Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (75)
- Legal Profession (59)
- Constitutional Law (53)
- Criminal Law (37)
- International Law (36)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (35)
- Criminal Procedure (31)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (28)
- Jurisprudence (27)
- Law and Society (27)
- Civil Procedure (25)
- Jurisdiction (24)
- Legislation (23)
- Litigation (23)
- State and Local Government Law (23)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (22)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (17)
- Human Rights Law (17)
- Intellectual Property Law (17)
- Family Law (16)
- Law and Politics (16)
- Legal History (14)
- Administrative Law (13)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (13)
- First Amendment (13)
- Evidence (12)
- Law and Race (11)
- Political Science (11)
- Institution
-
- University of Tennessee College of Law (41)
- University of Michigan Law School (38)
- University of Richmond (21)
- Roger Williams University (20)
- University of Georgia School of Law (16)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (12)
- Duke Law (11)
- Georgetown University Law Center (10)
- Pepperdine University (10)
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (9)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (9)
- Notre Dame Law School (9)
- The University of Akron (9)
- Brigham Young University Law School (8)
- Seattle University School of Law (8)
- St. Mary's University (7)
- University of Dayton (7)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (6)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (6)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- UIC School of Law (5)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (5)
- University of Washington School of Law (5)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (4)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- Barry University School of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (23)
- Supreme Court (21)
- United States Supreme Court (21)
- Judges (14)
- Constitutional law (10)
-
- Separation of powers (10)
- State courts (10)
- Congress (9)
- Federal courts (9)
- Jurisdiction (9)
- Law reform (8)
- Juries (7)
- Standing (7)
- Statutory interpretation (7)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Court (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Jurisprudence (6)
- Same-sex marriage (6)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (6)
- Civil procedure (5)
- Constitution (5)
- Discrimination (5)
- Due process (5)
- Federalism (5)
- Judicial review (5)
- Justice (5)
- United States v. Windsor (5)
- Administrative law (4)
- Appeals (4)
- Publication
-
- Tennessee Law Review (41)
- Faculty Scholarship (20)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (14)
- Articles (13)
- Law Faculty Publications (13)
-
- Faculty Publications (12)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (12)
- Michigan Law Review (12)
- Faculty Articles (10)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (9)
- Northwestern University Law Review (9)
- Akron Law Review (8)
- University of Richmond Law Review (8)
- BYU Law Review (7)
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- Educational Leadership Faculty Publications (6)
- Law School Blogs (6)
- Touro Law Review (6)
- American University Law Review (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (4)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Scholarly Articles (4)
- Seattle University Law Review (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 90 of 394
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Ohio's Post-Gault Juvenile Court Law, Robert J. Willey
Ohio's Post-Gault Juvenile Court Law, Robert J. Willey
Akron Law Review
It is the writer's intention to compare Ohio's new juvenile code with that offered by the Crime Commission, with the Standards for Juvenile and Family Courts, and with the Uniform Juvenile Court Act, which was drafted to meet the constitutional requirements of Kent and Gault. These two cases now force one to reconsider in the juvenile court context the applicability of more formal procedural rules, as well as the applicability of all the Constitutional Rights contained in the Bill of Rights which have been incorporated (as far as criminal proceedings are concerned) into the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth …
Voir Dire: Strategy And Tactics In The Defense Of Social And Political Activists, Murray R. Bowes
Voir Dire: Strategy And Tactics In The Defense Of Social And Political Activists, Murray R. Bowes
Akron Law Review
