Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (85)
- Constitutional Law (62)
- State and Local Government Law (60)
- Legal Profession (58)
- Criminal Law (48)
-
- Law and Society (44)
- Supreme Court of the United States (39)
- Legal Education (38)
- Criminal Procedure (36)
- Jurisprudence (35)
- Litigation (30)
- Civil Law (28)
- Civil Procedure (28)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (24)
- Law and Race (18)
- Legal History (18)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (17)
- Jurisdiction (16)
- Law and Gender (13)
- Human Rights Law (11)
- Legislation (11)
- Rule of Law (11)
- Evidence (10)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (10)
- Family Law (9)
- Fourteenth Amendment (9)
- Social Welfare Law (9)
- Juvenile Law (8)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (57)
- Roger Williams University (50)
- Pepperdine University (11)
- New York Law School (5)
- University of Richmond (5)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- University of Baltimore Law (4)
- University of Maine School of Law (4)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- St. Mary's University (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Bellarmine University (1)
- Cal Poly Humboldt (1)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Seton Hall University (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Nebraska at Omaha (1)
- University of Rhode Island (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (54)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (34)
- School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events (13)
- Pepperdine Law Review (11)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Maine Law Review (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (3)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (3)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (2)
- Federal Court System and Administration (2)
- Law School Blogs (2)
- Scholarly Publications (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Communication Faculty Publications (1)
- Court Conferences and Events (1)
- Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Federal Courts and Federal Practice (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Law Library Newsletters/Blog (1)
- Mario Diaz Cruz Pamphlets (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 150 of 177
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Turning The Tables: Using The Government’S Secrecy And Security Arsenal For The Benefit Of The Client In Terrorism Prosecutions, Sam A. Schmidt, Joshua L. Dratel
Turning The Tables: Using The Government’S Secrecy And Security Arsenal For The Benefit Of The Client In Terrorism Prosecutions, Sam A. Schmidt, Joshua L. Dratel
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Independence In Family Courts, Barbara A. Babb, Judith D. Moran
Judicial Independence In Family Courts, Barbara A. Babb, Judith D. Moran
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Book Review, David S. Tanenhaus
Book Review, David S. Tanenhaus
Scholarly Works
This concise book explores the origins and early history of the Cook County Juvenile Court, the world’s first such court. The court, which opened on July 3, 1899, in Chicago, reflected its founders’ profound faith both in science to solve social problems and the power of the state to provide for the best interests of its children. Yet, as Getis argues, the juvenile court did not live up to its initial promise, and “instead of a place of experimentation and reform—which it could have been—or a place of individualized justice guided by science—perhaps an unattainable goal—the court became an institution …
Supreme Court Federalism Decisions, Leon Friedman
Supreme Court Federalism Decisions, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Modifying The Kentucky Rules Of Evidence—A Separation Of Powers Issue, Robert G. Lawson
Modifying The Kentucky Rules Of Evidence—A Separation Of Powers Issue, Robert G. Lawson
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
How do you modify laws that simultaneously exist as statutes and rules of court? For reasons that are described elsewhere and need not be repeated here, the Kentucky Rules of Evidence (K.R.E.) came into existence through concurrent enactment by the General Assembly and Kentucky Supreme Court and thus are endowed with all the attributes of both statutes and rules of court. So, how do you change them when the inevitable need to do so arises, a question made both interesting and difficult by the fact that there is no institutional mechanism for concurrent lawmaking by the General Assembly and supreme …
Interpretation Of The Kentucky Rules Of Evidence—What Happened To The Common Law?, Robert G. Lawson
Interpretation Of The Kentucky Rules Of Evidence—What Happened To The Common Law?, Robert G. Lawson
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
The Kentucky Rules of Evidence, which became effective on July 1, 1992, dramatically transformed the method by which lawyers and judges address evidence issues. Before the adoption of the Rules, the law of evidence consisted mostly of a vast collection of common law rulings, accumulated over two centuries and inaccessible to lawyers and judges for all practical purposes. In addressing an evidence issue, participants had to first deal with the problem of "finding" the law-distilling from a morass of conflicting common law precedents the ones applicable to the issue at hand, a task regularly producing contention rather than agreement and, …
Association Of American Law Schools Panel On The International Criminal Court, Christopher L. Blakesley
Association Of American Law Schools Panel On The International Criminal Court, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
Professor Blakesley participates in this panel discussion on the International Criminal Court. The Association of American Law Schools sponsored the panel.
