Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Procedure (184)
- Constitutional Law (88)
- International Law (62)
- Evidence (57)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (55)
-
- Courts (44)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (41)
- Law and Society (41)
- Legislation (36)
- Juvenile Law (33)
- Human Rights Law (32)
- Law and Gender (31)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (31)
- State and Local Government Law (23)
- Legal History (19)
- Jurisprudence (18)
- Administrative Law (17)
- Legal Studies (17)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (15)
- Fourth Amendment (15)
- Law and Economics (15)
- Sexuality and the Law (15)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (14)
- Law and Psychology (14)
- Immigration Law (13)
- Law and Race (13)
- Transnational Law (13)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (12)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (62)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (37)
- American University Washington College of Law (29)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (25)
- New York Law School (24)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (24)
- University of Michigan Law School (23)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (17)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (16)
- Georgetown University Law Center (13)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (13)
- Boston University School of Law (10)
- Brooklyn Law School (10)
- Columbia Law School (10)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (10)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (10)
- Singapore Management University (9)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (9)
- University of Colorado Law School (9)
- Seattle University School of Law (8)
- UIC School of Law (8)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (7)
- University of Baltimore Law (7)
- Cornell University Law School (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (6)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (6)
- Southern Methodist University (6)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (6)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (6)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (48)
- Evidence (34)
- Crime (23)
- Fourth Amendment (18)
- Criminal (15)
-
- Constitutional Law (14)
- Death penalty (14)
- Sixth Amendment (14)
- Capital punishment (13)
- Criminal procedure (13)
- Innocence (13)
- Sentencing (13)
- Criminal Law (12)
- Criminal Procedure (12)
- Criminal justice (12)
- Rape (12)
- United States (12)
- California (11)
- Constitution (11)
- Criminal justice system (11)
- Due Process (11)
- Police (11)
- Drugs (10)
- Exclusionary rule (10)
- Law (10)
- New York (10)
- Testimony (10)
- Deterrence (9)
- Fifth Amendment (9)
- Punishment (9)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (53)
- Faculty Scholarship (49)
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (31)
- Touro Law Review (23)
- NYLS Law Review (20)
-
- Articles (16)
- All Faculty Scholarship (15)
- War Crimes Memoranda (14)
- Faculty Publications (13)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (13)
- American University Criminal Law Brief (12)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (12)
- Florida Law Review (11)
- All Faculty Publications (9)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (9)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (9)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (8)
- Publications (7)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (7)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (6)
- Cardozo Law Review (6)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (6)
- St. Thomas Law Review (6)
- American Indian Law Journal (5)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Journal Articles (5)
- Scholarly Publications (5)
- Student Works (5)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (5)
- BYU Law Review (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 301 - 330 of 599
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Making Sense Of Reasonable Doubt: Understanding Certainty, Doubt,And Rule-Based Bias Filtering, Yali Corea-Levy
Making Sense Of Reasonable Doubt: Understanding Certainty, Doubt,And Rule-Based Bias Filtering, Yali Corea-Levy
American University Criminal Law Brief
No abstract provided.
Is It Justice Or A Crime To Record The Police?: A Look At The Illinois Eavesdropping Statute And Its Application, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 485 (2012), Stephanie Claiborne
Is It Justice Or A Crime To Record The Police?: A Look At The Illinois Eavesdropping Statute And Its Application, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 485 (2012), Stephanie Claiborne
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Guy Fawkes's Dangerous Remedy: The Unconstitutionality Of Government-Ordered Assassination Against U.S. Citizens And Its Implications For Due Process In America, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1121 (2012), Emily Kendall
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Where Art Thou, Privacy: Expanding Privacy Rights Of Minors In Regard To Consensual Sex: Statutory Rape Laws And The Need For A Romeo And Juliet Exception In Illinois, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 309 (2012), Jordan Franklin
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Victim Participation At The International Criminal Court And The Extraordinary Chambers In The Courts Of Cambodia: A Feminist Project, Susana Sacouto
Victim Participation At The International Criminal Court And The Extraordinary Chambers In The Courts Of Cambodia: A Feminist Project, Susana Sacouto
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
The question this Article poses is whether victim participation--one of the most recent developments in international criminal law--has increased the visibility of the actual lived experience of survivors of sexual and gender-based violence in the context of war, mass violence, or repression. Under the Rome Statute, victims of the world's most serious crimes were given unprecedented rights to participate in proceedings before the Court. Nearly a decade later, a similar scheme was established to allow victims to participate as civil parties in the proceedings before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC or Extraordinary Chambers), a court created …
No Contact Parole Restrictions: Unconstitutional And Counterproductive, Sharon Brett
No Contact Parole Restrictions: Unconstitutional And Counterproductive, Sharon Brett
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
Although what Jesse Timmendequas did was abhorrent, the legislation enacted in the wake of his crime went far beyond making sure we know the pedophiles or pedophile-murderers living in our neighborhoods. Megan's name now lends itself to a host of state laws requiring the state to notify neighbors when a sex offender moves into the neighborhood. The term "sex offender" is intentionally broad, covering everyone from voyeurs and exhibitionists to rapists and child molesters. Yet, Megan's Laws treat them the same way, ignoring some crucial questions: Are all sex offenders alike? Are they all monsters? In reality, the majority of …
Confrontation Control, Pamela R. Metzger
Confrontation Control, Pamela R. Metzger
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
After Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 42 (2004), face-to-face confrontation between accused and accuser is the constitutionally normative mode of presentation for testimonial evidence. Yet, eight years into the Crawford revolution, courts routinely hold that counsel can waive a defendant's confrontation rights without even discussing the matter with the defendant. Why? Because counsel, not client, has the authority to decide whether to confront and cross-examine government witnesses.
