Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Procedure (65)
- Courts (44)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (44)
- Criminology (40)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (40)
-
- Legal Studies (40)
- Sociology (40)
- Constitutional Law (37)
- Evidence (17)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (17)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (13)
- Fourth Amendment (12)
- Law and Gender (12)
- Judges (11)
- State and Local Government Law (11)
- International Law (9)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (7)
- Legislation (7)
- Litigation (7)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Jurisprudence (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Human Rights Law (5)
- Juvenile Law (5)
- Legal History (5)
- Civil Law (4)
- Supreme Court of the United States (4)
- Institution
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (39)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (34)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (15)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (13)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (11)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (8)
- UC Law SF (8)
- UIC School of Law (8)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (6)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- Brooklyn Law School (4)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- Pace University (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Mercer University School of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- Keyword
-
- New York (28)
- Federal (22)
- 1994) (21)
- Constitutions (20)
- Supreme Court (20)
-
- Defendant (14)
- N.Y. Constitutional Article I (14)
- Appellate Division (13)
- Criminal law (13)
- Capital punishment (11)
- Jury (11)
- § 6 (11)
- Capital Jury Project (10)
- Death penalty (9)
- Evidence (9)
- Search & Seizure (9)
- U.S. Constitutional Amendment IV (9)
- § 12 (9)
- Violation (8)
- Sentences (Criminal procedure) (7)
- Violated (7)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (6)
- Criminal procedure (6)
- Furman v. Georgia (6)
- U.S. Constitutional amendment V (6)
- Art. 1 (5)
- Conviction (5)
- Court of Appeals (5)
- Drug trafficking (5)
- Juries (5)
- Publication
-
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (39)
- Touro Law Review (32)
- Faculty Scholarship (17)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (14)
- Indiana Law Journal (11)
-
- Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011) (11)
- UIC Law Review (8)
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Cardozo Law Review (5)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (5)
- Articles (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (4)
- Michigan Law Review (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (3)
- American University Law Review (3)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Oregon Law Institute, 1995 (3)
- Scholarly Articles (3)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Buffalo Law Review (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- LLM Theses and Essays (2)
- Mercer Law Review (2)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (2)
- San Diego Law Review (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 150 of 246
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Criminal Law - Bordering On Unreasonableness: The Third Circuit Again Expands The Border Search Exception In United States V. Hyde, Gregory T. Arnold
Criminal Law - Bordering On Unreasonableness: The Third Circuit Again Expands The Border Search Exception In United States V. Hyde, Gregory T. Arnold
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Neighbors Are Watching: Targeting Sexual Predators With Community Notification Laws, Christine M. Kong
The Neighbors Are Watching: Targeting Sexual Predators With Community Notification Laws, Christine M. Kong
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
What Does No Mean In Pennsylvania - The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Interpretation Of Rape And The Effectiveness Of The Legislature's Response, Rosemary J. Scalo
What Does No Mean In Pennsylvania - The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Interpretation Of Rape And The Effectiveness Of The Legislature's Response, Rosemary J. Scalo
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Sentencing Boomerang: Drug Prohibition Politics And Reform, Eric E. Sterling
The Sentencing Boomerang: Drug Prohibition Politics And Reform, Eric E. Sterling
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
On Crime, Criminal Lawyers, And O.J. Simpson: Plato's Grogias Revisited, George Anastaplo
On Crime, Criminal Lawyers, And O.J. Simpson: Plato's Grogias Revisited, George Anastaplo
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction, Mary Kay Kane
Guilt, Reasonable Doubt And The Reasonable Woman, Rory K. Little
Guilt, Reasonable Doubt And The Reasonable Woman, Rory K. Little
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Definition Of Hearsay: To Each Its Own, Roger C. Park
The Definition Of Hearsay: To Each Its Own, Roger C. Park
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
United States V. One 1973 Rolls Royce: The Confusion Continues In Interpreting Drug Forfeiture Statutes, Patricia A. O'Neill
