Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (119)
- Constitutional Law (100)
- Legal Profession (75)
- International Law (74)
- Supreme Court of the United States (66)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (59)
- Jurisprudence (56)
- Legislation (54)
- Criminal Law (53)
- Jurisdiction (52)
- State and Local Government Law (46)
- Civil Procedure (45)
- Litigation (39)
- Law and Society (37)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (33)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (32)
- Criminal Procedure (32)
- Transnational Law (31)
- Human Rights Law (30)
- Law and Politics (30)
- Legal History (30)
- Civil Law (29)
- European Law (22)
- International Humanitarian Law (17)
- Legal Writing and Research (17)
- National Security Law (17)
- Rule of Law (17)
- Administrative Law (16)
- Institution
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (66)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (35)
- University of Michigan Law School (28)
- University of Richmond (25)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (23)
-
- Brooklyn Law School (22)
- Duke Law (18)
- Notre Dame Law School (16)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (16)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (16)
- Roger Williams University (12)
- Fordham Law School (10)
- William & Mary Law School (8)
- Boston University School of Law (7)
- Pepperdine University (7)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (7)
- Columbia Law School (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (6)
- Seattle University School of Law (6)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (5)
- St. John's University School of Law (5)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (5)
- University of New Hampshire (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Barry University School of Law (4)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (4)
- Emory University School of Law (4)
- St. Mary's University (4)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (29)
- Judges (22)
- Civil procedure (17)
- ICJ (17)
- Federal courts (14)
-
- Judge (14)
- Constitutional law (13)
- International Court of Justice (13)
- Litigation (13)
- Congress (12)
- Court (11)
- Jurisdiction (11)
- Law reform (11)
- Supreme court (11)
- Discrimination (9)
- Due process (9)
- Supreme Court (9)
- Supreme Court of the United States (9)
- Lawyers (8)
- United States Supreme Court (8)
- Civil rights (7)
- Judicial process (7)
- New York (7)
- Arbitration (6)
- Article III (6)
- Authority (6)
- Chief Judge (6)
- Constitutional Convention (6)
- Criminal procedure (6)
- Dual Constitutionalism (6)
- Publication
-
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (60)
- Tennessee Law Review (35)
- Faculty Scholarship (32)
- Law Faculty Publications (15)
- Touro Law Review (15)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (11)
- Brooklyn Law Review (9)
- Faculty Publications (9)
- Nevada Law Journal (9)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (8)
- Michigan Law Review (8)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (8)
- Journal Articles (7)
- Notre Dame Law Review (7)
- Scholarly Works (7)
- University of Richmond Law Review (7)
- Articles (6)
- Court Briefs (6)
- Publications (6)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (5)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (5)
- Duke Law Master of Judicial Studies Theses (5)
- Faculty Articles (5)
- Fordham Law Review (5)
- Journal of Law and Policy (5)
- Pepperdine Law Review (5)
- Scholarly Articles (5)
- The Catholic Lawyer (5)
- The University of New Hampshire Law Review (5)
- All Faculty Publications (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 210 of 468
Full-Text Articles in Courts
The Place Of Policy In International Law, Elihu Lauterpacht
The Place Of Policy In International Law, Elihu Lauterpacht
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Place Of Policy In International Law, D. H. N. Johnson
The Place Of Policy In International Law, D. H. N. Johnson
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Place Of Policy In International Law, Oscar Schachter
The Place Of Policy In International Law, Oscar Schachter
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Introductory Statement, Rosalyn Higgins
Introductory Statement, Rosalyn Higgins
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Circuit Splits And Empiricism In The Supreme Court, Karen M. Gebbia
Circuit Splits And Empiricism In The Supreme Court, Karen M. Gebbia
Pace Law Review
This Article demonstrates, empirically rather than merely in theory, how a failure to do so leads to unreliable conclusions concerning the relationship between the Supreme Court and the circuit courts of appeal. Specifically, commentators routinely misapply facially accurate raw data regarding the rate at which the Court reverses circuit court decisions to support unreliable conclusions regarding the comparative degree of accord between the Court and individual circuits. Commentators and the popular press then employ these unreliable conclusions to draw unsupported inferences regarding the reasons for supposed discord between the Court and the circuits, and to urge fundamental institutional reforms ranging …
Book Review: Conflict Of Laws: Mexico And The United States. By S.A. Bayitch And Jose Luis Siqueiros. Coral Gables: University Of Miami Press, 1968. Pp. Xv, 296. $15.00., Woodfin L. Butte
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Standing To Represent Corporate Claims In The International Court Of Justice: The Barcelona Traction Case, W. B. Stillwell Iii
Standing To Represent Corporate Claims In The International Court Of Justice: The Barcelona Traction Case, W. B. Stillwell Iii
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Enforcement Of Icsid Convention Arbitral Awards In U.S. Courts, Abby Cohen Smutny, Anne D. Smith, Mccoy Pitt