With the courts increasingly being the forum for legal disputes between those who demand change in the superstructure and those who represent (or are) the structure, a rather unfortunate by-product has evolved: a feeling that the courts can no longer adequately dispense justice.8 This manifests itself in beliefs that if one is prosecuted for activities that were designed to advance social change, either in violation of the law or not, that the individual will not be afforded a fair trial; 9 a reflection that the social or political activist will not be judged by an impartial jury….For the purposes of …
From Orphans To Families In Crisis: Parental Rights Matters In Maine Probate Courts, Deirdre M. Smith
From Orphans To Families In Crisis: Parental Rights Matters In Maine Probate Courts, Deirdre M. Smith
Faculty Publications
This Article examines the sources of the contemporary problems associated with the adjudication of parental rights matters in Maine’s probate courts and identifies specific reforms to address both the structural and substantive law problems. The Article first reviews the development of Maine’s probate courts and their jurisdiction over parental rights matters. It traces the expansion of jurisdiction over children and families from a limited role incidental to the administration of a decedent’s estate to the current scope: a range of matters that may result in the limitation, suspension, or termination of the rights of living parents. Maine probate courts now …
It's Not Just Ferguson: Missouri Supreme Court Should Consolidate The Municipal Court System, Thomas Harvey, John Mcannar, Michael-John Voss, Joshua Feinzig, Chris Mcallister
It's Not Just Ferguson: Missouri Supreme Court Should Consolidate The Municipal Court System, Thomas Harvey, John Mcannar, Michael-John Voss, Joshua Feinzig, Chris Mcallister
All Faculty Scholarship
The Missouri Supreme Court's unprecedented decision to take control of Ferguson's Municipal Court was based primarily on issues raised during sustained protest following the killing of Mike Brown and reports published by ArchCity Defenders and the Department of Justice. These reports highlighted racial disparity in traffic stops, excessive revenue generation, and excessive warrants and arrests and confirmed the lived experiences of poor and Black people in St. Louis: there is a racially discriminatory and profit-driven approach to law enforcement made possible only by the collaborative efforts of local government, police, and courts.
These condemned practices are not unique to Ferguson. …
The European Court Of Human Rights Proclaims That It Will Neither Forgive Nor Forget Those Who Wage War, Shantel Talbot
The European Court Of Human Rights Proclaims That It Will Neither Forgive Nor Forget Those Who Wage War, Shantel Talbot
Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Law Professors Bruce P. Frohnen, Robert P. George, Alan J. Meese, Michael P. Moreland, Nathan B. Oman, Michael Stokes Paulsen, Rodney K. Smith, Steven D. Smith, And O. Carter Snead As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, John D. Adams, Matthew A. Fitzgerald, O. Carter Snead
Brief Of Law Professors Bruce P. Frohnen, Robert P. George, Alan J. Meese, Michael P. Moreland, Nathan B. Oman, Michael Stokes Paulsen, Rodney K. Smith, Steven D. Smith, And O. Carter Snead As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, John D. Adams, Matthew A. Fitzgerald, O. Carter Snead
Court Briefs
No. 15-105
Little Sister of the Poor Home for the Aged v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
From the Summary of Argument
Suppose a federal law required government officials to enter a Catholic church and use church property to distribute contraceptives and abortifacients over church’s objection. Such a law would surely burden the church’s religion, even if the government paid for the objectionable medications and compensated the church for the use of its resources. By commandeering church property, such a law would force the …
The Inversion Of Rights And Power, Philip Hamburger
The Inversion Of Rights And Power, Philip Hamburger
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Strategic Behavior And Variation In The Supreme Court’S Caseload Over Time, Kenneth W. Moffett, Forrest Maltzman, Karen Miranda, Charles R. Shipan
Strategic Behavior And Variation In The Supreme Court’S Caseload Over Time, Kenneth W. Moffett, Forrest Maltzman, Karen Miranda, Charles R. Shipan
SIUE Faculty Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activity
Over the past sixty years, the size of the Supreme Court’s docket has varied tremendously, growing at some points in time and shrinking at others. What accounts for this variation in the size of the docket? We focus on two key strategic factors – the predictability of outcomes within the Court, and whether justices consider the potential actions of other political institutions – and assess whether these factors help to explain the variation in docket size over time. We discover that uncertainty and institutional constraints prevent the Court from choosing cases with complete freedom, even after accounting for other potential …