United States V. One 1973 Rolls Royce: The Confusion Continues In Interpreting Drug Forfeiture Statutes, Patricia A. O'Neill
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Appellate Determinacy: The Sentencing Philosophy Of The United States Court Of Appeals For The Third Circuit, Gary S. Gildin
Appellate Determinacy: The Sentencing Philosophy Of The United States Court Of Appeals For The Third Circuit, Gary S. Gildin
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
United States V. Cheely: Leaving The Back Door Open For Arbitrary Death Sentencing, Lisa S. Paye
United States V. Cheely: Leaving The Back Door Open For Arbitrary Death Sentencing, Lisa S. Paye
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Sentencing Controversy: Punishment And Policy In The War Against Drugs - Introduction - What Frankel Hath Wrought, Donald W. Dowd
The Sentencing Controversy: Punishment And Policy In The War Against Drugs - Introduction - What Frankel Hath Wrought, Donald W. Dowd
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
One Cheer For The Guidelines, Stewart Dalzell
One Cheer For The Guidelines, Stewart Dalzell
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Sentencing Drug Offenders: The Incarceration Addiction, Margaret P. Spencer
Sentencing Drug Offenders: The Incarceration Addiction, Margaret P. Spencer
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
A Retreat From Uniformity: Does Compliance With A Plea Agreement Justify Downward Departure, Bryant D. Lim
A Retreat From Uniformity: Does Compliance With A Plea Agreement Justify Downward Departure, Bryant D. Lim
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Nichols V. United States: Using Prior, Uncounseled Misdemeanor Convictions To Enhance Sentences - A Dispute Resolved, Kerry R. Northup
Nichols V. United States: Using Prior, Uncounseled Misdemeanor Convictions To Enhance Sentences - A Dispute Resolved, Kerry R. Northup
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
A Critical Analysis Of The Proposed Sentencing Guidelines For Organizations Convicted Of Environmental Crimes, Robert L. Kracht
A Critical Analysis Of The Proposed Sentencing Guidelines For Organizations Convicted Of Environmental Crimes, Robert L. Kracht
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Crime Bill Of 1994 And The Law Of Character Evidence: Congress Was Right About Consent Defense Cases, Roger C. Park
The Crime Bill Of 1994 And The Law Of Character Evidence: Congress Was Right About Consent Defense Cases, Roger C. Park
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Emerging Role Of The Quid Pro Quo Requirement In Public Corruption .Prosecutions Under The Hobbs Act, Peter D. Hardy
The Emerging Role Of The Quid Pro Quo Requirement In Public Corruption .Prosecutions Under The Hobbs Act, Peter D. Hardy
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note discusses the quid pro quo requirement under the Hobbs Act, a federal criminal statute which applies to bribery by public officials. The author first describes two recent decisions by the Supreme Court, McCormick v. United States and Evans v. United States, which established slightly different versions of a quid pro quo requirement in public corruption prosecutions under the Hobbs Act. The author then explains that the lower federal courts interpreting McCormick and Evans have molded the quid pro quo requirement so that a prosecutor must prove in all public corruption cases under the Hobbs Act that the …
Probability And Proof In State V. Skipper: An Internet Exchange, Roger C. Park, Ronald J. Allen
Probability And Proof In State V. Skipper: An Internet Exchange, Roger C. Park, Ronald J. Allen
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Rape Law Pedagogy, Kate Bloch
Fictions, Fault, And Forgiveness: Jury Nullification In A New Context, David N. Dorfman
Fictions, Fault, And Forgiveness: Jury Nullification In A New Context, David N. Dorfman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Recently, critics of the Anglo-American jury system have complained that juries in criminal trials have been ignoring the law, in favor of defendants who claim that they lack criminal responsibility because they are afflicted by the various victimization syndromes now popularized in the mass media. In this Article, Professors Dorfman and Iijima counter this characterization of the "runaway" jury and argue that juries are not ignoring the law, but rather, are exercising a primary power of the jury, to nullify the application of the law when such application to a particular defendant is unjust. The Authors trace the development of …
Prosecutorial Misconduct In Presenting Evidence: "Backdooring" Hearsay, Bennett L. Gershman
Prosecutorial Misconduct In Presenting Evidence: "Backdooring" Hearsay, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Rules of evidence are designed to bring about just and informed decisions. One of these rules, the hearsay rule, is designed to ensure that juries receive reliable evidence, and that out-of-court statements ordinarily are inadmissible. Prosecutors are well aware of these evidentiary restrictions, but occasionally seek to circumvent them. The author describes methods used by some prosecutors to manipulate the hearsay rule and thereby distort the truth-finding process of the trial.