This Essay, written as part of the Texas Tech Sixth Amendment Symposium, explores this peculiar and perplexing rule. If confrontation is essential to a constitutionally valid criminal trial, how can defense …
Proving Medical Child Abuse: The Time Is Now For Ohio To Focus On The Victim And Not The Abuser, Tiffany S. Allison
Proving Medical Child Abuse: The Time Is Now For Ohio To Focus On The Victim And Not The Abuser, Tiffany S. Allison
Journal of Law and Health
Part I of this Note will discuss the history of Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy and how the medical community is trying to make the general public aware of medical child abuse. Part II provides a history of Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy and medical child abuse. It also highlights the differences in how litigation was previously handled under the nomenclature of Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy and how litigation should be handled in the future under the nomenclature of medical child abuse. Part III identifies Ohio's current statutes and federal legislation that have an effect on child abuse. Part III also identifies …
Updates From The International And Internationalized Criminal Courts, Claire Grandison, Sofia Vivero, Andra Nicolescu, Danielle Dean, Benjamin Watson
Updates From The International And Internationalized Criminal Courts, Claire Grandison, Sofia Vivero, Andra Nicolescu, Danielle Dean, Benjamin Watson
Human Rights Brief
No abstract provided.
Professionalism And Advocacy At Trial – Real Jurors Speak In Detail About The Performance Of Their Advocates, Mitchell J. Frank, Osvaldo F. Morera
Professionalism And Advocacy At Trial – Real Jurors Speak In Detail About The Performance Of Their Advocates, Mitchell J. Frank, Osvaldo F. Morera
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
"No Older 'N Seventeen": Defending In Dylan Country, Abbe Smith
"No Older 'N Seventeen": Defending In Dylan Country, Abbe Smith
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article is about an actual experience the author had defending a teenager accused of a serious crime where Bob Dylan grew up-- the Minnesota Iron Range. In order to protect the young man's privacy, it does not divulge the actual time period of the case. Likewise, details about his life and the charges he was facing have been changed. His name has been changed to Jamal. Things did not go well for Jamal. Though a child when he was sent from the juvenile jail outside of Washington, D.C. to a secure treatment facility for serious juvenile offenders in the …
When The Law Doesn't Work, Richard H. Underwood
When The Law Doesn't Work, Richard H. Underwood
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Article looks at Dylan songs and traces them back to "true crime" to relate Dylan to the law. It looks at "Ballad of Hollis Brown," "Ballad of Donald White," "The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll," "Hurricane," "Percy's Song," and "Talking Bear Mountain Picnic Massacre Blues." Part I looks at Dylan's traditional songs. Part II looks at Dylan's finger-pointing songs. Finally, part III looks at "Bad Judge Ballads."