Enforcement Of Icsid Convention Arbitral Awards In U.S. Courts, Abby Cohen Smutny, Anne D. Smith, Mccoy Pitt
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Assistance In Arbitration—Some Observations On The Critical Stand-By Function Of The Courts, Jan K. Schaefer
Court Assistance In Arbitration—Some Observations On The Critical Stand-By Function Of The Courts, Jan K. Schaefer
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Innovation In Arbitration Law: The Case Of Delaware, Christopher R. Drahozal
Innovation In Arbitration Law: The Case Of Delaware, Christopher R. Drahozal
Pepperdine Law Review
Delaware has become increasingly active in adopting innovative arbitration laws. In 2009, Delaware adopted a confidential system of “arbitration” conducted by sitting Court of Chancery judges, which was subsequently held unconstitutional as violating the First Amendment right of public access to the courts. In 2015, it enacted the Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act (DRAA), creating a system of expedited arbitration in Delaware. Among other things, the DRAA sets mandatory time limits for the completion of arbitration proceedings (with financial penalties for arbitrators who fail to comply), restricts the degree of court involvement in the arbitration process, and provides for expeditious review …
Gateway-Schmateway: An Exchange Between George Bermann And Alan Rau, George Bermann, Alan Scott Rau
Gateway-Schmateway: An Exchange Between George Bermann And Alan Rau, George Bermann, Alan Scott Rau
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction: International Arbitration And The Courts, Donald Earl Childress Iii, Jack J. Coe Jr., Lacey L. Estudillo
Introduction: International Arbitration And The Courts, Donald Earl Childress Iii, Jack J. Coe Jr., Lacey L. Estudillo
Pepperdine Law Review
What role do national courts play in international arbitration? Is international arbitration an “autonomous dispute resolution process, governed primarily by non-national rules and accepted international commercial rules and practices” where the influence of national courts is merely secondary? Or, in light of the fact that “international arbitration always operates in the shadow of national courts,” is it not more accurate to say that national courts and international arbitration act in partnership? On April 17, 2015, the Pepperdine Law Review convened a group of distinguished authorities from international practice and academia to discuss these and other related issues for a symposium …
State V. Carroll, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 23 (Apr. 7, 2016), Jessie Folkestad
State V. Carroll, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 23 (Apr. 7, 2016), Jessie Folkestad
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Defendant Deangelo Carroll appealed from a conviction for conspiracy to commit murder and first-degree murder with use of a deadly weapon. The Supreme Court of Nevada found the district court erred in denying Carroll’s motion to suppress his statements to police because the police subjected Carroll to a custodial interrogation, without advising him of his Miranda rights. The Court affirmed however, finding the error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Voting Rights Act And The "New And Improved" Intent Test: Old Wine In New Bottles, Randolph M. Scott-Mclaughlin
The Voting Rights Act And The "New And Improved" Intent Test: Old Wine In New Bottles, Randolph M. Scott-Mclaughlin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Police Misconduct - A Plaintiff's Point Of View, Part Ii, John Williams
Police Misconduct - A Plaintiff's Point Of View, Part Ii, John Williams
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Police Misconduct - A Plaintiff's Point Of View, Fred Brewington
Police Misconduct - A Plaintiff's Point Of View, Fred Brewington
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Prosecution And Section 1983, Barry C. Scheck
Criminal Prosecution And Section 1983, Barry C. Scheck
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Due Process Claims, Erwin Chemerinsky
Procedural Due Process Claims, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Qualified Immunity When Facts Are In Dispute, Leon Friedman
Qualified Immunity When Facts Are In Dispute, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1983 Custom Claims And The Code Of Silence, Myriam Gilles
Section 1983 Custom Claims And The Code Of Silence, Myriam Gilles
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Problems Concerning Litigating Custom And Practice Cases, Steve Ryals
Problems Concerning Litigating Custom And Practice Cases, Steve Ryals
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Eleventh Amendment Federalism And State Sovereign Immunity Cases: Direct Effect On Section 1983?, Stephen H. Steinglass
Eleventh Amendment Federalism And State Sovereign Immunity Cases: Direct Effect On Section 1983?, Stephen H. Steinglass
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction, George C. Pratt
Shuffling The Deck: The Role Of The Courts In Problem Gambling Cases, Cheryl B. Moss
Shuffling The Deck: The Role Of The Courts In Problem Gambling Cases, Cheryl B. Moss
UNLV Gaming Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Big Data Jury, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson
The Big Data Jury, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson
Notre Dame Law Review
Big data technologies now exist to create algorithmically perfect jury pools matching the demographic realities of a community. Big data technologies also exist to provide litigants a wealth of personal information about potential jurors. The question remains whether these technological innovations benefit the jury system. This Article addresses the disruptive impact of big data on jury selection and the dilemma it presents to courts, lawyers, and citizens.