Playing "21" With Narcotics Enforcement: A Response To Professor Carrington (Symposium, Regulatory Future Of Contingent Employment), Frank O. Bowman Iii
Playing "21" With Narcotics Enforcement: A Response To Professor Carrington (Symposium, Regulatory Future Of Contingent Employment), Frank O. Bowman Iii
Faculty Publications
Although I have fundamental disagreements with Professor Carrington even when his argument is reduced to its core, my purpose here is neither to defend every jot and tittle of national drug policy, nor to propose any sweeping personal vision of the place of recreational drugs in America. My ambitions are more modest. I suggest three premises: (1) Intelligent discussion of drug policy requires that we shed the image of law enforcement as warfare. (2) Instead, criminal narcotics prohibitions, penalties, and enforcement methods should be analyzed by the same standards which *939 govern any other type of crime. (3) If antinarcotics …
The Plain Feel Doctrine In Washington: An Opportunity To Provide Greater Protections Of Privacy To Citizens Of This State, Laura T. Bradley
The Plain Feel Doctrine In Washington: An Opportunity To Provide Greater Protections Of Privacy To Citizens Of This State, Laura T. Bradley
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment argues that Washington should return to an independent analysis of search and seizure doctrine under article I, section 7 of the state constitution and reject the admission of contraband seized during the course of a pat-down frisk. The decisions in Hudson and Dickerson have established an unnecessary and unworkable standard, and involve an increased invasion of personal privacy without the counter-balancing need to protect the safety of others. The plain feel doctrine as announced in Dickerson and Hudson developed from two well-established concepts in search and seizure law-the Terry frisk of persons to discover weapons and the plain …
Reconstructing The Bill Of Rights: A Reply To Amar And Marcus's Triple Play On Double Jeopardy, Susan Herman
Reconstructing The Bill Of Rights: A Reply To Amar And Marcus's Triple Play On Double Jeopardy, Susan Herman
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Section 1983 Litigation, Martin A. Schwartz
Fantasy, Celebrity, And Homicide, Thomas Morawetz
Fantasy, Celebrity, And Homicide, Thomas Morawetz
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
New Insights On Waiver And The Inadvertent Disclosure Of Privileged Materials: Attorney Responsibility As The Governing Precept, Audrey Rogers
New Insights On Waiver And The Inadvertent Disclosure Of Privileged Materials: Attorney Responsibility As The Governing Precept, Audrey Rogers
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This Article suggests that fostering the development of attorney responsibility should be the central goal in addressing the issues raised by the inadvertent disclosure. Deciding the waiver issue by concentrating on attorney responsibility will help prevent inadvertent disclosures (and resultant waivers) by impressing upon the attorney the need to take care to avoid them. When disclosures inadvertently occur, the amount of precautions the attorney took (albeit unsuccessfully) should determine whether the privilege is waived. Placing the onus of precautions against inadvertent disclosure on the attorney is not only beneficial to the client, but also aids the profession, and the overall …
The Criminal Courtroom: Is It Child Proof?, Barbara Gilleran Johnson Hon., Timothy R. Evans
The Criminal Courtroom: Is It Child Proof?, Barbara Gilleran Johnson Hon., Timothy R. Evans
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.