The Arkansas Supreme Court And The Civil War, L. Scott Stafford
The Arkansas Supreme Court And The Civil War, L. Scott Stafford
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A More Complete Look At Complexity, Jeffrey W. Stempel
A More Complete Look At Complexity, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
The ability of courts to successfully resolve complex cases has been a matter of contentious debate, not only for the last quarter-century, but for most of the twentieth century. This debate has been part of the legal landscape at least since Judge Jerome Frank's polemic book from which this Symposium derives its title, and probably since Roscoe Pound's famous address to the American Bar Association. During the 1980s and 1990s in particular, the battlelines of the pro-and anti-court debate have been brightly drawn. Some commentators, most reliably successful plaintiffs' counsel and politically liberal academics, defend the judicial track record in …
"Doubts About Our Processes": Richard D. Simons And The Jurisprudence Of Restraint In State Constitutional Analysis, David E. Mccraw
"Doubts About Our Processes": Richard D. Simons And The Jurisprudence Of Restraint In State Constitutional Analysis, David E. Mccraw
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dedication To The Honorable Richard D. Simons, Patrick M. Connors
Dedication To The Honorable Richard D. Simons, Patrick M. Connors
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Court And The Changing Constitution: A Discussion, Carl Sividorski, James Gardner, Barry Latzer, Peter Galie
The Court And The Changing Constitution: A Discussion, Carl Sividorski, James Gardner, Barry Latzer, Peter Galie
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Evidentiary Hearings Under The New Habeas Corpus Statute, Larry Yackle
Federal Evidentiary Hearings Under The New Habeas Corpus Statute, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
Constitutional claims invariably turn on the underlying historical facts. In order to adjudicate claims presented in habeas corpus petitions, accordingly, the federal courts must somehow ascertain the facts. In some instances, the factual record can be augmented via discovery or expansion of the record under the federal habeas corpus rules.' Otherwise, disputed factual issues typically must be determined on the basis of previous litigation in state court or in independent federal evidentiary hearings.
Bias In The Washington Courts: A Call For Reform, Melisa D. Evangelos
Bias In The Washington Courts: A Call For Reform, Melisa D. Evangelos
Seattle University Law Review
Because of the documented threat that racial and gender bias pose to the effective administration of justice in Washington, this Comment advocates amending the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct to explicitly make intentional gender and racial bias an act of attorney misconduct and to discipline any attorney who engages in such behavior. Section I of this Comment identifies and describes instances of attorney behavior that result in gender and racial bias and explains the impact of such bias on attorneys, clients, and the judicial system. Section II explores similar anti-bias rules proposed or in place in other states. Section III …
Voting Behavior On The Texas Court Of Criminal Appeals, 1991-92, Keith A. Rowley, Michael D. Weiss
Voting Behavior On The Texas Court Of Criminal Appeals, 1991-92, Keith A. Rowley, Michael D. Weiss
Scholarly Works
Between early 1991, when Judge Fortunato Benavides was appointed to replace Judge Marvin O. Teague, and July 1, 1992, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals decided 251 cases where the ultimate question at stake was whether or not an accused individual would receive punishment for his or her alleged wrongdoing. While the sitting judges unanimously decided roughly one-half of these cases, 133 cases resulted in one or more dissenting votes. Furthermore, a margin of two votes or less decided thirty-five cases.
The purpose of this Article is to analyze and, if possible, explain the voting behavior of the members of …
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Comptroller And Attorney-General
Corporate Pro-Choice: New York Assumes An Anti-Takover Position, Paula Walter
Corporate Pro-Choice: New York Assumes An Anti-Takover Position, Paula Walter
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.