Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (392)
- Constitutional Law (79)
- Jurisprudence (73)
- Legal Profession (68)
- Law and Society (62)
-
- Law and Politics (58)
- Legal History (44)
- Criminal Law (36)
- Criminal Procedure (36)
- Litigation (36)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (35)
- Supreme Court of the United States (35)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (34)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (33)
- Legal Education (32)
- Civil Procedure (29)
- Legislation (25)
- Jurisdiction (24)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (23)
- State and Local Government Law (23)
- Administrative Law (19)
- Evidence (19)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (18)
- International Law (17)
- Law and Race (17)
- Law and Gender (16)
- Civil Law (15)
- Legal Writing and Research (15)
- Institution
-
- BLR (46)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (40)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (32)
- Roger Williams University (30)
- Duke Law (22)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (22)
- University of Richmond (17)
- Pace University (14)
- William & Mary Law School (14)
- American University Washington College of Law (13)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (13)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (11)
- Pepperdine University (11)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (11)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (9)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (8)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (8)
- Washington University in St. Louis (7)
- West Virginia University (7)
- Columbia Law School (6)
- New York Law School (6)
- St. Mary's University (6)
- University of Maine School of Law (6)
- University of San Diego (6)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (6)
- Cleveland State University (5)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (5)
- University of Baltimore Law (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Marquette University Law School (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (43)
- Faculty Scholarship (32)
- Cardozo Law Review (25)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (23)
- Touro Law Review (19)
-
- Faculty Publications (16)
- Indiana Law Journal (16)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (14)
- Scholarly Works (13)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (11)
- Faculty Articles (11)
- Law Faculty Publications (11)
- Pepperdine Law Review (9)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (9)
- School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events (9)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (8)
- All Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Faculty Working Papers (7)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (7)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (7)
- University of Richmond Law Review (7)
- West Virginia Law Review (7)
- Articles (5)
- Law School Blogs (5)
- University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series (5)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (5)
- Cleveland State Law Review (4)
- Judges (4)
- Marquette Law Review (4)
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 391 - 420 of 461
Full-Text Articles in Courts
City And Town Courts: Mapping Their Dimensions, Julia C. Lamber, Mary Lee Luskin
City And Town Courts: Mapping Their Dimensions, Julia C. Lamber, Mary Lee Luskin
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Possibly the most unsettling phenomenon in the Supreme Court's 1988 term was Justice White's decision to vote contrary to his own exhaustively stated reasoning in Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. His unexplained decision to vote against the result of his own analysis lends support to those who argue that law, or at least constitutional law, is fundamentally indeterminate. Proponents of the indeterminacy argument sometimes base their position on the allegedly inescapable inconsistency of decisions made by a multi-member court. There is an answer to the inconsistency argument, but it founders if justices sometimes vote, without explanation, on the basis of …
Retrospective Justification, Jeffrey Malkan
Memorial Service: Judge James T. Foley, Roger J. Miner '56
Memorial Service: Judge James T. Foley, Roger J. Miner '56
Judges
No abstract provided.
Where To Draw The Guideline: Factoring The Fruits Of Illegal Searches Into Sentencing Guidelines Calculations, Cheryl G. Bader, David S. Douglas
Where To Draw The Guideline: Factoring The Fruits Of Illegal Searches Into Sentencing Guidelines Calculations, Cheryl G. Bader, David S. Douglas
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pitfalls Of Public Policy: The Case Of Arbitration Agreements, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Pitfalls Of Public Policy: The Case Of Arbitration Agreements, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
As the juxtaposition of these quotations suggests, judges have long held disparate views on the legitimacy and value of “public policy” considerations as a basis for legal decision making. The popular notion posits that Justice Holmes and legal realists carried the day, making public policy analysis an ordinary part of the adjudication process. The story, of course, is more complex than this legal version of Don Quixote. Many judges and lawyers, including Justice Holmes in other writings, continued to speak of adjudication in more formalist and positivist terms, with most laypersons in apparent agreement. Judge Burroughs' view of public policy …
Remarks: Clerks Of Judge Luther A. Wilgarten, Jr., Roger J. Miner '56
Remarks: Clerks Of Judge Luther A. Wilgarten, Jr., Roger J. Miner '56
Judges
No abstract provided.
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable George C. Pratt, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable George C. Pratt, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Brennan: The Heart Has Its Reasons, Richard D. Cudahy
Justice Brennan: The Heart Has Its Reasons, Richard D. Cudahy
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ideology And Judging In The Supreme Court Of Canada, Robert Martin
Ideology And Judging In The Supreme Court Of Canada, Robert Martin
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
The purpose of this article is to advance some hypotheses about the way the Supreme Court of Canada operates as a state institution. The analysis is based on the period since 1948. The first hypothesis is that the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada belong to the dominant class in Canadian society. The second hypothesis is that they contribute to the dominance of their class primarily on the ideological plane.
Passion For Justice, Martha L. Minow, Elizabeth V. Spelman
Passion For Justice, Martha L. Minow, Elizabeth V. Spelman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Brennan, Natural Right, And Constitutional Interpretation, George Anastaplo
Justice Brennan, Natural Right, And Constitutional Interpretation, George Anastaplo
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Justice's Passion, David Cole
Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dedication Of The James T. Foley United States Courthouse, Roger J. Miner '56
Dedication Of The James T. Foley United States Courthouse, Roger J. Miner '56
Judges
No abstract provided.
