Criminal Law Commons^™

Volume 04 (Part 2 Of 2), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 03 (Part 3 Of 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 03 (Part 2 Of 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 02 (Part 5 Of 6), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 02 (Part 4 Of 6), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 02 (Part 3 Of 6), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 01 (Part 5), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 01 (Part 2), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 01 (Part 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 09 (Part 1 Of 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 07 (Part 1 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 06 (Part 1), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 05 (Part 1 Of 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 02 (Part 1 Of 6), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 01 (Part 1 Of 5), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 07 (Part 2 Of 4), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Volume 06 (Part 3 Of 3), Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Ohio v. Fred Ahmed Evans: Trial record transcript, 1969

No abstract provided.

Criminal Justice In Extremis: Administration Of Justice During The April 1968 Chicago Disorder, Mark N. Aaronson

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Juvenile Justice - Unlawful Extrajudicial Confession Excluded Under Miranda - Testimonial In-Court Confession "Impelled" By The Admission Of The Invalid Confession Into Evidence. In Re Teters. (Cal. 1958), Edward J. Pulaski Jr.

San Diego Law Review

This recent case discusses In re Teters. (Cal. 1958).

Criminal Law—Denial Of Counsel And Failure To Provide Adequate Warnings Regarding Constitutional Rights Have Important Bearing On Confessions Which Are Tested Under The Totality Of Circumstances., Edwin H. Wolf

Buffalo Law Review

Greenwald v. Wisconsin, 390 U.S. 519 (1968).

Jury Consideration Of Parole, Fernand N. Dutile

Journal Articles

Under our system of criminal justice, a jury faces two basic decisions: the determination of guilt and, in many cases, the selection of an appropriate penalty for the convicted. In both instances the jurors' impressions of the parole system could be crucial. For example, the jury's notion—correct or incorrect—that the defendant will be eligible for parole very quickly if sentenced to prison may cause it to compromise on the issue of guilt. In cases where the jury has discretion in setting the penalty, this notion may seduce it into selecting the death penalty over life imprisonment.

There are additional problems …

"Uncontrollable" Actions And The Eighth Amendment: Implications Of Powell V. Texas, Kent Greenawalt

Faculty Scholarship

No questions of criminal justice are more fundamental than the bases for imposing criminal punishment, yet the Federal Constitution says nothing explicit about them. It is, therefore, understandable that the increasing limitations imposed by constitutional interpretation upon procedures for ascertaining criminal guilt have not been accompanied by similar limits upon principles of criminal responsibility. That the difference in treatment is understandable does not, of course, necessarily mean it has been justified.

When the Court struck down a law punishing addiction in Robinson v. California in 1962, it was still unclear whether it was willing to become significantly implicated in developing …

James V. Headley: Right To Counsel For Petty Offenses

Georgia Law Review

The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the case of James v. Headley' was confronted with the question of whether an accused is entitled to court-appointed counsel when charged only with a "petty offense," that is, an offense carrying a maximum penalty of six months in jail and/or a $500 fine. Basing its decision on the sixth amendment,the court concluded that the two appellants were entitled to have court appointed counsel. The court, in an opinion by Judge Wisdom, held that as a general proposition, there is a sixth amendment right to counsel for any defendant in a …

Criminal Law--Plea Bargaining, Larry Andrew Winter

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law--Misdemeanors--Indigent's Right To Appointed Counsel, John Charles Lobert

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Marijuana And The Law: The Constitutional Challenges To Marijuana Laws In Light Of The Social Aspects Of Marijuana Use, Mark S. Dichter

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Transatlantic Attitudes Toward Self-Incrimination, Kevin H. Tierney

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

On Interpreting The Ethiopian Penal Code, Peter L. Strauss

Faculty Scholarship

The aim of this article is to set out and discuss some general principles of interpreting the Ethiopian Penal Code – that is to say, of using it. Even now, ten years after it came into effect, many people have difficulty in understanding and using the Penal Code in a straightforward way. It seems complex, and many of its fundamental conceptions are unfamiliar to Ethiopian lawyers. This article, discussing at length how the code is built, may help reduce its apparent complexity and thus facilitate its day-to-day application.

Causation In Common Sense: A Reply To Messrs. Hart And Honore, Paul F. Rothstein

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

No abstract provided.

Science And Morality Of Criminal Law, Jerome Hall

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.