Our Backyard Slave Trade: The Result Of Ohio’S Failure To Enact Comprehensive State-Level Human-Sex-Trafficking Legislation, Priscila A. Rocha
Our Backyard Slave Trade: The Result Of Ohio’S Failure To Enact Comprehensive State-Level Human-Sex-Trafficking Legislation, Priscila A. Rocha
Journal of Law and Health
This Note examines the shortcomings of Ohio’s current anti-trafficking legislation and argues that additional victim-focused legislation must be enacted at the state level to prevent human trafficking and to protect victims. Part II provides a broad overview of the human-sex-trafficking epidemic, its magnitude at an international level, and the United Nations’ response. Part III discusses the scope of human trafficking within the United States. It also examines federal level anti-trafficking initiatives, including the Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA), its reauthorizations, and its effectiveness in preventing domestic human trafficking and in protecting victims. Part IV addresses the urgent …
Resolving The Post-Begay Maelstrom Statutory Rape As A Violent Felony Under The Armed Career Criminal Act, Sarena M. Holder
Resolving The Post-Begay Maelstrom Statutory Rape As A Violent Felony Under The Armed Career Criminal Act, Sarena M. Holder
Cleveland State Law Review
The Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA"), enacted in 1984, mandates a minimum fifteen-year sentence for defendants who unlawfully possess a firearm and who also have three prior convictions for violent felonies and/or serious drug offenses. Since its inception, the ACCA has presented a weighty problem: what constitutes a "violent" felony? The United States Supreme Court has made an effort to allay the confusion, most recently in its decision in Begay v. United States, requiring that violent felonies be purposefully violent or aggressive. This Note questions the reasoning of circuit courts that have disallowed statutory rape as a violent felony post-Begay, …
How Can A Program Similar To Rewards For Justice Be Established That Offers Rewards For Information Related To The Financiers Or Key Leaders Of Pirate Organizations?, Baker & Mckenzie Llp
How Can A Program Similar To Rewards For Justice Be Established That Offers Rewards For Information Related To The Financiers Or Key Leaders Of Pirate Organizations?, Baker & Mckenzie Llp
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Implications Of The Unclos Definition Of Piracy On Seychelles Prosecutions Specifically Addressing The Incorporation Of The Definition Of Piracy In Article 101 Of Unclos And The Implications For Seychelles Piracy Prosecutions, Randall Christopher Bray
Implications Of The Unclos Definition Of Piracy On Seychelles Prosecutions Specifically Addressing The Incorporation Of The Definition Of Piracy In Article 101 Of Unclos And The Implications For Seychelles Piracy Prosecutions, Randall Christopher Bray
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Understanding Jurors’ Judgments In Cases Involving Juvenile Defendants: Effects Of Confession Evidence And Intellectual Disability, Cynthia J. Najdowski, Bette L. Bottoms
Understanding Jurors’ Judgments In Cases Involving Juvenile Defendants: Effects Of Confession Evidence And Intellectual Disability, Cynthia J. Najdowski, Bette L. Bottoms
Psychology Faculty Scholarship
Juveniles are at heightened risk for falsely confessing to crimes, particularly if they are intellectually disabled. We conducted a mock trial experiment to investigate the effects of a juvenile defendant’s confession and status as intellectually disabled on jurors’ decision making. As expected, jurors discounted a juvenile’s coerced confession: Jurors’ judgments were similar for a juvenile who was perceived to have confessed under coercion and a juvenile who did not confess. In general, these effects were explained by the fact that, compared to a juvenile who was perceived as having confessed voluntarily, a juvenile who was perceived as having confessed under …
Every High Has A Low: A Pragmatic Approach To The War On Drugs, Mark Garibyan
Every High Has A Low: A Pragmatic Approach To The War On Drugs, Mark Garibyan
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Caveat
One of the lasting vestiges of Richard Nixon’s presidency is the infamous “War on Drugs,” a forty-year-old effort aimed at curtailing “illicit drug consumption and transactions in America.” Although the goal behind the policy—a reduction in the rate of substance abuse—may be altruistic, the War on Drugs has dismally failed to achieve its goals and has exacerbated existing problems. Specifically, laws dealing with crack cocaine result in a “heavily disproportionate impact on black defendants;” in 2008 “blacks comprised 79.8 percent of those convicted for crack cocaine-related offenses,” whereas “whites comprised only 10.4 percent.” More generally, these laws illustrate a fundamental …
The Death Penalty And The Mentally Ill: A Selected And Annotated Bibliography, Jean Mattimoe
The Death Penalty And The Mentally Ill: A Selected And Annotated Bibliography, Jean Mattimoe
Articles
The United States Supreme Court over the last decade has selectively whittled away at the scope and availability of the death penalty by exempting certain groups from execution under the Eighth Amendment. In 2002 the court ruled that executing mentally retarded criminals violates the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In 2005 the court ruled that the Constitution forbids the execution of individuals who were under the age of 18 when they committed their crimes. Currently there is an active debate on whether to extend the categorical exemptions created by the Court to the mentally ill. At the forefront …
Criminal Child Neglect And The Free Range Kid: Is Overprotective Parenting The New Standard Of Care?, David Pimentel
Criminal Child Neglect And The Free Range Kid: Is Overprotective Parenting The New Standard Of Care?, David Pimentel
Articles
No abstract provided.
