Criminal Law Commons^™

Data Advantage And Merger Review: Can Entrenchment Theory Reform Antitrust Enforcement?, Shin-Ru Cheng

Seattle University Law Review

A merger involving giant digital companies is likely to dampen competition, as it allows those companies to combine and control data access, enabling them to entrench their dominant positions in relevant markets and extend those positions into related markets. While competition law in many jurisdictions aims to prohibit mergers that may substantially lessen competition or create a monopoly, arguably the review of digital mergers is failing because antitrust agencies lack an effective approach to identify data-generated anticompetitive harms. This Article demonstrates that entrenchment theory, recently reintroduced in the 2023 U.S. Merger Guidelines, would help reform the process of antitrust enforcement. …

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents

Caution: Potholes In E-Scooter Data Collection, Dakota Rakestraw

Seattle University Law Review

Lime scooters keep ending up in major waterways in Washington state metro areas, a testament to the ubiquity of e-scooters in the metropolitan landscape. How they get there is unclear. Why they get there is even murkier. Perhaps the answer lies in the implications of modern geolocation data collection through e-scooters and gaps in current data collection regulation curbing individual liberties.

Since September 2020, electric scooters have run Seattle’s streets and have dramatically overtaken ridesharing bike trips. For example, from September 2020 to September 2021, there were about 1.4 million scooter and bike trips with September 2021 seeing 300,000 scooter …

Machinists Preemption In The New Administrative Law, Andrew J. Ziaja

Seattle University Law Review

This Article assesses Machinists preemption—a labor-specific form of implied field preemption—while freshly considering implications both for and of new developments in administrative law. The radical transformation of administrative law in the Supreme Court, particularly its newfound emphasis on clear-statement rules, provides opportunities to reconsider the Machinists rationale. Aligning with scholars who have called to question the doctrine’s “ossifying” influence on labor and employment policy, it argues that the modern-day version of Machinists preemption clashes with the Supreme Court’s newly constrained view of delegated power and its differing conceptions of the major questions doctrine.

On the other hand, Machinists preemption might …

Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Volume 48 Masthead

Defining Deference: Impacts Of Abandoning Chevron On Emerging Technology Governance And Administrative Law, R. Aubrey Davis Iii

Seattle University Law Review

Emerging technologies, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI), often lead to unforeseen legal outcomes. Notable abuses in areas such as facial recognition, employment bias, and housing discrimination are well known. However, legislative responses to these issues either have been largely reactive or there has been no legislative response at all. In lieu of legislation, agencies have sought to fill the gap. For example, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently proposed a rule mandating voter notification for all AI-generated political phone calls citing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991 as authority. However, the TCPA was originally passed to curtail telemarketing, not …

Intellectual Property Or Modern Folklore? The Problem With Open Gaming Licenses In Tabletop Gaming, Rosie Midget

Seattle University Law Review

This Note addresses how courts and legislatures should address “Open Gaming Licenses” commonly attached to tabletop roleplaying games (TTRPGs), which game publishers use to promote a false image of accessibility—misleading consumers and building goodwill from the misunderstanding. Part I discusses what TTRPGs are, including the defining features of the hobby and culture surrounding it, as well as the unique interplay between publishers and players. Part II explores the question of which elements in a TTRPG system may be subject to copyright protection. Part III examines these elements in practice using Wizards of the Coast’s Dungeons and Dragons TTRPG as a …

Inovasi Kolaboratif Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan: Optimalisasi Teknologi Untuk Meningkatkan Partisipasi Publik Dalam Legislasi, Hermawan Prasojo

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Meaningful public participation in the legislative process in Indonesia is a fundamental element in fostering an inclusive and transparent democracy. Despite the legal mandate for public involvement, as outlined in Law No. 13 of 2022 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 82/PUU-XXI/2023, such participation often remains formalistic and limited in practice. This article highlights the potential of digital technology, particularly the concept of CrowdLaw, as an alternative approach to enhancing public engagement. Case studies from Estonia, Iceland, and Brazil demonstrate that digital participation can effectively increase public involvement and improve the quality of legislative outcomes. With sufficient infrastructure and improved …

