Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Procedure (779)
- Constitutional Law (175)
- International Law (129)
- Courts (106)
- Evidence (106)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (90)
- Jurisprudence (80)
- Law and Gender (79)
- Law and Society (76)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (64)
- Human Rights Law (63)
- Legislation (53)
- Communications Law (52)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (52)
- Science and Technology Law (49)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (48)
- First Amendment (40)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (39)
- Sexuality and the Law (39)
- Legal Profession (38)
- Judges (36)
- Immigration Law (35)
- Legal History (35)
- Law and Race (33)
- Legal Education (30)
- Jurisdiction (28)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (25)
- Torts (25)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (151)
- Legal Practice and Procedure (33)
- Penology (33)
- Jurisprudence (26)
- Evidence (25)
-
- Courts (23)
- Constitutional Law (22)
- Sentencing and Punishment (22)
- Politics (General) (21)
- Law Enforcement (17)
- Criminal Law -- Criminal Procedure (16)
- Law and Society (16)
- Crimes Against the Person (13)
- Administrative Law -- Discretion (12)
- International Law (12)
- Punishment (12)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (10)
- Criminal Law (10)
- Criminal Procedure (10)
- Police (10)
- Criminal Law -- Conviction (9)
- First Amendment (9)
- Science and Technology Law (9)
- Slavery (9)
- Constitutional Law -- Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty (8)
- Legislation (8)
- Sex Crimes (8)
- Cardozo School of Law (7)
- Constitutional Law -- Prisoners’ Rights (7)
- Crimes (7)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Cardozo Law Review (330)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (95)
- Articles (92)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (61)
- Translated Opinions (52)
-
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (47)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (45)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (42)
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (31)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (18)
- 2025–2026 Flyers (8)
- Cardozo Law News Archive (6)
- 2022–2023 Flyers (4)
- 2023–2024 Flyers (4)
- 2021–2022 Flyers (3)
- 2022 Event Invitations (3)
- 2021 Event Invitations (2)
- 2026 Event Invitations (2)
- Amicus Briefs (2)
- CLIHHR Reports & Policy Submissions (2)
- Cardozo News 2023 (2)
- Perlmutter Center Reports (2)
- 2023 Event Invitations (1)
- 2024 Event Invitations (1)
- 2024–2025 Flyers (1)
- 2025 Event Invitations (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Online Publications (1)
- Perlmutter Center Briefs (1)
- Perlmutter Center Letters (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 571 - 600 of 862
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Morar V. Idf Commander In Judaea And Samaria, Dorit Beinisch, Eliezer Rivlin, Salim Joubran
Morar V. Idf Commander In Judaea And Samaria, Dorit Beinisch, Eliezer Rivlin, Salim Joubran
Translated Opinions
Facts: The petitioners, who represent five Arab villages in the territory of Judaea and Samaria, claimed that the respondents unlawfully deny Palestinian farmers in those villages access to their agricultural land. The petitioners also claimed that the respondents do not act to prevent attacks and harassment perpetrated by Israeli inhabitants of the territory of Judaea and Samaria against Palestinian farmers and do not enforce the law against the Israeli inhabitants. In reply, the respondents explained that the agricultural land was closed only when it was necessary to protect the Palestinian farmers from harassment by Israeli inhabitants. The respondents also notified …
Dobrin V. Israel Prison Service, Ayala Procaccia, Esther Hayut, Salim Joubran
Dobrin V. Israel Prison Service, Ayala Procaccia, Esther Hayut, Salim Joubran
Translated Opinions
Facts: The second respondent (Amir) was convicted of the murder of the late Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and was sentenced to life imprisonment. While in prison, he married the third respondent. When the first respondent refused, on security grounds, to allow Amir conjugal visits with his wife, Amir applied to the first respondent to be allowed to provide his wife with a sperm sample for the purposes of artificial insemination. The first respondent granted his request.
The petitioners, two members of the Knesset, consequently filed the petition, arguing that the first respondent did not have any authority in statute to …
Yissacharov V. Chief Military Prosecutor, Dorit Beinisch, Aharon Barak, Eliezer Rivlin, Ayala Procaccia, Edmond E. Levy, Miriam Naor, Salim Joubran, Mishael Cheshin, Asher Grunis
Yissacharov V. Chief Military Prosecutor, Dorit Beinisch, Aharon Barak, Eliezer Rivlin, Ayala Procaccia, Edmond E. Levy, Miriam Naor, Salim Joubran, Mishael Cheshin, Asher Grunis
Translated Opinions
Facts: While being admitted into prison for being absent from the army without leave, the appellant was found to have a dangerous drug in his possession. When he was interrogated about this, the interrogator failed to advise the appellant that he had a right to consult a lawyer. This omission, which was omitted by the prosecution, was held by the trial court to have been illegal and intentional. In the course of the interrogation, the appellant confessed that he had, on three occasions while he was a soldier, made use of dangerous drugs.
