Criminal Law Commons^™

Implications Of Non-Exclusive Choice Of Forum Clauses In Determining The Competent Dispute Resolution Forum In Indonesia, Alvansa Vickya, Tiurma M.P. Allagan

Indonesia Law Review

This research aims to analyze the implications of a non-exclusive choice of forum clause in determining the competent dispute resolution forum in Indonesia based on theories related to Private International Law, International Contract Law, and International Civil Procedure Law. Based on the results of this research, the implications of the non-exclusive choice of forum clause in determining the competent dispute resolution forum in Indonesia have not been fully regulated by Indonesian laws and regulations. This can be seen from the use of the doctrines of forum non conveniens, lis pendens, and res judicata, the three of which are still not …

Law School News: Welcome, Professor Bernard Freamon 04-20-2022, Michael M. Bowden

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

Are Constitutional Rights Enough? An Empirical Assessment Of Racial Bias In Police Stops, Rohit Asirvatham, Michael D. Frakes

Northwestern University Law Review

This Article empirically tests the conventional wisdom that a permissive constitutional standard bearing on pretextual traffic stops—such as the one announced by the Supreme Court in Whren v. United States—contributes to racial disparities in traffic stops. To gain empirical traction on this question, we look to state constitutional law. In particular, we consider a natural experiment afforded by changes in the State of Washington’s rules regarding traffic stops. Following Whren, the Washington Supreme Court first took a more restrictive stance than the U.S. Supreme Court, prohibiting pretextual stops by police officers, but later reversed course and instituted a …

Rewriting Whren V. United States, Devon W. Carbado, Jonathan Feingold

Faculty Scholarship

In 1996, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Whren v. United States—a unanimous opinion in which the Court effectively constitutionalized racial profiling. Despite its enduring consequences, Whren remains good law today. This Article rewrites the opinion. We do so, in part, to demonstrate how one might incorporate racial justice concerns into Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, a body of law that has long elided and marginalized the racialized dimensions of policing. A separate aim is to reveal the “false necessity” of the Whren outcome. The fact that Whren was unanimous, and that even progressive Justices signed on, might lead one to conclude that …

Locked Out: Sora, Sara And The Need For Defense Counsel Advisals And Judicial Plea Colloquies On Sex Offense-Related Housing Consequences, Matthew Cleaver

Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development

(Excerpt)

On May 20, 2014, Miguel Gonzalez became eligible for conditional release from prison, having served over two years of his two-and-a-half-year sentence for statutory rape. Instead of releasing Gonzalez, the New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) confined Gonzalez for an additional seven and a half months after his initial release date and over four months after his maximum sentence. On February 4, 2015, DOCCS finally released Gonzalez from New York’s Woodbourne Correctional Facility. The sole reason for Gonzalez’s additional confinement was his failure to secure housing that complied with the residency restrictions placed on individuals convicted …

The Local Community Standard: Modernizing The Supreme Court's Obscenity Jurisprudence, Jacob S. Gordon

Helm's School of Government Conference - 2021-2024

Paper presentation on the Supreme Court's outdated case law on obscenity and how it needs to be modernized to in order to combat the dissemination of inappropriate materials in the age of decentralized digital media.

The Dignitary Confrontation Clause, Erin L. Sheley

Faculty Scholarship

For seventeen years, the Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause jurisprudence has been confused and confusing. In Crawford v. Washington (2004), the Court overruled prior precedent and held that “testimonial” out-of-court statements could not be admitted at trial unless the defendant had an opportunity to cross-examine the declarant, even when the statement would be otherwise admissible as particularly reliable under an exception to the rule against hearsay. In a series of contradictory opinions over the next several years, the Court proceeded to expand and then seemingly roll back this holding, leading to widespread chaos in common types of cases, particularly those involving …

Human Dignity As A Chameleon, Ariel L. Bendor, Michal Tamir

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

This article offers an innovative argument, according to which courts do not interpret human dignity according to an abstract theoretical position on the nature of the value only, nor subordinate themselves to the subjective purpose of the drafters of a constitution. Thus, courts-whether in the United States, where human dignity is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, or in countries where the right is constitutionally enshrined, such as Germany, South Africa, and Israel-interpret and apply human dignity on the basis of the entirety of the provisions of the particular constitution. Human dignity serves as a constitutional chameleon in the sense …

Second Chances: Why Michigan Should Categorically Prohibit The Sentence Of Juvenile Life Without Parole, Richard Zhao