When Prenatal Care Becomes A Crime, Casey Hunter

Fordham Law Review

For decades, pregnant women have increasingly faced criminalization for their actions and conduct during pregnancy, with Alabama emerging as a focal point due to its aggressive use of section 26-15-3.2: Chemical Endangerment of Exposing a Child to an Environment in Which Controlled Substances Are Produced or Distributed. Originally intended to protect children from the dangers of methamphetamine labs, this law has been reinterpreted to prosecute pregnant women who test positive for controlled substances. Central to these prosecutions are positive drug tests obtained from prenatal health records, causing many women to avoid prenatal care for fear of legal consequences.

This Note …

An International Prosecutor As U.S. Special Counsel, Cody Corliss

Utah Law Review

The appointment of Jack Smith to investigate then-former President Donald Trump brought to the fore the essential qualities for special counsels who act when a conflict of interest precludes investigation by the Department of Justice. Most attention on Smith centered on his domestic work and its correlation with a special counsel’s responsibilities. That emphasis, however, obscured the most salient line on his resume: international investigator and prosecutor. The conclusion of Smith’s tenure as special counsel following the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president provides an opportunity to consider the skills and qualifications that matter most in …

Antiracist Expert Evidence, Jasmine Gonzales Rose, Asees Bhasin, Spencer Piston

Faculty Scholarship

Since 2020, when mass protests against racism swept across the United States, scholars, lawyers, and the general public have become increasingly aware that racism permeates society and the criminal legal system, from overt racial animus to the nuanced effects of structural racism. Demonstrating the influence of racism is therefore vital to the practice of criminal defense, yet many attorneys do not know how to prove racism in court. We surveyed over seven hundred criminal-defense attorneys across the United States, and nearly half had never heard of expert witnesses testifying or submitting written reports on racism—what we call “antiracist expert evidence.” …

Dynamics Of The Penitentiary System, Transparent And Accountable Handling Of Criminal Cases In Criminal Execution Law In Southeast Asia: Convergence And Divergence Of International Perspectives, Anis Widyawati, Ade Adhari, Ali Masyhar, Bearlly Deo Syahputra, Didik Purnomo

Indonesia Law Review

This research examines the dynamics of the penitentiary system transparent, and accountable criminal case handling in criminal execution law in Southeast Asia, focusing on the convergence and divergence of international perspectives. These countries have diverse approaches to the penitentiary system and criminal law enforcement, including in terms of the implementation of the death penalty and the treatment of prisoners. Some countries, such as Singapore and Malaysia, maintain strict death penalty practices, which often contradict international human rights standards, while others such as the Philippines show inconsistencies in implementing criminal execution laws. This research also examines the three main stages in …

Papering Justices, Michael L. Smith

BYU Law Review

Supreme Court reform is a lively topic of discussion and debate, with scholars, commentators, and politicians debating a variety of proposed Court reforms, such as term limits, additional Justices, and jurisdiction stripping. This Article adds a new idea to the mix: papering Justices. Several states permit each side to a dispute to file one motion to automatically disqualify the judge overseeing their case. These requests are to be granted automatically without any showing of facts, hearings, or further briefing. This is known as “papering” the judge. Drawing from these practices, I propose that each side to a dispute before the …

The Impact Of Erlinger V. United States On State Recidivist Sentencing Laws, Chad Flanders

Washington and Lee Law Review Online

In Erlinger v. United States, the United States Supreme Court ruled that finding that an offender had committed two felonies “on separate occasions” under the Armed Career Criminal Act had to be done by a jury, not a judge. In one respect, the decision is narrow: it is an extension of the Court’s Apprendi jurisprudence. But in another respect, the decision is far-reaching. As some state appeals courts have already realized, the decision makes unconstitutional state laws that give the judge—rather than the jury—the power to decide whether someone is a “persistent” or “habitual” offender based on whether a …

Sentencing Roulette: The Absurdity And Unconstitutionality Of The Crime Of Violence Enhancements, Noam Kozlov