A Distorted Mirror: The Supreme Court's Shimmering View Of Summary Judgment, Directed Verdict, And The Value Of Adjudication, Jeffrey W. Stempel
A Distorted Mirror: The Supreme Court's Shimmering View Of Summary Judgment, Directed Verdict, And The Value Of Adjudication, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
As almost anyone alive during the past decade knows, this is the era of the ‘litigation explosion,’ or there is at least the perception that a litigation explosion exists. Although all agree that the absolute number of lawsuits has increased in virtually every corner of the state and federal court systems, there exists vigorous debate about whether the increase is unusual in relative or historical terms and even more vigorous debate about whether the absolute increase in cases symbolizes the American concern for fairness and justice or represents a surge in frivolous or trivial disputes needlessly clogging the courts. As …
The Compelling Case Against Robert H. Bork, Stephen Gillers
The Compelling Case Against Robert H. Bork, Stephen Gillers
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why The United States Senate Should Not Consent To The Nomination Of Judge Robert H. Bork To Be A Justice Of The Supreme Court, Philip B. Heymann, Fred Wertheimer
Why The United States Senate Should Not Consent To The Nomination Of Judge Robert H. Bork To Be A Justice Of The Supreme Court, Philip B. Heymann, Fred Wertheimer
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Balance Favoring Restraint, Richard D. Friedman
Balance Favoring Restraint, Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Silence As A Trial Strategy After Strickland And Cronic: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?Nic : The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jo Ellen Silberstein
Silence As A Trial Strategy After Strickland And Cronic: Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?Nic : The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jo Ellen Silberstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Communication In The Ninth Circuit: A Concern For Collegiality, Stephen L. Wasby
Communication In The Ninth Circuit: A Concern For Collegiality, Stephen L. Wasby
Seattle University Law Review
After a discussion of the court's basic organization, the general stages of consideration of a case will be briefly described. Then attention will be focused on communication between the judges about cases. Cases before screening panels will be discussed first. Then cases set for argument before three-judge panels will be examined beginning with pre-argument communication, extending through exchanges at argument, the postargument conference, and the post-conference period. This will be followed by discussion of communication leading to the call for an en banc court. Communication among judges chosen for an en banc court will be considered next along with intracircuit …
A Government By Judges: An Historical Re-View, Michael Henry Davis
A Government By Judges: An Historical Re-View, Michael Henry Davis
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
In 1921, Edouard Lambert, a professor of law at Lyon specializing in comparative studies and founder of an Institute of Comparative Law there, published a book, Le Gouvernement des judges et la lutte contra la legislation sociale aux Etats-Unis, thus singlehandedly creating the phrase, a "government of judges", to denote a truly unconstrained system of judicial review which could not be limited even by constitutional amendment. The phrase quickly entered the parlance of French public law and even that of popular culture, deriving much of its force, no doubt, from the historical French aversion to a strong judiciary, eventually becoming …
Federal Courts At The Crossroads, Roger J. Miner '56
Federal Courts At The Crossroads, Roger J. Miner '56
Bar Associations
No abstract provided.
The Duty To Criticize The Courts (Ii), Roger J. Miner '56
The Duty To Criticize The Courts (Ii), Roger J. Miner '56
Judges
No abstract provided.
The State Of New York's State Federal-Judicial Council, Hon. George C. Pratt
The State Of New York's State Federal-Judicial Council, Hon. George C. Pratt
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Playing With Numbers: Determining The Majority Of Judges Required To Grant En Banc Sittings In The United States Court Of Appeals, James J. Wheaton
Playing With Numbers: Determining The Majority Of Judges Required To Grant En Banc Sittings In The United States Court Of Appeals, James J. Wheaton
Faculty Publications
This note addresses the effects that these two interests -- majority control of circuit law and judicial integrity -- have on the appropriate definition of majority. Neither legislative history nor Supreme Court constructions of section 46(c) provide an unambiguous rule, and interpretation of the majority requirement remains within the authority of each circuit. The Judicial Conference of the United States, at its meeting in September 1984, recommended that each circuit clearly describe its en banc voting procedures. This note delineates considerations that may assist the circuit courts in their efforts to outline the method by which they should order en …
The Judge's Role In Fostering Voluntary Settlements, Thomas D. Lambros
The Judge's Role In Fostering Voluntary Settlements, Thomas D. Lambros
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Meaning Of Judicial Self-Restraint, Richard A. Posner
The Meaning Of Judicial Self-Restraint, Richard A. Posner
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Book Review. The Judicial Process: An Introductory Analysis Of The Courts Of The United States, England, And France By Henry J. Abraham, Bryant G. Garth
Book Review. The Judicial Process: An Introductory Analysis Of The Courts Of The United States, England, And France By Henry J. Abraham, Bryant G. Garth
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
More Judgeships -But Not All At Once, Abner J. Mikva
More Judgeships -But Not All At Once, Abner J. Mikva
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.