The appellant argued that the confession should …
Liberalism, Normative Expectations, And The Mechanics Of Fault, Kyron J. Huigens
Liberalism, Normative Expectations, And The Mechanics Of Fault, Kyron J. Huigens
Articles
No abstract provided.
Police Identification Procedures: A Time For Change, Kenneth Patenaude
Police Identification Procedures: A Time For Change, Kenneth Patenaude
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article argues that eyewitness testimony, despite its influence, is often unreliable and a leading cause of wrongful convictions. The author, Lt. Kenneth Patenaude, details his involvement with the Department of Justice in developing the NIJ Guide to improve eyewitness evidence handling. The guide provides best practices aimed at reducing misidentifications and ensuring more reliable evidence in legal proceedings.
"Why Don't You Take Another Look At Number Three?": Investigator Knowledge And Its Effects On Eyewitness Confidence And Identification Decisions, Melissa B. Russano, Jason J. Dickinson, Sarah M. Greathouse, Margaret Bull Kovera
"Why Don't You Take Another Look At Number Three?": Investigator Knowledge And Its Effects On Eyewitness Confidence And Identification Decisions, Melissa B. Russano, Jason J. Dickinson, Sarah M. Greathouse, Margaret Bull Kovera
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article examines the impact of investigator knowledge on eyewitness identification and confidence, highlighting the potential for bias and the importance of implementing double-blind lineup procedures to mitigate such influences. It emphasizes the need for further research and policy changes to enhance the reliability of eyewitness testimony.
Reforming Eyewitness Identification: Cautionary Lineup Instructions; Weighing The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Show-Ups Versus Lineups, Nancy K. Mehrkens Steblay
Reforming Eyewitness Identification: Cautionary Lineup Instructions; Weighing The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Show-Ups Versus Lineups, Nancy K. Mehrkens Steblay
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article argues that the structure and instructions of eyewitness identification procedures significantly influence accuracy, with a focus on the advantages of cautious lineup instructions and the comparative effectiveness of lineups versus show-ups. It emphasizes that subtle changes in lineup instructions can reduce false identifications and improve reliability, while show-ups present unique challenges despite their practical benefits.
On Morality And The Law: Truth, Justice And The American Way, Daniel M. Abuhoff
On Morality And The Law: Truth, Justice And The American Way, Daniel M. Abuhoff
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article argues that the legal system should not be based on morality but rather on rules designed to protect individual freedoms and ensure fairness. It critiques Thane Rosenbaum's view that the legal system should prioritize morality, asserting that such an approach could lead to the imposition of a single moral code, undermining diversity and leading to potential inconsistencies and biases.
Empire State Injustice: Based Upon A Decade Of New Information, A Preliminary Evaluation Of How New York's Death Penalty System Fails To Meet Standards For Accuracy And Fairness, Sara Darehshori, Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier, Colleen Quinn Brady, Evan Mandery
Empire State Injustice: Based Upon A Decade Of New Information, A Preliminary Evaluation Of How New York's Death Penalty System Fails To Meet Standards For Accuracy And Fairness, Sara Darehshori, Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier, Colleen Quinn Brady, Evan Mandery
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article argues that New York's death penalty system requires significant reforms to address systemic flaws, particularly the risk of wrongful convictions and arbitrary sentencing. It emphasizes the need for the legislature to reexamine and revise the capital punishment framework in light of post-1995 research and recommendations from other states, such as Illinois and Massachusetts. The analysis highlights the importance of narrowing eligibility factors, improving procedural safeguards, and ensuring judicial discretion to prevent unjust outcomes.