University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review

The law needs to be clear. This dictum is true especially with respect to criminal law. Defendants need to be made aware of the statutory and judicial rules surrounding their trial, and sentencing outcome should be foreseeable, even if not predictable. But we have failed. We have failed in granting defendants this sought-after clarity, exposing them to grossly disproportional and disparate sentences. One such failure is found in the Crime of Violence enhancement rules. COV enhancements add years or even decades to sentences of defendants whose previous convictions are classified as 'violent'. Despite this detrimental impact of the COV rules, …

The Jerome Project: Titus Kaphar’S Deconstruction Of Incarceration Aesthetics, Anna Edwards

Montserrat Student Scholarship

Titus Kaphar is a multi-media artist from Kalamazoo, MI whose major works include The Jerome Project, From a Tropical Space and Exhibiting Forgiveness. He is also the founder of NXTHVN art center. When searching for his father in prison databases in 2011, Kaphar found 97 other men with the same first and last name sparking this personal and activist multi-media project.

Bowe V. United States: Brief Of Federal Courts Scholars As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioner, Leah Litman, Eve Brensike Primus

Appellate Briefs

Amici curiae are law professors who research, study, teach, and write about the writ of habeas corpus and federal postconviction relief. They share an interest in seeing habeas law applied in a way that ensures the just adjudication of claims.

Michigan V. Tucker: A Reevaluation Of Miranda, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

In Michigan v. Tucker the Supreme Court considered whether to exclude the fruits of an interrogation that did not meet the precautionary standards of Miranda v. Arizona. The defendant contended that use of the evidence at his trial violated his fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination. In deciding that the evidence had been properly admitted, the Tucker Court interpreted Miranda v. Arizona as outlining recommended procedural safeguards for the protection of fifth amendment rights and reasoned that omission of procedural safeguards does not necessarily constitute a violation of the underlying rights. Specifically, the Court concluded that a suspect who did not …

Appointment Of Counsel In Misdemeanor Prosecutions In Maine, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

When a criminal defendant appears without a lawyer before a trial court, the trial judge must decide whether to appoint counsel to represent him. The trial judge's decision is one of constitutional magnitude under both the United States and Maine Constitutions, and the decision made in any particular instance affects the integrity of the trial process and the validity of any conviction. The scope of the constitutional right to appointed counsel has lately been the subject of major decisions of the United States Supreme Court and of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court. The United States Supreme Court in Argersinger v. …

Attorneys And Subornation Of Perjury, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

Federal law has made the crime of subornation of perjury depend on a showing that the suborned witness has made an intentional false statement under oath. For a prosecution to be successful, it must be shown first, that the witness gave false testimony under oath; second, that the witness knew the testimony to be false; third, that the defendant induced the false testimony; and fourth, that the defendant knew the induced testimony to be false. Thus, if the criminal intent of the witness cannot be proven, the defendant must be acquitted. The curious result is that the prosecution fails not …

Sentencing, Melvyn Zarr

Maine Law Review

Once the legislature has defined the acts it will punish as criminal, it must then establish a sentencing system. There are two principal features of a sentencing system: it grades crimes according to seriousness, and it apportions sentencing discretion among the legislature, the courts, and administrative agencies. The device for apportionment between the legislature and the courts is the mandatory sentence, by which the legislature may fix a period of imprisonment for a crime and forbid judges to grant probation. Apportionment of sentencing discretion between the courts and administrative agencies, on the other hand, is governed by the choice between …

White Collar Crimes, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

This Article deals with those sections of the Maine Criminal Code which criminalize certain nonviolent conduct. Many of the offenses contained in the Chapters on bribery, fraud and falsification are new to Maine law. Here, as elsewhere, the drafters of the Code have attempted to distinguish between conduct that is sufficiently detrimental to community interests to require the criminal sanction and conduct that is regarded as merely undesirable. These sections in particular represent the societal interests in preserving the integrity of documents, official statements and public offices, and in encouraging honesty in business transactions. This Article focuses on the derivation …

