Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (212)
- University of Michigan Law School (127)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (106)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (46)
- West Virginia University (46)
-
- UIC School of Law (36)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (34)
- University of Richmond (34)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (34)
- University of Maine School of Law (33)
- William & Mary Law School (33)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (32)
- American University Washington College of Law (30)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (29)
- Roger Williams University (28)
- Brooklyn Law School (25)
- Pepperdine University (23)
- University of Georgia School of Law (20)
- BLR (19)
- Cleveland State University (19)
- Cornell University Law School (19)
- Fordham Law School (19)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (19)
- The University of Akron (18)
- University of Baltimore Law (18)
- Georgetown University Law Center (17)
- Georgia State University College of Law (14)
- Pace University (13)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (13)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (12)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (335)
- Criminal law (98)
- Criminal Law (67)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (56)
- Fourth Amendment (45)
-
- Testimony (41)
- Constitutional Law (38)
- Criminal procedure (36)
- Due process (36)
- Admissibility (34)
- Privacy (32)
- Law (31)
- DNA (30)
- Hearsay (30)
- Sixth Amendment (30)
- Supreme Court (30)
- Confrontation Clause (29)
- Fifth Amendment (29)
- Exclusionary rule (28)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (27)
- Search and seizure (26)
- Witnesses (24)
- Witness (23)
- Expert testimony (21)
- Rape (21)
- Constitution (20)
- Criminal (20)
- Fourth amendment (20)
- Police (20)
- Criminal Procedure (19)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (209)
- Michigan Law Review (99)
- Faculty Scholarship (82)
- Cardozo Law Review (61)
- West Virginia Law Review (44)
-
- Touro Law Review (39)
- Maine Law Review (32)
- UIC Law Review (30)
- University of Richmond Law Review (28)
- Faculty Publications (26)
- Pepperdine Law Review (23)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (22)
- Articles (21)
- Indiana Law Journal (21)
- ExpressO (19)
- Akron Law Review (18)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (18)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (17)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (17)
- All Faculty Scholarship (16)
- Scholarly Works (16)
- Cleveland State Law Review (15)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (15)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (15)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (14)
- Georgia State University Law Review (13)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (12)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (10)
- Supreme Court Case Files (10)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (9)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1231 - 1260 of 1442
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Testimony Of Accessory After The Fact Need Not Be Corroborated., Claude M. Mcquarrie Iii
Testimony Of Accessory After The Fact Need Not Be Corroborated., Claude M. Mcquarrie Iii
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Rights Warnings In The Armed Services, Fredric I. Lederer
Rights Warnings In The Armed Services, Fredric I. Lederer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 12 Of The Canada Evidence Act And The Deliberations Of Simulated Juries, Valerie P. Hans, Anthony N. Doob
Section 12 Of The Canada Evidence Act And The Deliberations Of Simulated Juries, Valerie P. Hans, Anthony N. Doob
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
In the past, there have been three major approaches to the experimental investigation of the jury. First, juror selection research involves the study of the relation between verdicts or leniency toward certain classes of defendants and the characteristics of potential jurors. The second class of research is group study, in which the amount and style of individual participation is observed within the context of simulated jury deliberations (e.g., Strodtbeck, James and Hawkins, 1957). Finally, experimental psychology has made another contribution to the study of the jury; numerous researchers have conducted experimental studies employing legal stimulus materials. Typically, in such a …
Evidence: Prior Crimes And Prior Bad Acts Evidence, Paul W. Grimm
Evidence: Prior Crimes And Prior Bad Acts Evidence, Paul W. Grimm
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Scientific Evidence In Criminal Cases; Scientific And Expert Evidence In Criminal Advocacy, Ronald J. Allen
Scientific Evidence In Criminal Cases; Scientific And Expert Evidence In Criminal Advocacy, Ronald J. Allen
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Administrative Law: Due Process Requirements Of Notice And Hearing Apply To Native Claims Under Administrative Procedure Act; Civil Rights: Challenging Tribal Membership Ordinance; Criminal Law: Nor Prejudice To Indian Defendant Sentenced Under State Due To Additional Or Alternative Fina Authorized By Federal Statute; Due Process: Tribal Elections And The Indian Civil Rights Act; Environment: Standing Of Non-Indians To Challenge Validity Of Coal Leases On Indian Land; Evidence: Indian Concept Of "Toka" As Concerning Issues Of Provocation And Justification; Indian Civil Rights Act: Residency Requirements For Tribal Political Office Upheld; Indian Lands: Quiet Title Action By Indian Allottees Against Railroad Holding Easement In The Nature Of A Limited Fee; Jurisdiction: Adoption Where All Parties Are Residents Of An Indian Reservation; Jurisdiction: New Mexico State Constitution As Affecting Adjudication Of Indian Water Rights; Taxation: State Right Of Taxation On Reservations When Commerce Effectuated Between Indians And Non-Indians
