdefense and suggests an approach to mitigate them. Part I outlines the background of the corporate cyberdefense quandary and various cyberdefense strategies. Part II explores the current landscape of cybersecurity law in the United States and the regulatory infrastructure that governs cybercrimes. Part II also surveys case law that illustrates the legal loopholes and ambiguities corporations face when implementing cybersecurity measures. Finally, Part III argues that the proposed active defense model fails to comport with practical concerns and established legal principles. This Note’s comparative analysis of common law ‘defense of property’ principles and …

The Under-Policed, I. Bennett Capers

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Sampling And Reliability In Class Action Litigation, Hillel J. Bavli

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

In this Article, I explain my conclusions in Aggregating for Accuracy in non-mathematical terms, and underscore certain implications with respect to class action litigation and considerations in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo. I begin by describing the building blocks of my analysis—the concepts of reliability and accuracy in the law.

Said I, 'But You Have No Choice': Why A Lawyer Must Ethically Honor A Client's Decision About Mental Health Treatment Even If It Is Not What S/He Would Have Chosen, Michael L. Perlin, Naomi M. Weinstein

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article argues that lawyers representing individuals with mental disabilities have an ethical responsibility to prioritize their clients' expressed preferences and autonomy, rejecting the presumption that substituted decisionmaking is acceptable. It critiques the legal system's reliance on paternalistic approaches and highlights the importance of supported decisionmaking, as mandated by international human rights law, particularly under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The analysis emphasizes the need for legal frameworks and attorney practices to align with therapeutic jurisprudence, which prioritizes psychological well-being and dignity while upholding due process principles.

Assessing Time Served, Patrick A. Woods

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

This article examines the utility of a new way of determining when increased punishment should be imposed pursuant to "three strikes" laws or other recidivist enhancements. In the past two years, Congress and the United States Sentencing Commission are each considering criminal justice reform measures that would use the length of time an offender spent incarcerated as a proxy for the seriousness of his earlier criminal conduct. While this reform seems sound at first glance, this article ultimately concludes that its incorporation into current state and federal sentencing laws must be done carefully, if at all, and that doing so …

Cash Is King: How Market-Based Strategies Have Corrupted Classrooms And Criminal Courts In Post-Katrina New Orleans, 39 Seattle U. L. Rev. 1199 (2016), Olympia Duhart, Hugh Mundy

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

On many accounts, it is a tale of two cities. The headlines and marketing machines tout to the world that “The Big Easy is Back.” But beyond the celebrations and parades, the story for poor Katrina survivors is very different. While many residents and businesses are enjoying a resurgence a decade after Katrina stormed through, others in post-Katrina New Orleans have a different experience. More than ten years after Hurricane Katrina, the city still struggles with systemic failures. These problem areas include housing, health care, mental health treatment, employment, education, and the criminal justice system. All of these challenges are …

Sexual Assault As A Law Of War Violation & U.S. Service-Members’ Duty To Report, Chris Jenks, Jay Morse

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

This Essay considers when U.S. service members deployed to Afghanistan are obligated to report allegations of sexual assault by Afghan security forces against Afghan nationals to the U.S. military. The answer requires applying a longstanding Department of Defense policy for reporting law of war violations and hinges on whether there is a nexus between the sexual assault and the armed conflict in Afghanistan. Although recent attention on this topic has brought much-needed visibility to sexual assault in conflict zones, the overbroad assertions of the media and the military have unfortunately fostered more confusion than clarity. This Essay does not attempt …

Voices On Innocence, Lucian E. Dervan, Richard A. Leo, Meghan J. Ryan, Valena Elizabeth Beety, Gregory M. Gilchrist, William W. Berry

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

In the summer of 2015, experts gathered from around the country to sit together and discuss one of the most pressing and important issues facing the American criminal justice system – innocence. Innocence is an issue that pervades various areas of research and influences numerous topics of discussion. What does innocence mean, particularly in a system that differentiates between innocence and acquittal at sentencing? What is the impact of innocence during plea bargaining? How should we respond to growing numbers of exonerations? What forces lead to the incarceration of innocents? Has an innocent person been put to death and, if …

Taking Dignity Seriously: Excavating The Backdrop Of The Eighth Amendment, Meghan J. Ryan

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

The U.S. punishment system is in turmoil. We have a historically unprecedented number of offenders in prison, and our prisoners are serving longer sentences than in any other country. States are surreptitiously experimenting with formulas for lethal injection cocktails, and some prisoners are suffering from botched executions. Despite this tumult, the Eighth Amendment of our Constitution does place limits on the punishments that may be imposed and how they may be implemented. The difficulty, though, is that the Supreme Court’s Eighth Amendment jurisprudence is a bit of a mess. The Court has been consistent in stating that a focus on …