Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (779)
- Universitas Indonesia (602)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (298)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (294)
- Seattle University School of Law (270)
-
- BLR (220)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (217)
- Columbia Law School (174)
- University of Richmond (172)
- American University Washington College of Law (154)
- UIC School of Law (153)
- University of Michigan Law School (149)
- University of Maine School of Law (117)
- Brooklyn Law School (116)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (113)
- University of Georgia School of Law (96)
- UC Law SF (91)
- Mercer University School of Law (87)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (84)
- Cornell University Law School (81)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (78)
- University of Miami Law School (76)
- Roger Williams University (75)
- St. John's University School of Law (72)
- Pace University (71)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (70)
- Boston University School of Law (69)
- St. Mary's University (68)
- Fordham Law School (67)
- University of Colorado Law School (63)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (501)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (464)
- Criminal procedure (376)
- Criminal Law (225)
- Evidence (217)
-
- Death penalty (191)
- Constitutional Law (190)
- Sentencing (189)
- Criminal justice (188)
- Criminal Procedure (185)
- Capital punishment (142)
- Fourth Amendment (134)
- Due process (124)
- Supreme Court (115)
- Police (105)
- Sixth Amendment (105)
- Courts (101)
- Jurisprudence (95)
- Punishment (95)
- New York (94)
- Constitution (91)
- Law and Society (86)
- Law (82)
- Criminal (81)
- Crime (80)
- Prosecutors (80)
- Federal (77)
- Fifth Amendment (77)
- Constitutional law (73)
- Jury (73)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (553)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (447)
- Cardozo Law Review (325)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (259)
- Seattle University Law Review (222)
-
- ExpressO (195)
- Touro Law Review (185)
- Articles (167)
- University of Richmond Law Review (138)
- UIC Law Review (128)
- Faculty Publications (125)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Maine Law Review (115)
- All Faculty Scholarship (100)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (94)
- Scholarly Articles (94)
- Michigan Law Review (89)
- Mercer Law Review (80)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (79)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (77)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (77)
- Supreme Court Case Files (76)
- Scholarly Works (75)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (67)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (61)
- Publications (59)
- West Virginia Law Review (58)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (54)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (50)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (49)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 4441 - 4470 of 6990
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Eighth Amendment Gaps: Can Conditions Of Confinement Litigation Benefit From Proportionality Theory, Alexander A. Reinert
Eighth Amendment Gaps: Can Conditions Of Confinement Litigation Benefit From Proportionality Theory, Alexander A. Reinert
Articles
No abstract provided.
A Witness To Justice, Jessica Silbey
A Witness To Justice, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
In the 1988 film The Accused, a young woman named Sarah Tobias is gang raped on a pinball machine by three men while a crowded bar watches. The rapists cut a deal with the prosecutor. Sarah's outrage at the deal convinces the assistant district attorney to prosecute members of the crowd that cheered on and encouraged the rape. This film shows how Sarah Tobias, a woman with little means and less experience, intuits that according to the law rape victims are incredible witnesses to their own victimization. The film goes on to critique what the right kind of witness would …
Death Penalty Law, Therese M. Day
Death Penalty Law, Therese M. Day
Mercer Law Review
This Article provides a survey of death penalty caselaw in Georgia from June 1, 2007 through May 31, 2008. The cases included in this Survey were heard by the Georgia Supreme Court on interim appeal and direct appeal. Discussion is limited to claims that present new issues of law, refine existing law, or are otherwise instructive.