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

The United States is the only country in the world that sentences children to die in prison. This practice, known as juvenile life without parole (JLWOP), is condemned by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Yet twenty-five states still permit the sentence, and Michigan houses one of the nation’s largest JLWOP populations. Despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s ban on some forms of JLWOP, more must be done to further limit the use of this sentence. The current JLWOP sentencing scheme is untenable, imposes a significant financial burden on taxpayers, and perpetuates racial inequality. This Note explores …

Llegaron Los Federales: The Federal Government’S Prosecution Of Local Criminal Activity In Puerto Rico, Emmanuel Hiram Arnaud

Faculty Scholarship

In the midst of a debilitating humanitarian crisis in Puerto Rico and high-profile litigation concerning other U.S. territories, scholars, political leaders, and activists have elevated conversations of constitutionally sanctioned inequality into the public spotlight. With respect to Puerto Rico, these conversations focus on its current economic morass and relation to the debate over decolonization. Absent from these important discussions is the role that federal criminal law plays in manifesting Congress’ continued plenary power over U.S. territories. This Article breaks from that pattern and highlights an ignored part of federal criminal jurisprudence: the federal prosecution of local criminal activity in Puerto …

"Insanity Is Smashing Up Against My Soul": The Fifth Circuit And Competency To Be Executed Cases After Panetti V. Quarterman, Michael L. Perlin, Talia Roitberg Harmon

Articles & Chapters

One of the open secrets of death penalty law and policy is the astonishingly high percentage of individuals on death row with serious mental disabilities. This is well known to lawyers who represent this cohort (and presumably, equally well known to the district attorneys who nevertheless prosecute them and the judges who try and sentence them), but is not generally discussed in the press nor, certainly, in political discourse. In the aggregate, this is far beneath society’s radar.

It is now over 14 years since the US Supreme Court decided a case that clarified the underlying issues. In Panetti v. …

Trauma: Community Of Color Exposure To The Criminal Justice System As An Adverse Childhood Experience, André Douglas Pond Cummings, Todd J. Clark, Caleb Gregory Conrad, Amy Dunn Johnson

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.

Kebijakan Countercyclical Sebagai Upaya Kesejahteraan Masyarakat, Made Cinthya Puspita Shara

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

The high level of economic growth in Indonesia is in line with the development of businesses that increase capital by making credit agreements with financial institutions. The state of the spread of the co-19 pandemic case has been declared a national disaster, impacting on the implementation of credit agreements between the debtor and financial institutions. Economic problems make it difficult for people to carry out their obligations. Countercyclical buffer policy is a buffer that is carried out by providing additional capital to replace losses if excessive credit growth occurs which has the potential to disrupt financial stability. Bank Indonesia Policy …

Hip Hop And The Law : Presented By Intellectual Property Law Association 03/31/2022, Roger Williams University School Of Law

School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events

No abstract provided.

Konsep Pelaksanaan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara: Menguji Asas Presumtio Iustae Causa Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara, Indah Fitriani Sukri, Anna Erliyana

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

In the implementation of the State Administration Decree (KTUN), the principle of presumtiousta causa is known as part of the implementation of the KTUN in order to resolve state administrative disputes. This principle means a state administration decision which is always considered valid. This decision will be invalid if there are new decisions that cancel or revoke the previous decisions. In its formation, the administrative court or state administration court has the objective to provide protection for the rights of the people derived from individual rights as well as to protect the rights of the community based on the common …

Kajian Hukum Terhadap Pengembangan Fintech Syariah Di Indonesia, Irham Virdi

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

In meeting the needs of today's financial services that are entering the era of digitalization, a service is needed following the developing financial technology. The existence of Islamic financial technology (fintech) is an alternative to fulfill the needs of financial services at this time. As one of the countries with the largest Muslim population in the world, Islamic fintech can be an option and has great potential because it follows current technological developments and sharia. However, the implementation of Islamic fintech faces various obstacles, including its regulation, the obligation of DPS, technical implementation, and human resources. For this reason, a …

Penyelesaian Sengketa Bedrog (Penipuan) Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Kayu: Onrechtmatige Daad Atau Wederrechtelijk? (Studi Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 449k/Pid/2001), Sri Laksmi Anindita, Eriska Fajrinita Sitanggang

