Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (541)
- Seattle University School of Law (235)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (145)
- University of Michigan Law School (138)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (106)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (98)
- UIC School of Law (70)
- University of Richmond (53)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (52)
- University of Georgia School of Law (48)
- American University Washington College of Law (36)
- Pepperdine University (31)
- Roger Williams University (31)
- Georgetown University Law Center (28)
- St. Mary's University (28)
- University of Maine School of Law (28)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (27)
- Brooklyn Law School (24)
- BLR (22)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (21)
- Fordham Law School (20)
- Florida International University College of Law (18)
- University of Miami Law School (18)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (17)
- Cornell University Law School (16)
- New York Law School (16)
- Notre Dame Law School (15)
- Pace University (15)
- Cleveland State University (14)
- Georgia State University College of Law (14)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (128)
- Criminal law (88)
- Supreme Court (81)
- Federal (79)
- Constitution (69)
-
- Sentencing (69)
- International Criminal Court (61)
- New York (61)
- State (56)
- Evidence (52)
- Defendant (51)
- Criminal Law (49)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (49)
- Court (48)
- Jury (46)
- Capital punishment (43)
- Due process (43)
- Criminal (41)
- Jurisdiction (40)
- Law (40)
- Criminal justice (37)
- Criminal procedure (36)
- Judges (36)
- Sixth Amendment (36)
- Police (35)
- Constitutional law (34)
- Death penalty (34)
- Crime (32)
- ICC (32)
- Trial (32)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (419)
- Seattle University Law Review (222)
- Touro Law Review (131)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Indiana Law Journal (73)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (69)
- UIC Law Review (63)
- Michigan Law Review (58)
- University of Richmond Law Review (44)
- Articles (40)
- Cardozo Law Review (39)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (34)
- Scholarly Works (34)
- Maine Law Review (28)
- Scholarly Articles (28)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (28)
- Pepperdine Law Review (27)
- Faculty Publications (26)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (25)
- ExpressO (21)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (20)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (20)
- Faculty Articles (18)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (17)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (16)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (15)
- Georgia State University Law Review (13)
- All Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (12)
- Journal Articles (11)
- Publication Type
Articles 2161 - 2190 of 2374
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Alabama V. White: Anonymous Tip Held Sufficient Basis For Investigatory Stop Under Fourth Amendment, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 909 (1991), Martin K. Berks
Alabama V. White: Anonymous Tip Held Sufficient Basis For Investigatory Stop Under Fourth Amendment, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 909 (1991), Martin K. Berks
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
James V. Illinois: Wither The Exclusionary Rule - Not Quite Yet, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 493 (1991), David H. Norris
James V. Illinois: Wither The Exclusionary Rule - Not Quite Yet, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 493 (1991), David H. Norris
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Videotaped Reenactments In Civil Trials: Protecting Probative Evidence From The Trial Judge's Unbridled Discretion, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 433 (1991), Elizabeth A. Savage
Videotaped Reenactments In Civil Trials: Protecting Probative Evidence From The Trial Judge's Unbridled Discretion, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 433 (1991), Elizabeth A. Savage
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Crime And Punishment In The Federal Courts, Roger J. Miner '56
Crime And Punishment In The Federal Courts, Roger J. Miner '56
Criminal Law
No abstract provided.
New York Law School — Final Examinations, Roger J. Miner '56
New York Law School — Final Examinations, Roger J. Miner '56
New York Law School Events and Publications
No abstract provided.
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
The exclusionary evidence rules derived from the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments continue to play an important role in constitutional criminal procedure, despite the intense controversy that surrounds them. The primary justification for these rules has shifted from an "imperative of judicial integrity" to the "deterrence of police conduct that violates... [constitutional] rights." Regardless of the justification it uses for the rules' existence, the Supreme Court continues to limit their breadth "at the margin," when "the acknowledged costs to other values vital to a rational system of criminal justice" outweigh the deterrent effects of exclusion. The most notable limitation on …
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Finding Harmony Amidst Disagreement Over Extradition, Jurisdiction, The Role Of Human Rights, And Issues Of Extraterritoriality Under International Criminal Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Finding Harmony Amidst Disagreement Over Extradition, Jurisdiction, The Role Of Human Rights, And Issues Of Extraterritoriality Under International Criminal Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
This Article examines extradition and jurisdiction over extraterritorial crime, focusing on the relationship between jurisdiction and extradition in the broader context of human rights law. The authors challenge what they argue are chimerical, although strongly held beliefs in the incompatibility of European and United States criminal justice systems and extradition practices. They argue that cooperation in matters of international criminal law may be enhanced, while protection of human rights is promoted. The authors establish this possibility by breaking down the barriers to understanding that stem from the divergent European versus Anglo-American modes of analysis.
The authors first analyze the five …