Theorizing About Self-Incrimination, Ronald J. Allen
Theorizing About Self-Incrimination, Ronald J. Allen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination In European Human Rights Law - A Pregnant Pragmatism?, Andrew Ashworth
Self-Incrimination In European Human Rights Law - A Pregnant Pragmatism?, Andrew Ashworth
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Toward Ethical Plea Bargaining, Erica Hashimoto
Toward Ethical Plea Bargaining, Erica Hashimoto
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination Doctrine Is Dead; Long Live Self-Incrimination Doctrine: Confessions, Scientific Evidence, And The Anxieties Of The Liberal State, Kenworthey Bilz
Self-Incrimination Doctrine Is Dead; Long Live Self-Incrimination Doctrine: Confessions, Scientific Evidence, And The Anxieties Of The Liberal State, Kenworthey Bilz
Cardozo Law Review
Confessions have historically been the most compelling evidence the state could offer at a criminal trial. However, improvements in forensic technologies have led to increased use of scientific evidence, such as DNA typing, videotapes, pattern-recognition software, location tracking devices, and the like, with very impressive rates of reliability. The reliability of these methods has become so impressive, in fact, that it far outstrips confessions. This should lead to a reduced reliance on confessions (and other nonscientific evidence, such as eyewitness identifications) over time. However, this does not mean that the doctrine of self-incrimination, which regulates the acquisition and use of …
Deregulating Guilt: The Information Culture Of The Criminal System, Alexandra Natapoff
Deregulating Guilt: The Information Culture Of The Criminal System, Alexandra Natapoff
Cardozo Law Review
The criminal system has an uneasy relationship with information. On the one hand, the criminal process is centrally defined by stringent evidentiary and information rules and a commitment to public transparency. On the other, largely due to the dominance of plea bargaining, criminal liability is determined by all sorts of unregulated, non-public information that never pass through the quality control of evidentiary, discovery, or other criminal procedure restrictions. The result is a process that generates determinations of liability that are often unmoored from systemic information constraints. This phenomenon is exemplified, and intensified, by the widespread use of criminal informants, or …
English Warnings, Mike Redmayne
The Right To Silence Helps The Innocent: A Response To Critics, Alex Stein
The Right To Silence Helps The Innocent: A Response To Critics, Alex Stein
Cardozo Law Review
This Article responds to the numerous critics of Daniel J Seidmann & Alex Stein, The Right to Silence Helps the Innocent: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Fifth Amendment Privilege, 114 HARV. L. REV. 430 (2000). Under Seidmann and Stein's theory, the right to silence protects innocents who find themselves unable to corroborate their self-exonerating accounts by verifiable evidence. Absent the right, guilty criminals would pool with innocents by making false self-exonerating statements. Factfinders would consequently discount the probative value of all uncorroborated exculpatory statements, at the expense of those innocents who cannot corroborate their true accounts. The right to …
Corporate Confessions, Brandon L. Garrett
Corporate Confessions, Brandon L. Garrett
Cardozo Law Review
In corporate crime investigations, when prosecutors pursue charges against both employees and corporations, confessions raise several novel questions without clear answers in constitutional criminal procedure. First, corporations confess. The firm, a target of a criminal investigation, may itself admit to crimes by employees as part of a settlement agreement with prosecutors. While useful to study in their impact and form, as a constitutional matter such confessions can not be coerced, the Supreme Court has adopted a "collective entity rule" that corporate persons may not invoke Fifth Amendment privilege. Second, before itself confessing, the firm may encourage employees to provide statements …
The Consequences Of Compelled Self-Incrimination In Terrorism Investigations: A Comparison Of American Grand Juries And Canadian Investigative Hearings, Kent Roach
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction: Wherefor The Privilege?, Kate Stith
Introduction: Wherefor The Privilege?, Kate Stith
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination And The Epistemology Of Testimony, Michael S. Pardo
Self-Incrimination And The Epistemology Of Testimony, Michael S. Pardo
Cardozo Law Review
The Supreme Court's limitation of the privilege against self-incrimination to evidence of a testimonial nature has been controversial. The doctrinal reliance on a distinction between physical and testimonial evidence has proven difficult to apply in practice, and it has been criticized as being descriptively inaccurate, analytically incoherent, and normatively indefensible. This article offers a defense of the distinction on epistemological grounds. The philosophical focus on testimony as a source of knowledge provides some insight into what makes testimony distinct as an epistemic source. These considerations are used to provide a coherent and principled way to distinguish what evidence to treat …
The Sixth Amendment And Criminal Sentencing, Stephanos Bibas, Susan Klein
The Sixth Amendment And Criminal Sentencing, Stephanos Bibas, Susan Klein
Cardozo Law Review
This symposium essay explores the impact of Rita, Gall, and Kimbrough on state and federal sentencing and plea bargaining systems. The Court continues to try to explain how the Sixth Amendment jury trial right limits legislative and judicial control of criminal sentencing. Equally important, the opposing sides in this debate have begun to form a stable consensus. These decisions inject more uncertainty in the process and free trial judges to counterbalance prosecutors. Thus, we predict, these decisions will move the balance of plea bargaining power back toward criminal defendants.
Summary Of Valdez V. State, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 97, Elham Roohani
Summary Of Valdez V. State, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 97, Elham Roohani
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Cumulative effect of prosecutorial misconduct and the abuse of discretion on the part of the district court through a failure to give the jury a written bifurcation instruction and the resultant effect of juror misconduct warrants reversal warranted reversal of a first-degree murder and attempted murder conviction.
The Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Drug Court: A Partnership Between The Criminal Justice System And The Treatment Community, Hon. Frederick G. Rockwell Iii
The Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Drug Court: A Partnership Between The Criminal Justice System And The Treatment Community, Hon. Frederick G. Rockwell Iii
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law And Procedure, Marla G. Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough
Criminal Law And Procedure, Marla G. Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legitimating Criminal Justice Through Community Engagement: Lessons From The Jury Experience, Mark Findlay
Legitimating Criminal Justice Through Community Engagement: Lessons From The Jury Experience, Mark Findlay
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
Fundamentally justifying the jury is the opportunity it provides for community participation in criminal justice and the legitimation function that offers. Indeed, a strong political motivation for the recent introduction of jury trial in several transitional jurisdictions is the public confidence it transfers to the system at large. Recent research on juror comprehension and satisfaction suggests the possibility of interrogating the participation/confidence nexus more intricately. This note argues that it is the quality of the participation and the participant satisfaction which eventuates that predicts juror confidence. Where the legitimacy of criminal justice through juror participation is to be maximised then …
Rights Without Remedy: The Myth Of State Court Accessibility After The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Alison Brill
Rights Without Remedy: The Myth Of State Court Accessibility After The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Alison Brill
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Summary Of Hernandez V. State, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. 83, Julian R. Gregory
Summary Of Hernandez V. State, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. 83, Julian R. Gregory
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a district court order denying Defendant’s post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital case.
Summary Of Rubio V. State, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 87, Holly Cheong
Summary Of Rubio V. State, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 87, Holly Cheong
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a district court order denying relief for ineffective assistance in a criminal case resulting in deportation.
Summary Of State V. Harte, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 82, Ian Houston
Summary Of State V. Harte, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 82, Ian Houston
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a district court order partially granting a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case.
Summary Of Knipes V State, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 79, Miranda Mahe
Summary Of Knipes V State, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 79, Miranda Mahe
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a conviction of driving under the influence causing death on the basis that the district court failed to follow the procedural safeguards for juror questioning.
Summary Of Davidson V. State, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. 76, Moorea Katz
Summary Of Davidson V. State, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. 76, Moorea Katz
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a criminal conviction of two counts of burglary, two counts of robbery, two counts of battery, and adjudication as a habitual criminal.
The Constitutionality Of Court-Martialing Civilian Contractors In Iraq, Margaret Prystowsky
The Constitutionality Of Court-Martialing Civilian Contractors In Iraq, Margaret Prystowsky
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article examines the legal implications of outsourcing military functions to private contractors, focusing on the accountability gap under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). It argues that recent amendments to the UCMJ, particularly the expansion of court-martial jurisdiction over civilian contractors during declared wars and contingency operations, address this gap. The analysis concludes that these changes are constitutionally sound, given Congress's authority under Article I, Section 8, and align with legal precedent. However, the article also highlights practical challenges, such as prosecutorial discretion and limited penalties, which may undermine the effectiveness of these reforms.
Confessing In The Human Voice: A Defense Of The Privilege Against Selfincrimination, Andrew E. Taslitz
Confessing In The Human Voice: A Defense Of The Privilege Against Selfincrimination, Andrew E. Taslitz
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is a cornerstone of American constitutional law, yet it faces erosion through recent Supreme Court rulings and scholarly critiques. The article presents a novel defense of this privilege, focusing on the protection of the "literal voice" and "metaphorical voice," arguing that compelled speech uniquely harms dignity, identity, and autonomy. It critiques existing justifications as insufficient and proposes a framework rooted in social science and linguistic compulsion, emphasizing the privilege's role in preventing state overreach and safeguarding individual autonomy.
Danforth, Retroactivity, And Federalism, J. Thomas Sullivan
Danforth, Retroactivity, And Federalism, J. Thomas Sullivan
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Social Reality And Philosophical Ideals In Transitional Justice, Jamie Rowen
Social Reality And Philosophical Ideals In Transitional Justice, Jamie Rowen
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article argues that transitional justice mechanisms in post-conflict societies, such as Bosnia, often fail to establish legitimate authority because they neglect the crucial role of community building. It emphasizes that community is a prerequisite for legal authority and highlights the dialectical relationship between law and community, where each can shape the other. The case of Bosnia illustrates how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the War Crimes Chamber (WCC) in Sarajevo have struggled to gain legitimacy due to their focus on procedural values over community engagement. The article advocates for a reoriented approach to transitional …
Punishing Aggressors In U.S. Courts: Will The Act Of State Doctrine Bar National Prosecution Of The Crime Of Aggression?, Gergana Halpern
Punishing Aggressors In U.S. Courts: Will The Act Of State Doctrine Bar National Prosecution Of The Crime Of Aggression?, Gergana Halpern
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The note examines the intersection of the Act of State Doctrine and the prosecution of the crime of aggression in U.S. courts, arguing that while the doctrine does not legally preclude such prosecutions, practical considerations such as political sensitivity and the need for international legitimacy suggest that U.S. courts should await international consensus before proceeding. The analysis highlights the complexities of balancing legal principles with diplomatic realities.