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Criminalization Of Civil Disputes Is A Common Case In Indonesia. This Case Can Occur Because An Act Or Action May Violate Two Laws At The Same Time, Those Are Civil Law And Criminal Law. The Intersection Between A Civil Dispute And A Criminal Act Does Not Only Make The Borderline Between Civil And Criminal Cases Thin. Settlement Of Disputes Over Acts That Contain Elements Of Fraud Arising From A Contractual Relationship Through Civil Law Mechanisms By Filing A Lawsuit (Onrechtmatige Daad Or Default) Or Criminal Law Mechanisms (Wederrechtelijk), Is Often Confusing. How To Determine An Act With An Element Of …

Analisis Yuridis Sanksi Pidana Pelanggaran Pasal 281 Jo 77 Ayat (1) Undang Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan Di Wilayah Hukum Polres Serang Kota, Januar Alihamzah, Benny Irawan, Dadang Herli

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Law Number 22 Year 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation (LLAJ Law) explains that traffic order and road transportation is a traffic condition that takes place regularly with the rights and obligations of every road user. Every motorized vehicle driver is required to have a driving license (SIM) in accordance with the provisions of Article 77 paragraph (1) of the LLAJ Law. The fact that happened in the jurisdiction of the Serang Kota Police, there were 156 cases of violations of Article 77 paragraph (1) of the LLAJ Law which were decided by the Serang District Court with fines whose …

Kedudukan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Hukum Ketenagakerjaan (Kajian Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 37/Puu-Ix/2011), Suparto Suparto, Zulkifli Zulkifli

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower is one of the laws that is subjected to a judicial review to the Constitutional Court (MK). One of the reasons for filing a judicial review is that the application of Article 155 paragraph (2) has the potential to create legal uncertainty, given the absence of a clear interpretation of the clause " not yet defined ”. The Constitutional Court Decision No. 37 / PUU-IX / 2011 granted the petitioners' petition, and stated that the phrase "not yet established" was interpreted as "not yet legally binding". As a result, the process fee during …

Moralitas Publik Sebagai Dasar Pembenar Terhadap Kewajiban Sertifikasi Halal Produk Makanan Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Gatt-Wto 1994, Neni Ruhaeni, Eka An Aqimuddin, Hadian Afriyadi

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

In principle, World Trade Organization (WTO) prohibit each member states to make policy, both tarrif and non tarrif, which potentially disturb international trade. Nevertheless, there are exceptions that can be used by the state as a basis for justification to hold trade policy which consider contratry to WTO law. One of them is to protect public morality. The Halal Product Assurance Act (UUJPH) stipulate obligation of halal certification for food products that enter, circulate and trade in Indonesia. This act is considered as a protective and discriminatory policy. This research founds that although some provisions in UUJPH are discriminatory and …

Dilema Praktik Dumping Dan Hukum Antidumping : Antara Kepentingan Pengusaha (Produsen) Dan Masyarakat (Konsumen), Yulianto Syahyu

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Antidumping provisions have been listed since the agreement of GATT in 1947, and provisions regarding anti-dumping agencies are regulated in Article VI GATT. The provision also recommends that each member state implements the provisions of GATT in their respective national legal systems. As a form of implementation of these provisions in the national legal system, Indonesia has issued regulations governing Antidumping. However, there is a dilemma in terms of dumping practices and the implementation of anti-dumping laws in Indonesia, because in this case it must be seen from two sides of interest, not only in terms of the interests of …

Peranan Hukum Rahasia Dagang Dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi: Undang-Undang Dan Putusan, Tantowi Akbar

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

There are five qualities required for a law to be said to have a role in the economic development of a country: stability, certainty, justice, education, and the special abilities of lawyers. One of the laws in Indonesia which closely related to the national economy is Trade Secret Law Number 30 Year 2000. This trade secret law should be able to comply these qualities. Therefore, this trade secret law has a role in national economic development in Indonesia. On the other hand, the Verdic of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 332K/Pid.Sus/2013 concerning trade secret matter could …

Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Di Tengah Perubahan Peta Geopolitik Global: Analisis Kepentingan Nasional Dalam Pembentukan Kebijakan Hukum, Kris Wijoyo Soepandji, M. Sofyan Pulungan

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Pancasila as the basis of the state is the main guideline for Indonesian political and social life. In the field of law, Pancasila has been determined as the main source national legislation process. However, the competing interests in formulation of legal policies sometimes put Pancasila values at difficult position to be implemented. Indonesian lawmakers should end the unfavorable situation by utilizing geopolitical knowledge. Moreover, currently there is important change in the global geopolitical map which provides opportunity for Indonesia to make legal policies which are in accordance with its national interests. This research was conducted based on the inter-disciplinary legal …