Partial Ban On Plea Bargains, Oren Gazal-Ayal
Partial Ban On Plea Bargains, Oren Gazal-Ayal
Cardozo Law Review
The influence of the plea bargaining system on innocent defendants is fiercely debated. Many scholars call for a ban on plea bargaining, arguing that the practice coerces innocent defendants to plead guilty. Proponents of plea bargaining respond that even an innocent defendant is better off when he chooses to plea bargain in order to assure a lenient result, if he concludes that the risk of wrongful trial conviction is too high. They claim that since plea bargaining is only an option, it cannot harm the defendant whether he is guilty or innocent. This paper argues that both supporters and opponents …
Bringing Human Rights Abusers To Justice In U.S. Courts: Carrying Forward The Legacy Of The Nuremberg Trials, Sandra Coliver
Bringing Human Rights Abusers To Justice In U.S. Courts: Carrying Forward The Legacy Of The Nuremberg Trials, Sandra Coliver
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remarks, Eli M. Rosenbaum
From Nuremberg To Tokyo: Some Reflections On The Tokyo Trial (On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Nuremberg Trials), Zhang Wanhong
From Nuremberg To Tokyo: Some Reflections On The Tokyo Trial (On The Sixtieth Anniversary Of The Nuremberg Trials), Zhang Wanhong
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Nuremberg Trials: A Reappraisal And Their Legacy: An Introduction, Sheri P. Rosenberg
The Nuremberg Trials: A Reappraisal And Their Legacy: An Introduction, Sheri P. Rosenberg
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transitional Justice: Postwar Legacies, Ruti Teitel
Transitional Justice: Postwar Legacies, Ruti Teitel
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remarks, Richard W. Sonnenfeldt
Essay: The Romance Of Nuremberg And The Tease Of Moral Justice, Thane Rosenbaum
Essay: The Romance Of Nuremberg And The Tease Of Moral Justice, Thane Rosenbaum
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dna In The Legal System: The Benefits Are Clear, The Problems Aren't Always, Jason Borenstein
Dna In The Legal System: The Benefits Are Clear, The Problems Aren't Always, Jason Borenstein
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article discusses the dual nature of DNA technology in the criminal justice system, highlighting its significant benefits, such as exonerating the wrongly convicted and solving cold cases, while also addressing its limitations and challenges. It emphasizes that DNA evidence, while powerful, is not infallible and should not overshadow other forms of evidence. The author underscores the need for cautious use of DNA evidence, proper legal standards, and addressing human fallibility to ensure justice.
Holding Restorative Justice Accountable, Zvi D. Gabbay
Holding Restorative Justice Accountable, Zvi D. Gabbay
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Part I of this Article provides a better understanding of the restorative justice theory and its practical expressions. It describes the values and objectives upon which restorative justice is premised and introduces the three most common restorative justice practices: victim-offender mediation, group conferencing and circles. Part II introduces the democratic experimentalism model and demonstrates its compatibility with the restorative justice theory. Part III introduces four restorative justice programs currently operating in the United States, two operated by courts and two by prosecuting agencies. Part IV demonstrates the inadequacy of the evaluation mechanisms currently employed by these programs and emphasizes the …
Mediating Cases Involving Domestic Violence: Solution Or Setback?, Aimee Davis
Mediating Cases Involving Domestic Violence: Solution Or Setback?, Aimee Davis
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Note will first explore the psychological and social aspects of domestic violence. It will then examine the appropriateness of mediation for such cases, exploring viewpoints on the topic. Lastly, the Note will propose a standard to guide cases involving domestic violence. Although the victim should always have the final word on whether to mediate, a judge, psychologist, and mediator should collaborate and make a united recommendation as to how they suggest the victim should proceed. This will allow the victim to make a thoughtful and individualized assessment of her situation.
The Road Less Traveled: Using Adr To Help Reform Firsttime Juvenile Offenders, Maggie Gertz
The Road Less Traveled: Using Adr To Help Reform Firsttime Juvenile Offenders, Maggie Gertz
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Section I of this Note details the history of the juvenile justice system, making specific reference to the various developments in juvenile justice policy, concluding with a discussion of the conflicts involved in juvenile offending. Section II examines ADR techniques that have been used in the juvenile justice field, with some success, as an alternative to further prosecution, incarceration or other punishment, highlighting Victim-Offender Mediation and Family Group Conferencing. In Section III, I analyze why ADR techniques are an ideal solution to the ills of the current system, and how these methods meet many of the goals of the traditional …
Reconceptualising Female Trafficking: The Inhuman Trade In Women, Alison Cole
Reconceptualising Female Trafficking: The Inhuman Trade In Women, Alison Cole
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article argues that female trafficking must be reconceptualized under international criminal law as a crime against humanity to establish a uniform legal framework for combating this global issue. It critiques existing international approaches for lacking coherence and enforcement, emphasizing the need for a clear definition and standardized measures to address the severity of trafficking. The UN Trafficking Protocol, while authoritative, leaves significant discretion to states, resulting in varied domestic policies that hinder effective international cooperation. By classifying female trafficking as a crime against humanity, the article proposes a more robust legal basis for universal jurisdiction and individual liability, aligning …
Reconceptualizing Child Sexual Exploitation As A Bias Crime Under The Protect Act, Tracy Agyemang
Reconceptualizing Child Sexual Exploitation As A Bias Crime Under The Protect Act, Tracy Agyemang
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note argues that the PROTECT Act, while expanding legal measures to combat child sexual exploitation, fails to address the crime's root causes and its nature as a form of discrimination. It advocates for reconceptualizing child sexual exploitation as a bias crime, which would enhance legal deterrence, increase penalties, and better acknowledge the psychological trauma experienced by victims. The note emphasizes that recognizing exploitation as a bias crime would address the systemic factors, such as poverty and discrimination, that perpetuate the crime.
