Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (114)
- Supreme Court of the United States (60)
- State and Local Government Law (56)
- Criminal Procedure (55)
- Judges (53)
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (51)
- Criminal Law (43)
- Civil Procedure (33)
- Jurisprudence (30)
- Law and Society (24)
- Litigation (24)
- Civil Law (21)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (21)
- Jurisdiction (21)
- Legal History (19)
- Legislation (19)
- Administrative Law (18)
- Human Rights Law (14)
- Law and Politics (13)
- Rule of Law (13)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (11)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (11)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (11)
- Evidence (10)
- Juvenile Law (10)
- Common Law (9)
- First Amendment (9)
- Fourth Amendment (9)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (50)
- University of Michigan Law School (46)
- Pepperdine University (10)
- Cleveland State University (8)
- University of Colorado Law School (8)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (7)
- Georgetown University Law Center (6)
- St. Mary's University (6)
- University of Maine School of Law (5)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (3)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Arcadia University (1)
- BLR (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (48)
- Michigan Law Review (19)
- Articles (18)
- Publications (7)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (7)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- Cleveland State Law Review (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Amicus Briefs (3)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (3)
- Maine Law Review (3)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (2)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (2)
- Journal of Law and Health (2)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- St. Thomas Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Capstone Showcase (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 194 of 194
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Preliminary Notes Toward A Study Of Judicial Notice, E. F. Roberts
Preliminary Notes Toward A Study Of Judicial Notice, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The author describes the common law as a "machine," with judges and lawyers as its working parts. He explains that its successful operation requires a kind of "intellectual adrenalin" in order to keep it responsive to its changing environment. This is the function of judicial notice. The author next examines the different views of judicial notice and points out that each is a reflection of the era in which it was created. He concludes that judicial notice is not a distinct doctrine like the hearsay rule, but rather is simply the art of thinking as practiced within the legal system.
Legislative Apportionment And Representative Government: The Meaning Of Baker V. Carr, Jo Desha Lucas
Legislative Apportionment And Representative Government: The Meaning Of Baker V. Carr, Jo Desha Lucas
Michigan Law Review
In three recent cases the Supreme Court has reopened the question of the extent to which federal courts will review the general fairness of state schemes of legislative apportionment. It is a question on which the Court has had nothing to say for over a decade, leaving the bar to patch together the current state of the law from the outcome of cases disposed of without opinion considered against a backdrop of language used in earlier decisions.
Gideon V. Wainwright: The Art Of Overruling, Jerold H. Israel
Gideon V. Wainwright: The Art Of Overruling, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
During the 1962 Term, the Supreme Court, on a single Monday, announced six decisions concerned with constitutional limitations upon state criminal procedure. The most publicized of these, though probably not the most important in terms of legal theory or practical effect, was Gideon v. Wainwright. In an era of constantly expanding federal restrictions on state criminal processes, the holding of Gideon-that an indigent defendant in a state criminal prosecution has an unqualified right to the appointment of counsel-was hardly startling. And while Gideon will obviously have an important effect in the handful of states that still fail to appoint counsel …
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Jurisdiction Of A State Court Over A Foreign Corporation, Robert L. Knauss S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Jurisdiction Of A State Court Over A Foreign Corporation, Robert L. Knauss S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Peninsular Gas Company, a Michigan corporation, brought an action in Missouri against the plaintiff for breach of contract. A judgment was returned for plaintiff, and plaintiff immediately filed suit for malicious prosecution and served process on the president of the corporation who was in Missouri for the prior trial. On a motion to quash, held, sustained. Under the due process clause of the United States Constitution, the court had no right to assume jurisdiction. Defendant corporation was not doing business in Missouri, for bringing a prior lawsuit was a single isolated act and was not a part of its …
Constitutional Law - Right To Counsel In Juvenile Court, John A. Ziegler Jr.
Constitutional Law - Right To Counsel In Juvenile Court, John A. Ziegler Jr.
Michigan Law Review
In April 1953 petitioner was found to have violated a law by the juvenile court. Being under the age of eighteen, he was committed to the National Training School for Boys of the District 0£ Columbia. He was paroled about a year later but was re-arrested in March 1955 for violation of his parole and brought before the United States Parole Board. Before the parole board could take action he petitioned the federal district court for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the action of the juvenile court in 1953 had been unconstitutional in that petitioner had …
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Use Of Habeas Corpus To Allow Federal Court To Review State Court Jury Determination Of Voluntariness Of Confession, Herbert R. Brown S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Use Of Habeas Corpus To Allow Federal Court To Review State Court Jury Determination Of Voluntariness Of Confession, Herbert R. Brown S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The prisoner had been convicted of murder in the state court. He brought a habeas corpus proceeding in federal district court to secure his release from custody on the ground that the conviction was based on a confession which was obtained by physical violence. The confession had been submitted to the jury, which was instructed to consider it only if it found that it was not obtained by duress or fear produced by threats. The district court granted the writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, held, affirmed. The district court could determine the facts of the case for itself. …
Constitutional Law-Jury Trial-Validity Of The "Blue Ribbon" Jury, Edward S. Tripp S.Ed.