Keeping Pace: The U.S. Supreme Court And Evolving Technology, Brian Thomas
Keeping Pace: The U.S. Supreme Court And Evolving Technology, Brian Thomas
Politics Summer Fellows
Contemporary mainstream discussions of the Supreme Court are often qualified with the warning that the nine justices are out of touch with everyday American life, especially when it comes to the newest and most popular technologies. For instance, during oral argument for City of Ontario v. Quon, a 2010 case that dealt with sexting on government-issued devices, Chief Justice John Roberts famously asked what the difference was “between email and a pager,” and Justice Antonin Scalia wondered if the “spicy little conversations” held via text message could be printed and distributed. While these comments have garnered a great deal of …
My Body, Not My Say: Regulation Of Reproductive Freedom In America, Kisha K. Patel
My Body, Not My Say: Regulation Of Reproductive Freedom In America, Kisha K. Patel
Gender, Women's, and Sexuality Studies Summer Fellows
Women’s bodies have been legislated for years. Many people associate regulation beginning in 1973 when Roe V. Wade was decided, however legislation has affected women for much longer. These infringements on women’s rights create a major roadblock in gender equality. During summer fellows I researched how the law regulates aspects of American women's lives particularly in reproductive freedom (birth control, day-after pill, abortion, maternity discrimination). Conducting this research included thorough research of 48 pieces of congressional legislation from the 114th Congress that limit women's reproductive freedom through abortion bans, non-accessible health care, and cuts in federal spending towards Planned …
The Sentencing Legacy Of The Special Court For Sierra Leone, Shahram Dana
The Sentencing Legacy Of The Special Court For Sierra Leone, Shahram Dana
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
A New Public-Interest Appellate Model: Public Counsel's Court-Based Self-Help Clinic And Pro Bono Triage For Indigent Pro Se Civil Litigants On Appeal, Meehan Rasch
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Oral Argument In The Early Roberts Court: A Qualitative And Quantitative Analysis Of Individual Justice Behavior, James C. Phillips, Edward L. Carter
Oral Argument In The Early Roberts Court: A Qualitative And Quantitative Analysis Of Individual Justice Behavior, James C. Phillips, Edward L. Carter
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Appellate Review Of Unpreserved Questions In Criminal Cases: An Attempt To Define The Interest Of Justice, Larry Cunningham
Appellate Review Of Unpreserved Questions In Criminal Cases: An Attempt To Define The Interest Of Justice, Larry Cunningham
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Prospects For An Independent Judiciary: The Russian Constitutional Court And The Cpsu Trial, Lynne M. Tracy
Prospects For An Independent Judiciary: The Russian Constitutional Court And The Cpsu Trial, Lynne M. Tracy
Akron Law Review
This Comment will explore the role of law in Russian and Soviet history. It will then consider the legal reforms that arose under Mikhail Gorbachev's program of perestroika. Particular attention will be devoted to judicial reform and the creation of the Constitutional Court. Second, there will be a description of the events that led to the CPSU trial and the trial itself. Finally, there will be an examination of the impact of the Constitutional Court's verdict on: (1) the future of the Constitutional Court as an independent third branch of the government; (2) the Russian political scene; and (3) the …
The American Inns Of Court: Preparing Our Students For Ethical Practice, Joryn Jenkins
The American Inns Of Court: Preparing Our Students For Ethical Practice, Joryn Jenkins
Akron Law Review
Despite the recognition of the merit and effectiveness of the American Inns of Court concept, and despite the rapid growth of this burgeoning movement, and despite the intrinsic involvement of over one thousand law students and of nearly one hundred law schools affiliated with Inns across the country, many legal educators are unaware of the Inns' existence, purpose, possibilities, and successes. Why should this ignorance be remedied?
Clouds In The Crystal Ball: Presidential Expectations And The Unpredictable Behavior Of Supreme Court Appointees, Christopher E. Smith, Kimberly A. Beuger
Clouds In The Crystal Ball: Presidential Expectations And The Unpredictable Behavior Of Supreme Court Appointees, Christopher E. Smith, Kimberly A. Beuger
Akron Law Review
This article will analyze the pitfalls that presidents face in hoping that their nominees' judicial performance will comport with presidential expectations.