Azbarga V. State Of Israel, Elyakim Rubinstein
Azbarga V. State Of Israel, Elyakim Rubinstein
Translated Opinions
This is an appeal to a single Justice of a decision of the Tel-Aviv-Jaffa District Court, in which the appellant’s application to be allowed out of house arrest, on a daily basis at fixed times, in order to participate in daily prayers at the mosque of the town of Qalansuwa, was denied. Justice Rubenstein allowed the appeal in part, allowing the appellant to go to the nearest mosque to pray once a week and, after three months without incident, to go to the mosque once a day.
Effective Compliance Programs And Corporate Criminal Prosecutions, Philip A. Wellner
Effective Compliance Programs And Corporate Criminal Prosecutions, Philip A. Wellner
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Blakely V. Washington Retroactive?, Haifeng Peng
Is Blakely V. Washington Retroactive?, Haifeng Peng
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Overenforcement, Richard A. Bierschbach, Alex Stein
Overenforcement, Richard A. Bierschbach, Alex Stein
Articles
Overenforcement of the law is widespread but underinvestigated. Overenforcement occurs when the total sanction, both legal and extralegal, suffered by the violator of a legal rule exceeds the amount optimal for deterrence. Overenforcement sometimes generates overdeterrence that cannot be remedied through the adjustment of substantive liability standards or penalties in light of operational and expressive constraints. When that happens, the legal system can counteract the effects of overenforcement by adjusting evidentiary or procedural rules to make liability less likely. This framework, which we call the overenforcement paradigm, illuminates previously unnoticed features of various evidentiary and procedural arrangements. It also provides …
Najar V. State Of Israel, Elyakim Rubinstein, Miriam Naor, Yonatan Adiel
Najar V. State Of Israel, Elyakim Rubinstein, Miriam Naor, Yonatan Adiel
Translated Opinions
Facts: The appellant, a Bedouin, stabbed his sister to death. Initially, he said that the reason why he did this was that his sister, who was unmarried, intended to travel alone to Egypt, and this would dishonour the family. At his trial, the appellant testified that in addition his sister had made a statement questioning his paternity of his children. The appellant claimed that the killing of his sister was the result of provocation, and therefore he should be convicted of manslaughter rather than murder. Inter alia he argued that the court should take into account the fact that in …
State Of Israel V. Jerusalem Magistrates Court, Dorit Beinisch, Mishael Cheshin, Aharon Barak
State Of Israel V. Jerusalem Magistrates Court, Dorit Beinisch, Mishael Cheshin, Aharon Barak
Translated Opinions
Facts: The third respondent (‘the respondent’) was indicted in the Jerusalem Magistrates Court for an offence of committing an indecent act. The victim of the alleged offence (‘the complainant’) kept a personal diary and the parts that were relevant to the period during which the complainant and the respondent were acquainted with one another were photocopied and sent to counsel for the respondent.
Counsel for the respondent applied to inspect the whole diary under s. 74 of the Criminal Procedure Law. The Magistrate Court ordered the prosecution to produce the whole diary for inspection by the court, after an ex …
State Of Israel V. Avraham Ben-Hayim, Dorit Beinisch
State Of Israel V. Avraham Ben-Hayim, Dorit Beinisch
Translated Opinions
Facts: The respondent, the manager of the Postmen Department at the Benei Berak branch of the Postal Authority, was charged, before the Civil Service Disciplinary Tribunal, with sexually harassing and victimizing a woman (the complainant) who was working temporarily at the branch. The tribunal found that the respondent promised to ensure the promotion of the complainant, and it found that the respondent had conducted a sexual relationship with the complainant in which full sexual intercourse had taken place. In addition the respondent tried to prevent the complainant making a complaint against him. The tribunal found that an abuse of authority …