Constitutional Law-Jury Trial-Validity Of The "Blue Ribbon" Jury, Edward S. Tripp S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendants, labor union officers, were indicted for conspiracy and extortion. The state moved for a "blue ribbon" jury. Defendants objected to the "blue ribbon" panel on grounds of denial of due process and equal protection; first, because laborers and women were unlawfully excluded from the panel, and also because "blue ribbon" juries were more inclined to convict than common juries. Defendants later accepted each individual juror. Defendants were convicted and the New York appellate court affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. Held, affirmed. Defendants failed to show any intentional and purposeful exclusion which would be prejudicial to …
Criminal Law And Procedure - Remedies Available To Convicted Defendant When New Facts Are Found, Smith Warder
Criminal Law And Procedure - Remedies Available To Convicted Defendant When New Facts Are Found, Smith Warder
Michigan Law Review
Due to its haphazard growth and evolution, the Anglo-American system of jurisprudence occasionally left gaping defects in its general contours. Many of these defects have been and are being filled, both by statute and by the continuing development of the common law. However, there is one case which re-occurs with distressing frequency where no satisfactory remedy has been developed and where this lack of remedy can have unjust or even barbaric results.
Administrative Tribunals-Right To Federal Injunction Against Administrative Orders
Administrative Tribunals-Right To Federal Injunction Against Administrative Orders
Michigan Law Review
The public utility commission of Ohio refused to permit the plaintiff motor bus company to operate over a portion of the route for which application was made for a certificate. The plaintiff applied to the federal district court for an injunction against enforcement of the commission's order on the ground that it amounted to a deprivation of property without due process. A temporary injunction was granted. Thereafter, the plaintiff took a statutory appeal to the state supreme court, which affirmed the order, after which the plaintiff sought a permanent injunction in the federal court. Held, the decision of the …
Administrative Finality, A. Martin Tollefson
Administrative Finality, A. Martin Tollefson
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this article is two-fold. In the first place it is intended to set forth certain determining factors (a) as to whether or not administrative decisions are subject to review in cases where their finality is challenged before the courts and (b) if subject to review, to what extent. The second purpose is to call attention to the need for improvement in this country along the lines of executive or administrative justice from the standpoint of better agencies and better- facilities for disposing of litigated questions within the administrative tribunals. It should be said at the outset, however, …
Due Process Of Law Under The United States Constitution, Hugh Evander Willis
Due Process Of Law Under The United States Constitution, Hugh Evander Willis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Social And Economic Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robert Eugene Cushman
Social And Economic Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robert Eugene Cushman
Michigan Law Review
For those who love precision and definiteness the question of the application of the Fourteenth Amendment to social and economic problems remains an irritating enigma. The judicial construction of due process of law and the equal protection of the law has from the first discouraged systematic analysis and defied synthesis. More than one writer has emerged from the study of the problem with a neat and compact set of fundamental principles, only to have the Supreme Court discourteously ignore them in its next case. But paradoxical as it may seem, those who long for a wise and forward-looking solution of …
Service As A Requirement Of Due Process In Actions In Personam, Charles Kellogg Burdick
Service As A Requirement Of Due Process In Actions In Personam, Charles Kellogg Burdick
Michigan Law Review
A prime requisite of due process is, of course, that the court shall have jurisdiction of the subject-matter. "To give such proceedings any validity, there must be a tribunal competent by its constitution-that is, by the law of its creation-to pass upon the subject-matter of the suit."' In proceedings in personam-proceedings to determine the personal liability of the defendant, no property being brought by the proceedings within the control of the court-the court must also have jurisdiction of the defendant. Attempts have repeatedly been made to take jurisdiction of nonresident defendants through service by publication or through personal service made …
Due Process Of Law In Procedure, Edson R. Sunderland
Due Process Of Law In Procedure, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
There are two classes of cases which may arise under the "due process" provisions of the 5th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution, so far as rules of procedure are concerned. One embraces cases of new remedial processes which may be criticized as too radical. The other consists of cases of old processes which may be criticized as obsolete and out of harmony with prevailing conceptions of justice. Due process may thus be said to fill the wide space between those innovations which carry us so far away from established methods as to remove the safeguards which are …