Confronting The Invisible Witness: The Use Of Narrative To Neutralize Capital Jurors’ Implicit Racial Biases, Pamela A. Wilkins
Confronting The Invisible Witness: The Use Of Narrative To Neutralize Capital Jurors’ Implicit Racial Biases, Pamela A. Wilkins
Articles
How can capital defense lawyers craft narratives that neutralize jurors’ unconscious racial and ethnic biases? A well-developed body of research in cognitive psychology indicates that despite even the best of intentions and the absence of conscious prejudice, most Americans harbor unconscious biases against African Americans. These biases influence what we actually perceive, how we interpret what we perceive, and how we act. For reasons related to the content and structure of capital sentencing trials, these unconscious biases are particularly likely to influence capital jurors. In effect, unconscious racial bias acts as an invisible witness against the African American defendant, buttressing …
Prosecutors And Bargaining In Weak Cases: A Comparative View, Jenia I. Turner
Prosecutors And Bargaining In Weak Cases: A Comparative View, Jenia I. Turner
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
One of the most controversial uses of prosecutorial discretion in plea bargaining concerns cases involving weak evidence of guilt. When a prosecutor bargains about the charges or even the facts in a case with weak evidence, at least three problems may arise. First, if the charge bargain is generous, it may coerce an innocent defendant to plead guilty. Second, such a bargain may let a guilty defendant off too easily, thus disserving the public and victim’s interests. Third, if the parties bargain about the facts, the result may distort the truth of the case.
In this book chapter, I examine …
Africa And The International Criminal Court, Charles C. Jalloh
Africa And The International Criminal Court, Charles C. Jalloh
Articles
No abstract provided.
A Neurological Foundation For Freedom, Nita A. Farahany
A Neurological Foundation For Freedom, Nita A. Farahany
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Book Review, Samuel W. Buell
Twenty-First Century Fingerprints: The Third Circuit's Approval Of Dna Collection Upon Arrest In United States V. Mitchell, Megan Pownall
Twenty-First Century Fingerprints: The Third Circuit's Approval Of Dna Collection Upon Arrest In United States V. Mitchell, Megan Pownall
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Legal Memorandum On Reintegration Of Former Pirates, Pilpg
Legal Memorandum On Reintegration Of Former Pirates, Pilpg
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Manson And Its Progeny: An Empirical Analysis Of American Eyewitness Law, Nicholas A. Kahn-Fogel
Manson And Its Progeny: An Empirical Analysis Of American Eyewitness Law, Nicholas A. Kahn-Fogel
Faculty Scholarly Works
Since the Supreme Court established the current constitutional framework for determining the admissibility of eyewitness identification evidence in Manson v. Brathwaite in 1977, scientists and scholars who have evaluated the opinion have uniformly criticized it as insufficient to deter police from using flawed identification procedures and inconsistent with scientific evidence of the best ways to assess the reliability of evidence tainted by such procedures. Until now, however, the work of these scientists and scholars has been based primarily on simulation experiments and on a selective assortment of easily criticized judicial decisions applying Manson. This study provides the first systematic analysis …
Criminal Sentencing Under The Advisory Guidelines And The Ex Post Facto Clause, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 435 (2012), Megan Preusker
Criminal Sentencing Under The Advisory Guidelines And The Ex Post Facto Clause, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 435 (2012), Megan Preusker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Protecting Tax Payers And Crime Victims: The Case For Restricting Utah's Preliminary Hearings To Felony Offenses, Paul G. Cassell, Thomas E. Goodwin
Protecting Tax Payers And Crime Victims: The Case For Restricting Utah's Preliminary Hearings To Felony Offenses, Paul G. Cassell, Thomas E. Goodwin
Utah OnLaw: The Utah Law Review Online Supplement
Requiring preliminary hearings for Class A misdemeanors is undesirable for two simple reasons. First, the court’s decision will result in hundreds of additional preliminary hearings a year, thus imposing substantial costs on taxpayers and burdens on an already overwhelmed criminal justice system. Second, the decision will create substantial hardships for crime victims, who will now be twice subjected to cross-examination by defense attorneys—once at the preliminary hearing and again later at trial. And these costs will generate no significant benefit in return.