Criminal Law Commons^™

Regional International Criminal Courts: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?, Firew Kebede Tiba

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Regionalism in international relations is a fact of life. Regional judicial implementation of international norms is relatively common in the fields of international human rights, international investment, and trade laws. There are attempts to break ground in the realm of international criminal law by creating a regional international criminal court, such as the proposed addition of the criminal jurisdiction to the African Court of Justice and Human Rights. Although there was momentum in creating a universal permanent international criminal court, the enthusiasm for the tribunal's exercise of jurisdiction has not continued. The International Criminal Court ("ICC") will remain short of …

Federal Preemption On Michigan State's Authority Enacting Law Concerning Ballast Water Discharge In The Great Lake, Mengxue Xie

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Practice Regarding Motions For Acquittal At The Close Of Evidence For The Prosecution. Specifically An Overview Of The Law And Practice Of The International Criminal Tribunals Regarding Motions For Judgment Of Acquittal At The Close Of The Prosecution Case, The Legal Standards Applied By The Other Tribunals That Also Provide For Such Motions, As Well As In The Practice Adopted, Including Whether The Practice Involves Full Briefing By The Parties Or Just Oral Argument., Daniel Joseph Carravallah

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Disagreement Settlement Between Co-Investigating Judges When Super-Majority Vote Is Not Reached In Pre-Trial Chamber, Yitao Li

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Scope Of Judicial Discretion Over Indictment At The Pre-Trial Level. Specifically Addressing Whether A Suspect Or Charged Person May Be Indicted By The Co-Investigating Judges For Specific Criminal Events That Have Not Been Specifically Requested To Be Investigated In Either An Introductory Or Supplemental Submission Against That Suspect By The Co-Prosecutors? If So, Under What Conditions?, Victoria Sarant

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Can Thomas Kwoyelo Negate The Requisite Mens Rea By Qualifying For Any Psychological Defenses Resulting From His Adbuction During His Childhood By A Militant Organization?, Scott Bobbitt

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Can A Service Member Who Lies In Order To Obtain Leave Still Be Charged With Being Absent Without Leave Under Article 86 Of The Uniform Code Of Military Justice?, Christina Marie Dombrowski

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

The Environmental Protection Of The Great Lakes And Enbridge’S Line 5 Under The Straits Of Mackinac, Brittany Hock

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Speed Of The Eccc Trials Compared To Other International Trials And Tribunals. Specifically Discussing The Numerical Speed Of The Pre-Indictment, Pre-Trial, And Trial Phases As Compared To Other International Trials And Tribunals. Also Specifically Discussing Whether The Eccc Comparatively Fails To Achieve The Purposes Of International Criminal Trials As A Direct Result Of The Speed Of The Eccc’S Process., Erin Rosson

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Fairness Of The Trial Of Eccc Case 002/01 Compared To Other Comparable Judgments In International Tribunals, Nicole Triola

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

How Does The Judgement Of The Eccc Trial Chamber Against Nuon Chea And Khieu Samphan In Case 002/01 Compare With The Judgments Of Other International Criminal Courts Or Tribunals In Terms Of The Quality And Quantity Of The Evidence Relied On As The Basis Of Convictions?, Sabrina Turner

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Relationship Between Old Age And Prosecution Specifically Addressing Whether Old Age Should Ever Be A Factor In Deciding Whether To Prosecute Large Scale Human Rights Abusers, Assuming Reasonable Health., Valerie Villacampa

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Anarchy In The Tribal Border Regions – How Do Federal And State Governments Handle Transnational Crime Prevention And Enforcement In Tribal Border Regions?, Aji M. Drameh

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

The Human Rights Of Sea Pirates: Will The European Court Of Human Rights Decisions Get More Killed?, Barry Hart Dubner, Brian Othero

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Destruction Of Cultural Heritage: A Crime Against Property Or A Crime Against People?, 15 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 336 (2016), Patty Gerstenblith

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The destruction of cultural heritage has played a prominent role in the ongoing conflicts in Syria and Iraq and in the recent conflict in Mali. This destruction has displayed the failure of international law to effectively deter these actions. This article reviews existing international law in light of this destruction and the challenges posed by the issues of non-international armed conflict, non-state actors and the military necessity exception. By examining recent developments in applicable international law, the article proposes that customary international law has evolved to interpret existing legal instruments and doctrines concerning cultural heritage in light of the principles …

Where Are We And Where Are We Going: Legal Developments In Cultural Property And Nazi Art Looting, 15 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 435 (2016), Thomas Kline

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

No abstract provided.

Cultural Plunder And Restitution And Human Identity, 15 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 460 (2016), Ori Soltes

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

No abstract provided.

What Is "Colonial" About Colonial Laws?, Arudra Barra

American University International Law Review

No abstract provided.

Zero-Tolerance Comes To International Law, Aya Gruber

Publications

No abstract provided.