Sex Offenses, Judy R. Potter

Maine Law Review

A central theme of the Maine Criminal Code is to "distinguish behavior that is merely socially undesirable from that which is sufficiently threatening to require the specialized effort of the criminal law to prevent it." Nowhere in the Code is this distinction more apparent than in the area of sex offenses, which encompasses a wide spectrum of degrees of social harm. At one end of this spectrum are acts which clearly involve dangerous behavior, such as non-consensual sexual acts and acts of sexual imposition on minors and incompetents. At the other end of the spectrum are sexual acts done in …

Homicide, Peter J. Rubin

Maine Law Review

The homicide provisions of the Maine Criminal Code break down culpable killings into six degrees. Until the line of cases beginning with State v. Wilbur, the law of Maine had always seemed to separate the various unlawful killings into separate crimes rather than degrees of the same crime. Commencing with State v. Rollins and State v. Lafferty, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court announced that there was and always had been only one crime of "felonious homicide." Murder and manslaughter were merely punishment categories or degrees of "felonious homicide." The new homicide provisions are similar to the pre-Code court interpretation in …

Property Offenses, Peter G. Ballou

Maine Law Review

The Criminal Code has sought to accomplish three goals in the area of property crimes: consolidation, simplicity, and consistency in the treatment of similar offenses. The consolidation of a variety of previously separate crimes into the single crime of theft may be the most drastic change from prior law in the entire Code. Almost all of the ways in which a person may be deprived of his property or services to the gain of another are now included in this single crime. The consolidation under the heading of burglary of a variety of crimes involving entry of buildings in combination …

Gambling, Michael D. Seitzinger

Maine Law Review

Simplification of the laws which define criminal offenses and decriminalization of behavior no longer warranting the enforcement mechanisms of the criminal law were two principal objectives of the Criminal Code Revision Commission. Chapter 39 of the Criminal Code contains the revision of Maine's anti-gambling statutes and illustrates as well as any Code chapter the application of these objectives to the formulation of substantive criminal offenses. The substantive provisions of the prior law failed, for the most part, to define key terms. Without such definitions, the provisions of Title 17 which established the elements of an offense were often prolix and …

Prefatory Note, Robert Checkoway Editor-In-Chief

Maine Law Review

In its recent simplification and clarification of the criminal law, the Maine Criminal Law Revision Commission was also obliged to reconsider the proper breadth of the criminal sanction itself. The results of these parallel efforts are apparent throughout the Criminal Code. Those activities ordinarily considered criminal have been more precisely and comprehensively regulated, while the limits of the law controlling activities less socially damaging have been readjusted in the process of exact delineation. The Articles in this Special Issue offer an explanation and critical evaluation of the Commission's efforts.

Introduction, Gerald F. Petruccelli

Maine Law Review

Others, most notably the late Professor Herbert Packer, have written extensively in recent years concerning the limits of the criminal sanction, and it seems trite to observe that the subject matter is hardly novel and has been the subject of literary and philosophical discourse for centuries. The purpose of this brief presentation, therefore, is not to review that voluminous literature or to make expansive claims for the new Maine Criminal Code. Rather, it is to show that the new Maine Code was written with an awareness of the basic premises both of classical theories of limited public intrusion into private …

Mens Rea And Insanity, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

Two developments in the administration of criminal law call for a closer examination of the relationship between mens rea and insanity. The first is the practice of bifurcating trials into a guilt phase and an insanity phase. The new Maine Criminal Code, for example, allows the defendant to elect such a procedure. The second development is the increasing willingness of courts to admit evidence of the accused's mental disease or defect as probative of whether he possessed the culpable state of mind, or mens rea, which must be proven as one of the elements of the crime charged. When the …

The Burden Of Proof And The Insanity Defense After Mullaney V. Wilbur, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

In 1970, the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of In re Winship specified an evidentiary standard of proof for criminal prosecutions as a requirement of the due process clause of the 14th amendment: "Lest there remain any doubt about the constitutional stature of the reasonable doubt-standard, we explicitly hold that the Due Process Clause protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged." Five years later, in Mullaney v. Wilbur, the Court extended Winship to invalidate Maine's statutory scheme of …