Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (333)
- Supreme Court of the United States (188)
- State and Local Government Law (171)
- Judges (110)
- Criminal Procedure (96)
-
- Jurisprudence (88)
- Criminal Law (69)
- Civil Law (50)
- Legislation (50)
- Fourteenth Amendment (49)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (48)
- Civil Procedure (47)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (46)
- Legal History (45)
- Law and Society (38)
- First Amendment (34)
- Fourth Amendment (33)
- Litigation (33)
- Jurisdiction (32)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (32)
- Law and Politics (27)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (23)
- Social Welfare Law (23)
- President/Executive Department (22)
- Legal Profession (19)
- Evidence (18)
- Rule of Law (18)
- Administrative Law (17)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (177)
- University of Michigan Law School (55)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (16)
- Seattle University School of Law (11)
- Pepperdine University (10)
-
- New York Law School (8)
- University of Richmond (8)
- American University Washington College of Law (6)
- Georgetown University Law Center (6)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (5)
- Roger Williams University (5)
- Marquette University Law School (4)
- St. Mary's University (4)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Duke Law (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- BLR (2)
- Liberty University (2)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Pace University (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (170)
- Articles (22)
- Michigan Law Review (18)
- Indiana Law Journal (15)
- Faculty Scholarship (13)
-
- Seattle University Law Review (11)
- Pepperdine Law Review (10)
- University of Richmond Law Review (7)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (6)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (6)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (5)
- Journal Articles (5)
- American University Law Review (4)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (4)
- Marquette Law Review (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (3)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Publications (3)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (3)
- Books (2)
- ExpressO (2)
- Federal Court System and Administration (2)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (2)
- Pace Law Review (2)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (2)
- Senior Honors Theses (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 301 - 330 of 380
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Pre-Emption Of Local Law By State Legislature
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Prohibition Against Use Of State Money For Private Undertaking
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Possibly the most unsettling phenomenon in the Supreme Court's 1988 term was Justice White's decision to vote contrary to his own exhaustively stated reasoning in Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. His unexplained decision to vote against the result of his own analysis lends support to those who argue that law, or at least constitutional law, is fundamentally indeterminate. Proponents of the indeterminacy argument sometimes base their position on the allegedly inescapable inconsistency of decisions made by a multi-member court. There is an answer to the inconsistency argument, but it founders if justices sometimes vote, without explanation, on the basis of …
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Substantive Due Process Analysis And The Lockean Liberal Tradition: Rethinking The Modern Privacy Cases, Jeffrey S. Koehlinger
Substantive Due Process Analysis And The Lockean Liberal Tradition: Rethinking The Modern Privacy Cases, Jeffrey S. Koehlinger
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Affordable Housing Forum, Richard F. Bellman, John M. Armentano, Alan Mallach
Affordable Housing Forum, Richard F. Bellman, John M. Armentano, Alan Mallach
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Organizational Standing In Environmental Litigation, Jeanne A. Compitello
Organizational Standing In Environmental Litigation, Jeanne A. Compitello
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Determining A Standard For Housing Discrimination Under Title Viii, Richard C. Cahn
Determining A Standard For Housing Discrimination Under Title Viii, Richard C. Cahn
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pitfalls Of Public Policy: The Case Of Arbitration Agreements, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Pitfalls Of Public Policy: The Case Of Arbitration Agreements, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
As the juxtaposition of these quotations suggests, judges have long held disparate views on the legitimacy and value of “public policy” considerations as a basis for legal decision making. The popular notion posits that Justice Holmes and legal realists carried the day, making public policy analysis an ordinary part of the adjudication process. The story, of course, is more complex than this legal version of Don Quixote. Many judges and lawyers, including Justice Holmes in other writings, continued to speak of adjudication in more formalist and positivist terms, with most laypersons in apparent agreement. Judge Burroughs' view of public policy …
Equality Theory, Marital Rape, And The Promise Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robin West
Equality Theory, Marital Rape, And The Promise Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
During the 1980s a handful of state judges either held or opined in dicta what must be incontrovertible to the feminist community, as well as to most progressive legal advocates and academics: the so-called marital rape exemption, whether statutory or common law in origin, constitutes a denial of a married woman's constitutional right to equal protection under the law. Indeed, a more obvious denial of equal protection is difficult to imagine: the marital rape exemption denies married women protection against violent crime solely on the basis of gender and marital status. What possibly could be less rational than a statute …
Ultra-Wrong About The "Ultra-Right", Terry Eastland
Ultra-Wrong About The "Ultra-Right", Terry Eastland
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Packing the Courts: The Conservative Campaign to Rewrite the Constitution by Herman Schwartz