Should I Stay Or Should I Go?: Why Bolivian Tactics And U.S. "Flexibility" Undermine The Single Convention On Narcotic Drugs, Robert C. Zitt

Brooklyn Journal of International Law

This Note examines the deterioration of the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (“Convention”), as Member State circumvention of treaty spirit continues to highlight the disconnect between progressive drug policies and an enforcement regime armed with little or no power to monitor compliance. It first provides a brief history of the Convention with discussion underscoring the governing bodies of the treaty itself, particularly the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB). Further discussion will note the procedural mechanisms whereby parties can propose amendments or reservations to the Convention itself. With such procedures in mind, subsequent examination will analyze how Member States have …

Response: The Icc, Pre-Existing Jurisdictional Treaty Regimes, And The Limits Of The Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet Doctrine--A Reply To Michael Newton, Carsten Stahn

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

It is a pleasure and a privilege to provide a few reflections on Michael Newton's thought-provoking essay on "How the ICC Threatens Treaty Norms." His article marks an important piece of scholarship. It reflects significant concerns about the reach and function of the International Criminal Court (ICC) that merit further attention and explanation in ICC practice. Newton makes a provocative argument. He argues that the ICC might undermine sovereign law enforcement efforts and exceed its powers if it exercises jurisdiction over American forces in Afghanistan or Israeli offenses in the West Bank or the Gaza Strip. This argument is not …

How The International Criminal Court Threatens Treaty Norms, Michael A. Newton

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

This Article demonstrates the disadvantages of permitting a supranational institution like the International Criminal Court (ICC) to aggrandize its authority by overriding agreements between sovereign states. The Court's constitutive power derives from a multilateral treaty designed to augment sovereign enforcement efforts rather than annul them. Treaty negotiators expressly rejected efforts to confer jurisdiction to the ICC based on its aspiration to advance universal values or a self-justifying teleological impulse to bring perpetrators to justice. Rather, its jurisdiction derives solely from the delegation by States Parties of their own sovereign prerogatives. In accordance with the ancient maxim "nemo plus iuris transfer …

The Transformative Influence Of International Law And Practice On The Death Penalty In The United States, Richard Wilson

Contributions to Books

No region of the world has been more vocal and persistent in its opposition to U.S. death penalty practice than Europe, which has itself become a death penalty-free zone. The chapter will examine the actions taken by European legislative and judicial bodies against U.S. practice of the death penalty, as well as those of the other regional treaty bodies, with particular attention to the Inter-American human rights system, in which the U.S. reluctantly participates. It then will examine U.S. interactions with its treaty partners in the area of extradition, where death penalty policy is acted out in the exchanges of …

Divided We Fall: How The International Criminal Court Can Promote Compliance With International Law By Working With Regional Courts, Tatiana E. Sainati

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Kenya's 2007 presidential elections inflamed deep-seeded ethnic tensions in the country, sparking violence that left thousands dead and more than half-a-million civilians displaced. After the bloodshed, Kenya failed to investigate, prosecute, and punish those responsible for the atrocities. The Prosecutor for the International Criminal Court (ICC) launched an investigation into the Kenyan situation, acting under his statutory authority, and eventually brought charges against six high-ranking Kenyans, including President Kenyatta. After years of investigations, the Prosecutor ultimately withdrew the case against the Kenyan President--a potentially fatal failure heralded by some as the death knell of the ICC.

During the course of …

Ukraine And The International Criminal Court: Implications Of The Ad Hoc Jurisdiction Acceptance And Beyond, Dr. Iryna Marchuk

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

The Article examines an array of important legal issues that arise out of the acceptance of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court by Ukraine, a non-State Party to the Rome Statute, within the framework of Article 12(3) with respect to the alleged crimes against humanity committed during the 2014 Maydan protests (Declaration I) and the alleged war crimes committed in eastern Ukraine and Crimea (Declaration II). It provides an in-depth analysis of constitutional law issues linked to the acceptance of the jurisdiction by Ukraine and discusses its possible implications on the proceedings before the ICC. The Article criticizes the …

The Ninth Circuit's Decision In Von Saher V. Norton Simon Museum Of Art At Pasadena: The Invocation Of The Act Of State Doctrine And Its Implications For Future Nazi-Stolen Art Claims, Erica Wolf

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Terrorists And Antiquities: Lessons From The Destruction Of The Bamiyan Buddhas, Current Isis Aggression, And A Proposed Framework For Cultural Property Crimes, Whitney Bren

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Biblical Fool And The Brander: The Law And Economics Of Propertization In American Trademark Law, William P. Kratzke

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Isaiah 35:8, which tells of 'fools" upon a highway who shall not err, became authority for the position that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) should protect fools from deception. This Article examines the biblical passage in context and concludes that it does not support protection of unthinking, credulous people. Ensuing FTC orders based on witnesses' speculation of how fools would construe particular claims actually harmed fools. The FTC retreated Unfortunately, the objective of protecting fools from deception has taken over § 43(a) Lanham Act jurisprudence-but now sellers speculate in competitor lawsuits how fools will construe competitors' claims and undertake to …

Talking Foreign Policy: The Iran Nuclear Accord, Paul Williams, Milena Sterio, Avidan Cover, Mike Newton

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

State-Enabled Crimes, Rebecca Hamilton

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

International crimes are committed by individuals, but many – from genocide in Rwanda to torture at Abu Ghraib – would not have occurred without the integral role played by the State. This dual contribution, of individual and State, is intrinsic to the commission of what I term “State-Enabled Crimes.” Viewing international adjudication through the rubric of State-Enabled Crimes highlights a feature of the international judicial architecture that is typically taken for granted: its bifurcated structure. Notwithstanding the deep interrelationship between individual and State in the commission of State-Enabled Crimes, the international legal system adjudicates the responsibility of each under two …