Standing For (And Up To) Separation Of Powers, Kent H. Barnett
Standing For (And Up To) Separation Of Powers, Kent H. Barnett
Scholarly Works
The U.S. Constitution requires federal agencies to comply with separation-of-powers (or structural) safeguards, such as by obtaining valid appointments, exercising certain limited powers, and being sufficiently subject to the President’s control. Who can best protect these safeguards? A growing number of scholars call for allowing only the political branches — Congress and the President — to defend them. These scholars would limit or end judicial review because private judicial challenges are aberrant to justiciability doctrine and lead courts to meddle in minor matters that rarely effect regulatory outcomes.
This Article defends the right of private parties to assert justiciable structural …
When Children Object: Amplifying An Older Child’S Objection To Termination Of Parental Rights, Brent Pattison
When Children Object: Amplifying An Older Child’S Objection To Termination Of Parental Rights, Brent Pattison
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Each year, thousands of children become wards of the state when a court terminates the legal rights of their parents. Between 2010 and 2014, more than 307,000 children lost their legal relationships to their parents in Termination of Parental Rights (TPR) proceedings. A growing percentage of child welfare cases involve older children. At the same time, too many young people lose their legal relationships with their parents without a family waiting to adopt them. The stakes are high for children in TPR cases; nonetheless, many children—even older children—cannot meaningfully participate in proceedings. Moreover, TPR cases threaten parents’ and children’s rights …
Keeping Up With New Legal Titles, Tina M. Brooks
Keeping Up With New Legal Titles, Tina M. Brooks
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
In this book review, Tina M. Brooks discusses Voters' Verdicts: Citizens, Campaigns, and Institutions in State Supreme Court Elections by Chris W. Bonneau and Damon M. Cann.
To Touch And Concern The United States With Sufficient Force: How American Due Process And Choice Of Law Cases Inform The Reach Of The Alien Tort Statute After Kiobel, Karima Tawfik
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Note explores the post-Kiobel ATS cases and argues that the Fourth Circuit’s approach to considering claims that manifest a close connection to the United States as potentially entitling the plaintiff to relief under the ATS is preferable to approaches that categorically bar claims when the alleged conduct has occurred abroad. Part I describes the Kiobel decision in more depth and the subsequent ATS case law to outline the contours of recent circuit cases. Part II demonstrates how domestic personal jurisdiction and choice of law principles weigh in favor of a more expansive reading of the ATS, as adopted …
Finding "Tapia Error": How Circuit Courts Have Misread 'Tapia V. United States' And Shortchanged The Penological Goals Of The Sentencing Reform Act, Matt J. Gornick
Finding "Tapia Error": How Circuit Courts Have Misread 'Tapia V. United States' And Shortchanged The Penological Goals Of The Sentencing Reform Act, Matt J. Gornick
Vanderbilt Law Review
The American criminal justice system is called many things; "compassionate" is usually not one of them. Yet in the course of federal criminal proceedings, a sentencing hearing allows a judge to convey compassion toward a defendant, if only to say, "I'm sorry about your situation, but this is how I must apply the law." Likewise, a defendant might throw herself on the mercy of the court in hopes that the judge exercises discretion compassionately. Mitigating factors and downward departures suggest that judges are capable of doing so. But how does a sentencing judge show compassion, as opposed to simply feeling …