Veteran Treatment Courts, Honorable Robert T. Russell
Veteran Treatment Courts, Honorable Robert T. Russell
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sexually Exploited Youth: A View From The Bench, Honorable Fernando Camacho
Sexually Exploited Youth: A View From The Bench, Honorable Fernando Camacho
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mental Health Courts: Bridging Two Worlds, Honorable Matthew J. D’Emic
Mental Health Courts: Bridging Two Worlds, Honorable Matthew J. D’Emic
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Adjudicating Cases Involving Adolescents In Suffolk County Criminal Courts, Honorable Fernando Camacho
Adjudicating Cases Involving Adolescents In Suffolk County Criminal Courts, Honorable Fernando Camacho
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword, Honorable Judith S. Kaye
Foreword, Honorable Sol Wachtler
King V Burwell: Subsidizing Us Health Insurance For Low- And Middle-Income Individuals, Lawrence O. Gostin, Mary C. Debartolo, Daniel Hougendobler
King V Burwell: Subsidizing Us Health Insurance For Low- And Middle-Income Individuals, Lawrence O. Gostin, Mary C. Debartolo, Daniel Hougendobler
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In King v. Burwell, the U.S. Supreme Court once again saved the Affordable Care Act (ACA) by upholding subsidies (tax credits) offered to low- and middle-income individuals for insurance bought on federal exchanges. A contrary opinion would have put at risk health insurance for 6.4 million Americans and threatened to destabilize insurance markets for millions more.
The ACA is supported by four interlocking reforms, each of which are necessary to realize its promise of expanding health care coverage: (1) guaranteed issue (prohibiting discrimination based on pre-existing conditions), (2) community rating (barring insurers from imposing higher premiums based on health …
Newsroom: Margulies On 'Ghostwriting', Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Margulies On 'Ghostwriting', Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Newsroom: Logan On Justice Scalia's Vitriol, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Logan On Justice Scalia's Vitriol, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
The Nlrb, The Courts, The Administrative Procedures Act, And Chevron: Now And Then, Theodore J. St. Antoine
The Nlrb, The Courts, The Administrative Procedures Act, And Chevron: Now And Then, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Articles
Decisions of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), like those of other administrative agencies, are subject to review by the federal judiciary. Standards of review have evolved over time. The Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 provides that administrative decisions must be in accord with law and required procedure, not arbitrary or capricious, not contrary to constitutional rights, within an agency's statutory jurisdiction, and supported by substantial evidence. In practice, more attention is paid to two Supreme Court decisions, Skidmore (1944) and Chevron (1984). For many years Chevron seemed the definitive test. A court must follow a clear intent of Congress, …
Practical Tips For Interpreting Statutory Overrides, Deborah A. Widiss
Practical Tips For Interpreting Statutory Overrides, Deborah A. Widiss
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Proportional Response: The Need For More—And More Standardized—Veterans’ Courts, Claudia Arno
Proportional Response: The Need For More—And More Standardized—Veterans’ Courts, Claudia Arno
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Over the past two decades, judges and legislators in a number of states have recognized significant shortcomings in the ways traditional systems of criminal corrections address cases involving criminal offenders who are veterans of the U.S. armed services. This recognition has come at a time when policy-makers have similarly recognized that, for certain subsets of criminal offenders, “diversionary” programs may achieve better policy results than will traditional criminal punishment. In accordance with these dual recognitions, some states have implemented systems of veterans’ courts, in which certain offenders, who are also U.S. veterans, are diverted into programs that provide monitoring, training, …
Access To Justice For Asylum Seekers: Developing An Effective Model Of Holistic Asylum Representation, Sabrineh Ardalan
Access To Justice For Asylum Seekers: Developing An Effective Model Of Holistic Asylum Representation, Sabrineh Ardalan
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Abducted, beaten, and tortured by government forces that accused him of supporting an opposition group, Matthew fled to the United States with the help of his church pastor.1 The pastor lent Matthew money and helped him obtain a passport and a visa. The pastor also put Matthew in touch with an acquaintance in Boston, who gave him a place to stay for a short time and encouraged him to apply for asylum. The acquaintance sat down with Matthew and helped him fill out the asylum application form. He told Matthew to be as specific and detailed as possible since that …