Telemedicine (Online Medical Services) Dalam Era New Normal Ditinjau Berdasarkan Hukum Kesehatan (Studi: Program Telemedicine Indonesia/Temenin Di Rumah Sakit Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo), Wahyu Andrianto, Amira Budi Athira

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Health is an important basis for the continuity of human life. Every human being has the right to have access to safe, quality, and affordable health services. However, in reality health services in Indonesia still have several obstacles, for examples the lack of health care for remote areas which is hindered by distance and time. Especially during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a solution is needed to serve public health without violating the regulations that enforce Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB) to prevent the spread of the virus. For this reason, one of the efforts that can be carried …

Hambatan Dan Prospek Hukum Penyelenggaraan Jasa Notaris Secara Elektronik Di Indonesia Memasuki Era Society 5.0, Muhammad Ricky Ilham Chalid

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

The development of technology, information and communication in the era of society 5.0 makes notaries have to be able to keep up with their ability to provide the best legal services, the best solution for notaries in facing the challenges of changing times is to implement cyber notaries and remote notaries, but this is not immune from the clash of the Indonesian legal system. Things that need to be considered are the reasons why Indonesia has not implemented it, such as the suitability of the application of long distance notaries and cyber notaries from common law to the Indonesian legal …

Buka Siape Sambehin Injin: Komentar Atas Putusan Tentang Izin Lingkungan Pltu Celukan Bawang, Andri Gunawan Wibisana, Fajri Fadhillah

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

This paper examines administrative court’s view in the Izin Lingkungan PLTU Celukan Bawang case. The paper puts emphasis on the use of actual losses to assess the plaintiffs’ legal standing and the deadline for filing a lawsuit. This paper considers that the court was incorrect in interpreting the legal standing by focusing on the absence of plaintiffs’ actual losses. The court also took a conservative position in determining the deadline for filing the lawsuit. This paper criticizes the court’s failure to take into account the issue of climate change addressed by the plaintiffs, so that the court missed a golden …

Pembaruan Hukum Perlindungan Hak Atas Kesehatan Reproduksi Perempuan Di Indonesia, Aulia Nabila, Yunita Desmawati

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

The right to reproductive health is a part of the human rights regime that must be guaranteed by states. Provisions of women’s right to reproductive health in Indonesia are found separately in various legal instruments. However, the regulations are not comprehensive, vague, and gender-biased. Using human rights and feminist perspective, this article analyses the issues relating to women’s right to reproductive health in statutes and other legal instruments, as well as formulates a concept of revision of the law of women’s right to reproductive health. This article concludes that regulations regarding women’s right to reproductive health contain provisions that are …

The Broken Fourth Amendment Oath, Laurent Sacharoff

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

The Fourth Amendment requires that warrants be supported by “Oath or affirmation.” Under current doctrine, a police officer may swear the oath to obtain a warrant merely by repeating the account of an informant. This Article shows, however, that the Fourth Amendment, as originally understood, required that the real accuser with personal knowledge swear the oath.

That real-accuser requirement persisted for nearly two centuries. Almost all federal courts and most state courts from 1850 to 1960 held that the oath, by its very nature, required a witness with personal knowledge. Only in 1960 did the Supreme Court hold in Jones …

The Dignitary Confrontation Clause, Erin Sheley

Washington Law Review

For seventeen years, the Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause jurisprudence has been confused and confusing. In Crawford v. Washington (2004), the Court overruled prior precedent and held that “testimonial” out-of-court statements could not be admitted at trial unless the defendant had an opportunity to cross-examine the declarant, even when the statement would be otherwise admissible as particularly reliable under an exception to the rule against hearsay. In a series of contradictory opinions over the next several years, the Court proceeded to expand and then seemingly roll back this holding, leading to widespread chaos in common types of cases, particularly those involving …

Perubahan Undang-Undang Oleh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Kacamata Pasal 1 Ayat (2) Kuhp, Marco Hardianto

Indonesia Criminal Law Review

One of the basic principles in criminal law is the principle of transitory, namely the principle that regulates the enforcement of the law in the event of an amendment in legislation after a criminal act is committed. Regarding to the phrase 'amandment in legislation', there are three running doctrine: formele leer (Simons, 1910), beperkte materiele leer (Van Geuns, 1919), and onbeperkte materiele leer (Hoge Raad, 1921). These three doctrines developed prior to the recognition of judicial review by the Constitutional Court. Logical implication: Amendment in legislation as referred to in the principle of transitory does not include amendment as the …