Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (394)
- Supreme Court of the United States (257)
- Judges (236)
- State and Local Government Law (140)
- Jurisprudence (107)
-
- Criminal Procedure (85)
- Criminal Law (81)
- Legal History (64)
- Fourteenth Amendment (62)
- Legislation (62)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (59)
- Litigation (57)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (51)
- Civil Procedure (50)
- First Amendment (45)
- Law and Politics (45)
- Law and Society (42)
- Jurisdiction (39)
- Fourth Amendment (38)
- Administrative Law (36)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (33)
- Civil Law (32)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (27)
- International Law (22)
- Property Law and Real Estate (22)
- Evidence (21)
- Political Science (21)
- Land Use Law (20)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (203)
- Georgetown University Law Center (87)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (78)
- Pepperdine University (29)
- Duke Law (26)
-
- University of Richmond (24)
- St. Mary's University (21)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (21)
- University of Georgia School of Law (15)
- Fordham Law School (13)
- University of Colorado Law School (13)
- American University Washington College of Law (12)
- Emory University School of Law (12)
- Boston University School of Law (11)
- Washington University in St. Louis (10)
- New York Law School (9)
- Columbia Law School (8)
- Seattle University School of Law (8)
- St. John's University School of Law (8)
- Pace University (7)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (7)
- Cleveland State University (6)
- Marquette University Law School (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (5)
- Florida International University College of Law (4)
- Liberty University (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- University of Baltimore Law (4)
- University of Kentucky (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (195)
- Indiana Law Journal (72)
- Faculty Scholarship (61)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (56)
- Pepperdine Law Review (29)
-
- Faculty Articles (26)
- Nevada Law Journal (19)
- Supreme Court Overviews (19)
- Scholarly Works (15)
- Law Faculty Publications (14)
- University of Richmond Law Review (11)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (10)
- SCI Papers & Reports (10)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (10)
- All Faculty Scholarship (9)
- Faculty Publications (8)
- Seattle University Law Review (8)
- American University Law Review (7)
- NYLS Law Review (7)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (6)
- St. John's Law Review (6)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- Journal Articles (5)
- Marquette Law Review (5)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (5)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (4)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (4)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 631 - 660 of 745
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Power Not Reason: Justice Marshall's Valedictory And The Fourth Amendment In The Supreme Court's 1990 Term , Bruce A. Green
Power Not Reason: Justice Marshall's Valedictory And The Fourth Amendment In The Supreme Court's 1990 Term , Bruce A. Green
Faculty Scholarship
In its 1990 Term, the United States Supreme Court heard five cases involving the Fourth Amendment. In this article, Professor Bruce Green analyzes these five search-and-seizure decisions in light of Justice Marshall's criticism that '[Plower, not reason, is the new currency of this Court's decision-making." He examines the various considerations the Court advances in its Fourth Amendment analysis-interpretive principle, policy, and precedent--and discovers inconsistencies in the importance assigned to each of these considerations in a series of cases decided very close together by virtually the same Justices. Each approach controlled, Professor Green argues, only when it could be said to …
Eighteen Feet Of Clay: Thoughts On Phantom Rule 4(M), Gene R. Shreve
Eighteen Feet Of Clay: Thoughts On Phantom Rule 4(M), Gene R. Shreve
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Religious Purpose, Inerrancy, And The Establishment Clause, Daniel O. Conkle
Religious Purpose, Inerrancy, And The Establishment Clause, Daniel O. Conkle
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction, Howard Glickstein, Leon D. Lazer
Compounding Confusion And Hampering Diversity: Life After Finley And The Supplemental Jurisdiction Statute, Richard D. Freer
Compounding Confusion And Hampering Diversity: Life After Finley And The Supplemental Jurisdiction Statute, Richard D. Freer
Faculty Articles
It has been a tough couple of years for supplemental jurisdiction. In recent decades, the doctrine, which earlier had been called the "child of necessity and sire of confusion," had become somewhat less confusing. The Supreme Court created a flurry of concern over the future of the doctrine with a pair of restrictive decisions in the late 1970s, but showed no further interest; the lower courts generally interpreted those holdings narrowly. With exceptions in a couple of areas, the application of supplemental jurisdiction in the various joinder situations became relatively clear and predictable, and the doctrine played a major role …
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Possibly the most unsettling phenomenon in the Supreme Court's 1988 term was Justice White's decision to vote contrary to his own exhaustively stated reasoning in Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. His unexplained decision to vote against the result of his own analysis lends support to those who argue that law, or at least constitutional law, is fundamentally indeterminate. Proponents of the indeterminacy argument sometimes base their position on the allegedly inescapable inconsistency of decisions made by a multi-member court. There is an answer to the inconsistency argument, but it founders if justices sometimes vote, without explanation, on the basis of …
Book Review Of The U.S. Supreme Court: A Bibliography, James S. Heller
Book Review Of The U.S. Supreme Court: A Bibliography, James S. Heller
Library Staff Publications
No abstract provided.
Rent Appropriation And The Labor Law Doctrine Of Successorship, Keith N. Hylton
Rent Appropriation And The Labor Law Doctrine Of Successorship, Keith N. Hylton
Faculty Scholarship
When there is a change of corporate control in a business enterprise a question arises as to whether the new employer should be bound by the predecessor's collective bargaining relationship with the union representing the predecessor's employees. This is known as the successorship problem in labor law.' Successorship doctrine is complex and controversial. Several commentators have attempted to reconcile Supreme Court decisions and to ascertain the assumptions underlying the Court's opinions in this area.2 This Article does not attempt to do this, although paradoxically, the arguments presented may lead to reconciliation of many of the Supreme Court's decisions relating to …
Administrative Failure And Local Democracy: The Politics Of Deshaney, Jack M. Beermann
Administrative Failure And Local Democracy: The Politics Of Deshaney, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay is an effort to construct a normative basis for a constitutional theory to resist the Supreme Court's recent decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services.1 In DeShaney, the Court decided that a local social service worker's failure to prevent child abuse did not violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment even though the social worker "had reason to believe" the abuse was occurring. 2 Chief Justice Rehnquist's opinion for the Court held that government inaction cannot violate due process unless the state has custody of the victim, 3 thus settling a controversial …
The Solicitor General And The Evolution Of Activism, James L. Cooper
The Solicitor General And The Evolution Of Activism, James L. Cooper
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Resolving Retroactivity After: Teague V. Lane, Ellen E. Boshkoff
Resolving Retroactivity After: Teague V. Lane, Ellen E. Boshkoff
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Substantive Due Process Analysis And The Lockean Liberal Tradition: Rethinking The Modern Privacy Cases, Jeffrey S. Koehlinger
Substantive Due Process Analysis And The Lockean Liberal Tradition: Rethinking The Modern Privacy Cases, Jeffrey S. Koehlinger
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
In Lieu Of Preclusion: Reconciling Administrative Decisionmaking And Federal Civil Rights Claims, Marjorie A. Silver
In Lieu Of Preclusion: Reconciling Administrative Decisionmaking And Federal Civil Rights Claims, Marjorie A. Silver
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Book Review: The Limits Of Judicial Power: The Supreme Court In American Politics, David S. Bogen
Book Review: The Limits Of Judicial Power: The Supreme Court In American Politics, David S. Bogen
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.