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Critique Of Two Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule: The Historical Error And The Comparative Myth, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
A Critique Of Two Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule: The Historical Error And The Comparative Myth, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Scholarly Works
“The great body of the law of evidence consists of rules that operate to exclude relevant evidence.” The most controversial of these rules are those which prevent the admission of probative evidence because of the irregular manner in which the evidence was obtained. Depending on whether the method of obtaining violated a provision of positive law, irregularly obtained evidence may be separated into two classes. Evidence obtained by methods which meet legal requirements but contravene some moral or ethical principle is unfairly obtained evidence. Evidence obtained in violation of a legal right or immunity is improperly obtained evidence, regardless of …
Doing Away With The Exclusionary Rule, Francis A. Gilligan, Fredric I. Lederer
Doing Away With The Exclusionary Rule, Francis A. Gilligan, Fredric I. Lederer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Pretrial Discovery Of Government Informers In Federal Narcotics Cases: A Defense Tool, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 221 (1975), Richard F. Walsh
Pretrial Discovery Of Government Informers In Federal Narcotics Cases: A Defense Tool, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 221 (1975), Richard F. Walsh
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Oregon V. Hass, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
A Look At Florida's Proposed Code Of Evidence, Charles W. Ehrhardt
A Look At Florida's Proposed Code Of Evidence, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Scholarly Publications
The law of evidence had been codified in three states, California, New Jersey and Kansas, prior to the United States Supreme Court's promulgation of the Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence. The submission of the rules to the Congress, and their approval, as amended, by the House of Representatives served as the catalyst for renewed interest in evidence codification. Three states have recently adopted comprehensive Rules of Evidence that closely parallel the Proposed Federal Rules, and at least four other states, including Florida, have drafted or are actively considering the adoption of such a codification. During the 1974 session of the …
Some Themes In The Proposed Federal Rules Of Evidence, Paul F. Rothstein
Some Themes In The Proposed Federal Rules Of Evidence, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Although the Federal Rules of Evidence are under consideration by Congress, it is unlikely that many of their major themes will be reversed. The present article examines some of these themes as they appear in the Supreme Court-approved draft. The aim is merely to make more explicit the effects of the Rules and suggest some questions for study.
Evidence--Presumptions--Application Of The Deadly Weapons Presumption In West Virginia, John P. Carter
Evidence--Presumptions--Application Of The Deadly Weapons Presumption In West Virginia, John P. Carter
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Accused May Be Compelled To Provide Handwriting Exemplars, Voice, Blood, And Urine Samples Without Violating The Constitutional Safeguards Against Self-Incrimination., David Brian Armbrust
Accused May Be Compelled To Provide Handwriting Exemplars, Voice, Blood, And Urine Samples Without Violating The Constitutional Safeguards Against Self-Incrimination., David Brian Armbrust
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
The Confrontation Clause And The Scope Of The Unavailability Requirement, Jerry J. Phillips
The Confrontation Clause And The Scope Of The Unavailability Requirement, Jerry J. Phillips
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The confrontation clause is that language of the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution which provides, "[I]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right… to be confronted with the witnesses against him." Despite the seemingly absolute language of the confrontation clause, which would suggest that no hearsay evidence may be admitted against an accused in a criminal proceeding, its guarantee has been subject to exception. For example, when either a witness to an event or his testimony is shown to be unavailable, others will be allowed to testify as to the information which the declarant-witness has related …
The Second Circuit Review: Ix. Evidence: Introduction, Paul F. Rothstein
The Second Circuit Review: Ix. Evidence: Introduction, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The past year's developments in the law of evidence have been characterized by a hardening attitude toward criminal defendants. The United States Supreme Court's evidentiary rulings during the term covered by the Second Circuit Review (1971-72) manifested this trend (although not uniformly). For example, police stop-and-frisk authority was broadened (and with it the use of evidence obtained therefrom); the scope of the immunity from criminal prosecution required to be granted by a governmental body before self-incriminatory statements can be compelled from a witness was narrowed; the right to have counsel at line-ups was limited to postindictment or post-charge line-ups (with …
United States V. Dionisio, Lewis Powell Jr.
United States V. Dionisio, Lewis Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Police Inventories Of The Contents Of Vehicles And The Exclusionary Rule
Police Inventories Of The Contents Of Vehicles And The Exclusionary Rule
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Admissibility Of Gruesome Photographs In A Criminal Trial Is Based On Their Competency, Materiality, And Relevancy To The Issue On Trial And Are Admissible If A Verbal Description Of The Scene Of The Crime Would Be Admissible, Unless The Photographs Are Offered Solely To Inflame The Minds Of The Jury., Steven M. Lee
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Schneble V. Florida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Schneble V. Florida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Intrusion Into The Body, William G. Eckhardt
Intrusion Into The Body, William G. Eckhardt
Faculty Works
The thesis of this article is that the rights of servicemen should be protected with the search and seizure concepts of the fourth amendment rather than with the fifth amendment protection against self-incrimination when intrusive bodily searches are required. The Supreme Court enunciated standard for intrusion into the body found in Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966). The subsequent application of this standard in the federal courts, and its adoption in the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969, (Rev.) are explored. Federal court decisions discussing the privilege against self-incrimination are contrasted with opinions of the Court of Military Appeals …
Title Iii - Recalcitrant Witnesses, Jeffrey J. Greenbaum
Title Iii - Recalcitrant Witnesses, Jeffrey J. Greenbaum
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This title represents a congressional attempt to codify the court-developed civil contempt practice. When a witness is granted immunity and still refuses to answer the question presented to him he can be ordered by a court to answer the specific question. Upon his continued refusal, a court can have him confined summarily until he complies with such order, or until he is no longer able to comply. Such confinement is not intended to be punitive in nature, but rather to coerce compliance with the court's order by imposing imprisonment as an alternative to answering the question. The witness will be …
Title Vi - Depositions, Peter A. Kelly
Title Vi - Depositions, Peter A. Kelly
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Title VI expands Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to permit the Government to depose its witnesses in certain limited classes of cases. Previously only the defendant had been accorded this right. Upon the motion of either party at any time after a criminal indictment or information has been filed, the court may order that the testimony of the party's witnesses be taken by deposition if "due to exceptional circumstances it is in the interest of justice" that such testimony be taken and preserved. Such exceptional circumstances were intended by Congress to include the existence of a …
Title Vii - Litigation Concerning Sources Of Evidence, Peter A. Kelly
Title Vii - Litigation Concerning Sources Of Evidence, Peter A. Kelly
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
There are two operative provisions of title VII, both of which mitigate previous judicially imposed restrictions on governmental collection and presentation of evidence in "any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, or other authority of the United States.” The first purports to set aside the Supreme Court's holding in the 1968 case of Alderman v. United States, in which the Court held that, in cases involving unlawful electronic surveillance, the government must make full disclosure to the defendant of all records in its possession which contain any of …
The Role Of Abandonment In The Law Of Search And Seizure: An Application Of Misdirected Emphasis, Edward G. Mascolo
The Role Of Abandonment In The Law Of Search And Seizure: An Application Of Misdirected Emphasis, Edward G. Mascolo
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Title Iv - False Declarations, Jeffrey J. Greenbaum
Title Iv - False Declarations, Jeffrey J. Greenbaum
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Title IV was designed to facilitate the bringing of federal perjury prosecutions, thereby strengthening the deterrent value of the perjury penalties and acting as a greater incentive for truthful testimony. It establishes a new false declarations statute applicable to court and grand jury proceedings, with maximum penalty slightly increased over that allowable under the previously controlling perjury statute.
Criminal Law—Electronic Eavesdropping-Standing To Object To Third Party Conversations, Joel E. Schweitzer
Criminal Law—Electronic Eavesdropping-Standing To Object To Third Party Conversations, Joel E. Schweitzer
Buffalo Law Review
Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165 (1969).
False Or Suppressed Evidence: Why A Need For The Prosecutorial Tie?, Ronald L. Carlson
False Or Suppressed Evidence: Why A Need For The Prosecutorial Tie?, Ronald L. Carlson
Scholarly Works
Many United States Supreme Court decisions have overturned criminal convictions for the reason that the government employed false evidence to obtain the conviction or failed to disclose relevant evidence important to the defense. In reversing federal or state judgments, the Court often has located direct proof of wrongdoing by the prosecutor. The notorious “bloody shorts” case is an example in point. There, the state introduced as evidence a pair of men’s “blood-stained” undershorts to achieve conviction of the accused. When the blood turned out to be red paint, the Supreme Court granted habeas corpus relief to the defendant because “[ilt …
Probable Cause For Arrest In Indiana: A Prosecutor Hoist With His Own Kinnaird, F. Thomas Schornhorst
Probable Cause For Arrest In Indiana: A Prosecutor Hoist With His Own Kinnaird, F. Thomas Schornhorst
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Limitations On Evidence In Criminal Cases. By James George, Jr., Irving Younger
Constitutional Limitations On Evidence In Criminal Cases. By James George, Jr., Irving Younger
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.